- *. 1 21 45. - 5 40. 6 (32 ), 20. 2 1 20,,,, 4. 3 17.. 4. * 2013 ( ) (KRF-2013S1A3A2055042). :,, 3 53 Tel : 02-760-0372, E-mail : hisim@skku.edu
. 1,333 41% (sbscnbc 2013. 1. 7), 2,178 72.9% ( 2007. 3. 9).. 300 109, 300 80 (2008) 44.3%, 42.6%,.., (,, 2008;, 2010).,.,.,.,.,. (, 2007), (Wheeler, Reis, & Bond, 1989), (, 1991).,., (communal relationship) (Matsumoto, Yoo, & Fontaine, 2008).,. (Hofstede, 1980; 1985)., ( ).
(, 1983;,,, 2000;, 2004a) (, 2006).,, (,, 1993).,,.,.,.,,, (,, 2004).,, 1980, 2000. (Clark, Ouellette, Powell, Milberg, 1987), (Berscheid, Snyder, Omoto, 1989), (Locke, 2002). Clark et al.(1987) (welfare),. Berscheid et al.(1989),,,, (Relationship Closeness Inventory: RCI). Locke(2002) (agentic),,, (Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values: CSIV)..,, (,, 2008)
., (,,,,,,, 2004),., (, 2001), (,, 2007), (,,,,,, 2007), 1) (,, 2008).. (,, 2008;, 2010) 1),,, -,,,..., (Marshall, 2008)., (, 2004).,,.,.,...
(,, 2008), (, 1994;, 2006), (,, 1993;, 2003), (, 2009), (,, 1993).,,,,. (, 2003), (, 2010), (,, 2008).,, (,, 2013).,,..,.,,. (Leung, 2010; Lu, Gilmour & Kao 2001; Ward, Pearson & Entrekin, 2002), (, 1982), (Oyserman, Coon, & Kemmelmeier, 2002, Shulruf, Hattie, & Dixon, 2007), (,, 2013). (Chinese Cultural Value, CVS),, (, human-heartedness) 2).,, 3) 2) (Leung, 2010). 3),.,.
. (, 1982). (interpersonal liking) (Ibid),,,,, (, 1975). (, 1982),., (, 2006). 4),,. 4).., (,,, 2012).. (Oyserman, Coon, & Kemmelmeier, 2002) 5), (Shulruf, Hattie, & Dixon, 2007).. 6),. 5) Oyserman, Coon Kemmelmeier(2002) 8, Shulruf, Hattie Dixon(2007) 6. 6) (, 2006), (, 2002).,.
(2013), 7).,,, (),,,, (Ibid). 8),, (Ibid),,,. (2013) 7) (2013),,,, 5. 8) (, 1986),., (, 2004).,.,..,., (, ),.,, (, 1994;, 2006), (,, 1993;, 2003),,,.,.
1 2011 6 8, 7 21. (, 2000; 2011;, 2011), (, 2002; 2003), (, 2006), (, 2002). 1990 5 2000 16, 17 4 ( 3, 1). 2,610, 7. 1 2,610 21, 1990 2,, 680. 680 (2013),,,, 5. 5,,,, (),,, (,, 2008), (, 2011), (, 2010), (Clark & Mills, 2011), (, 2001) 45.,., 45, -.,,.,
. 2012 11 19 26 215, 215 6 2 207. 117 (56.5%), 90 (43.5%), Likert 6., SPSS 18.0. (Exploratory Factor Analysis) - (correlated item-to-total correlation). (Principle component method) (Varimax rotation method). 45 ( 1), -. A3(.098), A16(.022), A22(.052), A34(.108), A44(.073) 5, 40. 3 9), 32 6..504 9) 1 40 1.0 8, A5(.439), A23(.479), A25(.372), A35(.358), A37(.384) 5. 5 A15(.678). 2 1 6 34 7 KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin).904,.487.786., 7 2 A14(.777), A36(.679) 2 3 32.
