., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Similar documents
상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

상담학연구. 9., , 21..,,,,,,... (Corresponding Author): / / 154 Tel: /

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

,.,,. (Vocational Ethics) (, 1999), Brown(2012). (, 2004).,,,,, ,400 (,,, 2011;, 2006)., (, 2006; Brown, 2012). (harm) (, 2006). NCDA(National

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

<30392EB9DAB0A1B6F72CC1A4B3B2BFEE2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

정보화정책 제14권 제2호 Ⅰ. 서론 급변하는 정보기술 환경 속에서 공공기관과 기업 들은 경쟁력을 확보하기 위해 정보시스템 구축사업 을 활발히 전개하고 있다. 정보시스템 구축사업의 성 패는 기관과 기업, 나아가 고객에게 중대한 영향을 미칠 수 있으므로, 이에 대한 통제

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

키고 있다. 이하에서는 이러한 인적자원과 자격에 대한 주요 정책 이슈들을 논의한다. Ⅱ. 인적자원의 형성과 활용의 흐름 인적자원의 흐름은 사람이 태어나서 무덤에 이르는 생애기간 동안 학습하고, 학습결과를 일터 에서 활용하는 것을 망라하는 넓은 영역을 포괄한다. 우선 이

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af


歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Qualitative Case


(5차 편집).hwp

<30382E20B1C7BCF8C0E720C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

0212-책표지-앞.ps, page Preflight ( 책표지-앞 )

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

< FC3D6C1BEBCF6C1A45FB1E2B5B6B1B3B1B3C0B0B3EDC3D E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등


歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Development of a curriculum to enhance pre-service golf coaches counseling competencies Hyosung Lim* & Kwan-Yong Choi Korea National Sport University

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: The Exploratory Stu

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,


,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi


歯1.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Study on the Resea

현 안 분 석 2 Catsouphes & Smyer, 2006). 우리나라도 숙련된 인 력부족에 대한 우려가 심화되고 있으며, 일자리의 미 스매치 수준이 해외 주요국보다 심각하다는 점도 지 지부진한 유연근무제의 확산을 위한 진정성 있는 노 력이 필요하다는 점을 보여준다

학교폭력사건 처리과정에 개입한 전문상담교사의 경험연구


한국교양교육학회/전국대학교양교육협의회/한국교양기초교육원 주최 2015 추계전국학술대회 프로그램 주제 교양교육의 : 당면과제와 전망 일시 : 2015년 11월 20일(금) 14:00~19:00, 21일(토) 09:00~17:00 장소 : 경남대학교 1공학관(공과대학 6층

15_3oracle

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis


Æ÷Àå½Ã¼³94š


상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

BSC Discussion 1

ePapyrus PDF Document

레이아웃 1

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability


untitled

44-4대지.07이영희532~

歯김길문.PDF



Main Title


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Theoretical foundation for the ethics of coaching sport Sungjoo Park* Kookmin University [Purpose] [Methods] [Results] [Conclusions] Key words:

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

SW¹é¼Ł-³¯°³Æ÷ÇÔÇ¥Áö2013

03-ÀÌÁ¦Çö

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께


Transcription:

* 4.,, 3,,, 3,, -., 3, 12, 27, 20. 9,,,,,,,,. 6,,,,,. 5,,,,.. * (2016),. (Corresponding Author): / / 303 Tel: 063-225-4496 / E-mail: jnj1015@jj.ac.kr

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), 2000. 2015 () 65, 4 51, 23 14 (,, 2015. 04. 01). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, 2015. 04. 01). 2015 () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,442, 2 3,233, 8,675 (, 2015. 4. 1). (, 1993;,,, 1994), (,,, 2007), (, 2009), (, 2013;,,, 2015a), (, 2013), (, 2015), (,,, 2015b), (, 2015;,,, 2013). 60-66,,,, (,,, 2015b). (,,, 2015a).,,, (,,, 2013;, 2015).. (, 2015), (,,, 2015b).. (, 2009).,

(,,, 2015a).,..,, (, 2010). (Spencer& Spencer, 1993), NCS (, 2015), 2015 6 (, 2015. 9. 23),,,,, (,,, 2010;, 2014;, 2010;, 2010).. Prahalad Hamel (1990) (, 2014). OECD, (Key competencies) 3 9 (OECD, 2003). (, 2010). (, 2007).,., (, 1993;, 2000;, 1993), (, 2008;,,, 2007), (,,, 2003;,, 2002), (, 2011;, 2009;, 2003), (, 2008;, 2014;, 2008;, 2004), (,,, 2012), (, 2011), (, 2012).,. (Competency) (2009). (2009) --, (2012), (2014),,,, (2012). 1.,

