Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

,......

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac



,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud


歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

상담학연구 * Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1370 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on



Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

Rheu-suppl hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Qualitative Case

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

44-6대지.08김정희-5

<30382E20B1C7BCF8C0E720C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

상담학연구. 9., , 21..,,,,,,... (Corresponding Author): / / 154 Tel: /

歯1.PDF

<303720C7CFC1A4BCF86F6B2E687770>

가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과

27 2, 1-16, * **,,,,. KS,,,., PC,.,,.,,. :,,, : 2009/08/12 : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/30 * ** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성 ( 황수경 ) ꌙ 127 노동정책연구 제 4 권제 2 호 pp.127~148 c 한국노동연구원 WHO 의새로운국제장애분류 (ICF) 에대한이해와기능적장애개념의필요성황수경 *, (disabi

.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw

1..


도비라

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

04김호걸(39~50)ok


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: ICT * Exploring the Re

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

<30392EB9DAB0A1B6F72CC1A4B3B2BFEE2E687770>


118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * Relationship among

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

원고스타일 정의

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Study on the Resea

11¹ÚÇý·É

상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j

. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

,.,,. (Vocational Ethics) (, 1999), Brown(2012). (, 2004).,,,,, ,400 (,,, 2011;, 2006)., (, 2006; Brown, 2012). (harm) (, 2006). NCDA(National

- * (32 ), ,,,, * 2013 ( ) (KRF-2013S1A3A ). :,, 3 53 Tel : ,

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * A Study on the

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp.325-349 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.3.201809.325 The Effect of Career Preparation Behavior Before and After Major Transitions on College Life Adjustment Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of career preparation behavior college student's life adjustment Method: In order to achieve the purpose of the research, a questionnaire survey was conducted on 254 of college students who completed the one semester of new major, among students that change majors in the middle of college curriculum. Results: The findings showed that they recorded an average level of college life adjustment with their best adjustment in college environment area than academic achievement, social relationships, or emotional adjustment areas. Their career preparation behavior was more active before major transition than after it, but their career preparation behavior after major change had a more significant effect than those of the students who didn't experience major change. Among sub-areas of their college life adjustment, career preparation behavior had somewhat different effects, but the interaction of career preparation behavior before and after major transitions explained well the whole college life adjustment and its sub-areas. Conclusion and suggestions: When the level of career preparation behavior both before and after major change was high, college life adjustment was positive. These findings can be used to establish educational policies or support to help before and after college life adjustment of students who were experiencing major change. Key words : major change, college life adjustment, career preparation behavior Corresponding Author: Seo, Hee-Jung. Dong-eui University, Dept. of Lifelong Education and Youth Counseling, Eomgwand-ro, Busanjin-gu, Busan, Korea, e-mail: hjseo11@deu.ac.kr

.,.,,. (, 2008;,, 2006;,, 2012).,, (,, 2014;,,, 2010;,, 2012;, 2013). 39.5%, 1 50.2%, 95% (,, 2012;,,, 2011).,.,..,.,,.,. 2000. (2000), (2006),

,, (2011),,, (2011), (2012). (2000), (2006),,,, (2011),, (2011)., (2012)..,...,,,.,.,.,,.,.

., (, 1995).,., (, 2014).,. (Gerdes & Mallinckrodt, 1994).,. Russell Petrie(1992). (Organizing Model).,,.,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,.,,,. Barker Siryk(1984),,,.,.,,.,,,,.,,

.,,,,.,,,. Barker Siryk(1984) (SACQ: Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire),. SACQ (, 2004;, 1992;, 2003;, 2010;, 2008), (,, 2005). (2016). Russell Petrie(1992), Barker Siryk(1984). (,, ), ( -, -,, ), (,, / ), (,, ), (,, ) 5 16 64.,.,, (,,, 2016;,, 2012;, 2009;,, 2014),,, -, (, 2017;, 2010;, 2014;, 2005).,,,,,, (, 2014;,, 2013;, 2014;,,, 2016;, 2007;,,, 2011), (,, 2013;,, 2014;,, 2012;,, 2016)..,.

