ๆญฏ์๊ณ 1-1.PDF
|
|
- ๊ดํ ๋งน
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1999 Report on the S urv ey of Re s e arch and D ev elopm ent in S cience and T echnolog y M inistry of S cienc e and T echnolog y Repulic of Kore a Korea Institute of S cience & T echnology Ev aluation and Planning
2 1963,. 1982, 1963,.,, OECD(FRASCAT I MANUAL), 1998, ,366, 129,967'97121, , %, 6.3%...,,
3 ( ) 1 ( )
4 1-8 (F T E ) ( ) (NSI ) (WIPO) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ' ' ' '98,, ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
5 ' ' ' ' ( ) '98,, ' ' ' '98, ' ( ) ' ' ' ( ) '98,, '98,, '98,, '98,, '98,, '98,, '98,, '98,, - 3 -
6 '98,, '98,, '98, '98, '98, '981, '981, '98, ' ' ' ' ' ' ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
7 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
8 ( ) ,, GDP ( ) ,,,,, ( ) , 1( ) ( ) 437 :
9 CON T EN T S. Outlin e of the Surv ey 17. Ex planation of T erm s 27. Summ ary of the Surv ey R&D ex penditures P er sonn el eng aged in R&D activities R&D ex penditures paid t o abraod R&D ex penditures by socio- econ om ic objectiv es R&D ex penditures by region 64. St atistical T ables Int ern ation al com parison of scien ce and t echn ology activities M ajor indicat or s concernin g scien ce an d t echnology activ ities by nation R&D ex penditures by y ear R&D ex penditures and research er s R&D researcher s by y ear R&D ex penditures by charact er of w ork R&D ex penditur es by sect or of perform an ce R&D ex penditur es as a per cent of total sales by indu stry P er sonn el eng aged in R&D activities T otal gov ernm ent budget appropriation or outlay s on R&D Num ber of science and technical papers in the last fiv e y ears St atu s of P at ent s applied an d registered of each country
10 1-12 T echnological balance of paym ent s R&D activities in Korea 80 ( Sum m ary ) R&D ex penditures : R&D ex penditures by source of fun ds : R&D ex penditures by sect or of perform an ce : R&D ex penditures by type of cost s : R&D ex penditures by charact er of w ork : R&D ex penditures per research er by sect or of perform an ce : P er sonn el eng aged in R&D activities, research er s per 10,000 population by sector of perform ance : Researchers by m ajor field of stu dy an d degree : R&D P erform ing in stitut es, researcher s by sex : Intram ural R&D ex pen ditures by sect or of perform an ce, source of fun ds, type of cost s, ch aract er of w ork : R&D ex pen ditures fin an ced by g ov ernm ent by ch aract er of w ork : R&D ex p. receiv ed from and paid t o out side by sector of perform ance : P er sonn el eng aged in R&D activities, reseach er s by m ajor field of study and degree an d R&D ex p. per researcher by sector of perform ance : Researchers by m ajor field of stu dy an d degree : Researchers by sect or of perform an ce, ag e and sex : F.T. equiv alent R&D personnal by sect or of perform ance an d sex : R&D ex p. by sect or of perform an ce : R&D ex p. by sector of perform ance and socio- econ om ic objectiv es : R&D ex p. ratio by sect or of perform an ce and socio- econ om ic objectiv es : R&D ex p. by sector of perform ance and region : R&D ex p. ratio by sect or of perform an ce an d region : R&D per sonnel by sect or of perform an ce an d region : R&D per sonnel ratio by sector of perform ance and region : R&D perform ing unit s by sect or of perform ance an d region : R&D perform ing unit s ratio by sect or of perform an ce - 8 -
11 and region : ( R esearch In stitut es : 1998 ) R&D ex p. by charact er of w ork, per sonnel eng aged in R&D an d annual R&D ex p. per resear ch er by field R&D ex p. by field, source of fun ds, type of cost s Researchers by field an d m ajor field of study Researchers by m ajor field of stu dy an d degree Researchers and F.T equiv alent researchers by field, age and sex R&D performing in stitut es by kin d of org anization an d field 116 ( Univer sities & Colleges : 1998 ) Intram ural R&D Ex pen ditures by type of organization and field R&D ex penditures by type of organization, sour ce of fun ds and type of cost s Researchers by m ajor field of stu dy an d degree 119 ( Com panies : 1998 ) R&D ex p. by indu stry, size of em ploy ees, source of funds, type of cost s and u sage R&D ex p. by indu stry, size of capit al, source of fun ds, type of cost s and u sage R&D ex p. by indu stry, size of sales, source of fun ds, type of cost s and u sage R&D ex p. by indu stry, size of reseacher s, source of fun ds, type of cost s and u sage R&D ex p. by indu stry, size of R&D ex p., source of funds, type of cost s and u sage R&D ex p. by charact er of w ork, per sonnel eng aged in R&D an d annual R&D ex p. per resear ch er by indu stry an d size of em ploy ees R&D ex p. by charact er of w ork, per sonnel eng aged in R&D an d annual R&D ex p. per resear ch er by indu stry an d size of capit al R&D ex p. by charact er of w ork, per sonnel eng aged in R&D an d annual R&D ex p. per resear ch er by indu stry an d size of sales
12 2-38 R&D ex p. by charact er of w ork, per sonnel eng aged in R&D an d annual R&D ex p. per research er by indu stry an d size of researcher s R&D ex p. by charact er of w ork, per sonnel eng aged in R&D an d annual R&D ex p. per resear ch er by indu stry an d size of R&D exp R&D ex p. and com panies ' ow n R&D fun ds as a percent of sales by in du stry and size of em ploy ees R&D ex p. and com panies ' ow n R&D fun ds as a percent of sales by in du stry and size of capital R&D ex p. and com panies ' ow n R&D fun ds as a percent of sales by in du stry and size of com pany R&D ex p. per research er and research er s per thou san d employ ees by indu stry an d size of em ploy ees R&D ex p. per research er and research er s per thou san d employ ees by indu stry an d size of capit al Researchers and F.T equiv alent researchers by in du stry, ag e an d sex Researchers by in du stry and m ajor field of stu dy Researchers by m ajor field of stu dy an d degree Researchers by in du stry and degre Con centration rat es of R&D exp. by in du stry Con centration rat es of researcher s by indu stry Con centration rat es of t otal sales by in du stry Indu strial property Indu strial property applied and granted by right : P at ent s applied an d grant ed by field : P at ent s applied an d grant ed by n ationality : T echnological balance of paym ent s T echnological balance of paym ent s : T echnological export : F oreign t echn ology allow ances and paym ent s by nation : F oreign t echn ology allow ances and paym ent s by field : F oreign t echn ology allow ances by nation an d field : M ajor statistics of R&D activ ities in s elected countries
13 U.S.A 420 Japan 424 Germ any 427 F ran ce 430 U.K Gen eral econom ic statistics Gros s nation al produ ct s, population, GDP deflat or Indu strial production indices, price in dices, ex port, import, current balance, foreign ex ch ang e holdin g GDP per capit a in select ed countries Ex chan ge rat es 437 Appendix
14 - -. ( : R&D Ex penditure s ),. = ()
15 . 1. ( ) : : : 1967: 1982: 1983:, 1984:, 1987: 1988: 1989: 1991: 1995: OECD (FRASCAT I MANUAL), 1996: 1997: 1998: (: ) 1999: 1999: OECD
16 4.. OECD (Proposed Standard Practice for Surv ey s of Research and Experim ental Development : F RA SCAT I MANUAL) ( ),,,,,,,,,,, ( ),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (),,
17 () - 300, 1,000, '97,,, '98 () (92% ) (91%) (96% ) 267 5,520 4,532(82% ) ,480 5,425(84% ) 2,869 5., , *,
18 -,..,, 7. 8.,
19 . O ut line of the S urve y 1. Objetctive of the S urvey T h e S urv ey cov er s research an d dev elopm ent activ ities in scien ce an d t echn ology in clu din g per sonn el an d ex pen ditures. T he Surv ey aim s at providin g ba sic dat a w hich is utilized for th e est ablishm ent of n ation al policy for s cien ce an d t echn ology, an d for R&D plannin g in scien ce an d t echn ology. 2. Lega l Bas is fo r the S urvey T h e Surv ey w as approv ed a s Gen er al S t atistics N o un der th e S t atisics Law. 3. Histo ry of the S urvey o 1963 : S urv ey w a s initiat ed as th e "S t atu s surv ey of Research In stitut es" by T echn ology Dev elopm ent Bureau of Econ om ic P lannin g Board. o 1967 : Con du ctin g of S urv ey w as carried out by M inistry of S cien ce sn d T echn ology. o 1982 : S urv ey w a s appr ov ed a s Gen er al st atistics N o un der S t atistics Law. o 1983 : S urv ey it em s an d t erm s w ere redefin ed accordin g t o "UNE S CO Recom m en dation con cernin g th e Int ern ation al St an dardization of St atistics on S cien ce an d T echn ology ". o 1984 : F ull- tim e an d part - tim e research er s w ere introdu ced : proces sin g of dat a com put erized. o 1987 : Con centr ation rat e of R&D activ ities of com panies w a s added. o 1988 : F ull- tim e equiv alent resear ch er s w ere intr odu ced
