Original Article Korean J Child Stud 2016;37(5): pissn: eissn: X Relationships A

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Park and Lee (Korean Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Fourth edition [K-WPPSI-IV]) (Park, Lee, & Ahn, 2016). K-

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

(5차 편집).hwp



. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

歯14.양돈규.hwp

,......

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타


27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren


<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

jung, pack, song, kim, and Yi , , , OECD 1.30 (Statistics Korea, 2015a).,,., , 2006 (Ministry of Health

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

012임수진


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research


다문화 가정의 부모

untitled


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Jeein Jeong 20., (teaching), (Skerry, Lambert, Powell, & Mcauliffe, 2013; Strauss, Ziv & Stein, 2002)..,.,.,.??,?,.,,. (Davis-Unger & Carlson, 2008; S

서론 34 2

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


석사

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: : A Case Study on T

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특


139~144 ¿À°ø¾àħ

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

<353420B1C7B9CCB6F52DC1F5B0ADC7F6BDC7C0BB20C0CCBFEBC7D120BEC6B5BFB1B3C0B0C7C1B7CEB1D7B7A52E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

<30312DC1A4BAB8C5EBBDC5C7E0C1A4B9D7C1A4C3A52DC1A4BFB5C3B62E687770>

433대지05박창용

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare

Research Article Korean J Child Stud 2016;37(6): pissn: eissn: X A Study on the St

The characteristic analysis of winners and losers in curling: Focused on shot type, shot accuracy, blank end and average score SungGeon Park 1 & Soowo


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

Lumbar spine

가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.1-22 DOI: * An Analysis of the Ext

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Analyses the Contents of Points per a Game and the Difference among Weight Categories after the Revision of Greco-Roman Style Wrestling Rules Han-bong

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi


,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

A study on the sports educational zeal through the qualitative network analysis: Focusing on mothers of student athletes Byung-Goo Lee & Han-Joo Lee*

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

인문사회과학기술융합학회

歯6권2호.PDF

The effect of the temporal and spatial distance and the types of advertising messages on sport consumers attitude toward an advertising and purchase i

44-4대지.07이영희532~

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Analysis of objective and error source of ski technical championship Jin Su Seok 1, Seoung ki Kang 1 *, Jae Hyung Lee 1, & Won Il Son 2 1 yong in Univ

Transcription:

