지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

Similar documents
DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap


(5차 편집).hwp

. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

교육치료연구 SNS : SNS SNS SNS SNS, SNS, SNS. SPSS MACRO SNS., SNS SNS. SNS, SNS,. SNS SNS,. (2016) (Corresponding Author) : / / 608 / Tel:


상담학연구 : *.,,,,, (N=495)..,.,.. * (2013). (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

- * (32 ), ,,,, * 2013 ( ) (KRF-2013S1A3A ). :,, 3 53 Tel : ,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

<30392EB9DAB0A1B6F72CC1A4B3B2BFEE2E687770>

<B0E6C8F1B4EBBBE7C8B8B0FAC7D05F3339B1C732C8A32E687770>

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * A Study on the

歯14.양돈규.hwp


380 Hyun Seok Choi Yunji Kwon Jeongcheol Ha 기존 선행연구에서는 이론연구 (Ki, 2010; Lee, 2012), 단순통계분석 (Lee, 2008), 회귀분석 (Kim, 2012)과 요인분석 (Chung, 2012), 경로분석 (Ku,

歯유성경97.PDF

05_최운선_53~67,68.hwp

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare

歯이희경13-1.PDF

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

원고스타일 정의

11¹ÚÇý·É

202 김 수 현 원 영 신 있으므로, 이러한 선수들의 긍정적인 태도를 높여 구 단의 성과를 향상시킬 수 있는 조직적 차원의 연구가 요구된다 하겠다. 따라서 선수들을 대상으로 한 프로 구단의 조직성과 제고에 관한 학문적 작업은 중요한 연구과제인 것이다. 최근 조직 커뮤

상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j

상담학연구 * Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1370 Tel: /

<3131BAB8B0C7BBE7C8B8BFACB1B85FC3D6BCD2BFAC2E687770>

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

,......

44-6대지.08김정희-5

44-6대지.07전종한-5

2014 자격연수 제1기_수정.hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

상담학연구 : ,,,,. AMOS..,.,.,.. * (2016). (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

00처음(1-6)

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

최종ok-1-4.hwp

<313220BCD5BFB5B9CCC1B6BFF8C0CF2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

:,,,. (,, ), (,,,, ),,. 559 ( 205, 203, 151; 132, 427).,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,..,. :,, ( )

Issue 두 가지 상대적 관점에서 검토되고 있다. 특히, 게임 중독에 대한 논의는 그 동안 이를 개인의 심리적 차원에서 접근해왔던 것에서 벗어나 청소년에 대한 사회문화 및 정보 리터러시(literacy) 교육의 방향이라든 지 나아가 게임중독과 관련한 사회구조적인 또는

,, (, 2003;, 2004).,, (, 2008;, 2010;, 2003;, 2012).,, (, 2007; Hahn et al., 2011). (, 2010;, 2012; Lam et al., 2010), (, 2008;, 2006).,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

<C1A63236B1C72031C8A328C6EDC1FDC1DF292E687770>

상담학연구 : *. 375, -,,. AMOS..,.,.,.,.,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1095 Tel: /

歯김정욱.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

다는 점을 지적한 바 있다. 어느 시대나 정신질환자가 있기 마련인데, 표현형식이 어떻게 나타나느냐가 중요하며, 강남역 살인사건 피의자가 여성 혐오적 망상을 하게 된 사회적 배 경에 주목해야 한다 는 거다. 80년대 정신질환의 증상이 누군가 나를 도청하고 있다 는 서 사


한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

<30315FC0CCB5BFC1D65FC7D1B1B9BCBAB8C5B8C52E687770>

①국문지리학회지-주성재-OK

지방자치시대의 정책갈등 분석

인문사회과학기술융합학회

<303420B9E8C1A4BCB7BFF8B5B5BFACC1B6B1A4B9CE2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

상담학연구 * -,, ,,....,.,.,... * 2011 ( ) (NRF B00234). (Corresponding Author): / / Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

5-김재철

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

1-2-2하태수.hwp

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Research Article Korean J Child Stud 2019;40(3): pissn: eissn: X Effect of Parental N

Analyses the Contents of Points per a Game and the Difference among Weight Categories after the Revision of Greco-Roman Style Wrestling Rules Han-bong

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Qualitative Case

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

레이아웃 1

상담학연구 *,. 41 -, ,,, 82,,, Likert..96,.94,.88,.89, ,. (CCR: Conflict Over Child Rearing) (DSC: Dissatisfaction With Childre

