:,, : :. 1. (, 1984 : Stuart, and Sundeen, 1987 : H ack er, 1981). ( 1993). (, 1983). (Carrea, an d Calderone, 1981)., (, 1983 :, 1983). (,, 1986), (, 1983).,., (,, 1986 :, 1983). 1970,,, (, 1983 :, 1990). T V,, (, 1989 :, 1989), (, 1990).,, (, 1984 :, 1989 :, 1989). (, 1983 :, 1983).. (,,, 1984).
, (, 1991).., (, 1983 :, 1983 : H eisler, and F riedm ann, 1980). (, 1983 : Ca ssell, 1981), (, 1983 :, 1990 :, 1983 : Rubin son, and Baillie, 1981).. 2... 1). 2). 3.. 1). 2). 4. 1) (1) :,, (, 1982). (2) :,,,, 5 20. 2) (1) : (, 1986). (2) :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
30. 3) (1) :,. (2) :,,,,, 2,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 30. 4) (1) : (, 1986). (2) :,,,,, ( ),,.. 1. Latin A dolescere (, 1981). (1992),, (, 1992). Erick son (1968) (m orat orium ),,,, (, 1990).,,,,... (, 1992).,. 2. (, 1983).
13-1410- 11(, 1983).,,. (, 1990 :, 1983).,, (, 1983), (, 1986)... (1981) 27.7%, 14.7%., 40.8%, 33.1%, 19.5%, 7.1%, 3.0%, 56.3%, 36.8%, 6.9%, 3.4% (, 1981).., (, 1993). Lucy (1980)15-192, 13-14 75 1, 80%. 1 91% (Kapp, T aylor, and Edw ards : 1980), 15-191 15 3, 92% (T ru s sell, 1988). Hu ston (1990) 10 (Hu st on, M artin, and F oulds, 1990). 10, (Odon go, and Ojw an g, 1990). (1977-78, 198048< > ) 1010 3.3% 16.,, (, 1993).,,, rd (F ielding, and W illiam s, 1991), 10,, 10,,,,
(Kapp, T aylor, an d Edw ards, 1980), (S choem an, 1990). 10 (Kapp, T aylor, and Edw ards, 1980).. 3. (1984) 1 10 (t =8.62, p <.01), (, 1984), 19857(1986) 1 2 (t =- 20.46, p<.001), (t =- 6.04, p<.001) (, 1986). 1 2548 19881 24(1990) (, 1990), (1992) 2 10 ( - ) ( - ) (F (1.18)=6.08, p<.05), (F (1.18)=26.20, p<.01)(, 1992). Kirby (1980), T V,,. (Kirby, 1980). H och (1971) 50 10,., (Kirby, 1980). S am son (1977) 830. S am son (Kirby, 1980), Crosby (1971)fam ily life 50 (Kirby, 1980). Kirby (1980),
(Kirby, 1980). Sheila (1980)42,,,,,, 20. 11, 65 38.72, 48.44 p =.05 (Gum erm an, Jacknik, and Sipko, 1980).,. 4.,,,.,,,,,. (, 1984). (1991) 10562%(, 1991), 1993 30-40200 61.3% 3 2 (, 1993). 1990 426 (1991) (96.2% )(, 1991), 1989 2 4, 5, 6 395(1990) 76.5% (, 1990), 311 (1992) (, 1992). (1991) 2.2%, 97.8%,, 79.5% 93.3%,. 74.5%1 1,156 (, 1991). 198995, 229, 176 (1990), 80.9%, 62.7% (p< 0.005)(, 1990). (1989) 64.2% (1989), (1983),,, (, 1983).