Original Article Korean J Child Stud 2016;37(5):117-128 http://dx.doi.org/10.5723/kjcs.2016.37.5.117 pissn: 1226-1688 eissn: 2234-408X Relationships Among Preschoolers Temperament, Intelligence and Problem Behaviors Jin Suk Lee 1, Jihyeon Han 1, Hyewon Park 2 Department of Child Studies, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea 1 Department of Child & Family Welfare, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea 2, 1, 1, 2 1, 2 Objective: This study examined the relationships among preschoolers temperament, intelligence, and problem behaviors. Intelligence was individually measured by the newly standardized K-WPPSI-IV (2015). Methods: The participants were 113 children (4 6 years old), their mothers and teachers. The following instruments were administered: EAS, K-WPPSI-IV, K-CBCL. Descriptive and correlational analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0. Results and Conclusion: The major results were as follows. First, sociability of temperament was negatively correlated with depression, withdrawal, and internalizing problem behavior. Second, activity and sociability of temperament were positively correlated with the most of the K-WPPSI-IV major indices (VCI, VSI, FRI, PSI, FSIQ, NVI, GAI, CPI). Third, depression, withdrawal, and internalizing problem behavior were negatively correlated with NVI and CPI indices of the K-WPPSI-IV. Attention problem and externalizing problem behavior were negatively correlated with FRI, WMI, FSIQ, NVI, GAI, and CPI indices of K-WPPSI-IV. Keywords: preschooler, temperament, intelligence, problem behaviors (Y. Kim, Han, & Hwang, 2004; Y. Kim et al., 2006).. (Koh & Lee, 2008, 2008)., (Campbell, 2002; Y. Kim et al., 2006) Corresponding Author: Jihyeon Han, Department of Child Studies, Chonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, Korea E-mail: narahan1217@hanmail.net The Korean Association of Child Studies This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Lee, Han, and Park 118.,,,., (S. H. Kim, 2009; Kwon & Chun, 2015; Moon & Lee, 2012; Woo, 2007),.,.. Thomas Chess (1977), Buss Plomin (1975, 1986), Rothbart Derryberry (1981). Buss Plomin (1986),..,. (Zeidner & Matthews, 2000) (Ackerman, 1996; Cattell, 1995). (Kaczmarek, Strelau, & Miklewska, 2010; Miklewska, Kaczmarek, & Strelau, 2006; Zuckerman, 1994).., (Park, Kwak, & Jung, 1994).. Suh (2009). Korean-Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth edition (K-WPPSI-IV) IQ, (Ji, 2016), K-WISC-IV (S. Kim & Kwak, 2014)..,. Thomas Chess (1977), (Nelson, Martim, Hodge, Havil, & Kamphaus, 1999). (Henderson, Marshall, Fox, & Rubin, 2004; Moon & Lee, 2012). (Kong & Lim, 2013; Kwon & Chun, 2015; S. H. Kim, 2009; Moon & Lee, 2012; Woo, 2007)., (Moon & Lee, 2012; Woo, 2007), (Moon & Lee, 2012).,.., (Anderson, Huston, Schmitt, Linebarger, & Wright, 2001),,, (Hwang & Hwang, 2001) K-WPPSI (Choi, 2002)... K-WPPSI-IV., (Kuem, Park, & Park, 2014). Burks Behavior Rating Scales, Second Edition (BBRS-II) Ryu (2015) K-WPPSI-IV,

119 Preschoolers Temperament, Intelligence, and Problem Behaviors,,,,. K-WPPSI-IV.,,. Buss Plomin (1986) 4, 4. 6 24 (Blennow & McNeil, 1980; Matheny, Wilson, & Nuss, 1984). (Cheon, 1992; S.-H. Kim, 2003) (S. Lee, 2007). (Ham, 2004; J. Lee, 2004; Y. Lee, 2004) K-WPPSI-IV (Ji, 2016; Ryu, 2015). (Ryu, 2015), (Kong & Lim, 2013).,..,,. K-WPPSI-IV (Park, Lee, & Ahn, 2015) IQ.,..,,,?,,? 연구대상 J 3 113. 66 (584.4%), 47 (41.6%), 4 35 (31.0%), 5 49 (43.4%), 6 29 (25.7%). 48.5%, 37.1%, 14.4%. 10.8%, 72.9%, 6.3%. 연구도구한국웩슬러유아지능검사 4판 (K-WPPSI-Ⅳ) 4 (K-WPPSI-IV). K-WPPSI-IV WPPSI-IV (Wechsler, 2012) Park (2015). 2 6 ~ 7 7, 15 (,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ). K-WPPSI-IV 2 6 ~ 7 7 2 6 ~ 3 11 (2 6 / 12 3 11 / 12 ), 4 0 ~ 7 7 (4 0 / 12 7 7 / 12 ) 2,., IQ, IQ. IQ,,, (Kuem et al., 2014). IQ (Full Scale IQ [FSIQ]) 3. (Verbal Comprehension Index [VCI]), (Visual Spatial Index [VSI]), (Fluid Reasoning Index [FRI]), (Working Memory Index [WMI]), (Processing Speed Index [PSI]),

