DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Similar documents
<3037C0CCC8AFB9FC5FC0CCBCF6C3A22E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

,......

정보화정책 제14권 제2호 Ⅰ. 서론 급변하는 정보기술 환경 속에서 공공기관과 기업 들은 경쟁력을 확보하기 위해 정보시스템 구축사업 을 활발히 전개하고 있다. 정보시스템 구축사업의 성 패는 기관과 기업, 나아가 고객에게 중대한 영향을 미칠 수 있으므로, 이에 대한 통제


,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

15_3oracle


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree


232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

untitled

16, al, 1998)., (Davenport & Prusak, 1998;, 1999). 10,,.., (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995).,...,,.,.

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

창업 여성CEO의 특성이 경영성과에 미치는 영향 연구

ePapyrus PDF Document

288 經, 35 卷 4 그러나 정작 CRM은 사용되는 상황이나 CRM을 보는 관점에 따라 그 의미가 분분 한 것이 실상이다. 예를 들면, 영업을 담당하는 사람들은 CRM을 하나의 영업전략으 로 정의하고 있는 반면, 캠페인 관리를 하는 사람은 CRM을 좀더 개인화되고

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

29권6호.PDF

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

08_¹Úö¼øöKš

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )


11¹Ú´ö±Ô

,, (, 2010). (, 2007).,,, DMB, ,, (, 2010)., LG., (, 2010) (, ,, ) 3, 10, (, 2009).,,. (, 2010)., (, 2010). 11

목차 1. 서론 1.1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1.2. 연구의 내용 및 방법 2. 제품스타일 분석 2.1. 제품이미지 2.2. 미래지향적 스타일 3. 신세대 감성분석 3.1. 라이프스타일 3.2. 광고전략 3.3. 색채에 따른 제품구매 분석 4. 결론 *참고문헌 ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

¼±ÅÃÀû º¹¸®ÈÄ»ýÁ¦µµ.hwp


,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

<30315FC0CCB5BFC1D65FC7D1B1B9BCBAB8C5B8C52E687770>

(5차 편집).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

에너지경제연구 Korean Energy Economic Review Volume 9, Number 2, September 2010 : pp. 19~41 석유제품브랜드의자산가치측정 : 휘발유를 중심으로 19

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


HCCP 패널 이슈 브리프 분석 - 기업의 조직문화를 관계, 혁신, 위계, 그리고 시장문화로 분류하여 각 조직 문화가 구성원들의 직무만족 및 조직몰입에 어떻게 영향을 미치는지 분석 함. 직무만족은 일의 내용, 임금, 그리고 인간관계에 대한 만족으로 나누어 분석하였고,

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * Relationship among

untitled


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

#Ȳ¿ë¼®

상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j

<303720C7CFC1A4BCF86F6B2E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

시안

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

2 KHU 글로벌 기업법무 리뷰 제2권 제1호 또 내용적으로 중대한 위기를 맞이하게 되었고, 개인은 흡사 어항 속의 금붕어 와 같은 신세로 전락할 운명에 처해있다. 현대정보화 사회에서 개인의 사적 영역이 얼마나 침해되고 있는지 는 양 비디오 사건 과 같은 연예인들의 사

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

창업 여성CEO의 특성이 경영성과에 미치는 영향 연구

untitled

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

, ( ) * 1) *** *** (KCGS) 2003, 2004 (CGI),. (+),.,,,.,. (endogeneity) (reverse causality),.,,,. I ( ) *. ** ***

<312DB3EBB5BFC6F7C4BFBDBA5BBCF6C1A4BABB5D2E687770>

<C0C7B7CAC0C720BBE7C8B8C0FB20B1E2B4C9B0FA20BAAFC8AD5FC0CCC7F6BCDB2E687770>

제19권 제3호 Ⅰ. 문제제기 온라인을 활용한 뉴스 서비스 이용은 이제 더 이 상 새로운 일이 아니다. 뉴스 서비스는 이미 기존의 언론사들이 개설한 웹사이트를 통해 이루어지고 있으 며 기존의 종이신문과 방송을 제작하는 언론사들 외 에 온라인을 기반으로 하는 신생 언론사

1-2-2하태수.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

논총13집.PDF

Output file


118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

ecorp-프로젝트제안서작성실무(양식3)

WPS Working Paper Series 고성과작업시스템의결정요인에대한연구 : 산업수준의특성을중심으로 1). 65 2,197,., R&D.. (HPWS: high-performance work systems), (adoption of HPWS) (Or

