Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: NCS : * A Study on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * The Meaning of Pl

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Basic Study on t

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: Operation Plan of W


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

<31335FB1C7B0E6C7CABFDC2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

서론 34 2

,......

歯1.PDF

ePapyrus PDF Document

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on the Recog

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: A Critical Reflecti

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )


118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

Theoretical foundation for the ethics of coaching sport Sungjoo Park* Kookmin University [Purpose] [Methods] [Results] [Conclusions] Key words:

09김정식.PDF

(5차 편집).hwp

¿ï¸²58È£

<303720C7CFC1A4BCF86F6B2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa


서론

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

강의지침서 작성 양식


.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

부산교육 311호

KD hwp


04 형사판례연구 hwp

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: : A Case Study on T

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

다문화 가정의 부모

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

歯14.양돈규.hwp

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

12È«±â¼±¿Ü339~370

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

본문01

[ 영어영문학 ] 제 55 권 4 호 (2010) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1) Kyuchul Yoon, Ji-Yeon Oh & Sang-Cheol Ahn. Teaching English prosody through English poems with clon

歯kjmh2004v13n1.PDF

2 I.서 론 학생들을 대상으로 강력사고가 해마다 발생하고 있다.범행 장소도 학교 안팎을 가리지 않는다.이제는 학교 안까지 침입하여 스스럼없이 범행을 하고 있는 현실 이 되었다.2008년 12월 11일 학교에 등교하고 있는 학생(여,8세)을 교회 안 화장 실로 납치하여

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp DOI: * (,, )..,., ( ),.


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

아태연구(송석원) hwp

.....hwp


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.335-363 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.26.3.201612.335 Awareness, Supports in Need, and Actual Situation on the Curriculum Reconstruction of Special Education Teachers Purpose: The study aimed to showed the basic data of suitable education for students with disabilities through awareness, supports in need, and actual situation analysis on the curriculum reconstruction of special education teachers. Method: For the current study, 380 special education teachers were selected in objects of the study. Results: The results of this study are as follows. First, the older and more experienced female elementary school teachers the better aware of necessity and effectiveness of curriculum reconstruction. Moreover interests, needs and learning abilities of students with disabilities should be considered when the curriculum is reconstructed. In addition, special education school teachers have difficulty reconstructing curriculum from the lack of time. Secondly, only one chapter was replaced with other alternative contents by the envolved teacher alone especially by Korean subject. However the problem is that teachers have no knowledge how to reconstruct and have no time. Conclusion: I suggest it is necessary that government-level assist should be systemized for official teacher training, the related data offer, and sharing case information sharing. Key words : curriculum reconstruction, actual situation, awareness, supports in need Corresponding Author: Kim, Hye-Ri. Joongbu University, Dept. of Secondary Special Education, 305, Dongheon-ro, Deogyang-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 412-480, Korea. e-mail: miss1117@hanmail.net

. 20 3, 2011 2013 2011 ( 2011-501 ) ( ). 2015 ( 2015-81 ),. 2011 1 2 3 12. (2011),,.,.,. 2011 ( ).,. 2015 (,, 2016).,,, (, 2003),. (, 2014;, 2016)., (, 2014).

, (, 2014).., (, 2016).. 2010, --,.... ( )... (, 2011;, 2016), (,, 2008), (, 2003, 2014)..,..,?

,?.,. < -1>. (%),,, 48 12.6,,, 165 43.4,,, 59 15.5,, 108 28.5 87 22.9 293 77.1 29 73 19.2 30 ~39 175 46.1 40 132 34.7, 262 68.9 118 31.1 5 97 25.5 5 ~10 105 27.6 10 ~20 139 36.6 20 39 10.3 267 70.3 113 29.7 116 30.5 264 69.5 251 66.1 129 33.9 273 71.8 107 28.2

,, 3 ( 5, 1 5 ), 1 40. (,,, 2015;, 2005;, 2014;, 1997), 23. 23 20 2 3, 5,,,. 5 4 2, 40. < -2>. Cronbach α,,,,,,, 9,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 40 7.762 6.815 5.639 13,.766.