상담학연구 :, ,,.,,,.,.,.,. (Corresponding Author): / / 250 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Political Science& International Relations EWHA WOMANS UNIVERSITY

,, (, 2010). (, 2007).,,, DMB, ,, (, 2010)., LG., (, 2010) (, ,, ) 3, 10, (, 2009).,,. (, 2010)., (, 2010). 11

Transcription:

: * 30~40.,, 30~40 646.,..,.,.,,,.. * (2014) 30~40. :,, (120-728) 34 Tel : 02-300-0899, E-mail : hyhong@mju.ac.kr

2009 11 4 1 1, (2014) 2014 8 4,000. (, 2012).. (2013) 77.4%, 53.9%. 61.6%, 11.5%, 1% (, 2014).,, 30~40... (2012),,. (, 2012;, 2011),,,, (, 2012;, 2012).,.. (, 2012;, 2012),.,,, SNS (, 2012)., (, 2012).

,.,,,.,, (Wink, 1991)., (, ; 2012).,. (, 2011;, 2010),, (, 2007).,, SNS (,,, 2013), SNS (Kuss & Griffiths, 2011).., (, 2011). (Coplan, 2011),, (Baston, 2009). (Decety & Lamm, 2006),

. Cooper Ronningstam(2002) (,,, 2010). (, 2013), (Paulhus & Williams, 2002). (, 2014),.,,,, (, 2010). (, 2008), (, 2010).,., (, 2005;, 2005).. (, 2004) (, 2010).. (, 2004), (, 2003), (,, 2009). (, 2004).,

.,. (, 2011).., (, 2005).., (,, 2012).,,, (, 2005). SNS (, 2012). (, 2006).,,.,.,,,,.,,. 30~40.,,,,

. 1.,, 30 40 670 646. 646 266 380, 193 ( :86, :107 ), 296 ( :112, :184 ), 157 ( :68, :89 ), 15.6%, 24.5%, 49.1%, 10.8%, 82.5%, 17.5%. (2002) Akhtar Thompson (1982) 5. 45, / 9, / 9, 9, / 10, / 8. 5..93,.76, /.72, /.71, /.79, /.71. Barnett-Lennard(1981) Yoon(1999) (2003), 8..78. Snyder(1979) (Marital Satisfaction Inventory: MSI) (1999) (K-MSI). K-MSI 160 14,.,,,.

(,, 1999). 22 5..93. (phantom variable). (2012). 5, 2, 4, 4, 15. 4..92.76,.66,.81,.79. SPSS 18.0 AMOS 18.0.,. (Structural Equation Modeling: SEM). (bootstrap).,, 1. (r=-.23, p<.01), (r=-.37, p<.01), (r=.42, p<.01) (r=.33~.38), (r=.64, p<.01), (r=-.14, p<.01) (r=-.14~-.10), (r=-.22, p<.01) (r=-.24~-.16). 2 7.,,,

(Confirmatory Factor Analysis: CFA)..77~.89,.59~.85, -.94~.60,.77~.87. p<.001 14 4, p<.01. RMSEA TLI CFI. CFI, TLI.90, RMSEA.05.08,.10 (, 2012). χ 2 χ 2. χ 2, TLI=.95, CFI=.96, RMSEA(90% )=.067 TLI=.97, CFI=.97, RMSEA(90% )=.056. 2. 2., -.24(p<.001), -.29(p<.001), -.19(p<.01),.69(p<.001),.40(p<.001).. Shrout Bolger(2002)., Aroian,, Aroian.. p <.05, p <.01, p <.001 χ 2 df p TLI CFI RMSEA (90% ) 209.06 70.000.966.974.056(.047~.065)

(95% ) -.29 *** -.29 *** (-.36~-.21) (-.36~-.21).69 ***.69 *** (.60~.76) (.60~.76) -.19 * -.19 * (-.32~-.06) (-.32~-.06) -.24 *** -.20 ** -.44 ** (-.31~-.16) (-.26~-.14) (-.50~-.36),.40 ***.06 **.46 ** (.32~.48) (.02~.10) (.40~.52).09 -.13 * -.04 (-.04~.22) (-.24~-.04) (-.12~.52) p <.05, p <.01, p <.001. (Cheung & Lau, 2008). amos, (, 2011). (, 2011).,, 3, 4. (-.26~-.14), (-.24~-.04), (.02~.10) 95% 0., (-.38~-.20) (-.51~-.37) 95% 0

95% low upper -.29 *** -.38 -.20 -.44 *** -.51 -.37. 30~40,,,,.,,,.,, 30~40 646,,,,.,,. (,, 2012), (, 2011) (, 2010). SNS (,, 2014;, 2014;, 2013).. (, 2011). (Paulhus & Williams, 2002).