11370(1986) 1 2 22.4%24.0%, 10 8.0%. 370 144(39% ), 226(61% ) (, 1986).,, (1991) 37.9%, 29.3%,. 53.4% (, 1991),,,., (, 1993). 1992 600 (1992) 24.1%, (40.0% ) (8.5% ),. 65.8% (, 1992),. (1987)45.8% (, 1987), 2,015 66.7%1,344(, 1993)..,. (, 1984). (, 1983). 1983.,.,,,,,,
. (, 1989).. 1. (n on equiv alent control pretest - postt est design ) < 1>. Ye1 Yc1 X Ye2 Yc2 < 1> < 2>. < 2> 2. 1 1, 1 1, 1993522, 52971920, 7 20. 54, 54, 54, 48 6.. 3. (, 1983) (, 1987 :
, 1990 :, 1989 :, 1988 :, 1982) (, 1988, 1991),,,,, 5. 20 V.T.R. (, 1991 :, 1990 :, 1987 :, 1990 :, 1990 :, 1987),. 6, 6, 6, 9, 3, 6, 8, 8. groupsum m ation A LP HA =.7709, ALPHA =.7024.,, V1. 30 4 4 14 v. 4. SP S S < sup> pc</ sup>, x < sup > 2</ sup> - t est,, t - test.. 1.,,,,. < 1>. 54, 48102. 42.2%, 36.3%, 15.7%, 88.2%, 5.9%. 31.4%33.3%, 86.4%, 9.8%, 3.9%. 10.0, 8.5, x < sup > 2</ sup>. 2. 1) 1 (1) < 2>.
< 1> (N) (%) (N ) (%) (N) (%) 1. 5 9.3 11 22.9 16 15.7 2. 24 44.4 19 39.6 43 42.2 3. 3 5.6 3 6.3 6 5.9 4. 22 40.7 15 31.3 37 36.3 1. 49 90.7 41 85.4 90 88.2 2. 2 3.7 4 8.3 6 5.9 3. 3 5.6 3 6.3 6 5.9 4. 1.1 14 25.9 18 37.5 32 31.4 2.2 20 37.0 14 29.2 34 33.3 3.3 10 18.5 6 12.5 16 15.7 4.4 6 11.1 5 10.4 11 10.8 5.5 2 3.7 2 4.2 4 3.9 6.6 1 1.9 3 6.3 4 3.9 7.7 1 1.9 1 1.0 1. 45 83.3 43 89.6 88 86.3 2. 7 13.0 3 6.3 10 9.8 3. 2 3.7 2 4.2 4 3.9 4. x 2 3.816 1.028 4.311 1.297 M 10.024 M 10.063 M 10.044 16.412 M 8.426 M 8.521 M 8.474 7.579 3.907, 3,854, 2.407, 2.333, 4.333, 4.313, 3.482, 4.313, 1.907, 1.958 < 2> () t p (6) (6) (6) (9) (3) (30) 3.907 2.407 4.333 3.482 1.907 16.037 1.120 1.572.991 2.026.680 4.198 3.854 2.333 4.313 3.917 1.958 16.375 1.321 1.693 1.095 1.955.651 4.384.22.23.10-1.10 -.39 -.40.826.819.920.274.701.692
, 16.037, 16.375(t =-.40, p =.692). (2) / t - t est < 3>. < 3> () (6) (6) (6) (9) (3) (30) 3.987 2.574 4.453 3.648 1.759 16.426 1.226 1.382.862 1.739.612 4.201 5.604 5.063 5.417 7.979 2.667 26.729.676.909 1.048 1.082.663 2.987 t - 7.93-10.60-5.04-14.88-7.18-14.11 p.000.000.000.000.000.000 3.982 5.604, 2.574 5.063, 4.463 5.417, 3.648 7.797, 1.759, 2.667, 16.426 26.729., 3.9073.982, 2.4072.574, 4.333 4.463, 3.4823.648, 1.9071.759, 16.03716.426 (t =.48, p =.631)., 3.8455.604 2.333 5.063, 4.3135.417, 3.9177.979, 1.9582.667, 16.37526.729 t - t est (t =- 13.52, p -.000). 1. < 4> < 3>. 2) 2 (1) 2.900, 2.867 (t =.71, p =.447).