.,.,. (career preparation behavior) (,, 2011).,,,,,,.,,,, (,,, 2012;, 1997). (Smith & Gerhart, 1991) (, 2010)., (, 2014)... Stumpf, Colarelli Hartman(1983), Kopleman, Rovenpor Millsap(1992) 10. (1997), (1998)., (2010), (2012)

,,., (2014),.,,.,,, 30.,,., (,,, 2005;,, 2013),,, (,,,, 2009;, 2004), (,, 1997;, 2003;,, 2005;, 2004;, 2004). (, 2003;, 2005;, 2006),,, (, 2005;, 2006;, 2007).. (,,,, 2011;,, 2013;, 2013;,, 2016). (2013),., (,,,, 2011;,, 2013;,, 2012).,.,.

. 4 1.,. 349 254. 154 (60.6%), 100 (39.4%), 2 114 (44.9%), 3 140 (55.1%). 137 (53.9%), 116 (45.8%), 119 (46.9%), 135 (53.1%). 1) 대학생활적응척도 Baker Siryk(1984) 4., (24 ),,, (20 ),, (16 ),, (16 ). 8, 1., 76, 3,, (, ), 64. - - - - 5.

2) 대학생용진로준비행동검사.,. (2014). 3., (11 ),, (12 ),, (7 ) 30. 3,,, 27. - - - 4. 3) 조사도구의양호도검증 1, 2, 1.,,..,. 2, 7 West, Finch Curran(1995)., -.17 1.23, -.56 1.12.,,.,,,..

100, 200, 300 (Hanson & Roberts, 2006), 254. KMO(Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy) Bartlett, KMO.816.8, Bartlett (p<.001)., 1 (, 2010;,, 2014;, 2016; Baker & Siryk, 1984),., 3, 1, 3.30, 65..35.63,.30.71,.30.77,.39.72..79,.52,.51,.31,.61,.37...92,.84,.81,.83.,.49.70,.51.72,.69.87..63,.55,.48.,.,.91,.79,.86,.81., (< -1> ).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1. 1 2..63 ** 1 3..55 **.48 ** 1 * p<.05, ** p<.01 4..62 **.49 **.53 ** 1 5..51 **.70 **.47 **.69 ** 1 6..43 **.40 **.69 **.64 **.56 ** 1 7..23 **.20 **.13 *.37 **.35 **.14 * 1 8..25 **.30 **.09.27 **.34 **.05.52 ** 1 9. -.08 -.10 -.06.05.01 -.05.51 **.31 ** 1 10..18 **.20 **.02.18 **.24 ** -.08.61 **.79 **.37 ** 1.54.06 1.10.63.31 1.23.18 -.17.04 -.03 -.23 -.56.28 -.14 -.40.80 1.12.78.09 -.42.79.86.81.82.87.84.84.84.81.83.91.92.92 10 12 5 10 12 5 22 16 13 14 27 27 65 SPSS 22.0.,.,, t-, t-.,. VIF, Durbin-Watson., (,,,, )

(,, 1997;, 2003;,, 2005;,,, 2016;,, 2012;, 2009;, 2004;,, 2014;, 2004),. R 2,..,.,,,, 1 5.,,., 3.29. 3.54, 3.35, 3.18, 3.10 (< -1> ). M(SD) t M(SD) t M(SD) t M(SD) t M(SD) t 3.13(.46) 3.34(.52) 3.27(.59) 3.50(.51) 3.31(.42) 1.50.59 3.11 * 1.60 3.04(.44) 3.38(.51) 3.03(.59) 3.61(.57) 3.27(.42) 2 3.07(.46) 3.35(.53) 3.17(.58) 3.47(.51) 3.27(.41).81.04.19 2.01 * 3 3.12(.44) 3.35(.50) 3.18(.61) 3.61(.55) 3.31(.43) 3.09(.42) 3.33(.50) 3.15(.57) 3.54(.52) 3.28(.38).11.54.91.02 3.10(.49) 3.37(.53) 3.22(.63) 3.54(.55) 3.31(.46).52 3.12(.45) 3.33(.52) 3.17(.62) 3.61(.56) 3.31(.44).84.54.10 1.82 3.07(.45) 3.37(.51) 3.18(.58) 3.49(.51) 3.28(.40).61 3.10(.45) - 3.35(.51) - 3.18(.60) - 3.54(.53) - 3.29(.42) - * p<.05.81.94

,,,,., (p<.05), 3 2 (p<.05).. 6 6.,,, 1 4., 1.91, 1.85.,.05..,,,.05,.01.,,,,., (p<.05)., (p<.05).,. 3 (M=2.02) 2 (M=1.76),.001. 3 (M=1.94) 2 (M=1.75).01. 2.01.05. 3.05,.01.,, (M=1.90) (M=1.82)