20 o 1989 : S pecification of R&D ex pen diture by u sag e an d by ty pe of cost s. o 1991 : S pecification of com pany type by law an d plan of R&D ex pen diture of follow in g y ear intr odu ced. o 1995 : Surv ey it em s an d t erm s w ere redefin ed accordin g t o "OE CD P roposed S t an dar d Practice for Surv ey s of Resear ch an d Ex perim ent al Dev elopm ent : F RA S CAT I MA NUA L." o 1996 : S cien ce an d T echn ology P olicy In stitut e (S T EP I), on e of g ov ernm ent support ed research in stitut es un der the supervision of th e M OST, w a s giv en the auth ority t o con du ct th e surv ey on b eh alf of th e M OS T, A s th e ear of local aut on om y dev elops, th e relat ed surv ey it em s w ere added. o 1997 : Univ. & colleg e R&D ex pen ditures by type of or g anization an d field w a s added. o 1998 : R&D ex pen ditures by ch aract er of w ork fin an ced by g ov ernm ent w a s added. o 1999 : K orea In stitut e of S cien ce & T echn ology Ev alu ation an d Plannin g (KIS T EP ), on e of g ov ernm ent support ed research in stitut es un der th e superv ision of th e M OST, w as giv en the auth ority t o con du ct th e surv ey on beh alf of the M OS T. o 1999 : K orean St an dard In du strial Clas sification w a s introdu ced accordin g t o "OE CD P roposed S t an dar d P ractice for Surv ey s of Research an d Ex perim ent al Dev elopm ent : F RA S CA T I M A NUA L." 4. Cove rage (1) Fields of the Survey o N atural scien ces, en gin eerin g an d t echn ology, m edical scien ces an d agricultural scien ces accor din g t o "OECD P roposed St an dard Pr actice for Surv ey s of Research an d Ex perim ent al Dev elopm ent : F RA S CA T I M A NUA L" subject s of th e S urv ey
21 F ields Natural sciences Engineering and technology Scope astr onomy, bacteriology, biochemistry, biology, chemistry, computer sciences, entom ology, geology, geophy sics, m athem atics, m et eorology, mineralogy, phy sical geography, phy sics, zoology, other allied subjects engineering proper, such as chemical, civil, electrical and m echanical engineering, and special subdivision s of these; forest pr oduct s ; applied sciences such as geodesy, indu strial chemistry, etc. ;architecture; the science and technology of food production ; specialized technologies or interdisciplinary fields, e. g., sy stem s analy sis, m etallurgy, mining, textile technology, other allied subject s M edical sciences anatomy, dentistry, medicine, nur sing, obstetrics, optom etry, osteopathy, pharm acy, phy siotheraphy, public health, other allied subject s Agricultural Sciences agr onomy, anim al hu sbandry, fisheries, forestry, horticulture, v eterinary m edicine, other allied subject s o S ocial scien ces, hum anities are ex clu ded in th e Surv ey. (2) Organizations Covered in the Survey o Research in stitut es - N ation al an d public research in stitut es - Gov ernm ent support ed an d oth er n on - pr ofit research in stitut es o Univ er sities an d colleg es o M edical in stitut es w ith eighty or m ore b eds - Gen eral h ospit als o Com panies - Com plet e enum eration : com panies w ith 300 per son s or m ore em ploy ees, com panies w ith on att ach ed research in stitut e or R&D division, V enture bu sin es ses an d com panies inv olv ed R&D project s fun ded by g ov ernm ent et c. ar e in clu ded ev en if
22 th e num b er of em ploy ee is les s th en S am ple S urv ey : com panies w ith th e num b er of em ploy ee is les s th en 300 o St atu s of th e surv ey or g anization s in th e y ear 1998 Classification Number of Number of Org. Number of the Retrieval org. Carrying out R&D the Survey Org. ( Retrieval Rate) Activities Resear ch In st (92% ) 133 General Hospital (91% ) 50 Univ. and Colleges (96% ) 267 Companies 5,520 4,532(82% ) 2,419 T otal 6,480 5,425(84% ) 2, Pe riods Cove red by the S urvey Dat a on per sonn el an d capit al w ere surv ey ed a s of Decem b er 31, 1998, w hile fin an cial figures, su ch a s sales an d R&D ex pen ditures, w ere report ed for each in dividu al org anization ' s fiscal y ear com plet ed prior t o April 1, S urvey lte ms (1) Organizat ion o T ype of org anization o Div ision respon sible for R&D o M eth ods of carryin g out R&D (2) Personnel o P er sonn el en g ag ed in R&D - Research er s by m ajor filed of stu dy, degree, ag e, an d sex
23 o Num b er of t ot al em ploy ees o Other r elat ed inform ation (3) R&D Expenditures o Intram ural R&D ex pen ditures by ch ar act er of w ork, type of cost s, source of fun d s an d u sag e o R&D ex pen ditur es paid t o out side or g anization s (4) Others o A m ount of sales, m ain produ ct s, paid - in capit al, oper atin g in com e of th e com pany o N am e, location an d h ead of R&D perform in g in stitut e o Com m ent s on R&D activities by the org anization it self 7. S urvey Methods T h e Surv ey w as con du ct ed by the m ailin g m eth od. Qu estionn aires w ere m ailed directly t o com panies, univ er sities an d colleg es, an d r esearch in stitut es by th e M inistry of scien ce an d T echn ology. T h e filled - in qu estionn aires w ere return ed t o the M inistry by m ail 8. Pub licat io n of the S urvey Res ult s Com plet ed qu estionn aires w ere t abulat ed at the Ministry of S cien ce an d T echn ology. Surv ey result s are publish ed un der th e title "Report on th e S urv ey of Research an d Dev elopm ent in S cien ce an d T echn ology ". S om e of th e result s are also in clu ded in th e "S cien ce an d T echn ology A nnu al" of th e M inistry of S cien ce an d T echn ology
24 . 1. -,, -,,, (prot o - t y pe m odel ),,.. (Pilot P lant ),,
25 3..,, (). (), (),., 4....,,
26 5.. - (, ),,,,,, - - (: ) - (), ()().,. -, -,,,,, -,,.,
27 , (,, ), ( ) 6.. ( ),., <> 5(2, 3)2 1/ 4, 11/ 2, : 2+(2 ¼)+1/ 2=3 *.,
28 ..,
29 . Explanat io n of Te rms 1. Res ea rch and De ve lo pme nt Act iv it ie s o Refer to any systematic and creative work in science and technology which is undertaken in order to increase the stock of knowledge, with this knowledge utilized t o dev ise n ew application s. - S y st em atic stu dies an d creativ e effort s un dert ak en for acquisition of n ew kn ow ledg e of m at erials, fun ction s, n atural ph en om en a, et c., an d for th e u se of ex istin g kn ow ledg e t o devise n ew application s. - A ctivities dir ectly required in th e cour se of carryin g out R&D, i. e., t estin g, m easurin g, an aly zin g, an d pur ch a sin g, in st allation or con stru ction of m achin ery, apparatu s an d equipm ent. - Relat ed clerical an d fin an cial w ork. 2. Examp le s of Dis t ing uis hing R&D f ro m No n- R&D Act iv ite s (a) Prototype Model o A Prototype Model is either the sample m ade prior to the comm ercial production, or the test model for acquiring essential characteristics of prospective product. T he design, con struction and t esting of prototypes mu st be attributed to R&D. o T he design, m anufacture, and succes sful testing of a prototypes m odel, including m odification s an d im pr ov em ent s a s a result of t est failures, ar e reg arded a s R&D activ ities, w hile activities follow in g th e su cces sful com pletion of t estin g are con sidered t o b e n on - R&D activ ities. (b) Pilot Plants o A Pilot Plant is sm all scale test facility aiming at either the m anufacturing of new pr oduct s or the dev eloping of process technology
30 o T he design, construction and successful testing of a pilot plant, including m odifications an d im prov em ent s a s a result of failures, are reg arded a s R&D activ ities, w hile activities follow in g su cces sful com pletion of t estin g are con sidered t o b e n on - R&D activities. 3. R&D Expe ndit ure s by S o urce of Funds o Gov ernm ent an d Public Sect or R&D fun d s prov ided by th e central g ov ernm ent, local g ov ernm ent s, n ation al or public high er edu cation al in stitut es an d m edical in stitut es. o Private Sector R&D fun ds provided by ent erprises, g ov ernm ent inv est ed in stitut es, priv at e high er edu cation al in stitut es, priv at e m edical in stitut es, priv at e in div du als, an d oth er s. o F or eign Countries S ect or R&D fun ds receiv ed from abroad, e, g., int ern ation al org anization s, foreign g ov ernm ent s, et c. 4. R&D Expe ndit ures by Cha racte r of Wo rk o R&D Ex penditur es for Basic Resear ch R&D ex pen ditures for any ex perim ent al or th eor etical w ork un dert ak en prim arily t o acquire n ew kn ow ledg e of the un derlyin g foun dation s of ph en om en a an d ob serv able fact s, w ith out any particular or specific application or u se. o R&D Ex penditur es for Applied Research R&D ex pen ditur es for any origin al inv estig ation un dert aken in order t o acquire n ew kn ow ledg e prim arily t ow ards a specific practical aim or obj ectiv e. o R&D Ex penditur es for Ex perim ent al Dev elopm ent R&D ex pen ditures for any sy st em atic w ork, draw in g on ex istin g kn ow ledg e g ain ed from b asic an d applied research, or practical ex perien ce th at is direct ed t o produ cin g