歯14.양돈규.hwp

DW 개요.PDF

AIAA (I).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * A Study on the

12주간의 복합 파워트레이닝

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

0212-책표지-앞.ps, page Preflight ( 책표지-앞 )

¹ýÁ¶ 12¿ù ¼öÁ¤.PDF

제 출 문 문화체육관광부장관 귀하 본 보고서를 문화예술분야 통계 생산 및 관리 방안 연구결과 최종 보고서로 제출합니다. 2010년 10월 숙명여자대학교 산학협력단 본 보고서는 문화체육관광부의 공식적인 견해와 다를 수 있습니다

레이아웃 1


380 Hyun Seok Choi Yunji Kwon Jeongcheol Ha 기존 선행연구에서는 이론연구 (Ki, 2010; Lee, 2012), 단순통계분석 (Lee, 2008), 회귀분석 (Kim, 2012)과 요인분석 (Chung, 2012), 경로분석 (Ku,

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

BSC Discussion 1

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

07_Àü¼ºÅÂ_0922

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

첨 부 1. 설문분석 결과 2. 교육과정 프로파일 169

202 김 수 현 원 영 신 있으므로, 이러한 선수들의 긍정적인 태도를 높여 구 단의 성과를 향상시킬 수 있는 조직적 차원의 연구가 요구된다 하겠다. 따라서 선수들을 대상으로 한 프로 구단의 조직성과 제고에 관한 학문적 작업은 중요한 연구과제인 것이다. 최근 조직 커뮤

<B9E6BCDBC5EBBDC5BDC9C0C7B5BFC7E220C1A D3032C8A32833C2F720BCF6C1A E687770>


1. KT 올레스퀘어 미디어파사드 콘텐츠 개발.hwp

SW¹é¼Ł-³¯°³Æ÷ÇÔÇ¥Áö2013

Transcription:

유연한조직문화와임파워먼트가인지된조직유효성에미치는영향 The impact of organizational culture on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in mediation of empowerment 저자 (Authors) 출처 (Source) 발행처 (Publisher) URL APA Style 이용정보 (Accessed) 류장헌, 신형덕 Jang-Hun Ryu, Hyung-Deok Shin 연세경영연구 48(2), 2011.12, 213-242 (30 pages) Yonsei Business Review 48(2), 2011.12, 213-242 (30 pages) 연세대학교경영연구소 Yonsei Business Research Institute http://www.dbpia.co.kr/article/node02008445 류장헌, 신형덕 (2011). 유연한조직문화와임파워먼트가인지된조직유효성에미치는영향. 연세경영연구, 48(2), 213-242. 대구대학교 203.244.***.232 2018/05/24 06:03 (KST) 저작권안내 DBpia에서제공되는모든저작물의저작권은원저작자에게있으며, 누리미디어는각저작물의내용을보증하거나책임을지지않습니다. 그리고 DBpia에서제공되는저작물은 DBpia와구독계약을체결한기관소속이용자혹은해당저작물의개별구매자가비영리적으로만이용할수있습니다. 그러므로이에위반하여 DBpia에서제공되는저작물을복제, 전송등의방법으로무단이용하는경우관련법령에따라민, 형사상의책임을질수있습니다. Copyright Information Copyright of all literary works provided by DBpia belongs to the copyright holder(s)and Nurimedia does not guarantee contents of the literary work or assume responsibility for the same. In addition, the literary works provided by DBpia may only be used by the users affiliated to the institutions which executed a subscription agreement with DBpia or the individual purchasers of the literary work(s)for non-commercial purposes. Therefore, any person who illegally uses the literary works provided by DBpia by means of reproduction or transmission shall assume civil and criminal responsibility according to applicable laws and regulations.

Yonsei Business Review Vol. 48, No. 2 (Fall 2011), 213-242 The impact of organizational culture on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in mediation of empowerment Jang-Hun Ryu* Hyung-Deok Shin** Kirkman and Rosen, 1999; Sigler and Pearson, 2000 127 1 shinhd@hongik.ac.kr)

214 ABSTRACT This study investigates the relationship among perceived organizational culture, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and empowerment. Especially, prior studies have shown that empowerment mediates between organizational culture and organizational effectiveness, and we confirm that organizational culture focusing on flexibility has more positive impact on both job satisfaction and organizational commitment than that focusing on control has. However, the organizational cultures that are perceived to be focusing on flexibility and control, respectively, have somewhat mixed impacts on empowerment. Lastly, empowerment positively and partially mediates between perceived organizational culture and individual-level organizational effectiveness measures. Keywords organizational culture, empowerment, job satisfaction, organizational commitment 2007; Holland, 1985; Thomas and Velthouse, 1990; Spreitzer, 1995a; Ogden et al., 2006 2011 2001 2007

