상담학연구 :, ,,.,,,.,.,.,. (Corresponding Author): / / 250 Tel: /

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

., (, 2011). Back(1976),.,. 19~24..,, (, 2008;,, 2013),,,,, (, 2002;, 1999;, 2013;, 2009).,,,.,. (Beck et al., 1979).,. (metacognition)., (Flavell, 19

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).

상담학연구 : *.,,,,, (N=495)..,.,.. * (2013). (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

,......

<BCF6C1A42D312DC0E5C0BAC7FD2CC0CCB5BFB1CD2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th


상담학연구 * Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1370 Tel: /

:..,,. (KCYPS)., 2. 5 ( 5) 2 1., 1.,. :,, ( )

歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j

,......

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

歯유성경97.PDF

상담학연구. 9., , 21..,,,,,,... (Corresponding Author): / / 154 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * A Study on the

(5차 편집).hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

상담학연구 : * ,,,.,,,..,.,.,,,,.. *. (Corresponding Author): / / 815 Tel: /

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :


歯5-4-26(황혜리,김미경).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

상담학연구 * -,, ,,....,.,.,... * 2011 ( ) (NRF B00234). (Corresponding Author): / / Tel: /

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

상담학연구 , , ,, ( ),.,., 15 19,, 30, (Corresponding Author): / Tel: /

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

<30392EB9DAB0A1B6F72CC1A4B3B2BFEE2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

교육치료연구 SNS : SNS SNS SNS SNS, SNS, SNS. SPSS MACRO SNS., SNS SNS. SNS, SNS,. SNS SNS,. (2016) (Corresponding Author) : / / 608 / Tel:

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /


인문사회과학기술융합학회

歯이희경13-1.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

- * (32 ), ,,,, * 2013 ( ) (KRF-2013S1A3A ). :,, 3 53 Tel : ,

歯김길문.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

다문화 가정의 부모

,......

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability


,, (, 2003;, 2004).,, (, 2008;, 2010;, 2003;, 2012).,, (, 2007; Hahn et al., 2011). (, 2010;, 2012; Lam et al., 2010), (, 2008;, 2006).,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<3131BAB8B0C7BBE7C8B8BFACB1B85FC3D6BCD2BFAC2E687770>


ÀÌÁÖÈñ.hwp

도비라

상담학연구 : ,,,,. AMOS..,.,.,.. * (2016). (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

정보화정책 제14권 제2호 Ⅰ. 서론 급변하는 정보기술 환경 속에서 공공기관과 기업 들은 경쟁력을 확보하기 위해 정보시스템 구축사업 을 활발히 전개하고 있다. 정보시스템 구축사업의 성 패는 기관과 기업, 나아가 고객에게 중대한 영향을 미칠 수 있으므로, 이에 대한 통제



44-6대지.08김정희-5

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

저작자표시 - 비영리 - 변경금지 2.0 대한민국 이용자는아래의조건을따르는경우에한하여자유롭게 이저작물을복제, 배포, 전송, 전시, 공연및방송할수있습니다. 다음과같은조건을따라야합니다 : 저작자표시. 귀하는원저작자를표시하여야합니다. 비영리. 귀하는이저작물을영리목적으로이용할

202 김 수 현 원 영 신 있으므로, 이러한 선수들의 긍정적인 태도를 높여 구 단의 성과를 향상시킬 수 있는 조직적 차원의 연구가 요구된다 하겠다. 따라서 선수들을 대상으로 한 프로 구단의 조직성과 제고에 관한 학문적 작업은 중요한 연구과제인 것이다. 최근 조직 커뮤

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

석사학위 논문

,, (, 2010). (, 2007).,,, DMB, ,, (, 2010)., LG., (, 2010) (, ,, ) 3, 10, (, 2009).,,. (, 2010)., (, 2010). 11

상담학연구 : *. 375, -,,. AMOS..,.,.,.,.,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1095 Tel: /


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * Relationships a

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A Longitudinal St

380 Hyun Seok Choi Yunji Kwon Jeongcheol Ha 기존 선행연구에서는 이론연구 (Ki, 2010; Lee, 2012), 단순통계분석 (Lee, 2008), 회귀분석 (Kim, 2012)과 요인분석 (Chung, 2012), 경로분석 (Ku,

:,,,. (,, ), (,,,, ),,. 559 ( 205, 203, 151; 132, 427).,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,..,. :,, ( )


Transcription:

:,. 3 1 506,,.,,,.,.,.,. (Corresponding Author): / / 250 Tel: 043-230-3441 / E-mail: heejoungkim@knue.ac.kr

...,,, (Lesser, 1982). Pennebaker (1990) (active inhibition), King Emmons (Pennebaker, Hughes, & O Heeron, 1987). (ambivalence over emotional expression) (King & Emmons, 1990).,, (Albani et al., 2007; King & Emmons, 1990; Lee, 2009).,.. (Lee, 2009)...... (,, 2005).,.. (Berry & Pennebaker, 1993).,., (Porter et al., 2005),

(Berry & Pennebaker, 1993) (,, 2007; Lundh & Wagby, 2002; Pennebaker et al., 1987). (Holtforth et al., 2013; Mongrain & Zuroff, 1994; Trachsel et al., 2010) (Krause, Robins, & Lynch, 2000) (,,, 2008; King & Emmons, 1990; Mongrain & Vettese, 2003); 1990; Quinton & Wagner, 2005)., (,,, 2007;, 2008).. Emmons Colby(1995),. King(1998)., (Albani et al., 2007)..., (, 2008)., (, 1997)., (, 2007;, 2013).,..,.

, (Lee, 2009; Sue & Sue, 2008). ( :,,, ) (Albani et al., 2007; ; Mongrain & Vettese, 2003). Lee(2013)..,.., (Block & Block, 1980) (,,, 2004;,, 2005; Tugade & Fredrickson, 2004)..,,, (Luthar, Cicchetti, & Becker, 2000). (Goldstein & Brooks, 2009)., (,, 2005),, (, 2009;, 2010;, 2010;, 2007)., (resilience),, (ego-resiliency), (Luthar, Cicchetti, & Becker, 2000; Masten & Coatsworth, 1998;, 2013).

, (, ) (Luthar et al., 2000).,.. (, 2010;, 2007),., (Mongrain & Zuroff, 1994). (, 2006), (Lee, 2009).. (, 2005;, 2004)...,.. (, 2001). (, 1988). (, 2003), (, 2006).

(Giarrochi, Deane, & Wilson, 2002; Gross & John, 2003), (Emmons & Colby, 1995). Lee(2009).,.., -.,...,?,? 3 1 560. 560 521 506. 203 (40.1%), 303 (59.9%). King Emmons (1990) (AEQ; Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire), (2007) (AEQ-K). 20, 13, 7. Likert 5,.90,.78.87. Block Kremen (1996) Higgins(1994)

(1996) (2010). 40, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8 Likert 5., Cronbach a =.03. (squared multiple correlation: SMC).40,.30. 5, 3, 3.90,.65.69..90,.72.76. Furman Buhrmester(1985) NRI(Network of Relationships Inventory) (2002). 40, (,,,,, ) 20 (,,,, ) 20. Likert 4,..90,.80.84. Carkuff (1988) (2002). 18, 5, 5, 5, 3 Likert 4., (squared multiple correlation: SMC).40,.29. 4,,. 4 SPSS/Window 16.0 AMOS 7.0,,, (skewness) (kurtosis). Pearson,..

(,,, ), 1., (r= -.24) (r= -.16), (r= -.16) (p <.01).,,. (r=.37), (r=.55),,. (r=.32) (p <.01). 2. 1 2 3 4 M SD 1. 1 2.98.61 2. -.24** 1 3.35.45 3. -.16**.37** 1 2.73.48 4. -.16**.55**.32** 1 2.98.34 ** p <.01 -.037 -.086 -.302.487 -.090.365.065 -.017.043.148 -.075 -.244 -.189.212 -.074.232.005.393 -.173.018

, <2.0, <7.0 (, 2007). (maximum likelihood estimate) (West, Finch, & Curran, 1995).. χ 2 CFI, GFI, TLI, RMSEA. χ 2, (, 2000). CFI(Comparative Fit Index) GFI(Goodness of Fit Index), TLI (Turker-Lewis Index), RMSEA(Root Mean Square Error of Approximation), TLI RMSEA (, 2000). TLI, CFI, GFI.90, RMSEA RMSEA <.05, RMSEA <.08, RMSEA <.10, RMSEA >.10 (, 2000; McDonald & Ho, 2002). χ 2 = 121.7 (25, N=506) (p <.01). TLI=.915, CFI=-953, GFI=.955. RMSEA Browne Cudeck(1993).10. 3, 1., 4 p<.001. (squared multiple correlation: SMC). 98.9%, 30.2%. 49.1%, 74.6%, 41.4%. χ 2 df TLI CFI GFI RMSEA 121.7 25.915.953.955.088 (p=.000)