31 n ew m at erials, produ ct s an d devices, t o in st allin g n ew proces ses, sy st em s an d serv ices, an d sub st antially im prov in g those already pr odu ced or in st alled. 5. Int ramura l R&D Expe ndit ures Intram ural R&D ex pen ditures refer t o th e t ot al am ount of m on ey spent for R&D activities w ithin an org anization, w h at ev er th e sour ce or origin of fun ds. T h e break dow n of intram ural R&D ex pen ditures is a s follow s : o Curr ent Intr amur al R&D Expenditures Current intram ural R&D ex pen ditures com prise all paym ent s m ade durin g th e referen ce y ear for th e perform an ce of R&D activ ities w ithin th e st atistical unit cov erin g lab or, oth er current cost s. - Lab or cost s : T h e t ot al am ount of m on ey paid t o "per sonn el en g ag ed in R&D ". T his com prises t ot al w ag es an d salaries in clu din g bonu ses, pen sion s an d all oth er r elat ed labor cost s b efore dedu ction of v ariou s dedu ction s su ch a s, contribution s t o pen sion fun d s an d com pulsory social security sy st em s, in com e t ax es, et c. H ow ev er, th e lab or cost s for per sonn el prov idin g in dir ect serv ices (su ch a s security gu ards, j anit or s, et c.)sh ould b e ex clu ded an d a ssign ed t o th e sub cat eg ory "other current cost ". In the ca se of part - tim e research er s, lab or cost s should b e com put ed con siderin g their w orkin g tim e dev ot ed t o R&D activ ities. A s t o R&D project s receiv ed from out side, lab or cost s ex pen ded for im plem entin g th e project s are in clu ded. F or high er edu cation in stitut es, research sub sidies an d allow an ces paid by supportin g a ssociation s, univ er sities or colleg es are in clu ded. H ow ev er, lab or cost for t eachin g an d academ ic guidan ce are ex clu ded. - Other curr ent cost s T h ese com prise all oth er current intram ur al ex pen ditures su ch as ex perim ent al m at erials, office an d lab orat ory supplies, sub scription s t o journ als, b ook s, rent al of buildin g s, m aint en an ce, trav el an d public serv ice fees, et c
32 o Capital Intramural Expenditures Capit al intram ural ex pen ditures com prise all pay m ent s m ade durin g th e referen ce y ear for m achin ery, apparatu s, equipm ent, lan d, buildin g s an d oth er relat ed it em s. - M achin ery, apparatu s an d equipm ent T h ese com prise th e purch a se an d in st allation of ex perim ent al apparatu s, m achin ery an d equipm ent. T h ese ex pen ditur es also in clu de th e repair an d m aint en an ce ex pen ses t o ex t en d th e u seful life an d in cr ea se th e v alu e of th e fix ed as set s. - Lan d, buildin g s an d v ehicles T h ese com prise th e purch ase of lan d, ships, v ehicles an d con stru ction of n ew m ain an d aux iliary buildin g s in clu din g pur ch a se, m odification s, et c. T h ese ex pen ditures also in clu de the repair an d m aint en an ce ex pen ses t o ex t en d th e u seful life an d in crea se th e v alu e of th e fix ed a s set s. 6. Pe rs o nne l Engaged in R&D Act ivit ies (a) Researchers - P er sonn el w ho h old a univ er sity degree or it s equiv alent, an d w h o perform R&D project s (in clu ded also per sonn el en g ag ed in adm inistration an d m an ag em ent, w h o form erly h eld r esearch career s ). - In th e ca se of th e higher edu cation sect or, school per sonn el ab ov e th e lev el of in stru ct or, post gr adu at e stu dent s in th e doct or ' s cour se an d per sonn el w h o h old a univ er sity degree or equiv alent kn ow ledg e in a special field w h o are en g ag ed in an att ach ed R&D in stitut e perform in g R&D project s. (b) Full Time Eq uivalent (FTE) R&D Personnel Num ber of F T E R&D per sonn el is ba sed on th e m easurem ent unit representin g on e per son w orkin g full- tim e for a giv en period, it sh ould be u sed t o conv ert figur es relatin g t o the num b er of part - tim e w ork er s int o th e num b er of full- tim e w ork er s. < Ex am ple> If out of fiv e research er s, t w o w ork full- tim e, t w o w ork for a qu art er of th eir tim e
33 an d th e rem ainin g, on e spen ds only a h alf of his w orkin g tim e, th en the num b er of F T E research er s w ould b e 2 + (2) + 1/ 2 = 3. Roun din g of figures w ill be applied. (c) Assistant Researchers P er sonn el w ho a s sist research er s perform in g ex perim ent s, t estin g, m ea surem ent s, et c., un der th eir dir ection an d superv ision. In th e ca se of th e high er edu cation sect or, post gradu at e stu dent s in the m ast er ' s cour se en g ag ed in R&D activities are in clu ded. P er sonn el w h o perform t echnical serv ice un der th e direction an d superv ision of research er s an d as sist ant resear ch er s. In th e case of th e high er edu cation sect or, post gradu at e in th e m a st er ' s cour se en g ag ed in R&D activities are in c. (d) Other Support Personnel P er sonn el w h o ar e en g ag ed in secret arial, fin an cial an d m iscellan eou s w ork relat ed t o R&D activ ities
34 . '99,,, '98 () 113,366. '97121, % 10%, 7.0%GDP (0.8% ). (GDP ) 2.52%'972.69% 1) 0.17%, GNI 2.56%2.70%0.14%. '98 113, , 82, : %79,721, 18.5%2995, 11.2%12,651. '98 '97212,1176.1% (12,926) 199,191, 129,767.(6.3% ) 12,587, 51,162, 66, %, 11.6%, 5.3%. '9737,8592,748, 7.3%40,607. '98'9730.1(FT E : 22.3)27.9(FT E : 19.9), 1 87,361(FT E : 122,504) '9788,024(F T E : 118,701)662, 0.8%.( 3,803, 3.2% ) : 1) ' %, '99 GDP () ,366, 7.0% '98,, 2,
35 3, ,8588,492, 7.0%. 10%, 7.0%GDP (0.8%). '98' '97113,720 13,266, 11.7%., '98IMF. 5'9719.6%' %2.1%, 4.5%. GDP '90 '98, '97 '98' %. < 1> '95 2 ) () (% ) () (% ) (% ) (% ) ,069 19,852 24,542 28,173 33,499 41,584 49,890 61,530 78,947 94, , , , ,845 24,520 28,409 30,966 49,356 55,264 61,603 70,964 84,572 94, , , ,454p ) p ) p ) : 1) p ) 2) 90'90(GNP), '90(GNI) 3) '99 GDP '
36 < 2> (: ) ('98) ('98) ('97) ('98) ('97) ('97) 8, , ,275 49,316 31,681 24, GDP(% ) 2.52p ) 2.79p ) p ) : 1). 2) p ). '98, 79,721, 2 995, 12, %, 9.9%, 0.5%. 18.5%, 11.2%, 70.3%,. < 1> (: )
37 : 2995 '98 '97 306, 1.5% 2995, 9.1% 19,189, 42.5% 1, : 8, 3,800, 15,993, 1, ,288 (63.3% ), 3,155(15.0% ), 3,510(16.7% ), 748(3.6% ), 295(1.4% ). : 12,651 '98 12, %, 6,587 6, : 4897, 4,583, 8,067. 2,343, 6,209, 891, 2,145, 1, % 2.7% 49.1%. : 79,721 '98 79,721'9788,543 8,732, 9.9%. 4,7427 4, : 94.0, 71,302, 8,
38 < 3 > () ,852 24,542 28,173 33,499 41,584 49,890 61,530 78,947 94, , , ,366 5,627 5,881 5,898 7,311 9,042 10,603 13,106 15,406 17,667 18,956 20,689 20,994 1,981 2,328 2,292 2,443 2,886 3,029 4,447 6,089 7,709 10,188 12,716 12,651 12,244 16,333 19,983 23,745 29,656 36,258 43,977 57,452 69,030 79,636 88, (% ) (% )
39 < 2> < 2>. '98, 3518, 82, %, 11.2%. 27 : 73'9723 : 77. < 3 > (: )
40 < 4 > (: ) () - () - () - - : 78,947 (28.3) 12,602 (21.3) 66,345 (29.7) - 16 : 84 94,406 (19.6) 17,809 (41.3) 76,597 (15.4) : ,780 (15.2) 23,977 (34.7) 84,667 (10.5) : ,858 (12.0) 28,507 (18.9) 93,233 (10.1) : ,366 (7.0) 30,518 (7.1) 82,764 (11.2) : 73 () 15,406 (17.5) 17,667 (15.3) 18,956 (7.3) 20,689 (9.1) 20,995 (1.5) - () 9,829 (15.4) 11,641 (18.4) 15,425 (32.5) 17,592 (19.9) 19,189 (9.1) - () 5,577 (21.5) 6,026 (8.1) 3,525 (- 41.5) 3,095 (- 12.2) 1,781 (42.5) : 64 : : : : : 8 () 6,089 (36.9) 7,709 (26.6) 10,188 (32.2) 12,716 (24.8) 12,651 (0.5) - () 1,710 (106.3) 3,744 (118.9) 5,055 (35.1) 6,613 (30.8) 6,587 (0.4) - () 4,379 (21.0) 3,965 (9.5) 5,104 (28.7) 6,036 (18.3) 6,035 (0.0) : 28 : : : : : 48 () 57,452 (30.6) 69,030 (20.2) 79,636 (15.4) 88,453 (11.1) 79,721 (9.9) - () 1,063 (1.8) 2,424 (128.0) 3,497 (44.9) 4,303 (23.0) 4,742 (10.2) - () 56,389 (31.3) 66,606 (18.1) 79,037 (14.2) 84,102 (10.6) 74,948 (10.9) : 2 : 98 4 : 96 2 : 98 4 : 96 6 :
41 < 4 > (1998 ) <> <>,,,,. < 4 > : OECD governmentother national sources
42 '98 113,366 < 5> 3,731,, 68 3,795, 13,409, 1,258, 704, 570, 11, 23, 19 15,993, 463, 22, 420, ,203, 5,293, 563, 1,338, 293, 69, 28 5,91912,651, 231, 8, 27 8,138 8,419, 4,141, 284, 63, 82, 4, 28 66,698 71,302. < 5>. 98%. < 5 > ( '98 ) (: ) (A ) 373,113 6, ,782 1,473,486 28,121 92, , , ,844 28,058 6,669, ,342 8,515,220 2,821,397 (B) 379,951 1,599, ,251 1,265, ,902 7,130,171 11,336,617 (A/ B ) 98.2% 7.9% 23.4% 39.9% 96.7% 93.5% 75.1%
43 < 5 > (1998 ) (: ) 373,113 1,340,904 46, , ,637 23, ,134 2,726,887 (98.20) (83.84) (38.50) (60.80) (31.07) (2.74) (5.81) (24.05) , ,732 28, , ,753 (0.11) (7.86) (0.82) (6.05) (3.55) (0.10) (0.40) (1.88) 367 1,888 28,121 2,708 4,167 1,166 6,315 44,733 (0.10) (0.12) (23.39) (0.59) (0.52) (0.14) (0.09) (0.39) ,717 1, ,432 (0.02) (0.04) (0.25) (14.12) (0.18) (0.00) (0.00) (0.59) , , ,298 (0.06) (0.03) (0.05) (0.25) (54.20) (0.00) (0.00) (3.88) ,389 2,179 18,826 10, ,844 8, ,499 (0.14) (4.40) (1.81) (4.11) (1.30) (96.67) (0.12) (8.15) 5,204 56,966 42,040 63,792 72,041 2,711 6,669,829 6,912,582 (1.37) (3.56) (34.96) (13.92) (8.93) (0.32) (93.54) (60.98) - 2, , ,823 8,433 (0.00) (0.14) (0.22) (0.16) (0.26) (0.03) (0.04) (0.07) 379,951 1,599, , , , ,902 7,130,171 11,336,617 (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00) 113,366((100%) 2,726,887 (24.05%) 212,753 (1.88%) 44,733 (0.39%) 67,432 (0.59%) 439,298 (3.88%) 924,499 (8.15%) 6,912,582 (60.98%) 8,433 (0.07%) : ( )
44 . (,, ) 15,854, 28,485, 69,028 '98, 15,854, 28,48569,0281.9%, 17.9% 2.8%. 14.0%, 25.1%, 60.9%,. 50.4%. 90.8%, 69.2%, 31.9%, 12.8%. < 7 > (: ) ,947 (100% ) 94,406 (100% ) 108,780 (100% ) 121,858 (100% ) 113,366 (100% ) - (% ) ,319 (14.3% ) 11,768 (12.5% ) 14,390 (13.2% ) 16,165 (13.3% ) 15,854 (14.0% ) - (% ) ,808 (23.8% ) 23,621 (25.0% ) 29,273 (26.9% ) 34,706 (28.5% ) 28,485 (25.1% ) - (% ) ,820 (61.9% ) 59,017 (62.5% ) 65,117 (59.9% ) 70,987 (58.2% ) 69,028 (60.9% ) - (% ) : ( )