215 2000 2002; Spreitzer, 1996 1998 2007 2005; Deal and Kennedy, 1982; Quinn and McGrath, 1985; Cummings and Huse, 1989 Kirkman and Rosen, 1999; Sigler and Pearson, 2000 Hofstede(1980) Sigler and Pearson, 2000 Kirkman and Rosen, 1999

216 2.1 Pettigrew, 1979 Cummings and Huse, 1989; Hunger and Wheelen, 1993 Deal and Kennedy, 1982 Schein, 1983 Olsen et al, 1998 2001 Peters and Waterman(1982) 7S Schein(1983) Deal and Kennedy(1982)

217 Quinn and McGrath(1985) competing values approach Quinn and McGrath(1985) Walton and Dawson, 2001 Quinn and McGrath(1985) 2.2 1985 Dalton et al(1980) Campbell(1977)

218 2007 2.2.1 job satisfaction 1996 2003 2003) Beatty, 1981 Robbins et al, 1998 2.2.2 organizational commitment Sheldon, 1971 Mowday et al, 1979 1997

219 Meyer and Allen(1991) 3 Mayer and Schoorman(1998) OCQ(organizational commitment questionnaire) 2.3 Conger and Kanungo (1988) selfefficacy Thomas and Velthouse(1990) impact competence meaning selfdetermination

220 1 H1(+) H3(+) H2(+) / H4 1 3.1 Vogot and Murrell, 1990 Zammuto and O Conner, 1992 Quinn and McGrath(1985) 2003

221 1 3.2 Smircich, 1983 Robbins, 1989 Chow et al., 2002 1998 2006 2

222 3.3 Holland, 1985 Kanter, 1968; Hartline et al, 2000 Spreitzer, 1995a 2004 2007 2007 3 3.4 Sigler and Pearson(2000) Kirkman and Rosen(1999)

223 Thomas and Velthouse(1990) 4

224 4.1 1 Quinn and McGrath(1985) 1998 4 4 4 4 16 5 2Spreitzer(1995b) 4 4 4 4 16 5 3 Churchill et al(1976), Maghribi(1999) 6 5 Meyer and Allan(1991) 3 3 3 9 5 4.2 53 50~300 50~100 10,000 100~300 6,400 500

225 50~100 200 100~300 300 500 260 240 132 26.4% 10% 260 33 12.7% 240 99 41.3% 5 127 66.1% 33.9% 59% 41% 27.6% 25 30 42.5% 28% 18.9% 40.9% 48% 28.3% 63% 4 2,000~2,500 13.4% 1~3 31.5% 5~10 1 1 83 66.1 62 48.8 11 8.7 25 3 2.4 7 5.5 43 33.9 6 4.7 23 18.1 25~30 54 42.5 3 2.4 14 11.0 80 63.0 31~35 30 23.6 4 3.1 10 7.9 11 8.7 36~40 17 13.4 52 40.9 35 27.6 2 1.6 41~45 14 11.0 7 5.5 45 9 7.1 15 11.8 39 30.7 127 100 127 100 127 100 127 100 127 100

226 4.3 Cronbach s Alpha Baron and Kenny(1986) three-step mediated regression analysis 4.4 4.4.1 6 0.723-0.767 0.50 0.397 2008 Eigenvalue 4.09 68.158% 9 1 0.477-0.836 6.293 69.922% 4 3 1 4 3 2 0.709-0.927 1 2 5.546, 1.187 48.171%, 36.0% 84.1% 16 8 factor loading 1 0.760-0.876 2 0.886-0.909 1

227 2 4 1 4 1 0.516-0.824 4.818 48% 2.256 22.556% 70.1% 0.713-0.855 0.691-0.871 Cronbach s Alpha 0.6-0.7 0.8-0.9 2005 0.936 0.871 0.905 0.904 2 2 Construct Cronbach s 1.838 2.880 3.857.939 4.876.760 1.886 2.891.944 3.909.850.848.630.863.902.859.876 1.937 2.911.905 3.903

228 2 Construct Cronbach s 1.832 2.862 3.855.896 4.845 1.713 1.691 2.861 3.819.863 4.871 4.692 4.4.2 3 4 0.1 VIF 10 3 SD 3.70.845 1 3.74.843.373*** 1 3.83 1.010.641***.411*** 1 4.33.866.577***.518***.632*** 1 3.94.853.735***.656***.642***.767*** 1 3.84 1.057.709***.615***.666***.761***.886*** 1 3.09 1.318.359***.372***.566***.479***.478***.585*** 1 1.85 1.062.359***.112***.454***.328***.313***.400***.571*** 1 - -.258***.172***.285***.317***.310***.332***.369***.359*** 1 <.10 *p <.05 **p <.01 ***p <.001