A1,, 4.63 1.098.419 A2 4.98.870.498 A3 (R) 3.69 1.179.098 A4 3.95 1.099.487 A5, 4.06 1.346.438 A6 4.01 1.229.448 A7 4.82 1.091.591 A8 3.86 1.036.561 A9 4.61 1.057.593 A10 4.00 1.174.514 A11 3.63 1.158.411 A12 3.79 1.021.549 A13 4.53 1.056.554 A14 3.81 1.105.361 A15 3.97 1.116.477 A16 3.19 1.558.022 A17 4.18.946.601 A18 4.29 1.262.397 A19 4.05 1.042.593 A20 4.48 1.288.550 A21 3.74 1.455.427 A22 (R) 3.69 1.308.052 A23 4.87.947.530 A24 4.79 1.072.547 A25 4.05 1.103.496 A26 4.06 1.166.470 A27 4.53 1.028.615 A28 4.94.940.481 A29 4.80.884.671
A30 4.59 1.137.602 A31 4.79.985.650 A32 4.20 1.134.405 A33 4.77 1.084.576 A34 2.69 1.191.108 A35 4.63.990.592 A36 4.11 1.137.481 A37 4.28 1.027.618 A38 4.62.938.610 A39 3.81 1.171.587 A40 4.73.981.607 A41 4.57 1.138.394 A42 3.97 1.226.440 A43 4.45.988.647 A44 3.04 1.157.073 A45 4.70 1.027.605.788 ( 2). 6,,. 1 A8, A12, A17, A19 A10, A11, A13, A26, A42, A43. 2 A29, A31, A2, A28, A30, A32,. 3 6,
1 2 3 4 5 6 A12.777 A19.727 A11.708 A8.655 1 A26.654 A17.605 A10.519 A43.518 A42.508 A13.504 A29.736 A28.695 2 A31.672 A32.577 A30.570 A2.537 A9.753 A24.745 3 A7.695 A27.635 A33.624 A6.788 4 A4.782 A21.569 A18.517 A20.638 5 A39.618 A1.561 A41.546 A38.673 6 A45.627 A40.569 4.954 3.780 3.436 2.638 2.515 2.149 15.481% 11.814% 10.738% 8.243% 7.859% 6.717% 15.481% 27.295% 38.032% 46.275% 54.134% 60.851%
. 3 A7, A9, A27, A33. 6 A38 A45 A40. 4 A4, A6, A21. A18, 5 4 (.304) A41. 5 A20, A39 A1 A20, A39 A1, 20. 2 2013 1 91 21. 312 165 (52.9%), 147 (47.1%), 20 61 (19.6%), 30 85 (27.2%), 40 92 (29.5%), 50 74 (23.7%), 170 (54.5%), 46 (14.7%), 44 (14.1%), 11 (3.6%), 3 (0.9%), 31 (10.0%), 7 (2.2%). 209 104 (49.8%), 105 (50.2%), 20 53 (25.3%), 30 48 (23.0%), 40 56 (26.8%), 50 52 (24.9%), 99 (47.4%), 41 (19.6%), 25 (11.9%), 7 (3.4%), 3 (1.4%), 26 (12.5%), 8 (3.8%). SPSS 18.0. AMOS 18.0.
1 20 2 17.,,. (2013) 5 6 (1: ~6: ). (, 2004a),,,, 1. (2003), (2004b),, (2012) 8, 5 6 (1: ~6: ). Clark Mills(2011) exchange orientation A3, A13 5 6 (1: ~6: ). 312
Q3.872 Q2.870 Q1.835 Q5.812 Q4.802 Q15 Q14 Q12.715 Q11.690 Q13 Q8 1 2 3 4 Q7.747 Q9.710 Q10 Q6 Q17.778 Q20 Q18 Q16.678 Q19.780.726.665.772.639.619.741.727.553 3.840 3.040 2.855 2.844 (%) 19.200 15.198 14.273 14.218 (%) 19.200 34.399 48.672 62.890 (Cronbach's ).906.833.823.779
KMO=.885, Bartlett s test of sphericity =2994.326(p<.001)., 20 4 5 62.890% ( 3). 1. 5, 19.201%, Cronbach's.906. 2 15.198%, Cronbach's.833,.,. 3 14.273%, Cronbach's.823,.,. 4, 14.218%, Cronbach's.779. 4 4 ( 1) 4 ( 2), 1 2 ( 4).,,,, 4,.,,,, 4,, 4 1 2 2
X 2 (CMIN) X 2 (CMIN/DF) RMSEA TLI CFI 1 321.20 1.983.069.894.910 2 325.76 1.986.069.894.908 220.95 1.955.068.920.933 3 <.08 >.9 >.9 1 2(). 2 Q6 (.459) Q19 (.395), Q20 (.462) (construct validity), 17. X 2 (CMIN)=220.950, X 2 (CMIN/DF)=1.955, RMSEA=.068, TLI=.920, CFI=.933,.547.934.,,, 4,, ( 5)..,.
1.221 ** 1.332 **.588 ** 1.282 **.355 **.377 ** 1 -.174 *.069 -.014.099 1 -.013.373 **.388 **.360 **.324 ** 1.186 **.352 **.417 **.469 **.230 **.524 ** 1 * p<.05, ** p<.01,, 10) ( 6).,,,.,, 10) (self-reward) (self-benefit) (Clark & Mills, 1979; Batson, 1993),, (Clark, Mills, & Powell, 1986).,, (Clark & Mills, 1979).,.,,.,..