Lee, Han, and Park 120. (Vocabulary Aquisition Index [VAI]), (Non Verbal Index [NVI]), (General Ability Index [GAI]), (Cognitive Proficiency Index [CPI]). 4 ~ 6 4 0 / 12 7 7 / 12. 2 13 8. 기질 Buss Plomin (1986) EAS (Emotionality, Activity, Sociability). (6 ), (5 ), (7 ) 3 18.. (emotionality), (activity) (Buss & Plomin, 1975).,,. (sociability) (Buss & Plomin, 1975),. 1 ( ) 4 ( ) 4 6 24, 5 20, 7 28,.. Cronbach s α =.88, Cronbach s α =.78, Cronbach s α =.80. 문제행동 Achenbach (1991) (CBCL) Oh, Lee, Hong Ha (1997) (K-CBCL). K-CBCL 99 1,,,, 49. 0, 1, 2 3. 0 18, 0 16, 0 16, 0 10, 0 38. (Cronbach s α).61 ~.82. 연구절차, J 3 4 ~ 6.. 121 2015 8 9 K-WPPSI-IV. 3 1:1. 1 ~ 1 30.,.. 113. 자료분석 PAWS Statistics 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).,,, t-.,. K-WPPSI-IV, ( )

121 Preschoolers Temperament, Intelligence, and Problem Behaviors. (scaled score) IQ. Park, Lee Ahn (2016) K-WPPSI-IV, IQ. 연구결과유아의성에따른기질, 지능, 문제행동경향,, Table 1.,, 1 4 (M = 2.5) (M = 1.96, SD = 0.64), (M = 2.72, SD = 0.60) (M = 2.78, SD = 0.55). t-, (M = 2.79, SD = 0.60) (M = 2.64, SD = 0.52),.., K-WPPSI-IV IQ, IQ 94.62 (SD = 12.44) 94.20 ~ 99.16. (M = 99.16, SD = 12.82), (M = 98.22, SD = 12.26), (M = 98.03, SD = 15.10), (M = 97.35, SD = 16.73), (M = 96.58, SD = 14.69), (M = 95.53, SD = 13.66), (M= 95.03, SD = 14.39), (M = 94.20, SD = 13.85). K-WPPSI-IV IQ t-, Table 1 Child Temperament, K-WPPSI-Ⅳ Performances, and Problem Behaviors Variables Temperament Total (n = 113) M (SD) Boy (n = 66) M (SD) Girl (n = 47) M (SD) Emotionality 1.96 (0.64) 2.00 (0.56) 1.90 (0.73).77 Activity 2.72 (0.60) 2.79 (0.60) 2.64 (0.52) 1.31 Sociability 2.78 (0.55) 2.81 (0.56) 2.76 (0.54).42 K-WPPSI-Ⅳ indices VCI 98.22 (12.26) 98.06 (12.63) 98.44 (11.85) -.16 VSI 98.03 (15.10) 100.07 (15.38) 95.17 (14.38) 1.71 FRI 97.35 (16.73) 98.68 (16.95) 95.48 (16.41) 1.00 WMI 99.16 (12.82) 97.93 (12.54) 100.87 (13.14) -1.20 PSI 96.58 (14.69) 96.10 (16.11) 97.23 (12.58) -.40 FSIQ 94.62 (12.44) 95.12 (12.43) 93.91 (12.54).50 NVI 94.20 (13.85) 95.12 (13.96) 92.91 (13.75).83 GAI 95.53 (13.66) 96.64 (13.59) 93.98 (13.74) 1.02 CPI 95.03 (14.39) 94.00 (15.25) 96.47 (13.12) -.89 Problem behavior Emotional instability 1.45 (1.44) 1.55 (1.52) 1.31 (1.33).79 Anxiety and depression 1.92 (1.75) 1.98 (1.90) 1.85 (1.56).35 Withdrawal 1.35 (1.69) 1.57 (1.89) 1.04 (1.36) 1.50 Attention problem 1.50 (1.39) 1.59 (1.45) 1.39 (1.32).69 Aggressive problem 5.06 (4.71) 5.63 (5.18) 4.29 (3.94) 1.38 Internalizing problem 4.73 (4.09) 5.10 (4.57) 4.21 (3.34) 1.05 Externalizing problem 6.56 (5.65) 7.21 (6.19) 5.67 (4.75) 1.32 Note. VCI = verbal comprehension index; VSI = visual spatial index; FRI = fluent reasoning index; WMI = working memory index; PSI = processing speed index; FSIQ = full scale IQ; NVI = non verbal index; GAI = general ability index; CPI = cognitive proficiency index. t-value