45 , '97 1.5% 5,615, 33.9%, 7,412, 3.5% 7, %, 35.3%, 37.9%. 5,0730.5%, 4,275, 3, %, 6.6%, '9737.8%40.1%, 31.5%33.8%, 30.7%26.1%. 5,166, 16,797, 57, %, 28.0%, 28.6%, 6.5%, 21.0%, 72.5%. < 7 >,,
46 < 8 >, 84.7%6 7,542(41,383, 26,160), 15.3%1 2, %6167(3 6,944, 23,223), 6.6%4,225 '97. < 9 > < > < >
47 . 87,754, 25,612 '98 '9794, % 87,754, '9727,585, 7.2% 25, % 38,805, 8.3% 48, % 2624, 17.1% 4,988. ' % 43.2%, 22.6%. < 8 > (:, % ) '95 '96 '97 ' : ( ). 94, ,616(75.9% ) ,604(33.5% ) ,012(42.4% ) ,790(24.1% ) ,759(17.7% ) 3.6 6,031(6.4% ) , ,333(75.7% ) ,215(33.3% ) ,118(42.4% ) ,447(24.3% ) ,505(17.9% ) ,942(6.4% ) , ,273(77.4% ) ,912(33.6% ) ,361(43.8% ) ,585(22.6% ) ,570(17.7% ) ,015 (4.9% ) , ,754(77.4% ) ,805(34.2% ) ,949(43.2% ) ,612(22.6% ) ,624(18.2% ) 4.4 4,988(4.4% ) 17.1, 18.0% 11.9%.,. IMF,., IMF,
48 < 9 > (1998 ) (:, % ) 113,366(100% ) ,995(100% ) ,651(100% ) ,721(100% ) ,754(77.4% ) ,970(80.8) ,146(80.2) ,638(76.1) ,805(34.2% ) 5.2 6,429(30.6) 3.1 4,245(33.6) ,131(35.3) ,949(43.2% ) ,541(50.2) 6.6 5,901(46.6) ,506(40.8) ,612(22.6% ) 7.2 4,025(19.2) ,504(19.8) ,083(23.9) ,624(18.2% ) 4.4 2,260(10.8) ,900(15.0) ,465(20.7) 1.9 4,988(4.4% ) ,765 (8.4) (4.8) ,619(3.3) 24.0 : ( ). < 9 > (: % ) ( '98) ('95) ('95) ('93) ('94) ('96) :,. 1) '98 86,354'9797, %, 2.47% 0.12% 2.35% '972.65%'982.64%0.01%
49 5.25%, 4.81%, 4.24%. < 11> 34%. < 10 > (: %) (%) (%) 8,845,307 9,704, * 2.47 * 7,972,073 8,635, ,166 13, ,913 16, ,196 4, , , ,371, ,126 7,606, , ,439,212 84,396 6,752,225 87, ,154 42, ,491 44, ,985 46, ,143 37, , , , , ,680 96, ,614 79, , , , , , , ,969 53, ,355,775 3,456, ,088,045 3,356, ,280 67, ,367 61, ,281,123 14,800 2,348,138 15, ,681,520 42,054 1,848,196 31, , , , , , , * 1.09 * 282, , , , , , , , , , ,003 75, ,692 61, : 1) *. (: , / : , )
50 2) '98'972.25% '982.17%, '972.57%2.52%. 6.38%, 4.42%. < 11> (: % ) ('98) ('96) ('97) ('93) ('95) ('97) < 12 > ('98) (6.38% ) (4.42% ) (4.14% ) (3.86% ) (2.75% ) ('95) (10.4% ) (8.1% ) (8.0% ) (8.0% ) (8.0% ) ('97) (8.06% ) (6.28%) (6.05% ) (6.01%) (5.24% ) ('95) (26.7% ) (5.8% ) (5.1%) (5.0% ) (4.9% ) ('98) (2.87%) (2.26%) (1.81% ) (1.55%) (1.20% ) : ( )
51 . '9879,7216 8,838(86.3% ) 1882(13.7% ).,,. < 13 > (1998 ) (: ) 7,972,073(100% ) 6,883,835(86.3% ) 1,088,238(13.7% ) - 19,913 10,458 9,455-66,661 66, ,439,212(100% ) 5,588,558(86.8% ) 850,654(13.2% ) 84,396 68,857 15,539 45,491 37,157 8,334, 38,143 30,480 7, , , ,189 79,614 69,544 10, , ,975 12,910 62,969 23,852 39, , ,693 98,903 3,088,045 2,785, ,542,, 74,367 6,664 67,703 1,681,520 1,563, ,012 42,054 7,382 34, , ,202 3, , ,476 8, , ,613 11, , , ,672-57,692 47,823 9,869 : ( )
52 < 14 > (1998 ) (: % ) ' % ' %, %, %'97. 10% (242)87.0%
53 < 10 > 15 > (: ) ,365,463 1,941,479 22,384,897 2,572,487 3,184,615 3,202,927 (31.04% ) (33.79% ) (34.55% ) (32.30% ) (36.00% ) (40.18% ) 10 1,763,098 2,509,524 3,123,223 3,543,307 4,249,072 3,960,851 (40.09% ) (43.68% ) (45.24% ) (44.49% ) (48.04% ) (49.68% ) 20 2,274,852 3,123,612 3,968,935 4,497,535 5,252,038 4,842,928 (51.72% ) (54.37% ) (57.50% ) (56.48% ) (59.38% ) (60.75% ) 4,397,706 5,745,280 6,902,981 7,963,611 8,845,307 7,972,073 (100% ) (100% ) (100% ) (100% ) (100% ) (100% ) 2,864 2,179 2,150 2,435 2,507 2,
54 2.. '98199,191'9712,926, 6.1%, 6.3%129,767, 13.0% 50,719, 21.7% 18, ,431, 92,591, 87,169. < 16 > (: ) ,390 28,448 28,448 11,663 6, ,720 32,117 30,309 19,493 7, ,524 37,103 34,857 25,153 8, ,516 41,473 39,043 24,152 7, ,430 47,042 43,694 30,465 9, ,288 52,783 48,463 32,923 10, ,737 56,545 51,978 35,720 12, ,357 66,220 61,335 38,655 14, ,512 70,503 65,468 42,841 12, ,983 76,252 72,607 44,772 10, ,947 88,764 82,891 46,625 13, ,073 98,764 93,680 44,548 12, , ,446 89,018 56,802 16, , , ,456 57,474 15, , ,023 99,433 55,647 14, , , ,660 58,310 15, , ,767 92,541 50,719 18,705 19,431 12,587 10,952 4,054 2,790 92,591 51,162 21,525 32,406 9,023 87,169 66,018 60,064 14,259 6,
55 . 129,767(FT E :92,541), 6.3% (FT E :9.9% ) (headcount )(FT E : full- tim e equiv alent ). (headcount ) (FT E ) ( ). (F T E )OECD. '98 (headcount ) 6.3% 129,767, (FT E ) 9.9% 92, %. < 17 > () , , , , , ,767 93,680 89, ,456 99, ,660 92,541 16,068 15,465 15,007 15,503 15,185 12,587 28,618 42,700 44,683 45,327 48,588 51,162 54,078 59,281 68,625 71,193 74,665 66, (21.2) 26.3 (19.9) 28.5 (22.3) 29.0(21.8) 30.1(22.3) 27.9 (19.9) (% ) (10.8) (% )
56 : 117,405, : 12, ,405, 12,317'97 9.6%, 1.8%, 9.1%9.5%. < 18 > '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 () 98, , , , , ,767 (% ) () 92, , , , , ,405 (% ) () 6,590 9,052 10,235 11,166 12,545 12,317 (% ) : 19.9(FT E ) F T E ' (22.3), < 19>. < 19 > ( '98) ('93) ('97) ('97) ('96) ('96) ('97) 92, , , , , ,000 71,
57 . '98 ' % 12,587, 5.3% 51,162, 11.6% 66,018, 9.7%, 39.4%, 50.9%. < 11> (1998 ) < > < > < > : %.. '9712.2% 21,548, 7.6% 81,748, 15.5% 10,548, 13.3% 5,553, 57.8% 10, %, 63.0%, 8.1%, 4.3%, 8.0%
58 < 20> (:) ,220 70,503 76,252 88,764 98, , , , , ,767 9,449 10,088 11,041 12,583 14,378 18,629 23,383 23,483 24,539 21,548 41,962 45,751 51,748 60,168 64,629 74,809 78,936 84,358 88,433 81,748 7,869 7,766 7,002 8,317 9,504 10,784 10,343 11,854 12,489 10,548 4,729 4,663 4,897 5,617 7,424 6,391 6,705 6,855 6,407 5,553 2,211 2,235 1,564 2,079 2,829 6,833 8,948 5,473 6,570 10,370 16,229 17,662 18,836 22,484 26,813 33,998 35,105 36,106 37,859 40,607 19,520 20,459 21,310 25,717 29,205 38,725 44,178 46,537 49,999 44,077 28,953 30,710 34,167 36,962 38,950 40,893 44,991 45,084 45,828 40,034 1,518 1,672 1,939 3,601 3,796 3,830 4,041 4,296 4,752 5, '97 7.3% 40,607, 11.8% 44,077, 12.6% 40,034, 6.3% 5,049,
59 31.3%, 34.0%, 30.9%, 3.9%. 78.2%, 89.5%. < 21> (1998 ) (: ) 129,767(100) 12,587(9.7) 51,162(39.4) 66,018(50.9) 40,607(100) 4,825(11.9) 31,740(78.2) 4,042(10.0) 44,077(100) 5,904(13.4) 16,906(38.4) 21,267(48.2) 40,034(100) 1,720(4.3) 2,482(6.2) 35,832(89.5) 5,049(100) 138(2.7) 34(0.7) 4,877(96.6) :( ).. '98 < 12> ' < 12>
60 . 1 (F T E ) 1122,504 '98 1 '97118,7013.2% 122,504, 191,697, 58,772, 132,326. < 22> 1 (: ) '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 () - (%) 88,687 (67,220) 14.2 (7.9) 93,978 (73,574) 6.0 (9.5) 109,401 (82,395) 16.4 (12.0) 118,701 (88,620) 8.6 (7.6) 122,504 (87,361) 3.2 (1.4) 107,901 (99,619) - (%) 26.5 (22.1) 123,005 (117,726) 14.0 (18.2) 138,044 (122,274) 12.2 (3.9) 156,545 (145,155) 13.4 (18.7) 191,697 (166,797) 22.5 (14.9) 35,062 (14,259) - (%) 8.2 (8.2) 39,725 (17,253) 13.3 (21.0) 52,293 (22,477) 31.6 (30.3) 64,967 (26,171) 24.2 (16.4) 58,772 (24,727) 9.5 (5.5) 100,136 (96,916) - (%) 18.9 (19.2) 103,513 (100,590) 3.4 (3.8) 120,264 (111,859) 16.2 (11.2) 126,595 (118,466) 5.3 (5.9) 132,326 (120,756) 4.8 (1.9) : ( )(head count ), 17('93), 19('97), 24('95), 23('96), 15('96). < 23 > 1 ' ('98) ('93) ('97) ('97) ('98) ('96) () 8, , ,275 48,339 31,681 22,466 () 92, , , , , ,000 (1) (10.4) (6.8) (2.5) (1.7) (1.6) () (1) : ( )1 (2.0) (2.2) (2.3) (2.3) (1.8)
61 ' , 67.5, 117.5, < 24 > (: ) '95 '96 '97 '98 () () 1,521,926 68,625 1,470,462 71,193 1,374,573 74,665 1,115,996 66, , , ,
62 . '98 66,018, 520, %, 1025, %, 2031, % '97. 10%(242 )73.3%. < 25 > (: ) '95 '96 '97 ' ,434 (26.9% ) 19,380 (27.2% ) 21,367 (28.6% ) 20,038 (30.35% ) 10 24,017 (35.0% ) 26,304 (37.0% ) 27,505 (36.8% ) 25,117 (38.05% ) 20 23,803 (45.8% ) 33,307 (46.8% ) 34,823 (46.6% ) 31,065 (47.06% ) 59,281 (100% ) 71,193 (100% ) 74,665 (100% ) 66,018 (100% ) 2,152 2,435 2,507 2, OECD (Globalization ) '95. '986,057'97 4, %, ' 973.7% 1.6%5.3%. 54.4%3,295, 40.0%2,420,,. < 26>
63 < 26 > (: ) '97 '98 14,277(3.2% ) 12,864(2.8% ) 266(0.1% ) 997(0.2% ) 2,864(0.6% ) 29,530(6.5% ) 257(0.1% ) 64,774(14.3% ) 241,856(53.5% ) 339,281(74.9% ) 5,212(0.9% ) 5,717(0.9% ) 95(0.0% ) 890(0.1% ) 9,683(1.6% ) 88,809(14.7% ) - 153,173(25.3% ) 329,502(54.4% ) 581,167(95.9% ) 85,236(18.7% ) 12,676(2.1% ) 452,921(100% ) 605,757(100% ) : ( )(% ). : : 50% : 50% : 50% : : 4. OECD '95, '98 <27> (18.7% ), (16.8% ), (16.1% ), 50%. '97,,,,, '96,,,
64 < 27 > (: % ) ' ' < 28>. < 28 > (: % ) : 1) '98,, -, 2) '96. : Basic Science and T echnology Statstics (1998.3), OECD
65 5., '96., %, 20.10%, 16.39%, 23.59% 22.47%, 10.98%. < 29 > (: % ) %. '96. < 30 > (: % ) '96 '97 ' % 74.39% 74.81% 67.51% 66.57% 62.65%
66
67 . 1. : : - : e : p : 2... S t atis tic al T able s N ote s for S t atis tic al T able s 1. Symbols used in tables ar e : : less than unit value : data not available - : data not applicable e : data estimated p : data provisional 2. Details may not add to the t otal becau se of r ounding
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
ๆญฏ95_dbtech.PDF
: ( ) : ( ) - 685 - 1. 2..,,.,. 3... 1) - 687 - 2) - - - 94(1) 3).,. 4. 1 (1994 ),,.,,,,,.,. ( ),. - 688 - 5.,. 6.,,,,. - 689 - SUMMARY A Study on the Standardization for the Classification of Database
More information์ ๋ด์.PDF
A pplic ation of Continu ou s P re fle x Com po s it e Girder to Rig id F ram e by V ertic al Lo adin g 2001 2 A pplic ation of Continu ou s P re fle x Com po s it e Girder to Rig id F ram e by V ertic
More information์ต์ข ๋ณด๊ณ ์(196085).PDF
Vi deo Pr ogr am on t he Recent Technol ogy f or Pi g Pr oduct i on . 1999. 12. : : :,, :,, :,, :,, :,, :,, :,, :,, :,, :,, :, ( ) - 1 - .. U R,.,. 50,,,. 50%. 95 14, 96 37, 97 51, 98 88,. 1) PSY 25 2).
