상담학연구 *,. 41 -, ,,, 82,,, Likert..96,.94,.88,.89, ,. (CCR: Conflict Over Child Rearing) (DSC: Dissatisfaction With Childre

Similar documents
:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j


<30382E20B1C7BCF8C0E720C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

<30392EB9DAB0A1B6F72CC1A4B3B2BFEE2E687770>

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

歯14.양돈규.hwp

인문사회과학기술융합학회

. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


상담학연구 * Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1370 Tel: /

상담학연구 : *.,,,,, (N=495)..,.,.. * (2013). (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

歯유성경97.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

- * (32 ), ,,,, * 2013 ( ) (KRF-2013S1A3A ). :,, 3 53 Tel : ,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception



DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

<C0DBBEF7C1DF202D20C7D1B1B9BFA9BCBAC0CEB1C7C1F8C8EFBFF85FBFA9BCBAB0FA20C0CEB1C728C5EBB1C736C8A3292DB3BBC1F62E687770>

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

(5차 편집).hwp

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

정보화정책 제14권 제2호 Ⅰ. 서론 급변하는 정보기술 환경 속에서 공공기관과 기업 들은 경쟁력을 확보하기 위해 정보시스템 구축사업 을 활발히 전개하고 있다. 정보시스템 구축사업의 성 패는 기관과 기업, 나아가 고객에게 중대한 영향을 미칠 수 있으므로, 이에 대한 통제

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

서론


<C1A63238B1C731C8A328C6EDC1FDC1DF292E687770>


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<3132C8ABBCF8C7FD2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등


歯6권2호.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

초기부모애착척도

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

학습영역의 Taxonomy에 기초한 CD-ROM Title의 효과분석

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

<31342DC0CCBFEBBDC42E687770>


WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

Rheu-suppl hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A Longitudinal St

Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in Univ

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E


Output file

08_¹Úö¼øöKš

202 김 수 현 원 영 신 있으므로, 이러한 선수들의 긍정적인 태도를 높여 구 단의 성과를 향상시킬 수 있는 조직적 차원의 연구가 요구된다 하겠다. 따라서 선수들을 대상으로 한 프로 구단의 조직성과 제고에 관한 학문적 작업은 중요한 연구과제인 것이다. 최근 조직 커뮤

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp DOI: * (,, )..,., ( ),.

44-6대지.08김정희-5

380 Hyun Seok Choi Yunji Kwon Jeongcheol Ha 기존 선행연구에서는 이론연구 (Ki, 2010; Lee, 2012), 단순통계분석 (Lee, 2008), 회귀분석 (Kim, 2012)과 요인분석 (Chung, 2012), 경로분석 (Ku,

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

Transcription:

*,. 41 -, -. 146,,, 82,,, 4 44. 44 4 28 5 Likert..96,.94,.88,.89,.86.. 4,. (CCR: Conflict Over Child Rearing) (DSC: Dissatisfaction With Children),.. * (2013). (Corresponding Author): / / 690-756 102( ) / Tel: 064-754-2166 / E-mail: kor153@naver.com

,.,, (, 2011),... ( ) ( ),., (, 2009)., (, 2011).. (Stanley, Markman, & Whitton, 2002), (,, 1999;, 2010; Cui & Donnellan, 2009)., (, 2009), (,, 1999). 2, -, -,.,,,,,,, (, 2008),,,, (,, 2007). (, 2009;,, 2009;, 2009; Feinberg, Brown, & Kan, 2011).,,,.,

.. -, (Cui & Donnellan, 2009), - (Davis & Commings, 1994).,,,,. - -.,,, (,, 1997;, 1999; Brooks, 2001; Smetana, 1988) -., -,. (,, 2002;, 2000; Goldenberg & Goldenberg, 1991), (Rummel, 1991).,.., (, 2001)., (, 2011). (2012),,,,,. ((2010). (,, 2003;, 2006), (, 1999)., (, 2007;, 2005;, 2011; Fantuzzo, Tighe, & Childs, 2000).,