B β SE SMC 1.00.99.989.53***.55.04 15.10.302 1.00.70.491 1.36***.86.09 15.13.746 1.05***.64.08 13.32.414 1.00.67.443 1.05***.77.09 11.97.592.94***.69.08 11.77.481 1.00.86.744 1.01***.89.06 15.70.805 *** p <.001 44.3%, 59.2%, 48.1%. 74.4%, 80.5%. 40%.,.. 1. 2. 1 2 2 3. 5 1(χ 2 =104.24 (df=26, N=506), p=.000; TLI=.93, CFI=.96, GFI=.96, RMSEA=.077) 2(χ 2 =107.77(df=27, N=506), p=.000; TLI=.93, CFI=.96, GFI=.96, RMSEA=.076). (nested)

χ 2 df TLI CFI GFI RMSEA 1 104.24(p=.000) 26.93.96.96.077 2 107.77(p=.000) 27.93.96.96.076 B β SE t -.39 -.42.06-6.80*** -.18 -.18.05-3.40***.51.51.05 10.48***.11.12.04 2.40*** *** p <.001. (nested) χ 2. χ 2, χ 2 (, 2007). χ 2 3.53, 1. 1 χ 2.05 3.84. (, 2010). 2 1 (df= 27 > df =26, ) 2, (Kline, 2005). 6 2( ). (B= -.42, p<.001) (B= -.18, p<.001). (B=.51, p<.001), (B=.12, p<.001).,., 4,

. Sobel. Sobel Baron Kenny (1986), (,, 2011, ). Z 1.96. Sobel, SE a SE b a b. Z, -2.68. Z, -1.97..

. 506...,,,,,. (, 2007) (, 2006).., (,,, 2004;,, 2005; Shonk & Cicchetti, 2001; Tugade & Fredrickson, 2004),. (,, 1991;, 2005;, 2007) (, 2007),...,,. 1, 2.

..,.. (,, 2007; Lee, 2009).,.,. (, 2001)., (,, 2004).., (Pyszczynski & Greenberg, 1986), (. ) (. ) (Safran & Greenberg, 1990). (Lee, 2009).,. -, (Howard & Olson, 1985)..,.,..

.,, (, 2009;, 2010;, 2007). Mongrain Zuroff(1994) ( :, ), King Emmons(1990),. (2006)...,...,...,,.,,.,,,.,

...,....,.. (Mongrain & Zuroff, 1994).., 1.,.,...,.,,., (Lee, 2009)..,. (2010).

:. (2006).,. (2005).,. (2002).,. (2002).,.,, (2007). - -. (4), 1243-1261. (2001).,. (1988).,. (1997). :. (2007).,. (2008).,. (2007). :. (2004).,. (2009).,. (2010).,. (2003).,. (2013).. (5), 2751-2782., (2011). :. (3), 671-691. (2013).,. (2001).,.,, (2004).,,. (1), 393-408., (1991).. (1), 48-69. (2010).,. (2007).,.

, (2004). /. (3), 187-200. (2010).,. (2006).,., (2005).. (2), 161-206. (2005).,. (2007).,. (2008).,., (2005).. (1), 239-257., (2007).. (4), 71-89.,, (2008).. (3), 1063-1080., (2007). :,. 218-219.. (2007).,., (2005).,. (1), 37-51. (2000).. (1), 161-177. Albani, C., Blaser, G., Völker, J., Geyer, M., Schmutzer, G., Bailer, H., Brähler, E., & Traue, H. C. (2007). Ambivalence over emotional expressiveness: Psychometric evaluation of the AEQ-G18 in a representative German survey. GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine, 4, 1-13. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. Berry, D. S., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1993). Nonverbal and verbal emotional expression and health. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 59, 11-19. Block, J. H., & Block, H. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In W. A. Collins(Ed), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology(13, pp. 39-101). Block, J., & Kremen, A. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 349-361. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen, J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. (pp. 136-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Ciarrochi, J., Deane, F. P., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Adolescents who need help the most are the least