.05.,.05,.01..,. (M=2.02) (M=1.80).001, (M=1.93) (M=1.79).05.,.05.,.01,.001 (< -2> ). t t t t 1.96 1.93 2.20 2.13 1.17 2.63 * 1.51 1.54 1.89 1.86 -.57 (.51) (.49) (.55) (.56) (.60) (.62) (.46) (.47) 1.17 2.00 1.89 2.10 * 2.18 2.10 1.60 1.51 1.93 1.84 1.55 1.51 (.54) (.57) (.59) (.60) (.68) (.70) (.51) (.55) 2.12 * t.51.52 -.21.32-1.10.28 -.59.43-2 1.83 (.45) 3 2.10 (.54) 1.84 (.44) 1.98 (.57) 2.14.05 (.56) 2.98 ** 2.23 (.57) 2.03 (.53) 2.19 (.60) 3.03 ** 1.32 (.42) 1.74 1.30 (.71) 1.39 (.51) 1.64 (.73) 1.99 * 1.76 (.37) 2.02 1.91 (.53) 1.75 (.41) 1.94 (.56) t 4.20 *** 2.15 * - 1.26 2.18 * - 5.88 *** 3.26 ** - 4.58 *** 3.02 ** - 1.96 (.51) 1.99 (.52) 1.88 (.48) 1.96 (.56) 2.18 * 2.16 (.55) 2.23.88 (.58) 2.06 (.54) 2.18 (.61) 2.75 ** 1.57 (.64) 1.52 1.25 (.63) 1.51 (.63) 2.18 (.61) 1.38.67 1.90 (.47) 1.91 (.48) 1.82 (.47) 1.90 (.54) t.57 1.20 -.92 1.59 -.73.47 -.25 1.21-2.10 (.53) 1.87 (.49) 1.96 (.56) 1.87 (.47) 2.90 ** 2.22 (.56) 2.17.18 (.57) 2.18 (.61) 2.06 (.55) 1.75.75 (.69) 3.56 *** 1.37 (.51) 1.64 (.72) 1.43 (.57) 1.93 2.02 (.52) 1.80 (.42) 1.93 (.55) 1.79 (.57) t 3.52 ** 1.43 -.60 1.67-4.99 *** 2.56 * - 3.66 *** 2.21 * - 1.98 (.52) * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 1.91 (.52) 2.34 * 2.19 (.57) 2.12 (.58) 2.90 ** 1.55 (.63) 1.53 (.65) 1.69.65 1.91 (.48) 1.85 (.50).54 2.50 * 2.47 *.61 2.44 *.75 2.37 *

.,.,. VIF( ). VIF 1.05 2.91 10,.34.95.1.,. Durbin-Watson. Durbin-Watson 0, 4,., 2 0 (, 2015). Durbin-Watson 1.94.. < -3> 1, 2,, 3., 3, 9% (F=2.998, p<.01). R R 2 R 2 R 2 F 1 2 1.092 a 0.01-0.01 0.42 0.01 0.42 5 245 0.84 2.211 b 0.04 0.02 0.42 0.04 4.60 2 243 0.01 3.300 c 0.09 0.06 0.41 0.05 12.12 1 242 0.00 a : ( ),,,, b : ( ),,,,,, c : ( ),,,,,,,, (t=2.76, p<.01)

(t=3.48, p<.01).,, (< -4> ). B SE β t VIF 1 2 3 3.32 0.09-35.19 *** - - 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.91 0.88 1.13 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.82 0.36 2.80 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.32 0.95 1.05 0.01 0.09 0.01 0.10 0.35 2.86 3.00 0.15-20.14 *** - - 0.04 0.06 0.05 0.78 0.88 1.14 0.04 0.09 0.04 0.42 0.35 2.87 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.19 0.95 1.05 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.35 2.86 0.01 0.08 0.01 0.16 0.44 2.26 0.15 0.08 0.18 1.99 * 0.46 2.19 2.95 0.15-20.13 *** - - 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.83 0.88 1.14 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.84 0.34 2.91 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.33 0.95 1.06 0.02 0.09 0.02 0.24 0.35 2.87 0.03 0.08 0.04 0.39 0.44 2.27 0.21 0.08 0.26 2.76 ** 0.43 2.31 0.33 0.10 0.24 3.48 ** 0.82 1.21 * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001,,,. VIF 1.05 2.91 10,.34.95.1. Durbin-Watson 1.83, 1.94, 2.00, 1.82.