.., (, 1994).. Parker(1991),.,..,. Walton Dutton(1969),,,,,,, Harrison(1980),,,,. O'Brien John, Margolin, Erel(1994),, (1998),. Cui Donnellan(2009), (1999), (2007),,. (2007). (, 1997). Pondy(1967) 5,.,,.,. Pinkley(1990),..,,,,,,.,.,

,.., (Gelles & Straus, 1979; Steinmetz, 1971). Heider(1958),,,. Tayor(1970),,,,.. Ellis(1985), Eidelson Epstein(1982).,,. Dana (1990),,,.,,..,. (, 1983), 1990 (,, 1990;, 2001;, 2003;, 2000). 2000 (, 2003;, 2009;, 2008;, 2008;, 2010;, 2003), (, 2005;, 2003;, 2007).,, -.

-., (1998) (K-MSI) 14 (CCR),,, 10.. Center for Human Resources Research (2000) MCS(Marital Conflict Scale),,,, 10 1. (, 2009;, 2010;, 2001;, 1999;, 2002,, 1995). (, 2001;, 2009;, 2012, McHale et al, 2000; Merrifield, 2009; Van Egeren & Hawkins, 2004). Feinberg Brown Kan(2011) (CRS:Coparenting Relation Scale),,,,,,,. (, 1995).,.,.,. 16 797.,,,,, 102.,,,,,, 670,

,,,,,,,, 444. (K-MSI) (CCR: Conflict Over Child Rearing) (DSC: Dissatisfaction With Children) (CCR: Conflict Over Child Rearing) (DSC: Dissatisfaction With Children). Snyder(1979) (MSI: Marital Satisfaction Inventory), (1998) (K-MSI) 14 2. (CCR). 10,,, /. Cronbach's α - (r).72,.93. Cronbach's α.74. (DSC),, 11, /. Cronbach's α - (r).73,.89, Cronbach's α.75. - (K- PSI-SF: Parenting Stress Index Short Form) Abidin(1995),,, (2008) (Parenting Stress Index; Abidin, 1995) 36 - (K-PSI-SF). ( ), - ( - ), ( ) 3, (1) (5) 5,. Cronbach's α - (r).91,.77, Cronbach's α.92., 9. 1 1,,,., - 41 2. 2.

16 797. 3. 30 146. 4 13,, (,, 2005;, 2009) (,, 2005). 5. 4 102. 6 82 1. 7,. (, 2011), 82. 8, 82 28. 9. 41,,.,,,,,.. 1. 41

12, 64, 82 146., ( ). 3, 5, 3 11 2, 13 10 40, 62 102, 3, 3, 3, 9. 2, 2. 2 (, 1996). 29, 53 82, 3. 82 82. 82.3,.8 50,. KMO.977, Bartlett.000..4,.4, 6 4. 1 16 17.679%, 2 12 15.903%, 3 10 15.203%, 4 6 12.364% 4 44, 4 61.149%. 1,,,,,. 2,,.

Q62.676.677 Q59.672.686 Q55.649.659 Q67.641.675 Q58.640.645 Q66.616.706 Q56.613.623 1 ( ) 2 ( ) Q68.606.660 Q60.603.652 Q61.603.609 Q64.565.617 Q47.546.589 Q49.542.647 Q48.535.612 Q57.535.569 Q52.519.660 Q11.701.589 Q12.696.568 Q9.668.562 Q10.652.512 Q5.628.504 Q4.625.496 Q6.624.509 Q8.612.475 Q7.604.506 Q18.574.465 Q29.573.444 Q26.516.457 7.779 17.679 6.997 15.903

Q72.720.686 Q79.717.750 Q75.712.663 Q82.682.637 3 ( ) 4 ( ) Q74.663.682 Q77.632.577 Q81.603.611 Q70.591.614 Q80.582.586 Q69.455.577 Q42.762.742 Q43.748.734 Q41.732.705 Q44.715.684 Q39.704.666 Q38.598.619 6.689 15.203 5.440 12.364,. 3, 4 ( 1 ). 44 4, 44 16, 10, 7, 5, 6, 28. 1.641 ** 1.792 **.618 ** 1.542 **.774 **.538 ** 1 **p<.01