likely to seek it: The relationship between low motional competence and low intention to seek help. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 30, 174-188. Emmons, R. A., & Colby, P. M. (1995). Emotional conflict and well-being: Relation to perceived availability, daily utilization, and observer reports of social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 947-959. Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children's perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1016-1024. Goldstein, S., & Brooks, R. B. (2009). {Handbook of Resilience in Children}. ( ). : ( 2005 ). Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362. Holtforth, M. G., Krieger, T., Altenstein, D., Doerig, N., Friederich, H., & Bents, H. (2013). Ambivalence over emotional expression in major depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 862-864. Howard, L. B., & Olson, D. H. (1985). Parentadolescent communication and the circumplex model. Child Development, 56, 438-447. King, L. A. (1998). Ambivalence over emotional expression and reading emotions in situations and faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 753-762. King, L. A., & Emmons, R. A. (1990). Conflict over emotional expression: Psychological and physical correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 864-877. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press. Krause, E. D., Robins, C. I., & Lynch, T. R. (2000). A mediational model relating sociotropy, ambivalence over emotional expression and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 328-335. Lee, B. (2009). Relationships between adolescents preferred sources of help and emotional distress, ambivalence over emotional expression, and causal attribution of symptoms: A Singapore study. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 37, 435-457. Lesser, I. M. (1982). A review of the alexithymia concept. Psychosomatic Medicine, 43, 531-540. Lundh, L. G., & Wagby, M. (2002). Causal thinking about somatic symptoms: How is it related to the experience of symptoms and negative affect? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 701-717. Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543-562. Masten, A., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children. American Psychologist, 53, 205-220. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82. Mongrain, M., & Vettese, L. C. (2003). Conflict over

emotional expression: Implications for interpersonal communication. Personality and Social Psycholology Bulletin, 29, 545-555. Mongrain, M., & Zuroff, D. C. (1994). Ambivalence over emotional expression and negative life events: Mediators of depressive symptoms in dependent and self-critical individuals. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 447-458. Higgins, G. O. (1994). Resilient adults: Overcoming a cruel past. San Francisco: Jossey_Bass. Pennebaker, J. W., Hughes, C. F., & O Heeron, R. C. (1987). The psychophysiology of confession: Linking inhibitory and psychosomatic processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 781-793. Porter, L. S., Keefe, F. J., Lipkus, I., & Hurwitz, H. (2005). Ambivalence over emotional expression in patients with gastrointestinal cancer and their caregivers: Associations with patient pain and quality of life. Pain, 117, 340-348. Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1986). Evidence for a depressive self-focusing style. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 95-106. Quinton, S., & Wagner, H. L. (2005). Alexithymia, ambivalence over emotional expression, and eating attitude. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1163-1173. Safran, J. D., & Greenberg, L. S. (1990). The treatment of anxiety and depression: The process of affective change. In Kendall, P. & Watson, D. (Eds), Depression and anxiety: Distinctive and overlapping features (pp. 455-486). New York: Academic Press. Inc. Shonk, S. M., & Cicchetti, D. (2001). Maltreatment, competency, and risk for academic and behavioral maladjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 3-17. Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2008). Counselling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (5th ed.). New York: Wiley. Trachsel, M., Gurtner, A., von Känel, ML., & Holtforth, M. G. (2010). Keep it in or let it out? Ambivalence over the expression of emotion as a moderator of depressiveness in unemployed subjects. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 141-146. Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 320-330. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. : 2013. 12. 15. : 2014. 02. 14. : 2014. 02. 19.

Adolescents' Ambivalence over Emotional Expression and Peer Relationship: Mediating effects of ego-resiliency and Parents' Facilitative Communication Korea National University of Education This study examined the effects of ambivalence over emotional expression on peer relationship of adolescents. Ego-resiliency and parents facilitative communication were examined as important mediators in the link between ambivalence over emotional expression and peer relationship. The Ambivalence Over the Expression of Emotion Questionnaire(AEQ) was administered to 506 high school students along with the measures of quality of peer relationship, ego-resiliency, and parents facilitative communication. Data analyses revealed the followings. First, ambivalence over emotional expression has significant negative correlations with adolescents peer relations, ego-resiliency and parents facilitative communication. Second, ego-resiliency mediated the effect of ambivalence over emotional expression on adolescents peer relationship. Third, parents facilitative communication mediated the effect of ambivalence over emotional expression on adolescents peer relationship. These findings suggest that therapists must understand the role of ego-resiliency and parents facilitative communication on the relations of ambivalence over emotional expression to peer relationship and develop intervention plan based on that. More implications of the study and suggestions for future study are discussed. Key words : ambivalence over emotional expression, peer relationship, ego-resiliency, facilitative communication