, 2(F=4.486, p<.001) 3(F=4.53, p<.001). 2 11.4%, (t=3.83, p<.001)., 3 13.0% 2 1.6%, (t=4.23, p<.001) (t=2.10, p<.05).,,., 2(F=3.125, p<.01) 3(F=4.428, p<.001). 2 8.3%,. 3 12.8% 2 4.5%, (t=2.24, p<.05), (t=2.15, p<.05) (t=3.54, p<.001).,., 2(F=2.042, p<.05) 3(F=2.406, p<.05). 2 5.8%, (t=2.12, p<.05)., 3 7.4% 2 1.6%, (t=2.00, p<.05) (t=2.05, p<.05).,,., 3 (F=3.074, p<.01). 3 9.2%, (t=3.51, p<.001).,.

.,.,.,,,,.,,, 3 2., 1.91, 1.85,., 1.75 (,, 2014),..,,,,,, (2012).,, 2 3,.,,., 3,,.,.,. 4.

.,.,.,. (,,, 2011;,,, 2011), (, 2000;,, 2012).,,..,.,.,,., 2.,.,,,.,. - - (2012).,,.

,.,.,.... (2004).. 71-82.,, (2005). 2005. 1-78., (2014).. (5), 1771-1789. (2003). : 4..,, (2012). :., (2016).. (3), 253-293. (1997)..., (1997).. (1). 311-333. (2005).,,.. (2008). :

. (1), 227-249. (1992).. 85-114.,,, (2009).. (4), 195-217.,,, (2011).. (3), 49-66. (2003).,.. (2017). -. (4), 69-82. (2014). :. (2), 21-37. (2003)..., (2013).. (1), 23-38 (2014).. (12), 107-109. (2010).. (4), 1-29. (2010). :. (2), 45-66., (2014). : 4. (3), 105-125., (2011).. (3), 139-157. (1998)..., (2005). :. (2), 399-417., (2006). 2006. 115-135. (1995). :.,, (2010).. (3),

305-327., (2005).. (1), 233-239. (2013).. (2), 21-30. (2014).,,. (2), 111-132.,, (2016).. (3), 53-73. (2006)... (2000). :.. (2016).. (2), 49-68., (2012).. (3), 171-202., (2012).. 107-115. (2009).. (1), 1-18. (2008)... (2004). :.. (2004).. (1), 103-115., (2014). : K. (1), 19-31. (2015). :. (2007).. (4), 1501-1520. (2006)...,, (2011).. (4), 1-20.

,, (2011).. (1), 75-102. (2005).. (1), 185-196. (2004).. 105-126.., (2013).,. (3), 133-150.,, (2011).. (12), 535-558., (2014).. (4), 113-127. (2007).,,.. (2013).. 1-4., (2012).. (3), 91-102., (2012).. (5), 2085-2097., (2016).. (6). 145-173. (2010). Baker, R. W., & Siryk, B. (1984). Measuring adjustment to college. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(2). 179-189. Gerdes, H., & Mallinckrodt, B. (1994). Emotional, Social, and Academic adjustment of college students: A longitudinal study of retention. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 281-288. Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor Analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393-416. Kopleman, R. E., Rovenpor, J. L., & Millsap, R. E. (1992). Rationale and construct validity evidence for the Job search behavior index. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40(3), 269-287. Russell, R. K., & Petrie, T. A. (1992). Academic adjustment of college students: Assessment and Counseling. in Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. Handbook of counseling Psychology. second Edition. New

York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. Smith, C. I., & Ggerhart, B. (1991). The impact of job search strategy and interviewer assessments of employability on multiple measures of labor marker success. Paper presented at the 1991 Academy of Management Meetings, Miami, FL. Stumpf, S. A., Colarelli, S. M., & Hartman, K. (1983). Development of the career exploration Survey. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 191-236. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. Hoyle (Ed). Structural equation modeling: Concept, issues and applications(pp.56-75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. : 2018.07.31. / : 2018.08.03. / : 2018.09.20.

:. : 254. :,.,.,.. :.,.