23 15 2 3, 5. 40, 2016 5 25 6 8 2,,., 400, 20 380 ( 95%). SPSS(Statistical Package for the Social Science)WIN 21.0. (, %, ), t (ANOVA).. 1) 교육과정재구성에대한전반적인인식 (1) M SD. 3.54.76. 4.16.68. 4.46.63. 3.21.81. 4.14.71. 4.34.68. 3.57.84 3.92.47

3.92. 4.46. (2) n M SD t 87 3.68.77. 293 3.49.75 1.994* 87 3.98.73. 293 4.21.65-2.875** 87 4.28.79. 293 4.51.57-3.060** 87 3.30.88. 293 3.18.79 1.158 87 4.16.70. 293 4.13.72.360 87 4.20.81. 293 4.38.63-2.263*. 87 3.47.82 293 3.60.85-1.264 87 3.87.51 293 3.93.46-1.133 *p<.05, **p<.01 (M=3.87) (M=3.93). 1%, (M=3.98, M=4.29) (M=4.21, M=4.51), n M SD F Scheffe 29 73 3.23.70 30 ~39 175 3.62.74. 40 132 3.59.77 7.633** b.c>a** 29 73 4.19.70. 30 ~39 175 4.13.64.264 40 132 4.17.70

( ) n M SD F Scheffe 29 73 4.51.58 30 ~39 175 4.46.65. 40 132 4.42.63.504 29 73 2.95.72 30 ~39 175 3.26.81. 40 132 3.30.83 5.026** b.c>a** 29 73 4.12.69 30 ~39 175 4.11.75.284. 40 132 4.17.67 29 73 4.41.60 30 ~39 175 4.37.69. 40 132 4.27.71 1.325 29 73 3.45.87 30 ~39 175 3.62.78. 40 132 3.58.90.999 29 73 3.84.44 30 ~39 175 3.94.47 1.265 40 132 3.93.49 **p<.01 (M=3.84~3.94). 1%, 29 (M=3.23, M=2.95) 30 ~39 (M=3.62, M=3.26) 40 (M=3.59, M=3.30). n M SD t, 262 3.55.77. 118 3.51.73.491 118 4.14.71., 262 4.16.66.268, 262 4.45.62. 118 4.46.65 -.049, 262 3.22.84. 118 3.19.75.388. 118 4.11.73, 262 4.15.70.491, 262 4.32.69. 118 4.38.67 -.805

( ) n M SD t., 262 3.58.88 118 3.54.75, 262 3.92.47 118 3.90.48.446.308 (M=3.92) (M=3.90). n M SD F Scheffe 5 97 3.28.73 5 ~10 105 3.55.69 5.830** c,d>a** 10 ~20 139 3.66.76. 20 39 3.69.83.... 5 97 4.19.67 5 ~10 105 4.02.68 10 ~20 139 4.24.65 20 39 4.15.75 5 97 4.47.60 5 ~10 105 4.44.69 10 ~20 139 4.47.61 20 39 4.38.63 5 97 2.94.78 5 ~10 105 3.19.70 10 ~20 139 3.37.88 20 39 3.38.78 5 97 4.13.72 5 ~10 105 4.03.75 10 ~20 139 4.20.68 20 39 4.21.66 5 ~10 105 4.25.78 10 ~20 139 4.37.65. 20 39 4.28.69. 5 97 4.42.59 5 97 3.38.82 5 ~10 105 3.67.77 10 ~20 139 3.60.89 20 39 3.67.84 2.327.262 6.242** c,d>a*** 1.323 1.294 2.370

( ) **p<.01, ***p<.001 n M SD F Scheffe 5 97 3.83.43 5 ~10 105 3.88.48 10 ~20 139 3.99.47 2.599 20 39 3.97.52 (M=3.83~3.99). 1% 0.1%, 5 (M=3.28, M=2.94) 10 ~20 (M=3.66, M=3.37) 20 (M=3.69, M=3.38). n M SD t 116 3.66.80. 264 3.48.73 2.031* 116 4.28.65. 264 4.11.68 2.272* 116 4.59.56. 264 4.40.65 2.710** 116 3.29.90. 264 3.17.77 1.317 116 4.16.78. 264 4.13.68.333 116 4.41.72. 264 4.31.66 1.250. 116 3.73.84 264 3.50.83 2.506* 116 4.01.49 264 3.87.45 2.758** *p<.05, **p<.01 1%, (M=4.01)', (M=3.87)'. (M=4.59)', (M=4.40)' 1%.