.538.792 (p<.01) ( 2). 28 (Cronbach's α),.96..94,.88,.89,.86..,. RMR, RMSEA, TLI CFI, PRATIO PNFI. 3 /df 2.7624, RMR.0317. RMSEA.0631 6.3%. TLI.9186 91.8%, CFI.9259 4 28 92.6%. GFI.8663, AGFI.8422, GFI AGFI CFI (, 2011), CFI.9. PRATIO PNFI.9191,.8090.,.5,.5 (, 2011). C.R.(critical ratio).001. SMC 0.4 (, 2011). r=.6093.8884 (p<.01),.8587.9531.7, 1. 4 28, P /df RMR GFI AGFI CFI TLI PRATIO PNFI RMSEA 949.9157.0000 2.7624.0317.8663.8422.9259.9186.9101.8090.0631

,.,,, (1998) (K-MSI) 14 (CCR) (DSC). (CCR) -, ( ), ( ), ( ). /,. (DSC), -,, ( ), ( ), ( ), ( ). /,., Kaplan Sacuzzo(1997).60,.30 40, (2010).00.20,.20.40,.40.60,.6 0.80,.80 1.00. 4 r=.513 (p<.01)., r=.504(p<.01), r=.501(p<.01)..504 **.405 **.501 **.313 **.513 **.345 **.309 **.361 **.279 **.379 ** ** p<.01

r=.405 (p<.01), r=.313(p<.01). r=.279.361 (p<.01), r=.379(p<.01).,.,,,.,,,,,.. - (, 2000) (, 2011)...,,.,.,. (,, 2007) - -,,.,, (,, 2010;,, 2007;,, 2010),, (, 2013).

.,,.., -.. -, - 2,.. ( ), ( ).,,,, ( ),. (2010),.,..,..,.,.,

.,.,.,,, (2011). :., (2003).. (1), 141-157. (2010).,., (1998).. 35-51., (1999). :. (2), 139-150. (2009).,. (2007).. (6), 111-120. (1997).,. (2009).. 35-62., (1997). -. (3), 181-192. (2001).,. (2009).,. (2005).,., (2002).. (4), 1-18. (1999).,. (2000).,. (2010).,. (2005).. (1), 107-121. (2006).

. (1), 97-118. (2011). :. (2008). -. (2), 15-31., (1990).. (1), 141-156. (2011).,. (2003).,. (2012).,. (1995). -. 1-19.. (2009).,., (2009).. (4), 33-41. (2010).,., (2010).. (4), 1599-1622. (2010). :., (2007). : 3-7. (5), 933-944. (2011). : 21.,,,, (2011). :. (2001).,., (2005). :. (2001).,. (2012). :. (2010). :. (2008).,.,,, (2010).. (4), 267-292. (1999).,. (1983).,. (2002).,., (2010).. (4), 1623-1754. (2010). :. (2003).

,.,, (2008). :. (2011). :.,, (1996). :. (2008).,. (2010).,. (2001).,. (2007).,. (2013).,. (4), 2163-2174. (1995).,. (6), 99-113. (2000).. 213-237. (2007).,. (2007). -. (2), 45-56. (1994).,. (2009). :. (2000).,. (2003).,. Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting Stress Index(PSI) manual (3rd ed.). Odessa FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. Brooks, J. B. (2001). Parenting. (,, ). : ( 2001 ). Center for Human Resources Research (2000). Child and Young Adult Data Users Guide. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University. Cui., M., & Donnellan, B. M. (2009). Trajectories of Conflict over Raising Adolescent Children and Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 478-494. Dana, D. (1990). Talk it out!: 4 steps to managing people problem in your organization. Human Resource Development Press, Inc. Massachusetts. Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Matrial conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychlogical Bulletin, 116, 387-411. Eidelson, R. J., & Epstein, N. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(5), 715-720. Ellis, A. (1985). Cognition and affect in emotional disturbance. American Psychologist, 40, 471-472. Fantuzzo, J., Tighe, E., & Childs, S. (2000). Family environment questionnaire: A multivariate assessment of family participation in early childhood education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 367-376.