More informationa16.PDF
,,,, A B S T RA CT A S t u dy on S erv ic e Ch ara ct eri s t ic s of D ire c t ors of H e alt h Cen t ers in K ore a T his stu dy h as attempted to show general characteristics of health centre director
More information( )๋ฐ์ฉ์ฃผ97.PDF
DDA D D A 1 ) 1. D DA 1 ). D D A DDA (Doh a Developm en t Agen d a ) 194 7 GATT (Gen er a l Agr eem en t On T a r r ifs a n d T r a d e ; ) 9, 199 5 WT O. 1994 ( 1986-94 ) WT O,. D DA. WT O 2 ). GAT T
More informationๆญฏ320133.PDF
97-3 1 9 9 7 : () : ( ) () . 1. 1 1 1 3 1 3 2 3 3 4 2 5 1 5 1. 5 2. 5 3. 5 2 6 1. 6 2. 13 3 14 1 14 2 17 1. 18 2. 20 3. 21 4. 21 5. 23 - i - 4 1997 25 1. 25 2. 25 3. 25 4. 26 5. 28 5 34 36 Abs tract 39
More information:. 1. (,1995)..,, (,1994)..,.(,1989).,,,, (,1995).,,,, (,,,,1998)., (W oods,1985).. (1995) 7.8%, 17.3%, 61.5%. (,1995) 20-80%,, 5% (Hamilton, P arry, Alagm a, Blum enthal, and H erz,1984). 1 25 40% (,3196
More informationๆญฏ PDF
: :. 1.., 67 34 10.,, (,1989). (1994)., (,1992). (1989),, 64:36, 61:40., (Diann,1983),, 65 10%, 80 20% (F reda, 1987).. (1995) 8 3.,,. 2.,,,.. 1),,. 2)? 3)? 3. 1),.. 2).. 1..,, 3,,,.,..,,. Leonard B. Breen..
More information์ด์์ง.PDF
A S tudy on Elem entary S chool Children 's S ex u al Know ledg ea ttiude and A ctu al S t ate of S ex Educ ation 200 12 A S tudy on Elem entary S chool Children 's S ex u al Know ledg ea ttiude and A
More informationๆญฏ PDF
: :. 1., (w ife- abu se). 1983 42.2%, 40-60% (, 1993 ;, 1996 ;, 1992). tkdekae 20-40% ( YW CA, 1996 ;, 1994).,. (, 1996)..,, (, ),,.,,,.,, (1996) (1996),.,.,. 2., . 1). 2). 3). 3. - (sabo- m asochistic),..,,,
More information334 ้ ๆบช ๅญธ ๊ณผ ๅ ๆ ๆ ๅ ็ฌฌ 55 ่ ่ง ่ชช ์์๋ ๋ฟ์ด ๋ ๋ง๊ณผ ๊ณ ์์ด๋ผ๋ ๊ธฐํ์ ๋๋ฌผ์ ์์ฌ๋ก ํ์ฌ ๋น๋ ์ ์น ์ ํฉ์ ๋นํํ์๊ณ , ็ฝ ้ป ้ฃ ์์๋ ์ ๊ณผ ์ ์ ์์งํ๋ ์๊น์ธ ็ฝ ๊ณผ ้ป ์ด ์๋ก ๋ฒ์ด ๋ ๋ฌธ๋ต์ ํตํ์ฌ ์ณ๊ณ ๊ทธ๋ฆ์ ๊ฐ์น๊ด์ด ์ ๋๋ ํ์ค์ธ
ๅ ๅก ๆดช ๅฎ ้ ์ ๋ ผ์ค๋ฅ ์ฐ๋ฌธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ็ฆน ่ ่ฑ *1) ์ฐจ ๋ก. ์๋ก . ์น๊ทผํ ์์ฌ๋ฅผ ํตํ ๊ณต๊ฐ์ ํ๋. ๋ฌธ๋ต์ ์์ ๋ฐฉ์์ ํตํ ๋ ผ๋ฆฌ์ฑ์ ๊ฐํ. ์ฐ์ธ์ ์์ ๋ฐฉ์์ ํตํ ํ์ค ๋นํ. ๊ฒฐ๋ก ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ด๋ก ๅ ๅก ๆดช ๅฎ ้ ์ ไป ็ฅ ์์ ่ ๅฎ ์ฐ๊ฐ์ ํ๋ํ ๋ฌธ์ธ ๊ด๋ฃ์ด๋ค. ํ์ฐ์์ ๋ฌธ์ง์ธ ๅ ๅก ้ ์ ์์ ์์๋ฌธ์ด ๋๋ถ๋ถ์ ๋น์ค์ ์ฐจ์งํ๊ณ , ่จ ่ชช ๅบ ๋ฑ์ ์ฐ๋ฌธ
More informationๆญฏ PDF
: :. 1..,.., 1-2, (1980, 1983).,...,, (M oghadam, Rosen and Carpent er 1989)..,,.. 2... 1. .,,,,, (1989)., (M artin 1984).,,. 1.8, 2.3. 9012, 3,,,. 11.915.7%, 47.4%. 47.8%.( 1989).. (M artin and Ickovics
More informationๆญฏ320.PDF
Thermo Orion Model 320 PerpHecT Meter I. 1 II. A. 2 B. Keypad 3 III. A. 4 B. 4 IV. A. 5 B. 5 C. setup 6 V. ph A. 7 B. ph 8 VI. LogR ph A. 10 B. LogR? 11 C. LogR 12 VII. mv/ ORP/ A. mv 13 B. (, ) 13 VIII.
More information:,,. 1., (m en opau se)'.,.,,, (empty n est syn drom e)',, (Kizilay, 1992).. 40 50., (vital force), (spiritu al w ell- being ). (, 1984)..,,,,,,. (, 1994).,., (W elln ess ). (Spiritu al w ell- bein g ),.,,,,,,.,,..
More informationๆญฏ PDF
:,, : :. 1. (, 1984 : Stuart, and Sundeen, 1987 : H ack er, 1981). ( 1993). (, 1983). (Carrea, an d Calderone, 1981)., (, 1983 :, 1983). (,, 1986), (, 1983).,., (,, 1986 :, 1983). 1970,,, (, 1983 :, 1990).
More information์ก๋์ฐ.PDF
IS O/ IE C 170 25 A S tu dy on th e Qu ality S y s t em b a s e d on IS O/ IE C 17025 200 1 2 IS O/ IE C 170 25 A S tu dy on th e Qu ality S y s t em b a s e d on IS O/ IE C 17025 200 1 2 200 1 2 .,. ISO(
More information์์ฑ09E02๋ฐ์์.PDF
: * 1 ) 2 ) 3 ) 4 ) 1 ) 5 ) 6 ). 1.,., (cont ent - ba sed cu rricu la ) (pr ocess- b a sed cu rricu la ),,,,,., -, (Ben -Zu r, Ya gil & Spit zer, 1999 ; H egge, 19 9 5 ; Oer m a n n, 19 94 : Spit ser,
More informationๆญฏ์ ์ฉ์นด๋์์ฅํ์.PDF
2002. 11-4 - ,.. : Tel 3771-0230 / Fax 3771-0130 / E- mail ajh@fki.or.kr - 5 - - - 1. / 4 2. / 4 2.1 2.2 2.3 3. / 7 3.1 3.2 3.3 4. / 17 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 5. / 30 5.1 5.2 5.3 6. / 35 : / 39-6
More informationๆญฏ๋ ผ๋ฌธ์๊ท๋ง.PDF
3 3.1 (Lim it Equilibrium M eth od ),,, Coulom b,..,... = 0, F elleniu s, Bishop, Janbu, Spencer, M org en stern and Price, (GLE ),,,. 4.(Dun can & W right, 1980) 1) F., F = S (3.1), S = (Sh ear Stren
More informationๆญฏ์๋ฃ3-124.PDF
OE CD ( ( ) / ) hby @as ians ig n.c om 1.... 1). (T ax Jurisdiction ). (EU ). OECD (CF A : Comm itt ee of F iscal A ffairs ),, (T A Gs : T echn ology A dvisory Group s ). OECD., OECD. OECD (EU ). 2. 1997
More informationๆญฏ์ฐ๋ณด99-6.PDF
. 1. 45),,,. (N ICB), (CAIF),, (IRC : Insurance Research Cou ncil), III(In surance Inform ation Institu te), CAIF, Connin g & Com p any. Conning - 1996 Conning frau d Survey 46) - (IRC). Conning s Survey
More informationhwp
, 14% 18,300.,. ( ),.. 14 % 18,3 0 0., " "., ( ) " ".,... (E PA) (CARB ). " E PA ".. 9 6 5 1 0 1 5 %. CARB ( ). . "9 9 E PA, ".,. 1 3 [H P E 1 0 0 M ]., 7 2 0 0, 5 0 0.,.. " ".., 1 0 %., " 2 0 % ".,. '
More informationh99-37.PDF
1 ).,....,.,. 99,,,.,. I. ( ). 1) 99 / 1999 ( 8 4 ), (, 1999a ). 2) < 1>. 70 90 90. (66 79 ) 66 73 2,000 (66 72 ) 600 (7 1 ) 77 79 1,000. 80 82 1,263 770, 88 900. < 1> ( 1966-1998) : ; (1976-1997), (1998
More informationํ๊ตญ ํ์ต ์ฐธ๊ณ ์ ํํฉ์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ..hwp
41 - - 20035 - - 20035 20035 < >,,.,.., 2 20.,,.,.,,,.,,,.,.,, (W ork Sheet )., - i - ,.,. 2-3, Data,, DB,. DB,.,.,.,..,.,,, ( / ). - ii - < > 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 4 2 5 1 5 2 8 1. 8 2. 10 3. 14 3 19 3 24 1 24
More information๋ ผ๋ฌธ์์ ๋ณธ.PDF
200 1 2 200 1 2. . 200 1 2 < >. 1 1. 1 2. 3 3. 11. 16 1. 16 2. ( ) 24 (1) ( ) 24 (2) 28 (3) 35 3. 39 (1) 39 (2) 47 4. 57 (1) 57 (2) 65. 68 < > 73 ...,,,.,,,.,,.. . 1. 1970. 40 100 13,. 6.25,, 1970. 1980,..,.
More informationๆญฏ PDF
,, iii iii iv I 1 1 1 2 4 3 7 II 8 1 8 1. (Pluralism ) 8 2. (Corporatism ) 12 2 18 1. 18 2. 20 3 25 III 30 1 30 1. 30 2. 36 2 : 39 3 43 IV 45 i 1 45 1. : 45 2. 59 2 61 1. : 61 2. 62 3 66 V 69 1 69 1.