229 4 VIF VIF 0.505 1.980 0.505 1.980 0.596 1.678 0.596 1.678 0.806 1.240 0.806 1.240 0.547 1.827 0.547 1.827 0.741 1.349 0.741 1.349 0.503 1.990 0.503 1.990 0.578 1.730 0.578 1.730 4.4.3 1 5 5 1 1-1 1-2 1-1 1-2.365***.273**.294**.136 (3.786) (2.901) (2.815) (1.349).225*.160 -.032 -.050 (2.345) (1.756) (-.308) (-.517) -.034 -.078.163.115 (-.398) (-.987) (1.768) (1.369).371***.324*** (4.786) (3.895).106.303*** (1.412) (3.754) R 2.265.387.135.294 adj R 2.247.361.114.265 R 2 -.122*** -.159*** t <.10 *p <.05 **p <.01 ***p <.001

230 1-1 B= 0.365, p<0.001 B= 0.225, p< 0.05 1 0 1-2 B= 0.371, p< 0.001 B= 0.324, p< 0.001 B= 0.303, p< 0.001 B= 0.371 vs B= 0.106 B= 0.324 vs B= 0.303 R 2 R 2 0.356>0.247 0.186>0.180 1 2 1 6

231 6 2 2-1 2-2 2-1 2-2.408***.149*.498***.277*** (4.182) (2.379) (5.538) (4.308).024 -.033.072.022 (.243) (-.549) (.803) (.277).321.067.122.022 (1.771) (1.276) (1.536) (.351).617***.532*** (11.964) (10.022).460***.390*** (9.167) (7.567) R 2 0.249.728.360.712 adj R 2 0.231.716.345.700 R 2 -.479*** -.352*** t <.10 *p <.05 **p <.01 ***p <.001 2-1 B= 0.408 p<0.001 0.277 p<0.001 B= 0.321, p< 0.10 B= 0.122, p<0.10 2-2 p<0.001 B= 0.617 vs B= 0.460 B= 0.532 vs B= 0.390 R 2 R 2

232 0.539>0.406 0.584>0.478 2 3 7 7 3 3-1 3-2 3-1 3-2.408***.068.498***.202** (4.182) (.895) (5.538) (2.762).024 -.052.072.008 (.243) (-.749) (.803) (.119).152.064.122.043 (1.771) (1.054) (1.536) (.737).425***.363*** (6.538) (5.771).628***.556*** (10.480) (9.583) R 2.249.639.360.661 adj R 2.231.624.345.647 R 2 -.390*** -.301*** t <.10 *p <.05 **p <.01 ***p <.001 3-2 3 p<0.001 B= 0.425 vs B= 0.628 B= 0.363 vs B= 0.556 3 4 Baron and Kenny(1986) three-step mediated regression analysis 8

233 8 4 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-1 4-2 4-3.408***.149*.065.498***.277***.201* (4.182) (2.379) (1.109) (5.538) (4.308) (3.247).024 -.033 -.038.072.022.018 (.243) (-.549) (-.712) (.803) (.277) (.319).152.067.038.122.022.022 (1.771) (1.276) (.827) (1.536) (.351) (.440).617***.456***.532***.384*** (11.964) (8.124) (10.022) (6.461).460***.341***.390***.281*** (9.167) (7.087) (7.567) (5.509).139*.123** (2.371) (1.989).341***.317*** (6.257) (5.481) R 2.249.728.795.360.712.819 adj R 2.231.716.783.345.700.809 R 2 -.479***.067*** -.352***.058*** t <.10 *p <.05 **p <.01 ***p <.001 4 three-step mediated regression analysis 4-3 p-value p<0.001 t-value= 11.964 -> 8.124 t-value= 9.167 -> 7.087 B= 0.617-> 0.456 B= 0.460 -> 0.341 4-3 p- value p<0.001 t-value=

10.022 -> 6.461 t-value= 7.567-> 5.509 B= 0.532-> 0.384 B= 0.390 ->0.281 Quinn and McGrath(1985) 4 2 Kirkman and Rosen, 1999; Sigler and Pearson, 2000