n M SD t 251 3.66.73. 129 3.30.75 4.442*** 251 4.28.63. 129 3.92.70 5.030*** 251 4.52.60. 129 4.33.68 2.907** 251 3.41.76. 129 2.83.78 6.968*** 251 4.17.70. 129 4.07.73 1.322 251 4.39.67. 129 4.24.68 2.047*. 251 3.73.75 129 3.26.91 5.299*** 251 4.02.44 129 3.71.46 6.512*** *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 0.1%, (M=4.02)', (M=3.71)'. 5%~0.1%. 2) 특수교육교육과정재구성시고려사항에대한인식 (1) M SD,. 4.50.58. 4.68.53 (). 4.34.68. 4.15.72. 4.05.72. 4.63.63 4.39.47

4.39. 4.68. (2) n M SD t 87 4.53.59,. 293 4.49.58.475 87 4.63.55. 293 4.69.52 -.944 () 87 4.34.64. 293 4.33.70.124 293 4.12.73. 87 4.23.68 1.220 87 4.01.76. 293 4.06.71 -.568. 87 4.61.56 293 4.64.65 -.422 87 4.39.49 293 4.39.46.024 *p<.05, **p<.01 (M=4.39) (M=4.39). n M SD F 29 73 4.63.51,. 30 ~39 175 4.49.57 2.394 40 132 4.45.63 29 73 4.79.41. 30 ~39 175 4.66.52 2.293 40 132 4.64.58 29 73 4.44.58 () 30 ~39 175 4.38.64. 40 132 4.23.78 2.835

( ) n M SD F 29 73 4.23.66. 30 ~39 175 4.16.68 1.068 40 132 4.08.79 29 73 3.95.78. 30 ~39 175 4.06.68 1.016 40 132 4.09.74 29 73 4.73.75. 30 ~39 175 4.64.56 1.356 40 132 4.58.64 29 73 4.46.35 30 ~39 175 4.40.45 1.541 40 132 4.34.54 (M=4.34~4.46). n M SD t, 262 4.50.60,. 118 4.51.55 -.131, 262 4.68.54. 118 4.68.50.024 (), 262 4.33.73. 118 4.35.58 -.203, 262 4.18.72. 118 4.08.72 1.295, 262 4.09.74. 118 3.97.67 1.529, 262 4.61.67. 118 4.68.52 -.909, 262 4.40.49 118 4.38.41.447 (M=4.40) (M=4.38).

n M SD F Scheffe 5 97 4.63.51, 5 ~10 105 4.41.62. 10 ~20 139 4.50.53 2.608 20 39 4.44.79. ( ).... *p<.05 5 97 4.81.39 5 ~10 105 4.60.57 10 ~20 139 4.65.49 20 39 4.67.74 5 97 4.40.64 5 ~10 105 4.35.64 10 ~20 139 4.30.71 20 39 4.26.82 5 97 4.21.66 5 ~10 105 4.08.72 10 ~20 139 4.18.73 20 39 4.08.84 5 97 3.94.75 5 ~10 105 4.05.74 10 ~20 139 4.14.67 20 39 4.00.76 5 97 4.71.69 5 ~10 105 4.61.56 10 ~20 139 4.61.58 20 39 4.59.79 5 97 4.45.37 5 ~10 105 4.35.48 10 ~20 139 4.40.45 20 39 4.34.68 3.161* a>b*.611.778 1.643.663.981 (M=4.34~4.45)'. 5%, 5 ~10 (M=4.60) 5 (M=4.81).