More informationๆญฏFFF01288.PDF
1 9 9 6 M. Div : 1 9 9 6 M. Div . 1 9 9 6 10.,.., (?),.....,..!.!..,...........,,..,.,.,...... ...... ( ).,,,..,,,,,.....,...,..,. 1996 12 12 . 1 A. 1 B. 3. - 7 A., 7 1. 7 2. ( ) 9 B. ( ) 12 1. 12 2. 14
More informationๆญฏ PDF
*200 1 1, 2, 3 200 1 3 29 ( ), 200 1 5 25 ( ), 200 1 6 20 ( ).. 1. 19. : 200 1 4 13~ 14 (, ) : 1. 2. : 338, 199 ( 537 ) 2. 200 1 20 : 200 1 10 25 ( )~ 10 26 ( ) : : ( ) 3. 1) 200 1 10 25, 200 1 8 18 (
More informationๆญฏ์ฐ๋ณด01-10.PDF
2001. 12 ,.,..,..,.,..,. ..,.,,...,. 200112 . :,.,.,,... 1) 65 ( 19854.7%199917.0%). 199965 3. 1) 19602.9%20007.1%203019.3%. ii (1990 25.8%200044.9%). ( 19700.4 19992.5), (15199011.9% 199925.9%).,. 46%O
More informationํด
YONSEI ALLWAYS Contents 6 10 42 44 46 12 48 50 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 4 YONSEI UNIVERSITY YONSEI All-Ways+ 5 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104
More informationStudy on the Improvement of Management System through Analysis of golf semi- market: Focus on Physical Education Facility Act Ji-Myung Jung 1, Ju-Ho Park 2 *, & Youngdae Lee 3 1 Korea Institute of Sport
More informationๆญฏPLSQL10.PDF
10 - SQL*Pl u s Pl / SQL - SQL*P lus 10-1 1 0.1 PL/ SQL SQL*Pl u s. SQL*P lus 10-2 1 0.2 S QL* Pl u s PL/ S QL SQL*Pl u s, Pl / SQL. - PL/ SQL (i npu t ), (s t or e ), (r un). - PL/ SQL s cr i pt,,. -
More informationa02.PDF
- - 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 1 2 : 28 T el: 82-2 - 740-8324, FA X : 82-2 - 3673-3540 1997. Incidence of F emale Bre ast Cancer in a Defined A re a in Kore a * K e un - Y oun g Y o o, M.D. 1, S u e K y un g P ark
More information๊ฒํ์ง.PDF
1990 2000 A Study on the Shop- nam es in Kor ean accor ding to Kinds of W or ds - On the base of the telephone directory of Inchon between in 1990 and in 2000-2001 2 1990 2000 A Study on the Shop- nam
More informationๆญฏ96020102.PDF
:... (19959). (Diagnosis Related Groups ) (paym ent unit ).,,,, DRG ().. (m anaged competition )(client - centered approach )..,,,,.....,, ..,... 4. 1.,,. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health care
More informationๆญฏB-j2730a.PDF
99-1 Pol i cy Di r ect i ons for Pr omot i ng Techn i ca l Hi gh School Educa t i on / / / ( ) () () (STEPI). 5,.. 196197...,..,.. 21 ..,,.,..,. 1999. 6. i 5 1. / 7 1.1. / 8 1.2. / 1 1.3. / 11 1.4. / 14
More informationๆญฏFFF01379.PDF
1 9 9 5 M. Div. . 1995 M. Div. . 1 9 9 5 . 1 A. 1 B. 2. 4 A. 4 B. 6 C. 9. 15 A. 15 1. 15 2. 17 3. 2 0 B. 22 1. 22 a. 25 b. 26 c. 27 2. 29 a. 3 0 b. 35 c. 37 3. ( ) 4 1 a. 43 b. 4 5 c. 48. 5 2 A. 5 2 1.
More informationๆญฏD13236_F1.PDF
EL (Org an ic E L D is play T e chn olog y ),,, 455-6 T el:031-6104- 377, F AX : 031-6104- 126 Em ail : h anji@keti.re.kr, dgm oon @keti.re.kr I.. CRT,,,. CRT T F T LCD, PDP, EL. EL 1m s ( ), EL,,,,. 2010
More informationPBR PDF
EXECUTIV E SUMM ARY. - -, -. -, 4 - ( ) - ( ),, - ( ) P&G - ( ). 1. : - - P BR(20 03-3) 1 - Toyota Way' 2 : -, - (Our Credo) -,, -, 3. : P&G, CEO! - P&G CEO CEO - CEO, P&G CEO - P&G (learn by doing)' -
More information๋จ๋ถํ๊ต๊ณผ์์์๋ํ๋ ๋ฏผ์กฑ์ ์ฒด์ฑ
CR 200 1-18 CR 200 1-18 : .,.,...,.... 2001 .,, /,.. 1972 1995 4 1987 1997. 1979, 1987, 1996 1976 1987..,,.,...,,.,, ( ). - iii - ,.. 1970.,,..,,.,. 1970, 1990. 1996.,.,.,... ( ),..,.,. - iv - .. - v
More information20030905 04
Contents 04 06 17 2 1 24 20030905 04 S P E C I A L R E P O R T S P E C I A L R E P O R T 06 20030907 S P E C I A L R E P O R T S P E C I A L R E P O R T 08 20030909 S P E C I A L R E P O R T S P E C I
More informationๆญฏ PDF
:, :. 1. 1 (induced abortion ) 500,000,000, (, 1990). 1/ 3-1/ 2 (Hen shaw, 1990). 1),. 2 ) 269 14 (, 1996:, 1990). (, 1990).,, (Green, 1993)., 19..,. 270, 3 ). (Dan s, 1992),. 1995,,.. (, 1996).,,,. ,.
More informationๆญฏ๊ฐ์ค์.PDF
,, e- mail : noori@mythos.yonsei.ac.kr 1999 9 : +82-2- 361-2717 F a x : +82-2- 365-2579 :,,,,. (t errain height field dat a ) (greedy in sertion algorithm )[1,4,5].,. (trian gulation ),.,.,, 4 20,., 4.,.
More information๋ ์ด์์ 1
Annual 2013 vol.15 th HOW ENGINEERING ANNIVERSARY Annual ํ์ฐ์ธ 2013 vol.15 ํ์ฐ์์ง๋์ด๋ง๊ณผ ์๋งค์ฌ ์ฐ์ธ์์ง๋์ด๋ง์ ๊ฒฝ๋จ, ๋ถ์ฐ์ง์ญ ์ข ํฉ์์ง๋์ด๋ง ์ ๊ณ์ ์ ๋์ฃผ์๋ก์ ๊ฑด์ค๊ธฐ์ ์ ๋ฏธ๋์งํ์ ์ด์ด๊ฐ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. ํ๋ณตํ ์ถ์ ๊ณต๊ฐ ์ฐฝ์ถ, ์์ ํ๊ณ ํผํผํ ๋์๊ธฐ๋ฐ์์ค์ ๊ฑด์ค์ ์ํด ์ฐ์ํ ์ธ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์ ๋ ฅ์ ๋ฐํ์ผ๋ก
More information(Exposure) Exposure (Exposure Assesment) EMF Unknown to mechanism Health Effect (Effect) Unknown to mechanism Behavior pattern (Micro- Environment) Re
EMF Health Effect 2003 10 20 21-29 2-10 - - ( ) area spot measurement - - 1 (Exposure) Exposure (Exposure Assesment) EMF Unknown to mechanism Health Effect (Effect) Unknown to mechanism Behavior pattern
More informationๆญฏ F.PDF
2 0 0 1 8 2 0 0 1 8 2 0 0 1 8 . 1 1. 1 2. 2 3. 3 4. 3. 5 1. 5 2. 10 3. 13. 15 1. 15 2. 15 3. 17. 23 1. 23 2. 24 3. 26 4.. 28 - v ii - . 30 1. 30 2. 31 33 ABST RACT 36 38 [ 1] 39 [ 2] 51 - v iii - - 1.
More information๋ณด๊ด๋ณธ.PDF
T CP (T CP T hr oughput Gu ar ant ee u sing P acket Buffering ), {schoi, ckim }@popeye.snu.ac.kr (Differentiated Services ) T CP (flow ).. T CP.. T CP.. RT T. A bs tract T his paper deals w ith th e T
More information00๋ด์ง1๋ฒ2๋ฒ
www.keit.re.kr 2011. 11 Technology Level Evaluation ABSTRACT The Technology Level Evaluation assesses the current level of industrial technological development in Korea and identifies areas that are underdeveloped
More information7 1 ( 12 ) 1998.,. 5 ( ) ( ) 1945 11 19. 10 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ). 4) 1946 2 8 5 10 ( )..,. 5) 1946 11 1947 2 ( ).,, ( ) ( ). 6)., 2, 1948 9 ( )., ( ) ( ).
7 1 ( 12 ) : 61-74, 1998 K orean J M ed H ist 7 : 61-74, 1998 ISSN 1225-505X * ** ** 50. 50,...,.., 1). 2). 3),...,.,,. 1. 1945 8 15. * 1996. ** 1).. :, 1989.. :, 1989. :. :, 1989.. :, 1993.. :, 1995 2)..
More informationNo Title
2003 6 A Stu dy on Determ in ation of Con solidation Settlem en t in Soft Grou n d w ith th e Titled Load 2003 6 2003 6 Ab stract A Stu dy on Determ in ation of Con solidation Settlem en t in Soft Grou
More informationๆญฏ PDF
200 1 8 200 1 8 200 1 8 1 1 1 2 5 8 1 8 2 13 3 17 23 1 23 2 27 47 1 48 2 53 3 66 - i - 4 75 85 88 A B S T R A CT 93 - ii - 1 30 1).,,..., 4000. 2000.. 19, 2) 1), 3 5.4 5.30(1919 1925), 5.30 9.18 (1925
More informationa11.PDF
V D T,,,,, = b s tra ct = hang e on Lens c commodat i on and Pupi l Li ght r e f l ex i n VDT works Euna Kim, Ya ng ho Kim, Yo ung w o o J in, ha ng ho ha i Yo ng hy u ho i, Yo ung - Ha ha n Mo o n I nd
More information์ต์ข ์ฑ.PDF
A S tu dy on th e E s t im at ion of A ir t o Grou n d W e ap on Im p act P oint 200 1 2 A S tu dy on th e E s t im at ion of A ir t o Grou n d W e ap on Im p act P oint 200 1 2 200 1 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) ...,
More information- iii - - i - - ii - - iii - ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์์ฝ ์ข ํฉ๋ณ์๋จ์๊ฐํธ์ฌ๊ฐ์ง๊ฐํ๋์กฐ์ง๊ณต์ ์ฑ ์ฌํ์ ์ฒด์ฑ๊ณผ ์กฐ์ง์๋ฏผํ๋๊ณผ์๊ด๊ณ - iv - - v - - 1 - - 2 - - 3 - - 4 - - 5 - - 6 - - 7 - - 8 - - 9 - - 10 - - 11 - - 12 - - 13 - - 14 - ฮฑ ฮฑ ฮฑ ฮฑ - 15 - ฮฑ ฮฑ ฮฑ ฮฑ ฮฑ ฮฑ
More information๋ชฉ ์ฐจ โ . ์กฐ์ฌ๊ฐ์ 1 โ ก. ์ฉ์ดํด์ค 13 โ ข. ์กฐ์ฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 17 1. ๊ณผํ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ๋ ฅ ์์ฑ ๋ฐ ํ์ฉ์ ๊ดํ ๊ฑฐ์ํต๊ณ ๋ถ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 9 1 ๊ฐ. ๊ณผํ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ์ ์์ฑ ํํฉ 19 ๋. ๊ณผํ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ์ ์ทจ์ ํํฉ 24 ๋ค. ๊ณผํ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ์ ๊ฒฝ์ ํ๋ ํํฉ 27 ๋ผ. ๊ณผํ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ์ ๊ณ ์ฉ ํํฉ 28
๋ชฉ ์ฐจ โ . ์กฐ์ฌ๊ฐ์ 1 โ ก. ์ฉ์ดํด์ค 13 โ ข. ์กฐ์ฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 17 1. ๊ณผํ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ๋ ฅ ์์ฑ ๋ฐ ํ์ฉ์ ๊ดํ ๊ฑฐ์ํต๊ณ ๋ถ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 9 1 ๊ฐ. ๊ณผํ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ์ ์์ฑ ํํฉ 19 ๋. ๊ณผํ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ์ ์ทจ์ ํํฉ 24 ๋ค. ๊ณผํ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ์ ๊ฒฝ์ ํ๋ ํํฉ 27 ๋ผ. ๊ณผํ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ์ ๊ณ ์ฉ ํํฉ 28 2. ๊ณผํ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ๋ ฅ ํ์ฉ ์คํ์กฐ์ฌ ๋ถ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 23 ๊ฐ. ๊ณผํ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ์ ๊ณ ์ฉ ๋ฐ ์ฑ์ฉ ํํฉ 3
More informationๆญฏ๋๋ ธ์ฉ์ฒจ๊ฐ์ ์ถ์๋ํฅ.PDF
5. 5-1. 90 94 95,. T OYOT A CRC 1, AMCOL INT ERNAT IONAL, UBE, MIT SUBISHI CHEM. ASAHI KASEI 5 68%. 3-34. 3-35. 5-2. 90, 90, 97. 6. 3-36. 5-3. Clay.., AMCOL. 3-37. 5-3- 1.. 3-38. Amcol, Allied signal Inc,
More information์ด๋ณด์๋ฅผ ์ํ C++
C++. 24,,,,, C++ C++.,..,., ( ). /. ( 4 ) ( ).. C++., C++ C++. C++., 24 C++. C? C++ C C, C++ (Stroustrup) C++, C C++. C. C 24.,. C. C+ +?. X C++.. COBOL COBOL COBOL., C++. Java C# C++, C++. C++. Java C#
More informationๆญฏ์ฐ๋ณด01-04.PDF
36. 1. IN G 8 ) ING,.... ING.,,,,. (Executive Board) (Risk Policy Com mittee), (Central Credit Comm ittee), (Central Limit s Com mittee).,,.,. 8) 1999 ING Annual Report pp. 32 36 pp. 94 95. 37 1) ING,
More information์์ฑD10.PDF
:,, * * ** *...,.. (H er d a, 199 9 ), (H on g, et al., 2 000 )., (Ma son, Ba ck er & Gor ges, 19 9 1) (Br a dley, 1993 ). (Kim, N oh, H a n & Lee, 199 6 ).. (N oh & Soh n g, 199 7 )... (Weiss, 1994 ).,.