Lee, Han, and Park 122., (M = 4.73, SD = 4.09) (M = 6.56, SD = 5.65). t-,. 유아의기질과지능, 문제행동의관계유아의기질과지능의관계 유아의기질과문제행동의관계 Table 3. (r = -.24, p <.05), (r = -.24, p <.05) r = -.22 ( p <.05).,. 유아의지능과문제행동의관계 Table 2. K-WPPSI-IV (r =.25, p <.01), (r =.21, p <.05), (r =.30, p <.001), (r =.31, p <.001), IQ (r =.35, p <.001), (r =.35, p <.001), (r =.33, p <.001), (r =.26, p <.001).21 ~.35. (r =.27, p <.01), (r =.23, p <.05), (r =.22, p <.05), IQ (r =.31, p <.001), (r =.28, p <.01), (r =.31, p <.001), (r =.22, p <.05).22 ~.31. K-WPPSI-IV IQ. Table 4. K-WIPPSI-IV (r = -.20, p <.05), (r = -.22, p <.05), (r = -.20, p <.05), (r = -.23, p <.05). K-WIPPSI-IV., (r = -.20, p <.05), (r = -.23, p <.05). (r = -.28, p <.01), (r = -.23, p <.05), IQ (r = -.22, p <.05), (r = -.25, p <.05), (r = -.21, p <.05) -.21 ~ -.28. K-WIPPSI-IV Table 2 Correlations Between Child Temperament and K-WPPSI-Ⅳ Performances Emotionality Activity Sociability VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ NVI GAI Activity -.00 Sociability -.04.49*** VCI -.04.25**.16 VSI -.00.21*.27**.13 FRI.02.30**.23*.35***.13 WMI -.16.08.11.17.11.26** PSI -.02.31***.22*.17.18.23*.28** FSIQ.01.35***.31***.62***.51***.64***.44***.47*** NVI.02.35***.28**.30**.50***.79***.46***.47***.89*** GAI.05.33***.31***.70***.55***.64***.23**.23**.91***.75*** CPI -.10.26**.22*.22*.19*.31***.74***.85***.57***.58***.30*** Note. VCI = verbal comprehension index; VSI = visual spatial index; FRI = fluent reasoning index; WMI = working memory index; PSI = processing speed index; FSIQ = full scale IQ; NVI = non verbal index; GAI = general ability index; CPI = cognitive proficiency. *p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.