. (, 2007), (, 2010). (, 2011),.,. (Schutte, Malouff, & Bobik, 2001)., (, 2014),,,, (, 2010).,,, (, 2005) (,, 2012)..,.. (, 2010) (, 2013).,,, (, 2005;, 2005). (, 2012).,. (Kohut, 1991), (Paulhus & Williams, 2002), (, 2011).

.,. (,, 2000), (,, 2014;, 2013). (, 2011;, 2010),,. (,, 2012;, 2012).,.,. (, 2011).,, (Freud, 1914),,. (, 2014) (, 2012).,. (, 2006)..,,,. (2014).,.

(2005).,..,. (2011). (2011),. (2007),.,.,.,..,...,..,.

..,,, 30~40..,,..,,..,,...,, (2013).. (10), 502-508., (2002).. (4), 969-990., (2012).. (2), 563-580., (2000). :., (1999).. (1), 123-139. (2006).. (2014).. (2012).. (2012).. (2011).. (2005). -. (4), 877-906., (2014)., :

. (8), 157-183. (2005). :. (4), 1097-1118. (2003). /. 17-35. (2004). :. (2011).. (2007).. (2012).. (2011). : (2012).. (2010).. (2012).. (2008).., (2014).. (2), 115-132. (2012).. (2012). :. (2007).. (1), 55-69. (2005).. (4), 428-437. (2013).. (2012).. (2010).,. (1), 89-104. (2011).. (2014).., (2009).. (4), 105-132.

(2003). :,,. (1), 91-115. (2004).. (2014, 2 )... (2013).. (2004).. (2011). : S&M.,, (2010).. (3), 391-404. (2012).. :, 3(4), 21-43 (2013). 2012. :. (2014, 8 ). ICT. 6.. (2012).. :. Akhtar, S., & Thomson, A. (1982). Overview: Narcissistic personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 12-20. Barnett-Lennard, G. T. (1981). The empathic cyclo: Refinement of a nuclear concept. Journal of counseling psychology, 28, 91-100. Baston, C. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp.3-15). Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press. Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing Mediation and Suppression Effects of Latent Variables: Bootstrapping with Structural Equation Models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296-325. Cooper, A. M. & Ronningstam, E. (2002). Narcissistic personality disorder. In A. Tasman & M. B. Riba (Eds.), American psychiatric press review of psychiatry (pp.80-97). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press. Coplan, A. (2011). Understanding Empathy: Its Features and Effects. In A. Coplan & P. Goldie (Eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives (pp.3-18): Oxford University Press. Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. Scientific World Journal, 6, 1146-1163. Freud, S. (1914). On Narcissism: An Introduction. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (pp.69-102). London: Hogarth Press. Kohut, H. (1991). Freud s On Narcissism: an introduction. International Psychoanalytical Association. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction-review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8, 3528-3552. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563. Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., & Bobik, C. (2001). Emotional intelligence and interpersonal relations. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 523-536. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445. Snyder, D. K. (1979). Marital Satisfaction Inventory. LA: Western Psychological Services. Wink, P. (1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 590-597. Yoon, G. J. (1999). The effects of spousal empathy on stress and marital satisfaction of the unemployed in Korea. 61.,. : 2014. 10. 21 : 2015. 01. 11 : 2015. 02. 04

The Effects of Covert Narcissism on Smart-phone Addiction: Focusing on Marital Empathy and Marital Satisfaction as mediators Jeong, Byung Wan Hong, Hye Young Myongji University The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of covert narcissism on the smart-phone addiction of the married 30 s and 40 s. 646 participants living in Seoul city, Gyeong-gi province and Incheon city were recruited. Analyses showed that covert narcissism influenced smart-phone addiction positively and marital empathy and marital satisfaction negatively. Marital satisfaction was completely mediated the relation between marital empathy and smart-phone addiction, and marital empathy partially mediated the association between covert narcissism and marital satisfaction. In other words, covert narcissism, marital empathy and marital satisfaction influenced smart-phone addition of married people in their 30 and 40 s and marital empathy and covert narcissism influenced marital satisfaction. Lastly, marital empathy was influenced by covert narcissism. The implications and limitations of the current study are discussed. Key words : Covert Narcissism, Empathy, Marital Empathy, Marital Satisfaction, Smart-phone Addiction