More informationa08.PDF
= Abstract = Co rre latio n of Fit Fa cto rs fo r Re s p irato rs a nd Anthro po met ric Dime ns io n Do n- Hee Ha n D ep t. of Occup ational S af ety and H ealth, Colleg e of H ealth S ciences, I nj e
More information09๊น์ ์.PDF
00-09 2000. 12 ,,,,.,.,.,,,,,,.,,..... . 1 1 7 2 9 1. 9 2. 13 3. 14 3 16 1. 16 2. 21 3. 39 4 43 1. 43 2. 52 3. 56 4. 66 5. 74 5 78 1. 78 2. 80 3. 86 6 88 90 Ex e cu t iv e Su m m a r y 92 < 3-1> 22 < 3-2>
More information์ 4์ฅ ์ฌ์ ์ฐ์ ํฅํ ๊ณผ์ ๊ธฐ์ ๋ ฅ ํฅ์ ์ฌ์ ์ ๋ฐ ์ถ์ง ๋ฐฉํฅ ์ 4์ฅ ์ฌ์ ์ฐ์ ๊ธฐ์ ๋ ฅ ํฅ์ ์ฌ์ ์ ํฅํ ๊ณผ์ ๋ฐ ์ถ์ง ๋ฐฉํฅ ์์ ์ฐ์ ๊ธฐ์ ๋ ฅ ํฅ์ ์ฌ์ ์ ๋ณธ๋ฌธ์์ ์ดํด๋ณด์๋ฏ์ด ๋ถ๋ฌธ๋ณ๋ก ํ๊ฒฝ ๋ณํ์ ํ๋ ฅ์ ์ผ๋ก ์ ์นํ๋ฉด์ ํจ๊ณผ์ ์ผ๋ก ์งํ๋์ด ์.1998๋ ,2001๋ ๋๊ฐ ๋ณธ ์ฌ์ ์ ์์ํ์ฌ ๊ทธ ๊ถค๋๋ฅผ ์ก๋ ์๊ธฐ์๋ฉด,2002๋ ๋ ์ดํ๋ ์ฌ์ ์ ๊ท๋ชจ์ ๋ฒ์๊ฐ ํ์ฅ๋๋
More information<BCBCC1BEB4EB BFE4B6F72E706466>
์ธ์ข ๋ํ๊ต์๋ Sejong University 2017 2017 Sejong University 4 SEJONG UNIVERSITY www.sejong.ac.kr 5 2017 Sejong University 8 SEJONG UNIVERSITY 10 SEJONG UNIVERSITY www.sejong.ac.kr 11 12 SEJONG UNIVERSITY www.sejong.ac.kr
More information๋ถ์ ์ธต์์ฐ๊ด๋ฆฌ์ฌ์ ์ด์(์ต์ข ).hwp
29. 1..,.. (Federal Reserve Board: FRB) 10 (net worth) 10%. LIMRA FRB (Survey of Consumer Finance: SCF) (financial asset). 1) 25 25, 25., 25 50 (m ass afflu ent), 50 100 (afflu ent), 100 500 (high-net-w
More informationๆญฏ PDF
,,,, : 1995 : : : :. 1950, 60,,, (, 1985). 1970, (Nanette Silv a, 1994). 1983 6 5 (1987). 1989, 1993, 1995 (,1995)., 1985.,,. (1994) 40%, (1988) 60%, 28.5%, 22%.,,,,,,,,,,, (Hiberm an, 1980). (W etzel,
More informationๅคงๅญฆ๏ผๅนด็ใฎๆญฃ็คพๅกๅ ๅฎ่ฆๅ ใซ้ขใใๅฎ่จผๅๆ
190 2016 JEL Classification Number J24, I21, J20 Key Words JILPT 2011 1 190 Empirical Evidence on the Determinants of Success in Full-Time Job-Search for Japanese University Students By Hiroko ARAKI and
More informationAnalysis of teacher s perception and organization on physical education elective courses Chang-Wan Yu* Korea Institute of curriculum and evaluation [Purpose] [Methods] [Results] [Conclusions] Key words:
More information์ธ์ข ๋ ์๋
Sejong University 2016 2016 Sejong University 4 SEJONG UNIVERSITY www.sejong.ac.kr 5 8 SEJONG UNIVERSITY 2016 Sejong University 10 SEJONG UNIVERSITY www.sejong.ac.kr 11 12 SEJONG UNIVERSITY www.sejong.ac.kr
More information์ธ์ ์์๊ฐ๋ฐ์ ์ฑ ํ๋ ฅ๋ง <์ฐจ ๋ก> I. ๋ฌธ์ ์ ๊ธฐ II. ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ ๊ณ ๋ นํ์ ํน์ง๊ณผ ๋ฌธ์ ์ 1. ๊ณ ๋ นํ์ ํน์ง (1) ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ ์ธ๊ตฌ 10๋ช ์ค 1๋ช ์ด ๋ ธ์ธ (2) ๋์ด์ด ์ง์ญ์ ์ด๊ณ ๋ น์ฌํํ (3) ๋ ธ์ธ์ธ๊ตฌ์ ์ ๋ ์ธ๊ตฌ ์ถ์(2016๋ ) (4) ์์ฐ๊ฐ๋ฅ์ธ๊ตฌ 7.3๋ช ์ด ๋ ธ์ธ 1
์ธ์ ์์์ ์ฑ ํ๋ ฅ๋ง ์ ๋กํ ๋ก ์ 1์ฃผ์ ๊ณ ๋ นํ์ฌํ์ ๊ณ ๋ น์ ์ธ์ ์์๊ด๋ฆฌ ๋ฐํ์: ์ ์ฑ๊ธฐ(ํ๊ตญ์ธ์ฌ๊ด๋ฆฌํํ ๋ถํ์ฅ) ์ธ์ ์์๊ฐ๋ฐ์ ์ฑ ํ๋ ฅ๋ง I. ๋ฌธ์ ์ ๊ธฐ II. ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ ๊ณ ๋ นํ์ ํน์ง๊ณผ ๋ฌธ์ ์ 1. ๊ณ ๋ นํ์ ํน์ง (1) ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ ์ธ๊ตฌ 10๋ช ์ค 1๋ช ์ด ๋ ธ์ธ (2) ๋์ด์ด ์ง์ญ์ ์ด๊ณ ๋ น์ฌํํ (3) ๋ ธ์ธ์ธ๊ตฌ์ ์ ๋ ์ธ๊ตฌ ์ถ์(2016๋ ) (4) ์์ฐ๊ฐ๋ฅ์ธ๊ตฌ
More informationๆญฏIC-706.PDF
IC- 706. HL3QCE. HL2QCE. (HITOP) : (02)704-9104 : HL3QCE / : HITOP IC- 706.. 13.8V AC. 13.8V 16V 24V 10 ( +14 ) 60 ( +140 ) 80, ICOM,,..,. i IC- 706 (OP C- 025D )...1 (HM - 103)...1 (30A )...2 (4A )...2
More informationT he present Condition of the internet used car market in Korea and its growth factor s 200 1 2 T he present Condition of the internet used car market in Korea and its growth factor s 200 1 2. 2000 T he
More informationuntitled
. Clancy CM et al Evidence based decision making:global evidence local decision Health affairs Clancy CM et al, Evidence-based decision making:global evidence, local decision. Health affairs. 2005;24:151
More informationๆญฏ04.PDF
Vol.9, No.1, 39-49, 2003. :, * ** ** ** ** ** ** ***. 1..,.,,,,,,,,, (, 1995 ;,, 1999 ;,,,, 1999 ; J oh n, 1995)., Fr ank (1931) (Pr emenst ru al Tension),,,,, (,,, 1999). Pitt s (1987-1988), March Yonker
More informationPJTROHMPCJPS.hwp
์ ์ถ ๋ฌธ ๋๋ฆผ์์ฐ์ํ๋ถ์ฅ๊ด ๊ทํ ๋ณธ ๋ณด๊ณ ์๋ฅผ ํธ์์คํธ ํ ๋ฐฉ์ ํ๋น๋ ์๊ฑฐ๊ธฐ ๊ฐ๋ฐ ๊ณผ์ ์ ์ต์ข ๋ณด๊ณ ์๋ก ์ ์ถ ํฉ๋๋ค. 2008๋ 4์ 24์ผ ์ฃผ๊ด์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ธฐ๊ด๋ช : ๊ฒฝ ๋ถ ๋ ํ ๊ต ์ด๊ด์ฐ๊ตฌ์ฑ ์์: ๊น ํ ์ฑ ์ฐ ๊ตฌ ์: ์กฐ ์ฐฝ ๋ ์ฐ ๊ตฌ ์: ๋ฐฐ ์ ๊ฒฝ ์ฐ ๊ตฌ ์: ๊น ์น ํ ์ฐ ๊ตฌ ์: ์ ๋ ํธ ์ฐ ๊ตฌ ์: ์ ๊ธฐ ํ ์ํ์ฐ๊ตฌ๊ธฐ๊ด๋ช : ์ผ ์ ๊ณต ์ ์ํ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ฑ ์์:
More informationDBPIA-NURIMEDIA
27(2), 2007, 96-121 S ij k i POP j a i SEXR j i AGER j i BEDDAT j ij i j S ij S ij POP j SEXR j AGER j BEDDAT j k i a i i i L ij = S ij - S ij ---------- S ij S ij = k i POP j a i SEXR j i AGER j i BEDDAT
More informationDBPIA-NURIMEDIA
The e-business Studies Volume 17, Number 4, August, 30, 2016:319~332 Received: 2016/07/28, Accepted: 2016/08/28 Revised: 2016/08/27, Published: 2016/08/30 [ABSTRACT] This paper examined what determina
More informationๆญฏImg_man_kr.PDF
) (R e m ot e S en s in g ) ( ),.,... Rect if icat io n : (r e ct ificat ion ) Ge o codin g Ge or e fe r en cin g, ( )..,.. 1 ) ( ). 2 )..,,... (Dat a F u s ion ).,.,..,...,., (s k e w ).. .,.....,.,.