n M SD t 116 4.53.58,. 264 4.49.59.705 116 4.72.51. 264 4.66.53.898 () 116 4.42.61. 264 4.30.71 1.622 116 4.24.67. 264 4.11.74 1.694 116 4.16.67. 264 4.00.74 2.053* 116 4.69.50. 264 4.61.68 1.139 116 4.46.43 264 4.36.48 1.932 *p<.05 (M=4.46, 4.36)'. 5%, (M=4.00) (M=4.16). n M SD t 251 4.53.60,. 129 4.46.56 1.085 251 4.69.53. 129 4.65.53.738 () 251 4.34.69. 129 4.33.68.230 251 4.21.71. 129 4.02.72 2.429* 251 4.11.71. 129 3.94.74 2.187* 251 4.65.62. 129 4.61.64.484 251 4.42.47 129 4.33.46 1.712 *p<.05

(M=4.42, 4.33)'. 5%, (M=4.02, 3.94) (M=4.21, M=4.11)' '. 3) 교육과정재구성을방해하는요인에대한인식 (1) M SD. 3.54.96. 4.23.76. 3.87.86. 3.71.91. 3.65.91 3.80.56 3.80. 4.23. (2) n M SD t 87 3.48.99. 293 3.55.95 -.599 87 4.20.76. 293 4.24.76 -.434 87 3.80.85. 293 3.88.86 -.756 87 3.66.89. 293 3.72.91 -.587

( ) n M SD t 87 3.68.77. 293 3.65.94.299 87 3.76.52 293 3.81.57 -.644 *p<.05, **p<.01 (M=3.76) (M=3.81). n M SD F 29 73 3.53.80 30 ~39 175 3.62.98. 40 132 3.43 1.01 1.409 29 73 4.16.76 30 ~39 175 4.31.72. 40 132 4.15.80 1.937 29 73 3.95.86 30 ~39 175 3.82.87. 40 132 3.89.85.628 29 73 3.84.85. 30 ~39 175 3.65.94 1.139 40 132 3.71.90 29 73 3.77.79 30 ~39 175 3.62.94. 40 132 3.63.91.724 29 73 3.85.53 30 ~39 175 3.80.54.576 40 132 3.76.61 (M=3.76~3.85). n M SD t, 262 3.64.95 3.080**. 118 3.31.95

( ) n M SD t. 118 4.05.86, 262 4.31.69 3.071**, 262 3.86.88. 118 3.88.82 -.237. 118 3.75.91, 262 3.68.91 -.707, 262 3.67.88. 118 3.61.97.614, 262 3.83.56 118 3.72.56 1.757 **p<.01 (M=3.83, 3.72). 0.1%, (M=3.31, M=4.05) (M=3.64, M=4.31). n M SD F 5 97 3.53.84 5 ~10 105 3.56.94. 10 ~20 139 3.59 1.06.912 20 39 3.31.92... 5 97 4.22.74 5 ~10 105 4.28.66 10 ~20 139 4.26.79 20 39 4.00.89 5 97 3.97.82 5 ~10 105 3.72.84 10 ~20 139 3.93.88 20 38 3.77.90 5 97 3.87.82 5 ~10 105 3.56.89 10 ~20 139 3.73.95 20 39 3.62.94 1.414 1.840 2.065

( ) n M SD F 5 97 3.74.78 5 ~10 105 3.64.98. 10 ~20 139 3.59.92.572 20 39 3.69.92 5 97 3.86.49 5 ~10 105 3.75.56 10 ~20 139 3.82.60 1.342 20 39 3.68.60 (M=3.68~3.86). n M SD t 116 3.63.95. 264 3.50.96 1.247 116 4.25.80. 264 4.22.74.404 116 3.97.92. 264 3.82.83 1.501 116 3.73 1.03. 264 3.69.85.392 116 3.65.99. 264 3.66.86 -.087 116 3.84.61 264 3.78.54 1.090 (M=3.84, 3.78). n M SD t 251 3.54.96. 129 3.53.95.029 251 4.19.76. 129 4.29.75-1.263 251 3.85.86. 129 3.89.86 -.417