< 3> < 4> t p t p M M M M () SD SD SD SD (6) 3.907 1.120 3.982 1.266 -.32.748 3.854 1.321 5.604.646-8.17.000 (6) 2.407 1.527 2.574 1.382 -.59.560 2.333 1.693 5.063.909-9.84.000 (6) 4.333.991 4.463.862 -.73.470 4.313 1.095 5.417 1.048-5.05.000 3.482 3.648 -.46.647 3.917 7.979-12.60.000 (9).276.237 1.955 1.082 (3) 1.907.680 1.759.612 1.19.237 1.958.651 2.667.663-5.28.000 (30) 16.037 4.198 16.426 4.201 -.48.631 16.375 4.384 26.729 2.987-13.52.000 (2). t - t est< 6>. < 5> t p 2.900.238 2.867.71.71.447 < 6> t p 2.977.224 3.224.176-6.15.000 2.977 3.244
(t =- 6.15, P =.000). 2.9002.977 (t =- 1.72, P =.088),, 2.8673.224 (t =- 8.75, P =.000)., 2. < 7> < 4>. < 4> < 7> t p M M M M () SD SD SD SD 2.900.238 2.977.224-1.72.088 2.867.221 3.224.176 t p - 8.75.000 3. < 8>. 90.2%, 73.5%, 55.9%, 76.5%, 57.8%, 43.1%, 1.81, 42.2%, 35.3%, 14.7%. 28.4%, 23.5%10.8%, 24.5%, 24.5%, 10.8%, 15.7%. 0.525. 4. < 9>. 41.4%, 3.8%, 6.15%, 2.9%, 0.95%,.. 1. 1. t - t est
< 8> (N) (N ) (N) (N) (N) (N) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) 47 45 92 14 15 29 (87.0) (93.8) (90.2) (25.9) (31.3) (28.4) 40 (13.0) 3 ( 6.3) 10 ( 9.8) 40 (74.1) 33 (68.8) 73 (71.6) 32 27 59 7 2 9 (59.3) (56.3) (57.8) (13.0) ( 4.2) ( 8.8) 40 (74.1) 35 (72.9) 75 (73.5) 11 (20.4) 14 (29.2) 25 (24.5) 30 (55.6) 41 (75.9) 30 (55.6) 21 (38.9) 10 (18.5) 27 (56.3) 37 (77.1) 29 (60.4) 23 (47.9) 4 ( 8.3) 57 (55.9) 78 (76.5) 59 (57.8) 44 (43.1) 14 (13.7) 6 (11.1) 13 (24.1) 3 ( 5.6) 7 (13.0) 5 (10.4) 12 (25.0) 5 (10.4) 9 (18.8) 11 (10.8) 25 (24.5) 8 ( 7.8) 16 (15.7) 1 ( 1.9) 7 (13.0) 1 ( 1.9) 8 (16.7) 10 (20.8) 1 ( 2.1) 9 ( 8.8) 17 (16.7) 2 ( 2.0) 1 ( 1.9) 3 ( 5.6) 1 ( 2.1) 2 ( 4.2) 2 ( 2.0) 5 ( 4.9) M 1.704 1.917 1.81.509.542.525 14 (25.9) 25 (46.3) 1 ( 1.9) 8 (14.8) 10 (18.5) 22 (45.8) 18 (37.5) 5 (10.4) 7 (14.6) 1 ( 2.1) 36 (35.3) 43 (42.2) 6 ( 5.9) 15 (14.7) 11 (10.8) 3 ( 5.6) 9 (16.7) 7 (13.0) 1 ( 2.1) 15 (31.3) 4 ( 8.3) 4 ( 3.9) 24 (23.5) 11 (10.8)