235 2 127 25~30 42.5% 4 3 2011 LMX 48(1): 81-108 2003 2002 16: 101-123. 1998 6(2): 195-238 2003 1985 14(3): 56-82

236 1996 1997 2007 21(3): 227-240. Todd. C. D 2007 15(4): 43-86 2001 38(1): 71-111 2006 18(4): 115-134. 2005 19(3): 95-108 2004 17(5): 2139-2160 2007 30: 119-140 2005 2008. SPSS14.0 2001 2000 2(2): 71-99 2007 44(1): 69-88 2007 14(4): 295-311 2003 Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderate-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173-1182. Beatty, R. W. 1981. Personnel administration: An experimental skill-building approach, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

237 Campbell, J. P. 1977. On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In P. S. Goodman, and J. M. Pennings (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chow, C. W., Harrison, G. L., McKinnon, J., and A. Wu. 2002. The organizational culture accounting. Organizational and Society 27(3): 347-360. Churchill, G. A. Jr., Ford, N. M., and Walke, O. C. Jr. 1976. Organizational climate and job satisfaction in the salesforce. Journal of Marketing Research 13: 323-332. Conger, J. A., and Kanungo, R. N. 1988. The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review 13(3): 471-482. Cummings, T. G., and Huse, E. 1989. Organization development and change. St. Paul, MN: West. Dalton, D. R., Toder, W. D., Spendoloni, M. J., Fielding, G. J., and Porter, L. W. 1980. Organization structure and performance: A critical review. Academy of Management Review 5(1): 49-64. Deal, T. D., and Kennedy, A. A. 1982. Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Hartline, M. D., Maxham III, J. G., and McKee, D. O. 2000. Corridors of influence in the dissemination of customer oriented strategy to customer contact service employees. Journal of Marketing 64(2): 35-50. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture s consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Holland, J. 1985. Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Hunger J. D., and Wheelen, T. L. 1993. Strategic management. MA: Addison-Wesley. Kanter, R. M. 1968. Commitment: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Socialization Review 33(4): 499-517. Kirkman, B. L., and Rosen, B. 1999. Beyond self management: The antecedent and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal 42(1): 58-74. Maghribi, A. S. 1999. Assessing the effect of job satisfaction on managers. International

238 Journal of Value-Based Management 12: 1-12. Mayer, R. C., and Schoorman, F. D. 1998. Differentiating antecedents of organizational commitment: A test of March and Simon s model. Journal of Organizational Behavior 19(1): 15-28. Meyer, J. P., and Allen, N. J. 1991. A three component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review 1(1): 61-89. Mowday, R T., Steers, R. M., and Porter, L. W. 1979. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior 14: 224-247. Ogden S., Glaister, K. W., and Marginson, D. 2006. Empowerment and accountability: Evidence from the UK pivatized water industry. Journal of Management Studies 43(3): 521-555. Olsen, M. D., West, J. J., and Tse, E. C. Y. 1998. Strategic management in the hospitality industry. New York: Van Nostramd Reinhold. Peters, R. H., and Waterman, R. H. 1982. In search of excellence: Lessons from America s best-run companies, New York: Harpers and Row Publishers. Pettigrew, A. M. 1979. On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4): 570-581. Quinn, R. E., and M. R. McGrath. 1985. The transformation of organization cultures: A competing values perspective. In P. Forest, et al (Eds.)., Organizational culture, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Robbins, S. P. 1989. Organization behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Robbins, S. P., Millett, B., Cacioppe, B. R., and Waters-Marsh, T. 1998. Organizational behavior: Leading and managing in Australia and New Zealand. Sydney: Prentice Hall. Schein, E. H. 1983. The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organizational dynamics 12(1): 13-28. Sheldon, M. E. 1971. Investment and involvement as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 16(2): 143-150. Sigler, T. H., and Pearson, C. M. 2000. Creating an empowering culture: Examining the

239 relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment. Journal of Quality Management 5(1): 27-52. Smircich, L. 1983. Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 2(3): 339-358. Spreitzer, G. M. 1995a. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal 38(5): 1442-1465. Spreitzer, G. M. 1995b. An empirical test of a comprehensive model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace. American Journal of Community Psychology 23(5): 601-629. Spreitzer, G. M. 1996. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal 39(2): 483-504. Thomas, K. W., and Velthouse, B. A. 1990. Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review 15(4): 666-681. Vogot, J. F., and Murell, K. L. 1990. Empowerment in organization: How to speak exceptional performance. San Diego: Pfeiffer and Company. Walton, E. J., and Dawson, S. 2001, Managers perceptions of criteria of organizational effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies 38(2): 173-199. Zammuto, R. F., and O Conner, E. J. 1992. Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies benefits: The role of organization design and culture. Academy of Management Review 17(4): 701-728.

240 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

241 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

242 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15