( ) n M SD t 251 3.64.91. 129 3.84.89-2.044* 251 3.65.90. 129 3.66.91 -.097 251 3.77.57 129 3.84.55-1.144 *p<.05 (M=3.77, 3.84). 5%, (M=3.64) (M=3.84). ( ) (n=760) () (n=533) (n=380) 1 (n=273) ( ) (%) 301 39.6 1,, 273 35.9 2 99 13.0 3 52 6.8 4 27 3.6 5 5 0.7 6 ( ) 3 0.4 7 322 60.4 1 84 15.8 2 61 11.4 3 56 10.5 4 ( ) 10 1.9 5 273 71.8 1 107 28.2 2 (N=273) 119 43.6 1 88 32.2 2 33 12.1 3 30 11.0 4 3 1.1 5

( ) 2 (n=273) ( ) (n=546) () (n=814) () (n=1,038) (n=273) (n=273) ( ) (%) 73 26.7 1 71 26.0 2 58 21.2 3 37 13.6 4 33 12.1 5 1 0.4 6 () 102 18.7 1 () 101 18.5 2 () 85 15.5 3 () 84 15.4 4 () 78 14.3 5 () 54 9.9 6 42 7.7 7 187 23.0 1 159 19.5 2 115 14.1 3 101 12.4 4 58 7.1 5 53 6.5 6 43 5.3 7 36 4.4 8 35 4.3 9 20 2.5 10 ( ) 7 0.9 11 210 20.2 1 194 18.7 2 163 15.7 3 119 11.5 4 114 11.0 5 55 5.3 6 48 4.6 7 46 4.4 8 42 4.0 9 38 3.7 10 ( ) 9 0.9 11 138 50.5 1 89 32.6 2 39 14.3 3 6 2.2 4 ( ) 1 0.4 5 224 82.1 1 2 31 11.4 2 15 5.5 3 ( ) 3 1.1 4

( ) () (n=387) ( ) (n=214) ( ) (%) 105 27.1 1 95 24.5 2 75 19.4 3 71 18.4 4 35 9.0 5 (, ) 6 1.6 6 (n=107) 88 41.1 1 58 27.1 2 ( ) 33 15.4 3 19 8.9 4 16 7.5 5 (n=136) (,,, ) 76 55.9 1 (,, ) 30 22.0 2 16 11.8 3 ( ) 14 10.3 4 (39.6%)',,, (35.9%). (60.4%), 71.8%., (43.6%) (26.7%), (18.7%). 23% 20.2%, (50.5%), (82.1%), (27.1%)., (41.4%), (27.1%).

,, 55.9%, 22.0%..,..,,. (2005). 71.8%,, (, 2016).,,,.,.,

,,,,., 29 30 ~39 40, 5 10 ~20 20.,.,,, (2008). (, 2011)., -..,,,,. (, 2012)..,,,.,,..

(,, 2008),.,,.,,,, (2014).,.,,. (, 2014), 1 (,, 2007).,,, (Wehmeyer, Sands, Kwonlton, & Kozleski, 2002),.. (Marsh & Willis, 2003).,.

,,,,,,.,,,. (2016).,,..,..,,..,..

(2011). 2011-501. (2015). 2015-81 (2014). :. (2), 149-170., (2008).,,. (4), 195-212. (2011)...,, (2014).. (1), 321-338. (2016)... (2016)...,, (2015).. (4), 117-143. (2012)... (2005). :. (2005)... (2003).. (4), 525-542. (2011).. (1), 101-122. (2014).. (3), 107-131. (2014).. (2), 177-202. (1997). -.. (2014). :..

, (2016).. (2), 1-25., (2007).. (3), 283-302. Marsh, C. J., & Willis, G. (2003). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, Ongoing issue (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Wehmeyer, M. L., Sands, D. J., Kwonlton, H, E., & Kozleski, E. B. (2002). Providing assess to the general curriculum: Teaching students with mental retardation. Baltimore, MA: Paul. H Brookes Publishing Co.. : 2016.10.31 / : 2016.12.5 / : 2016.12.20

:,. : 380,. :,.,,,,.,,.,,.