(2012), (2014), (1993),,, (2012), (2009) (2012),, (2003), (2014) (2012), (1993),,, (2012), (2009) (2012), (2014), (1993) (2012), (2014),,, (2012), (2009), (2005), (2010), NCS(2015) (2012), (2014),,, (2012), (2009), (2005), (2010), Ridley, Mollen Kelly(2011), (2014), (2009), (2005), (2010), NCS(2015) (2012),,, (2012), (2005) (2012), (2014), (2009), (2004) (2012), (2009),,, (2012), (2005), (2010),, (2012), (2014),,, (2012), (2009), (2004) (2012), (2014),,, (2012), (2009), (2001), Corey(1987) (2012), (2014),,, (2012), (2009), Corey(1987)

, (, 2014;, 2009)...,,.,?,?. 3 1.. 5 5. (, 2001) 34 3 37( 2 ). 11, () () 11 33 26 4 30 6 6 40 19 4 50 11 60 1 8 1-5 5 3 5-10 8 6 10-15 11 15-20 13 10

25, 30 6, 40 18, 50 11, 60 1 40, 1-20.. (, 2012;, 2014;,,, 2012;, 2009) (,,, 2015b),,,., 5 Likert. --,,, 3.,,, 4,,,,,,, 7,, 2.,,. 14, 23, 5 42., (1) (5) 5 Likert. 1 42. 2 1 27. 3 (), (), 2., (1) (5) 5 Likert. (,,, 2012;, 2012), (1) (5) 5 Likert.

,,.,, 3..,,.. 3,.. - -. 1:1, 2015 9 1 5., 1 1 20..,., 2015 9 23-30, 10. Window SPSS 21.0, (Content Validity). Lawshe(1975) Schipper.,.05 CVR(Content Validity Ratio) (, 2001). 10 CVR.62. 2015 10 5 10 27 3,

37. 1 37( 100%), 2 35 ( 95%), 3 34( 92%). Window SPSS 21.0,,,, CVR.,,,. (CVR). 35 (CVR).31., 2. -. - X, Y 4 4. (H-H), (H-L), (L-L), (L-H). H-H, H-L, L-H, L-L. (Hershkowitz) (,,, 2012; McCaslin, Ojomo, & Na, 1995) - (,, 2015; Martilla & James, 1977). 4 (, 2014),. 4.0 (2014) 4.0. 14,,,,,,,,,,,,,..,,,,,,,.,,.

4.5, (CVR).800. 4.0, (CVR).800.,,.600 Lawshe(1975).620, 4.0, (,,, 2015b). 1, 15,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (CVR).31(N=35 ),,,.. 2, 27 2, (CVR).31(N=35 ), (. () () ). 3 2 () (). 3. 3, 12, 27 ( 4 ).,,,,.,,,,,,, (),,,,.,,,,,.,,,, (),,,,,,.

CVR 4.86.44.931 CVR 4.62.62.862 4.17.60.793 4.03.68.724 4.17.47.931 3.83.66.655 4.83.38 1.000 4.25.52.929 3.79.56.586 (), 3.76.58.517 3.79.73.793 4.28.70.862 4.10.72.862 4.14.70.793 4.07.65.793 () 3.79.62.517 4.31.66.793 4.57.63 1.000 3.90.56.586 4.55.51 1.000 4.90.41.931 4.76.51.931 4.38.56.931 4.38.49 1.000 4.90.31 1.000 4.00.54.724 4.31.54 1.000,,,,,,.,,,,. ( 5 ),,,,,,,,,,. (), (),,.,,,,,

.,. (,, ).,,,.,,.,.,,. (),, ().,,.,,,...,,, (),,, (),,,,,,,,,,

4.76.50 3 4.47.62 3 4.35.60 11 3.82.58 11 4.15.50 16 3.65.65 18 4.76.43 3 4.29.63 6 4.26.57 13 3.85.66 10 4.38.70 8 3.79.73 13 4.09.72 18 3.74.71 16 () 3.62.70 27 3.47.75 24 3.76.61 24 3.29.58 27 4.44.50 8 4.15.61 7 4.24.55 14 3.82.72 12 3.94.55 22 3.47.71 24 4.71.52 6 4.32.68 5 4.03.67 19 3.59.70 20 3.97.72 21 3.50.66 23 3.74.57 25 3.41.66 25 () 3.74.67 25 3.35.73 26, 3.82.72 23 3.62.74 19 4.12.64 17 3.76.66 15 4.03.58 19 3.59.66 20 4.46.61 6 4.06.64 9 4.38.60 8 4.12.69 8 4.89.32 1 4.69.47 1 4.74.44 5 4.47.56 4 4.29.52 12 3.80.68 13 4.89.32 1 4.54.61 2 4.18.39 15 3.69.63 16

,,,,., (),, (). - ( 6, 1 ), (H-H),,,,,,,,. (H-L),,,,,,,,,,. (L-L),, (),,,,, (). (-) H-H H-L L-L L-H ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (), () - - - -

4.0 (2014) 4.0 H-H H-L. 20 ( 2 ), 9,,,,,,,,,. 6,,,,,,. 5,,,,,..,, 3,,, 3,, -., 3, 12, 27, 20..,.,,,,,,,,. (2012), (2009).,,.,. (, 2009).,.,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,., (),..

