(,, 2007).,... (,,, 2010; Wendt, Euwenma, & Emmerik, 2009)..,, (Shonk, 1992). (Margerison, 2001).,.,., Hackman(1987),. Charles Henry

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "(,, 2007).,... (,,, 2010; Wendt, Euwenma, & Emmerik, 2009)..,, (Shonk, 1992). (Margerison, 2001).,.,., Hackman(1987),. Charles Henry"

정윤 상
6 years ago
Views:

1 :. 65.,,..,..,. (Corresponding Author): / 335 Tel: (031) / kkmmcc1122@naver.com

2 (,, 2007).,... (,,, 2010; Wendt, Euwenma, & Emmerik, 2009)..,, (Shonk, 1992). (Margerison, 2001).,.,., Hackman(1987),. Charles Henry(1995),,,,,,.. (, 1993; Abbey & Dickson, 1983), (, 1996), (, 2007), (,,, 2014;,, 2015;, 1992; Keller, 1992), (, 1996; Keller, 1986).,.,.. (, 2006;,,, 2010;, 1992; Keller, 1992)..

3 ., (, 2006), (,,, 2010). (,,, 2016). McGrath(1991)., (Bass, 1997). (initiating structure) (consideration) (Stogdill, 1969), (transformational) (transactional) (Burns, 1978). House Mitchell(1974) (directive), (supportive), (participative), (achievement-oriented).. (, 2006;, 2015;,, 2013) /, (, 2009;, 1995;,,, 2015) / ///.., Northouse(2004) -.,..,, (Kaiser & Overfield, 2010).., (Yukl, 2008).,,. (,,, 2014).,

4 (flex) (Kaplan & Kaiser, 2006).,. (Forsyth, 2010). (Quinn, 1988), Kaplan Kaiser(2003) (versatile leadership).. (ACT),,, (Hayes et al., 1996) ACT. (Hayes et al., 1999)..,.,.. Stogdill (1969),

5 ,,. Junge Piccolo(2004).,. Shea(1999),..,... ( 1). 1.? 2.? / (89.2%) 7 (10.8%) 37(56.9%) (43.1%) 1 (1.5%) 15 (23.1%) 39 (60.0%) 10 (15.4%)

6 ( 2, 9) 3, ,, (89.2%), 7(10.8%) (SD=4.65). 37(56.9%), 28(43.1%), 18, 12, 7. 39(60.0%), 15(23.1%), 10 (15.4%) (44.6%), (24.6%), (18.5%), (10.8%) 8.67(SD=7.30). Kaplan Kaiser(2002) (Leadership Versatility Index; LVI). LVI (forceful) (enabling), (strategic) (operational) LVI 0 (), (+).,,,,,.,. Cronbach α.82,.81. 1, HRD,.. Stogdill(1969) (The Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire; LBDQ). LBDQ, Blake Mouton(1964), PM (, 2013),. LBDQ. LBDQ 6,.,

7 ,,. 3 10, Cronbach's α.74. Bond (2011) (Korean Acceptance and Action Questionnaire: K-AAQ-),, (2009). (in press) AAQ-. AAQ- Hayes AAQ 10,. 6 3 Cronbach's α.67. Kaplan Kaiser(2002) LVI.,, Cronbach's α.87.,,, Mplus 7. 5 Mardia (Mardia, 1974; Mardia, Kent, & Bibby, 1979) (p <.05),. 95% (95% bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval) , (r=.34) (r=.31) (p <.01)., -.34 ** -.31 **.44 ** -.30 **.40 **.48 ** - **

8 (r=.44, p <.01).,., (r=.30), (r=.40), (r=.48) (p <.01).,,.. 3.,.34, 95% 0..34, % 0.,.12, 95% 0.., ( ) 95% 95%.58 (.34) (.18) (.34) (.12) ( ) 95% 95%.38 (.23) (.13) (.19) (.37) (-.28)

9 . 4. 0, ,. (Muller, Judd, & Yzerbyt, 2005) , % 95% -1 SD SD

10 ± 1 (SD) , , 0..,.,,..,.,.. ACT (, 2005). ACT,,,. ACT (Blonna, 2013)..,....,.. (, 2012). Hayes (1996),. (Kaiser & Overfield, 2010),

11 ..,. (, 2005)..,, (Kaiser & Overfield, 2010)..,, (shift)., (Lombardo, Ruderman, & McCauley, 1988)..,....,,.....,.

12 ,. (, 2014)....,...,,... Georgsdottir Getz (2004),.,, (Basadur & Hausdorf, 1996).,...,,,, (Carroll, 1997),

13 .,..,., (Charan, Drotter, & Noel, 2001; Kaiser & Craig, 2011; Meuse, Dai, & Wu, 2011).,..,...,,., 89%..,, (2014)., : IMO. (4), ,, (2016).. (2), (2012).,.,, (2014).. (2), (2006).,. (2015). :. (1), , (2013). / :. (3), (2005).,.