(SD) 1 4.18(.564) -.019 1 4.17(.739) ** p<.01.430 **.276 ** 1 4.67(.660).318 **.133 **.320 ** 1 4.64(1.10),. 1 45 20. 2,,,,,, 4 17.,.,,, 4,,,,. 11), (, 1994;, 2006).,.. 11) House, Hanges, Javidan, Dorfman Gupta(2004) 5,.
,,.,,,. (, 2006). 12),, (, 2009), (, 1975, 1982;, 2004a)., 12).., (,,, 2012).,,, (, 2012).., (, 2004),. (, 2006), (, 2002).,.,.,,,.,
. Q18( ) (,, 2007). (2007) 13),,..,,,, 4.,,,, 13) (2007),,,..,,., 21. 3 7., 2,. 1, 2. 2 (, ),,,,.,,,,,
. 2 4,. 4.,,,,,,.,,.,,.., (, 1994).,.,,.,,..,..,,
..., 1.,,. (2006). :. (1994). ( ). :. (2001). :. (2009). ( ). (1), 147-163. (2007).., 247-267., (2008).. (2), 375-389.,,,,,, (2004). :., (2004). :. (2010). :. (2010). :. (1979). :., (2008).. (4), 801-836., (2008).. (2004a)., :. (6), 23-45. (2004b).. (2), 93-125.,,,,, (2007).. (3), 23-63. (2011). :. (1975).. 71-102. (1982). :. (2003).
:. (1986). :. (2010)..,, (2012). :. (2), 375-402., (2012). :. (3), 457-485. (1983). :., (1993). : -. (1994).. (1), 83-94. (2002). :. (2006). :. (2001).. (1), 117-132. (2007). :. (2003).. 361-394. (2003). :. (2007). :. (4), 21-53. (2011).. (2000). :.,,, (2012).. (1), 27-51., (1993).. (1), 150-163. (2000).. (2011). :.,, (2000). ( ),. (1), 203-222., (2007).. (3), 251-269. (1994). :. (2002). :. (2003). :. (1991). :
. (1), 132-155. (2011). :. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. Batson, C. D. (1993). Communal and exchange relationships: What is the difference? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 677-683. Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., Omoto, A. M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792-807. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.. (2011). A theory of communal (and exchange) relationships. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, E. T. Higgins(Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology(pp.232-251). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage. Clark, M. S., Mills, J., & Powell, M. C. (1986). Keeping track of needs in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 333-338. Clark, M. S., & Ouellette, R., Powell, M. C., Milberg, S. (1987), Recipient's mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 94-103. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis(6th ed.). Prentice Hall International. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Hofstede, G. (1985). The interaction between national and organizational value system. Journal of management studies, 22(4), 347-357. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA. Leung, M. T. (2010). The effects of Chinese values(confucian work dynamism and human-heartedness) on students achievement goals and learning strategies. Australian Association for Research in Education, AARE 2010 International education research conference. Locke, K. (2002). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 249-267. Lu, L., Gilmour, R., & Kao, S. F. (2001). Cultural values and happiness: An east-west dialogue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
141(4), 477-493. Marshall. T. C. (2008). Cultural differences in intimacy: The influence of gender-role ideology and individualism-collectivism. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 143-168. Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Fontaine, J. (2008). Mapping expressive differences around the world: The relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(1), 55-74. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 128(1), 3-72. Shulruf, B., Hattie, J., & Dixon, R. (2007). Development of a new measurement tool for individualism and collectivism. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25(4), 385-401. Ward, S., Pearson, C., & Entrekin, L. 2002. Chinese cultural values and the Asian meltdown. International Journal of Social Economics, 29(3), 205-217. Wheeler, L., Reis, H. T., & Bond, M. H. (1989). Collectivism-individualism in everyday social life: The middle kingdom and the melting pot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 79-86. : 2014. 07. 08 1 : 2014. 07. 31 : 2014. 11. 26
Cultural characteristics of Korean interpersonal relationships and scale development - affective relationships Yoon Park Hyungin Shim Sook Jong Lee Sungkyunkwan University The purpose of this study was to examine the cultural characteristics of Korean interpersonal relationships. A total of 45 preliminary items were selected through book and literature review about the characteristics of the Korean or Korean society in study 1. The first survey data were collected from the Korean university students. Through the item analysis and Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA), 4 factors composed of 32 items were extracted. Four factors were found: friendly attitude, harmony, jeong(interpersonal affection), keeping relationship, and using content analysis, 20 items were refined. Study 2 was conducted with the data collected from the Korea adults. As the result of carrying out EFA and Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA), the final 17 items were fixed as an affective relationships scale of the Korean. And CFA were implemented to evaluate discriminative validity. Finally, the implications and limitations of this study were discussed. Key words : Korean culture, affective relationships, scale development