Feinberg, M. E., Brown, L. D., & Kan, M. L. (2011). Coparenting Relationship Scale, Unpublished manuscript. Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1979). Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical integration. In Wesley R. Burr, Reuben Hill., F. Ivan Nye & Ira L. Reiss(Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 1) (pp.549-581). NY: The Free Press. Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (1991). Family therapy: A overview. 3nd ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole. Harrison, F. (1980). A Conceptual Model of Organizational Conflict. Business and Society, Winter, 30-40. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley. Kaplan, R. M., & Sacuzzo, D. P. (1997). Psychological testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues(4nd ed.). Pacific Grove. CA: Brooks/Cold. McHale, J. P., Kuersten-Hogan, R., Lauretti, A., & Rasmussen, J, L.. (2000). Parental Reports of coparenting and observed Coparenting Behavior During the Toddler period. International Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 220-236. Merrifield, K. A. (2009). Marital and coparenting: Association with parenting cognitions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. O'Brien, M., John, R. S., Margolin, G., & Erel, O. (1994). Reliability and diagnostic efficacy of parents' reports regarding children's exposure to marital aggression. Violence and Victims, 9, 45-62. Parker, R. (1991). A Social Exchange Framework. Mediation Quartery, 9(2), 121-135. Pinkley, R. (1990). Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. JAP, 75, 117-126. Pondy L. R. (1967). Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(2), 296-320. Rummel, R. J. (1991). The Conflict Helix: Principles and Practices of Interpersonal, Social, and International Conflict and Cooperation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publisher. Smetana, J. G. (1988) Concepts of self and social convention: adolescent's and parents' reasoning about hypothetical and actual family conflict. In W. A. Collins, & M. R. Gunnar(Eds.), 21st Minnesota symposium on child psychology: Development during the transition to adolescence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Snyder, D. K. (1981). Multidimensional assessment of marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 813-823. Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Whitton, S. W. (2002). Communication, conflict, and commitment: Insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey. Family Process, 41, 659-675. Steinmetz, S. K. (1971). Occupation and Physical punishment: A response to status. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33(4), 664-666. Tayor, H. F. (1970). Balance in small groups. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Van Egeren, L. A., & Hawkins, D. P. (2004). Coming to terms with coparenting: Implication of definition and measurement. Journal of Adult Development, 11(3), 165-178. Walton, R. E., & Dutton, J. M. (1969). The

Management of Interdepartmental Conflict: A Model and Review. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1), 243-272. : 2013. 08. 15. : 2013. 10. 12. : 2013. 10. 18.

Development of the Perception Scale of Inter-Parental Conflict over Child Education Jeju National University The purpose of this study is to define the construct factors of inter-parental conflict over children's education, to develop and verify the perception scale of inter-parental conflict over children's education. For these purposes, 41 conflicts which might caused inter-parental conflict over children's education were extracted through reviewing literatures and 2 dimensions of the perception scale of inter-parental conflict over children's education were supposed according to the subject matter and types of expression of conflict. Based on the experimental data over national parents, 146 items were developed and preliminary 2 items were confirmed after experts' reviewing contents, professional content validity verification, pretesting over parents. After 82 items analysis, through the factor analysis, 4 factors - method of children's education, contents of children's education, cooperative children's education, support act for private education, 44 items were selected. Finally, through confirmatory factor analysis, the perception scale of inter-parental conflict over children's education - 4 factors 28 items 5-point likert scale - was developed. The total reliability of the perception scale of inter-parental conflict over children's education revealed.96, and by each factor revealed its high internal consistency, method of children's education.94, contents of children's education.88, cooperative children's education.89. support act for private education.86. For proving the validity of the scale of the perception scale of inter-parental conflict over children's education, construct validity verification and concurrent validity verification were conducted. The 4 factors structure was proved appropriate by confirmatory factor analysis and validated convergent validity, discriminant validity by construct reliability and two standard-error interval estimate. The results of the concurrent validity by examining the correlation between the perception scale of inter-parental conflict over children's education and Conflict Over Child Rearing(CCR), Dissatisfaction With Children(DSC), significant correlations were between them. Finally, we referred the means and limitations of this study, suggested follow-up projects. Key words : children's education, the perception of inter-parental conflict, scale