< 9> ( ) () ( ) ( ) ( ) 21(38.9) 21(43.8) 42(41.4) 2( 3.9) 2( 3.7) 4 ( 3.8) 1( 1.9) 5(10.4) 6( 6.15) 2( 3.7) 1( 2.1) 3 ( 2.9) 1( 1.9) 1(0.95) 3.8545.604(t =- 8.17, p =.000), 2.3335.063(t =- 9.84, p =.000), 4.3135.417 (t =- 5.05, p =.000), 3.9177.979(t =- 12.60, p =.000), 1.9582.667(t =- 5.28, p =.000), 16.37526.729(t =- 13.52, p =.000), 3.9073.982(t =-.32, p =.748), 2.407 2.574(t =-.59, p =.560), 4.3334.463(t =-.73, p =.470), 3.4823.648(t =-.46, p =.647), 1.9071.759(t =1.19, p =.237), 16.037 16.426(t =-.48, p =.631) 1. 1. (1984) 110 (t =8.62, p <.01)(, 1984), 1 114(1986) (t =- 20.46, p<.001)(, 1986), 1 2 5481 24 (1990) (, 1990). (1992)2 10 (F (1.18)=6.08, p<.05)(, 1992). 6 (1987) )p<.005)(, 1987), 1 5,6108 (1992) (t =- 27.43, p =.000)(, 1992), 1
5,6(1993) (t =- 22.61, p<.001) (, 1993). 8200 P arcelluttm an (1981) 6, 6 (P arcel, an d Luttm an, 1981). Sheia (1980) P =.05(Gum erm an, Jacknik, an d Sipko, 1980), Carter F rankel(1983)fam ily life p =.05(Carter, and F rankel, 1980), W att s (1974) (Vacalis, Hill, and Greg, 1979). Mim s (1976),, (p<.001) (Mim s, Brow n, and Lubow, 1976), P eg gy (1984)43 6-8(Sm ith, F lah erty, w ebb, and Mum ford, 1984).. 2. 2. t - t est 2.8673.224 (t =- 8.75, p =.000), 2,9002,977 (t =- 1.72, p =.088) 2. 2. (1986) (t =- 6.04, p<.001)(, 1986), (1990) (, 1990). (1992) (F < sub > 1.18</ sub > =26.20, p <.01)(, 1992). 4,6(1992) (t =2.47, p<.05)(t =6.90, p<.01) (, 1992). 1 5,6 108(1992) 114,842
10.397 (, 1992), 5,6 197(1993) (t =- 13.69, p <.001) (, 1993). P arcelluttm an (1981), (P arcel, an d Luttm an, 1981). H och (1971),, S am son (1977), Crosby (1971) (Kirby, 1980). W att s (1974) (V acalis, Hill, an d Gray, 1979).,, Mim s (1976) S KA T,, (P <.001)(Mim s, Brow n, an d Lubow, 1976).. 6(1987) (, 1987), (1984) (, 1984). W oods (1975) (W oods, an d M an dett a, 1975),., (, 1974). (, 1986), (, 1986 :, 1985),. 3. < 8> 90.2%. (1986) 72.9%1.81 1-2.. 73.5%,
(76.5% ), (57.8% ), (55.9% ), (43.1% ). 42.2%, 35.3%, 14.7%. 28.4%25.4%. 24.5%, 23.5%, 24.5%, 15.7%, 10.8% 0.525.. 41.4%(1981) 70.8%, 3. (1986)57.9%, (1991) 36.3%, (1991) 46.2%.,, 3.8%, 6.15%, 2.9%, ( ) 0.95%(1986) 21.9%, 11.4%, 7.9%, 0.6%, 7.7%.. 1.., 1 1 54, 1 1 54, 1993522, 52971920, 720. 54, 54, 54, 48 6 48.,,,, 5, V.T.R,,... 1
. (t =- 14.11, p =.000). 2. (t =- 6.15, p =.000). 90.2%, 73.5%. 76.5%, 57.8%, 55.9%, 43.1%, 42.2%, 35.3%, 14.7%. 1.81. 28.4%, 24.5%, 24.5%, (15.7% ), (10.8% ),, 23.5%. 0.525.. 2.. 1). 2). 3). 4). 1. (1992).,. 2. (1990)., 28 (5) : 24-27. 3. (1987).,. 4. (1986).,. 5. (1987). :,. 6. (1992).,. 73 (1989)., 114,, 35-41.