More information<B0ADB9AE5F33B1C75F30315FC0CEBCE232C2F728B9DAC1D6BEF0295F303133305FB3AAB4AEC5EBB0E85FB0B3BCB1B9E6BEC85FC3D6C1BEBAB8B0EDBCAD28C3D6C1BE295FC3D6C1BE283230313230333237292E687770>
๋๋ํต๊ณ ๊ฐ์ ๋ฐฉ์ 1 ๋๋ํต๊ณ ๊ฐ์ ๋ฐฉ์ ๋ฐ์ฃผ์ธ ์ดํฌ๊ธธ ์ 1์ ์ ๋ก 1. ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์ ์ต๊ทผ ์ฐ๋ฆฌ ์ฌํ์์ ๊ท ๋ฑํ ๊ธฐํ๋ณด์ฅ๊ณผ ๊ณต์ ํ ๊ฒฝ์์ผ๋ก ๋๋ณ๋๋ ๊ณต์ ์ฌํ ์๋ฆฝ์ด ์ค์ํ ๊ตญ์ ๊ณผ์ ๋ก ์ ์๋์๋ค. ์ด์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ๊ณต์ ์ฌํ๋ฅผ ์คํํ๊ธฐ ์ํ ์๋จ์ผ๋ก์ ๋ ๋ (philanthropy)์ ๋ํ ์ฌํ์ ๊ด์ฌ์ด ๊ธ์ํ ์ฆ๊ฐํ๊ณ ์๋ค. ๋๋ ์ ์์ ์ด ๊ฐ์ง ๊ฐ์น ์๋ ์์์
More informationๆญฏ์ฐ์กฐ98-4.PDF
98-4 M&A 1998. 8. M&A M&A. M&A. IMF M&A. M&A M&A.,., '90 ' 90.,. M&A. M&A M&A,. M&A,.,.,.,. 1998 8 . 1 1. 1 2. 3. M&A 5 1. M&A 5. 5. 6. 8 2. M&A 9. 9. 11. 13. 14 3. M&A 15. 16. (ta ke - ove r bid) 17.
More information์ค๊ณ์ฌ์์ฐ์ฑ์ ๊ณ ๋ฐฉ์(์ต์ข ).PDF
2003. 12. .,.,,...,,,...,. 2003 12 1. 10 1. 10 2. 11. 15 1. 15 2. 16 3. 20. 43 1. 43 2. 45 3. (comp en sation) 61 4. 72 5. 78. 81 1. 81 2. ALICO 92 3. 98 4. 105. 109 1. 109 2. 112 3. 118 4. 120. 124 127
More information#KM560
KM-560 KM-560-7 PARTS BOOK KM-560 KM-560-7 INFORMATION A. Parts Book Structure of Part Book Unique code by mechanism Unique name by mechanism Explode view Ref. No. : Unique identifcation number by part
More informationๆญฏkjmh2004v13n1.PDF
13 1 ( 24 ) 2004 6 Korean J Med Hist 13 20 36 June 2004 ISSN 1225 505X * 1 1886 ( ) 1) 1905 * 1) 20 2) 1910 1926 1910 1926 1930 40 2 1899 1907 3) 4) 1908 1909 ( ) ( ) ( 2) 1995 1998 3) 1997 p 376 4) 1956
More information7 1 ( 12 ) 1998. 1913 ( 1912 ) 4. 3) 1916 3 1918 4 1919. ( ) 1 3 1, 3 1. 1.. 1919 1920. 4) ( ), ( ),. 5) 1924 4 ( ) 1. 1925 1. 2). ( ). 6). ( ). ( ).
7 1 ( 12 ) : 1-11, 1998 K orean J M ed H ist 7 : 1-11, 1998 ISSN 1225-505X * **.,.., 1960.... 1) ( ) 1896 3 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2. 1), 14 1909 1,. 14 17 1913. 2)..,. ( ) ( ),. * 1998 (1998. 5. 7). ** 1).
More information#KM-235(110222)
PARTS BOOK KM-235A/B INFORMATION A. Parts Book Structure of Part Book Unique code by mechanism Unique name by mechanism Explode view Ref. No. : Unique identifcation number by part Parts No. : Unique Product
More informationๆญฏ2003-11(์ด์ฌ์น)[1].PDF
2 0 0 3-1 1 ,. 2003,.,. 2004 1 < > < > 1 1. 3 2. 5. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9 3. 10. 10. 12. 13. 14. 15 4. 16. 16. 17. 19 5. 21. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 25 6. 28. 28. 28. 29. 29 7. 31. 31. 32. 35. 36 8. 38. 38. 38. 39
More informationS hip Plannin g S y s tem for Efficient Cran e Operation of Cont ain er T ermin al
S hip Plannin g S y s tem for Efficient Cran e Operation of Cont ain er T ermin al 2000 2 Ship Planning System for Efficient Crane Operation of Container Terminal Tae-Yeong Ha Department of Logistics Engineering
More information141(26) 20056 1930 19 () ( ( ) () () () ) 2) 1932 ()()3) 2 1) 1897519( ) ( ) () () () 4) ( ) 5) 6) 15-20 7) 191216 2) ( ) () 42 () 193111 12 1933 4 3)
141(26) 20056 Korean J Med Hist 14131 Jun 2005 ISSN 1225505X ( 1897-1982) * ** 1 ( 1897-1982) ( ) 1) 3 1 ( ) 1930 1930 1930 * () ** 1) ( 2000 p 13-15) 1 141(26) 20056 1930 19 () ( ( ) () () () ) 2) 1932
More information13.11 โ ์ด์
11 2013 Health and Welfare Policy Forum 2 3 4 The Roles and Fiscal Responsibility on Social Security between the Central and Local Governments in Korea 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Structure
More information1999
1999 2000 1 2000 1 ( ) ( ) ( ) . < > 1 1 1 1. 1 2. 2 2 4 6 1 6 1. 6 2. 8 3. 10 2 Ohlson Feltham & Ohlosn 12 1. Ohlson 13 2. Feltham & Ohlson (1995) 15 3 18 1. 18 2. Dechow (1999) 20 3. Myer s (1999) 26
More information<C1B6BBE7BFACB1B820323030342D303428B1E8BEF0BEC62920303128B8F1C2F7292E687770>
์กฐ์ฌ์ฐ๊ตฌ 2004-05 ์ฅ์ ์ธ ๊ณต๋ฌด์ ์ง๋ฌดํน์ฑ๊ณผ ๊ณ ์ฉ์คํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ : ๊น์ธ์ (๊ณ ์ฉ๊ฐ๋ฐ์ ์ ์์ฐ๊ตฌ์) ๋จธ ๋ฆฌ ๋ง ์ฅ์ ์ธ ๊ณต์ง์์ฉ ํ๋ ์ฌ์ ์ 2004๋ 2์ 5์ผ ์ฒญ์๋์์ ๊ฐ์ต๋ ์ 37์ฐจ ๊ตญ ์ ๊ณผ์ ํ์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ฌ์ฑ, ์ง๋ฐฉ๋ ์ถ์ ์ ๊ณต์ง ์์ฉ ํ๋์ ๋๋ถ์ด, ์ฐธ์ฌ์ ๋ถ์์ ์ค์ ์ ์ผ๋ก ์ถ์งํ๊ณ ์ ํ๋ ๊ตญ์ ๊ฐํ์ ์ผ๋ถ๋ผ๊ณ ํ ์ ์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋์ ๋ ธ๋๋ถ์ ๊ณต๋จ์
More informationๆญฏ7๊ถ2ํธ.PDF
(SELSI) : 1 1) ( ). (SELSI) :., 2002, 7, 2, 1-23. 3 (SELSI). SELSI 1090.,.. Cronbach.98.. 14.996,.998. :, SELSI,,,.,., 3.. 1 BK.,,. 1 3,. (babbling ),.. (joint attention ),., 3.., 3, (Bzoch, Kemker & Wood,
More information7 1 ( 12 ) 1998 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ). ( ) ( ). ( ) ( ) ( ). ( ). ( ) ( ) ( ) 3).., 16 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ). 4). ( ) ( ) ( ),., 4-5, 6-7, 5) 6) (
7 1 ( 12 ) : 75-96, 1998 K orean J M ed H ist 7 : 75-96, 1998 ISSN 1225-505X (2)* ** *** ** 1. (4) 2. (5) (1) (6) (2) (7) (3) 5. 3. (1) ( ) 4. ( ) (2) (1) (3) (2). ( ) (3) 6. 4. ( ) 6 1). ( ), ( ).. (1)
More information(3) () () LOSS LOSS LOSS LOSS (4) = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100
1.,.. 2. (1) Flow + ( ) (2) Flow Flow (LINE) ) (LINE) ModelC/T LOSS DAT A Check Sheet ((%) (T PM) (LOSS) - (3) () () LOSS LOSS LOSS LOSS (4) = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100 = 100
More informationBSC Discussion 1
Copyright 2006 by Human Consulting Group INC. All Rights Reserved. No Part of This Publication May Be Reproduced, Stored in a Retrieval System, or Transmitted in Any Form or by Any Means Electronic, Mechanical,
More information๋ณด๊ณ ์(๊ฒํ์ง).PDF
11-13 10148-000092- 01 200 1 04 ( ) 2 0 0 1 ( ) E fficient Rules for Oper atin g the Det en tion B asin an d P umpin g St ation ( ) 2 0 0 1. 12 1 2 11-1310148- 000092-01 ( ) E fficien t Ru les for Oper
More informationํ์ ์๋ ผ๋ฌธ์ง ( ์์ฐ๊ณผํํธ ) ์ 50 ์ง 2 ํธ (2011) ์ฝฉ์์ํ์ ์์๋ฐ์์ฐ์๊ธ๊ณผ์์ฉ์ฝฉ์์๊ธํฅ์ ๏งกๅผไท * ๏งก่ฑ่ฑช ** ๏งก้ซๆฒณ *** * Significance of Soybean as Food and Strategies for Self Suffici
ํ์ ์๋ ผ๋ฌธ์ง ( ์์ฐ๊ณผํํธ ) ์ 50 ์ง 2 ํธ (2011) 97-137 ์ฝฉ์์ํ์ ์์๋ฐ์์ฐ์๊ธ๊ณผ์์ฉ์ฝฉ์์๊ธํฅ์ ๏งกๅผไท * ๏งก่ฑ่ฑช ** ๏งก้ซๆฒณ *** * Significance of Soybean as Food and Strategies for Self Sufficiency Improvement Hong Suk Lee*, Yeong-Ho Lee**, and
More informationๆญฏbok9.PDF
- - * ** *** 20001 ,., 1995,,,,.,,,.,,,. : G2 :,,, --------------------------------------------- *..,. ** (E-m ail: yslee@m ail.h an gkon g.ac.kr) *** (E-m ail: cllee@tiger.korea.ac.kr) .. 1. 2.. 1.
More information04_์ด๊ทผ์_21~27.hwp
1) KIGAS Vol. 16, No. 5, pp 21~27, 2012 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas) http://dx.doi.org/10.7842/kigas.2012.16.5.21 ์คํ์ค์ ์ฌ๋ก ๋ถ์์ ๊ดํ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ์ด๊ทผ์ ์ด์ ์ ํ๊ตญ์ฐ์ ์์ ๋ณด๊ฑด๊ณต๋จ ์ฐ์ ์์ ๋ณด๊ฑด์ฐ๊ตฌ์ (2012๋ 9์ 5์ผ ํฌ๊ณ , 2012๋ 10์ 19์ผ
More informationa09.PDF
= Ab stract = A S t u dy o n t h e M e di c a l In s u r an c e U t i li z at i o n o f W o rk e r s S u f f e rin g f ro m L o w B ac k P ain in an A re a Chul Gab Lee Hyun Ok Ahn So Yeon Ryu Jong Park
More informationuntitled
Ph.D, FRM, ick_chan_joo@lycos.co.kr IBK Economic Research Institute 1 1. 2. : ( ) ( ) 3. : 4. 5. & ( ) 6. 7. GDP :, 8. 1., 2004 10,222,000 bpd(barrel / day). 13.1%..,. OPEC 25 2,058,000 bpd, 20%, OPEC.,.,
More information