14 , (2015)., :,., (1993).,.,,, (2009).. (2), , (2007). (EAP) :. (4), ,,, (2014).. (3), (1995).. (2), ,, (2015).. (4), (2013).. :. (1996).. (1), ,, (2010). :. (3), (1992).,. (2007).,.,, (2009).. (4), Abbey, A., & Dickson, J. W. (1983). R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), Basadur, M. S., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1996). Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and innovation management. Creativity Research Journal, 9, Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), Blake, R., Mouton, J. (1964). The Managerial Grid: The Key to Leadership Excellence. Houston: Gulf Publishing Co. Blonna, R. (2013). [Maximize Your Coaching Effectiveness with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy]. ( ). : ( 2011 ). Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, Burns, J. M. (1979). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Carroll, M. (1997). Counseling in organization: An overview. In M. Carroll & M. Walton. (eds.), Handbook of counseling in organizations (pp.8-28). CA: SAGE. Charan, R., Drotter, S., & Noel, J. (2001). The

15 leadership pipeline: How to build the leadership powered company. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Charles, C. M., & Henry, P. S. (1995). Business without bosses: How self-managing teams are building High-performing companies. John Wiley & Sons. Forsyth, D. R. (2010). Group dynamics. CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Georgsdottir, A. S., & Getz, I. (2004). How flexibility facilitates innovation and ways to manage it in organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsh(Ed), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp ). New York, NY: Prentice Hall. Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R. T., Korn, Z., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I. S., Cooper, L. D., & Grundt, A. M. (1999). The impact of acceptance versus control rationales on pain tolerance. The Psychological Record, 49, Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), House, R. J., & Mitchell, R. R. (1974). Pathe-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, Junge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, Kaiser, R. B., Craig, S. B. (2011). Do the behaviors related to managerial effectiveness really change with organizational level? An empirical test. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 14, Kaiser, R. B., & Overfield, D. V. (2010). Assessing flexible leadership as a mastery of opposites. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62, Kaplan, B., & Kaiser, R. (2002). Leadership Versatility Index. Greensboro, NC: Kaplan DeVries Inc. Kaplan, B., & Kaiser, R. (2003). Rethinking a classic distinction in leadership: Implications for the assessment and development of executives. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 55, Kaplan, B., & Kaiser, R. (2006). The versatile leader: make the most of your strengths without overdoing it. CA: Pfeiffer. Keller, R. T. (1986). Predictors of the performance of project groups in R & D organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), Keller, R. T. (1992). Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of management, 18(3), Lombardo, M. M., Ruderman, M. N., & McCauley, C. D. (1988). Explanations of success and derailment in upper-level management positions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, Mardia, K. V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(2), Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., & Bibby, J. M. (1979). Multivariate Analysis. New York, NY: Academic Press. Margerison, C. (2001). Team competencies: Team performance management. An International Journal,

16 7(7/8), McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small group research, 22(2), Meuse, K. P. D., Dai, G., & Wu, J. (2011). Leadership skills across organizational levels: A closer examination. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 14, Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), Northouse, P. G. (2004). Leadership: theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Shea, C. M. (1999). The effect of leadership style on performance improvement on a manufacturing task. The Journal of Business, 72(3), Shonk, J. H. (1992). Team based organization: Developing a successful team environment. Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin. Stogdill, R. M. (1969). Validity of Leader Behavior Descriptions. Personnel Psychology, 22(2), Wendt, H., Euwema, M. C., Emmerik, I. J. H. (2009). Leadership and team cohesiveness across cultures. Leadership Quarterly, 20, Yukl, G. (2008). How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, Zaccaro, S. J., Foti, R. J., & Kenny, D. A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, : : :

17 The Influence of Team Leader s Experience Acceptance on Team Effectiveness: Mediating Effect of Leadership Flexibility and Moderating Effect of Consideration Leadership Yongmoon Graduate School of CHA University Soongsil University Counseling Psychology The purpose of this study was to investigate the mediating effect of leadership flexibility on a relationship between team leader s experience acceptance and team effectiveness along with the moderating effect of consideration leadership. For this, the data of 65 team leaders gathered through a convenience sampling method were analyzed through path analysis. The findings showed that experience acceptance of the team leaders affected team effectiveness and that the relationship between experience acceptance and team effectiveness was mediated by team leaders leadership flexibility. Also the relationship between leadership flexibility and team effectiveness was moderated by consideration leadership. In detail, the lower leadership flexibility of team leaders, the lower team effectiveness. But even if the leadership flexibility of team leaders was low and consideration leadership was high, team effectiveness did not get low. That is, consideration leadership had a buffering effect against leadership non-flexibility. More implications, limitations and suggestions for further study were discussed in the current study. Key words : workplace counseling, experience acceptance, team effectiveness, leadership, leadership flexibility, consideration leadership

2?.?,,..,,,..? 7..,, / /

2?.?,,..,,,..? 7..,, / / 7 www.kornferryinstitute.com 2?.?,,..,,,..? 7..,,..... 7. / / 7 3 /.,,,, (Charan, Drotter, and Noel 2011). (challenges). Korn Ferry (key career experiences).,.,... (Figure 1). Figure 1.,,. Percentile relative