8. (1987). 6,. 9. (1989).,. 10. (1991)., 6,. 11. (1983). :, : 61-71. 12. (1990).,,. 13. (1983). :, : 77-91. 14. (1993). 5,6,. 15. (1991).,. 16. (1983).,, : 25-34. 17. (1990).,. 18. (1987).,. 19. (1983).,. 20. (1982).,. 21. (1991). :,. 22. (1981)., :, 10. 23. (1993). 7 24. (1983)., : 19-22. 25. (1983).,. 26. (1985).,. 27. (1990)., 29 (5) : 5-9. 28.,,,,, (1984). :,. 29. (1986).,. 30. (1992).,. 31.,, (1986)., :, 53. 32. (1992).,.
33. (1990).,,. 34. (1989)., 114, : 22-29. 35. (1989). ;, 114, : 30-34. 36. (1990).,,. 37. (1990)., :. 38. (1982)., :. 39. (1989).,. 40. (1986).,. 41. (1983). :, : 5-19. 42. (1974).,. 43. (1989)., 114, : 17-21. 44. (1991).,,. 45. (1992).,. 46. (1981).,. 47., (1993).,, :. 48. (1990).,. 49.,,, (1984).,. 50. (1990).,. 51. (1988).,. 52. (1993). 8, 15, 8. 53. (1991).,. 54. (1993). 10, 6, 7. 55. (1983). :, : 41-55. 56. (1987).,. 57. A lv arez, M., M auricci, A. & Muzzo, S.(1990). S ex inform ation of adolescent
saccording to sex, Rev Chil P ediatr 61(2) : 102-108. 58. Carrera, M. A., Calderone, M. S.(1981). T he SIECUS/ New York Univ er sity P rinciples Basic to Edu cation for S ex uality, J S ch H ealth 51 L 315-316. 59. Cart er, J. A., F rankel, E. A.(1981). T he effect s of teacher training program in fam ily life an d hum an sex uality on the know ledg e and attitudes of public s chool t eacher s, J S ch H ealth 53 : 459-61. 60. Cassell, C.(1981). Puttin g sex education in it s place, J S ch H ealth 51 : 211-13. 61. F ielding, J. E. W illiam s, C. A.(1991). A dolescent pregnan cy in the Unit ed St ates : a review and recom m en dation s for clinician s an d research n eeds, Am J Prev - M ed 7 (1) : 47-52. 62. Gum erm an, S., Jacknick, M. & Sipko, R.(1980). S ex education in a rural high school, J S ch H ealth 50 : 478-80. 63. Hacker, S. S.(1981). It isn 't S ex E du cation Unles s., J S ch H ealth 51 : 207-10. 64. H eisler, A. B., F riedm an, S. B.(1980). A dolescence : P sy chological an d S ocial Dev elopm ent, J S ch H ealth 50 : 381-385. 65. Hu ston, R. L., M artin, L. J. & F oulds, D. M.(1990). Effect s of a program t o facilit ate parent - child comm unication about sex, Clin P ediatr (Phila ) 29(11) : 26-33. 66. Kapp, L., T aylor, B. A. & Edw ards, L. E.(1980). T eachin g hum an sexu ality in junior high sch ool : an interdisciplinary approach, J sch H ealth 50 : 80-83. 67. Kirby, D.(1980). T he effect s of school sex education program s : a rev iew of th e lit erature, J S ch H ealth 50 : 559-63. 68. Mim s, F. H., Brow n, L. & Lubow, R.(1976). Hum an sexu ality cour se ev alu ation, Nur sing Research 25 (3) :187-91. 69. Odon go, F., Ojw ang, S. B.(1990). S om e aspect s of t eenage pregnancy in Nairobi : a prospectiv e stu dy on t een age m other s at Keny atta National H ospital and Pum w ani M aternity Hospit al, East Afr M ed J 67 (6) : 432-36. 70. P arcel, G. S., Luttm an, D.(1981). Ev aluation in sex education : Ev alu ation research for sex edu cation applied t o program planning, J S ch H ealth 51 : 278-81. 71. Rin gdahl, E. N.(1992). T h e role of the fam ily phy sician in prev entin g teenag e pregn ancy, Am F am Phy sician 45(5) : 2215-20. 72. Rubin son, L., Bailie, L.(1981). Planning S chool Based S exu ality Program s Utilizing the P RECEDE M odel, J S ch Health 51 : 282-287. 73. S choem an, M. N.(1990). S ex uality education am on g black S outh African teenag er s : w h at can reason ably be expect ed?, Curationis 13 (3-4) : 13-18. 74. Sm ith, P. B., F laherty, C., W ebb, L. J. & Mum ford, D. M.(1984). T he lon g - t erm effect s of hum an sexu ality training program s for public school teacher s, J S ch H ealth 54 (4) : 157-59. 75. Stu art, G. W., Sun deen, S. J.(1987). Prin ciples and P ractice of P sy chiatric Nur sing, St. Louis : M osby, 667. 76. T ru ssell, J.(1988). T eenag e pregn ancy in the United Stat es, F am P lann P er spect 20(6) : 262-72.