123 Preschoolers Temperament, Intelligence, and Problem Behaviors Table 3 Correlations Between Child Temperament and Problem Behavior Emotionality Activity Sociability EI AD W AP AgP IP Activity.04 Sociability -.10.51*** EI.12.04 -.01 AD.16 -.12 -.24*.57*** W.06 -.13 -.24*.50***.58*** AP.15 -.03 -.06.40***.53***.41*** AgP.13 -.01 -.08.61***.66***.55***.57*** IP.13 -.09 -.22*.80***.87***.84***.54***.73*** EP.14 -.02 -.09.61***.69***.57***.72***.98***.74*** Note. EI = emotional instability; AD = anxiety and depression; W = withdrawal; AP = attention problem; AgP = aggressive problem; IP = internalizing problem; EP = externalizing problem. *p <.05. ***p <.001. Table 4 Correlations Between Child K-WPPSI-Ⅳ Prformance and Poblem Behavior VSI.10 VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ NVI GAI CPI EI A/D W AP AgP IP FRI.34***.14 WMI.15.11.22* PSI.12.18 +.22*.28** FSIQ.60***.51***.65***.43***.44*** NVI.28**.50***.79***.44***.46***.89*** GAI.69***.54***.65***.20*.18 +.91***.75*** CPI.18.19.28**.75***.85***.55***.57***.25** EI.00 -.03 -.07 -.02 -.14 -.04 -.08 -.05 -.10 AD -.09 -.11 -.17 -.17 -.17 -.18 -.20* -.15 -.22*.57*** W -.08 -.01 -.17 -.19 -.17 -.174 -.20* -.11 -.23*.51***.59*** AP -.28** -.06 -.18 -.23* -.10 -.22* -.17 -.25* -.21*.40***.53***.40*** AgP -.09 -.09 -.19 -.18 -.15 -.18 -.23* -.18 -.21*.61***.66***.55***.56*** IP -.07 -.06 -.17 -.16 -.19 -.16 -.20* -.13 -.23*.80***.87***.84***.53***.73*** EP -.14 -.09 -.20* -.21* -.15 -.21* -.23* -.22* -.22*.61***.69***.57***.71***.98***.74*** Note. VCI = verbal comprehension index; VSI = visual spatial index; FRI = fluent reasoning index; WMI = working memory index; PSI = processing speed index; FSIQ = full scale IQ; NVI = non verbal index; GAI = general ability index; CPI = cognitive proficiency; EI = emotional instability; AD = anxiety and depression; W = withdrawal; AP = attention problem; AgP = aggressive problem; IP = internalizing problem; EP = externalizing problem. +p <.10. *p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001. (r = -.23, p <.05), (r = -.21, p <.05)., (r = -.20, p <.05), (r = -.21, p <.05), IQ (r = -.21, p <.05), (r = -.23, p <.05), (r = -.22, p <.05), (r = -.22, p <.05) -.20 ~ -.23.

Lee, Han, and Park 124.,.,,.. (Cheon, 1992; S.-H. Kim, 2003) (Ji, 2016).. K-WPPSI-IV, 99,,, 98 K-WPPSI-IV IQ 100.00 (SD = 15),,,., IQ. K-WPPSI-IV IQ (Ji, 2016; Ryu, 2015), (Ham, 2004; J. Lee, 2004; Y. Lee, 2004). IQ. (Wechsler, 2012),.,,,.. (Kong & Lim, 2013) (Ryu, 2015)., K-WPPSI-IV,.. (Jeong, 2012; Shin, 2006)., K-WPPSI-IV (,,, ), IQ, (,, ), (,, ), IQ, (,, ).. K-WPPSI (Suh, 2009), (Zeidner & Matthews, 2000; Zuckerman, 1994).,.,,. (Ji, 2016; S. Kim & Kwak, 2014)..,,.,.,,., (Kong & Lim, 2013).,. (Kong & Lim, 2013)

125 Preschoolers Temperament, Intelligence, and Problem Behaviors (Nelson et al., 1999; S. H. Kim, 2009; Moon & Lee, 2012)..,, K-WPPSI-IV,,. (Hwang & Hwang, 2001; Kuem et al. 2014; Ryu, 2015).,, K-WPPSI-IV,. K-WPPSI-IV (Kuem et al., 2014). K-WPPSI-IV,...,,, IQ,, K-WPPSI-IV,. K-WPPSI-IV (Kuem et al., 2014) K-WPPSI-IV, (Ryu, 2015). (Park, Lee, & Ahn, 2016) (Kuem et al., 2014)., -, (Park et al., 2016).,, IQ,,,,..,, K-WPPSI-IV., (Choi, 2002). IQ, K-WPPSI-IV IQ. K-WPPSI-IV..,.,.,. (Moon, 2011).. K-WPPSI-IV,.,.