1 2., 1 (,,, 2015b),., (,,, 2015b).., (),,.,.,,,,,.,,,. NCS (2015), 4, 5,, 6, 7., NCS.,.. NCS(2015),.,... NCS(2013), NCS(2015)....., NCS(2015).,

, (2015b),.,. 1,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,.,,. NCS(2015). 6-8, 7-8,. NCS(2014)...,,.,,.,.,. (, ),,.,., -..,,,.., (,,, 2015a). 20 2 (, 2015)..,

..,,...,.,..,, NCS.. NCS.,.,,.,,.,, (2010). -. (1), 131-154. (NCS) (2014). :. (NCS) (2015). :. (2010). :. (2), 249-272.,,, (2013).. (2), 775-799. (2012).. (6), 2697-2713. (2008). ( ). 301-307. (2009).. (2), 793-811. (2015)..,, (2013).. (3), 1569-1585.,,, (2008).. (3), 961-986. (2014).,. (2008).

,. (2000).,.,,, (1993).. (2011).. (1), 117-136.,, (1993).. (2015).,. (2015).,. (2007). (competency). (3), 1-21.,, (2003).. (2), 161-182.,, (2012)..,, (1994)..,,,, (2011).. (1), 1-17. (2009).,. (2015).. I. (). (pp. 53-54)..,,, (2007). :. (3), 233-260.,,, (2007). RRC 2007-1., (2015). (IPA). (6), 927-949., (2002).. 231-250. (2000).. 91-107. (2001). :. (2014). -. (7), 49-75.,, (2012).. (1), 193-214.,,,,, (2010).. (1), 155-176. (2010).. (3), 151-171. (2014).,.,, (2015a).. (3), 303-324.,, (2015b).. (4), 301-319.

(2010).,. (2004).. (2), 147-173. (2003).. (2), 179-200.,, (2007).. 520-521. (2004).. 90-22.. (2012). :.,,, (2009).. (3), 1359-1382. Corey, G. (1987). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy(4th ed.). Pacific Groove. CA: Brooks/Cole. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personal Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 2(1), 77-79. McCaslin, N. L., Ojomo, C., & Na, S. I. (1995). Professional development needs of Ohio's community college and technical institute agriculture instructors. Journal of NACTA, June, 44-47. OECD (2003). Definition and selection of competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundation (DeSeCo). OECD Press. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competency of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91. Ridley, C. R., Mollen, D., & Kell, S. M. (2011). Beyond microskills: Toward a model of counseling competence. The counseling Psychologist, 39(6), 825-864. Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. : 2016. 04. 15. : 2016. 06. 07. : 2016. 06. 09.

An Exploratory Study on the Core Competencies of Undergraduate Students Majoring in Counseling JeonJu University This study was conducted to exploring the core competencies of undergraduate students majoring in counseling. For the purpose of this study, This study was performed literature research, in-depth interviews, testing validity of competency classification framework, delphi survey of three times, importance and required proficience analysis and importance-proficience matrix analysis in according to three-step research process. These were derived the core competencies of undergraduate students majoring in counseling. The study results are as follows. The finally confirmed competency of undergraduate students majoring in counseling was consisted of three competency clusters, twelve competency factors and twenty-seven competency indicators. The finally confirmed core competencies of undergraduate students majoring in counseling were twenty competency indicators. The knowledge of theory cluster was nine competency indicators, as the knowledge of counseling theory, the specific knowledge of counseling skills, the understanding of specific person, the knowledge of group counseling, the understanding of principle in changes, the utilizing knowledge of skills in counseling process, the understanding of human development and culture, the knowledge of problem domain, the interpretation and application knowledge of psychological test. The skills and performance competency cluster was six competency indicators, as relationship skills with clients, linkage and referral skills, document management, the relationship skills with group member, case conceptualization skills, interaction skills in group counseling, The attitude and personal qualities cluster was five competency indicators, as individual personality, self-reflection, counselor ethics, the preventing and coping burnout, researcher ethics. Based on the core competencies derived from undergraduate students majoring in counseling, counselor's training program and the curriculum for department of counseling were discussed. Key words : major in counseling, undergraduate students, competency, core competencies, department of counseling, counselor education