77. V acalis, T. D., Hill, E.& Gray, J.(1979). T he effect of tw o m ethods of t eaching sex edu cation on the Beh avior s of stu dent s, J S ch Health 49 : 404-9. 78. W oods, N. F., M andett a, A.(1975). Ch ang es in stu dent s ' know ledge and attitudes follw oing a course in hum an sex uality : Nur sing Research 24 (1) : 10-15. - A b s t ract - T he E ffect of S ex E duc ation for Hig h S chool Girls ' Know le dg e and A ttitude related to S ex Kim, Yon g JaLee, H ae Kyung Kim, Young Ja : M ajor in Nur sing Edu cation, Graduat e S chool of Edu cation Chun gn am N ational Univ er sity, T aejon, Korea Lee, H ae Kyun g : Nur sing Departm ent Chungnam Nation al Univ er sity T h e problem relat ed t o sex is closely conn ect ed w ith hum an life. It is im portant t o acquire accur at e sexu al know ledg e an d desirable attitu de specially during adolescence, in the physical, psychological and emotional changing period. T his study was made to find out the high school girls ' kn ow ledge, attitude an d ex perience relat ed to sex, and to support th e progress of sex edu cation at sch ool in th e future. T h e design w as nonequiv alent control pret est - postt est in the quasi- ex perim ent al design. In current study, the subj ect s w ere 102 girls from the 1 st grade of girls ' com m ercial high school. It w as control group 54 an d ex perim ent al group 48. T o t each the ex perim ent al group, th e sex edu cation program w as combin ed th e sex education program m ade in Korea Edu cation Dev elopm ent In stitut e, Inform ation of sex edu cation by the Ministry of Edu cation, oth er con cerning articles and previou s stu dies. T h e research t ool w as a questionn aire based on th e literature review. T h e pretest - postt est w as giv en t o the tw o group s. T he sex edu cation had been t aken for the experim ental group but n ot been taken for the control group. T h e dat a w as collect ed from M ay 22, 1993 t o July 20, 1993 an d w as analy zed throu gh spss < sup> pc</ sup>. T h e frequ ency, x < sup> 2</ sup > - t est and t - t est w ere calculat ed. Summ arized fin din g s from the study are as follow s : groups before sex edu cation. 1. Reg ar din g the fir st hypothesis w as support ed as follow in g : "T he scores of sex ual kn ow ledge in th e ex perim ent al group w h o w a s giv en sex edu cation w ill be higher th an those of the control group w ho w a s n ot giv en." (t =- 14.11, p =.000)
2. Reg ar din g the secon d hypothesis w a s supported as follow in g : "T he scores of th e attitu de t ow ard sex in the ex perim ent al group w ho giv en sex edu cation w ill be high er th an those of th e control group w ho w as n ot giv en." (t =- 6.15, p =.000) T h e result of this study su gg est s that it is so necessary th at school nur ses sh ould t each about sex regularly at school.