Lee, Han, and Park 126 Acknowledgements This study was supported by the 2015 research grant of Chonbuk National University. Notes This article was presented as a poster at the 2016 Annual Spring Conference of the Korean Association of Child Studies. Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. In English References Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 2(2), 227-257. doi:10.1016/s0160-2896(96)90016-1 Anderson, D. R., Huston, A. C., Schmitt, K. L., Linebarger, D, L., & Wright, J. C. (2001). Early childhood television viewing adolescent behavior: The recontact study. Monographs of the society for Research in Child Development, 66(1), 1-147. Blennow, I. P., & McNeil, T. F. (1980). Questionnaire for measurement of temperament in one- and two-year old children: Development and standardization. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 21(1), 37-46. doi:10.1111/ j.1469-7610.1980.tb00014.x Buss, A. H., & Plomin, R. (1975). A temperament theory of personality development. Oxford, England: Wiley- Interscience. Buss, A. H., & Plomin, R. (1986). The EAS approach to temperament. In R. Plomin & J. Dunn (Eds.), The study of temperament: Changes, continuities and challenges (pp. 67-79). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Campbell, S. B. (2002). Behavior problems in preschool children: Clinical and developmental issues (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. Cattell, H. E. P. (1995). Some comments on a factor analysis of the 16PF and NEO Personality Inventory-Revised. Psychological Report, 77(3), 1307-1311. doi:10.2466/ pr0.1995.77.3f.1307 Henderson, H. A., Marshall, P. J., Fox, N. A., & Rubin, K. H. (2004). Psycho physiological and behavioral evidence for varying forms and functions of nonsocial behavior in preschoolers. Child Development, 75(1), 251-263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00667.x Kaczmarek, M., Strelau, J., & Miklewska, A. (2010). The relationship between intelligence and Pavlovian temperament traits: The role of gender and level of intelligence. In A. Gruszka, G. Mattews, & B. Szymura (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (pp. 51-61). NY: Springer. Matheny, A. P., Wilson, R. S., & Nuss, S. M. (1984). Toddler temperament: Stability across settings and over ages. Child Development, 55(4), 1200-1211. Miklewska, A., Kaczmarek, M., & Strelau, J. (2006). The relationship between temperament and intelligence: Crosssectional study in successive age groups. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(4), 643-654. doi:10.1016/ j.paid.2005.06.030 Nelson, B., Martim, R. P., Hodge, S., Havil, V., & Kamphaus, R. (1999). Modelling the prediction of elementary school adjustment from preschool temperament. Personality and Individual Difference, 26(4), 684-700. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00174-3 Rothbart, M. K., & Derryberry, D. (1981). Development of individual differences in temperament. In M. E. Lamb & A. L. Brown (Eds.), Advances in developmental psychology (pp. 37-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. Oxford, England: Brunner Mazel. Wechsler, D. (2012). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth edition [Measurement instruments]. London: Pearson. Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2000). Intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 581-610). NY: Cambridge University Press. In Korean Cheon, H. Y. (1992). The type of Korean children s temperament and mother s parenting attitude (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. Choi, H. J. (2002). The relation between K-WPPSI (Korean wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence) and K-CBCL (Korean child behavior checklist) (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=t8593475 Ham, E. S. (2004). A study on the children s intellectual and social

127 Preschoolers Temperament, Intelligence, and Problem Behaviors competence and mothers and teachers perceptions of it (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=t9740360 Hwang, H. S., & Hwang, H. J. (2001). The effects of cognitive ability on emotional and behavioural problems among preschoolers. Family and Environment Research, 39(3), 25-34. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a75462193 Jeong, A. (2012). The effects of children s intelligence on preschool adjustment: The moderating effects of temperament (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=t12716534 Ji, S. H. (2016). The relatioships between preschoolers temperament and K-WIPPSI-Ⅳ performances (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=t14024372 Kim, S. H. (2009). The effect of young children s temperament and teacher-child relationships on problem behaviors. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 29(5), 203-224. Retrieved from http://dl.nanet.go.kr/ Kim, S., & Kwak, K. (2014). Effect of developmental change in children s temperament on intelligence development : Focused on the extraversion and effortful control temperament. The Korean Journal of Human Development, 21(3), 29-50. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=a100141172 Kim, S.-H. (2003). Relationships among children s temperament, parental rearing attitude, and emotional intelligence. The Korean Journal of Education Psychology, 17(4), 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a40123588 Kim, Y., Han, T.-S., Jung, I.-H., Park, Y.-K., Hwang, H.-J., & Koo, H.-A. (2006). A structural sample of the effects of rearing, temperament, cognitive ability, and social competence on children s behavioral problems. The Journal of Korean Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 11(2), 229-250. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a75437726 Kim, Y., Han, T.-S., & Hwang, H.-J. (2004). A study on the relative effects of emotional intelligence, cognitive ability and temperament on the emotional and behavioral problems of preschool children. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education, 24(6), 227-298. Koh, I., & Lee, J. (2008). Problematic behaviors in preschool: A socio-demographic analysis. Family and Environment Research, 46(9), 33-45. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=a82585306 Kong, Y.-S., & Lim, J.-Y. (2013). The effects of temperament and executive function on preschooler s externalizing and internalizing preblems: Focusing on testing latzman s problem behavior theory. The Journal of Child Education, 22(4), 5-24. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a99871562 Kuem, J., Park, H., & Park, M. (2014). The relation between young children s intelligence and behavior problems. The Journal of Cognitive Enhancement and Intervention, 5(2), 1-15. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a100113320 Kwon, H. J., & Chun, S. Y. (2015). A structural relationship between preschoolers s temperament, Mothers parenting competency, and externalizing behavior problems. Korean Journal of Childcare and Education, 11(6), 79-96. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a101744704 Lee, J. (2004). Developmental trend in intelligence and creativity: From early childhood through adolescence (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=t10051060 Lee, S. (2007). Young children s behavioral problems and attention ability by parenting attitude. Journal of Child Studies, 28(2), 71-89. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=a5101787 Lee, Y. (2004). Relationship among development of children s number concept, learning readiness and I.Q. (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=t126049 Moon, S. H., & Lee, K. N. (2012). Effects of young children s temperament and teacher-child relationship on young children s problem behaviors. Journal of Korean Child Care and Education, 8(3), 69-89. Retrieved from http://www. riss.kr/link?id=a60158563 Oh, K. J., Lee, H. R., Hong, G. U., & Ha, E. H. (1997). Korean Child Behavior Checklist (K-CBCL). Seoul: Jungang Publishing. Park, H., Kwak, K., & Jung, C. (1994). Temperament and the performance of the Fagan Test of Infant Intelligence (FTII) in Korean infants. Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7(1), 98-109. Park, H., Lee, K. O., & Ahn, D. H. (2016). K-WIPPSI-Ⅳworkshop. Seoul: Inpsyt. Park, H., Lee, K. O., & Ahn, D. H. (2015). Administration and scoring manual for K-WPPSI-Ⅳ. Seoul: Hakjisa. Ryu, K. (2015). The relation between young children s cognitive ability and behavior problem (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=t13674590 Shin, J. Y. (2006). The effect of preschoolers intelligence, temperament, control ability on teacher-child relationships (Master's thesis) Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=t10826966 Suh, J. (2009). The effect of child s temperament, mother s parenting style and goodness of fit on Korean children s intellectual ability (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=t11704703 Woo, S. K. (2007) The effects of gender, temperament, social competences and self-control on young children s emotional and behavioral problems. Journal of Future Early Childhood Education, 14(4), 427-450. Retrieved from http://www.riss. kr/link?id=a5050076

Lee, Han, and Park 128 ORCID Jin Suk Lee Jihyeon Han Hyewon Park http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-0979 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0805-7055 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2074-6128 Received August 31, 2016 Revision received October 26, 2016 Accepted October 28, 2016