Research Article Korean J Child Stud 2016;37(6): pissn: eissn: X The Effects of Pa

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare


. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과


歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

,......

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

(5차 편집).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

상담학연구 * Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1370 Tel: /


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

인문사회과학기술융합학회

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

untitled

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

상담학연구 : *.,,,,, (N=495)..,.,.. * (2013). (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /


서론 34 2

A study on the sports educational zeal through the qualitative network analysis: Focusing on mothers of student athletes Byung-Goo Lee & Han-Joo Lee*


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

380 Hyun Seok Choi Yunji Kwon Jeongcheol Ha 기존 선행연구에서는 이론연구 (Ki, 2010; Lee, 2012), 단순통계분석 (Lee, 2008), 회귀분석 (Kim, 2012)과 요인분석 (Chung, 2012), 경로분석 (Ku,

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

<30392EB9DAB0A1B6F72CC1A4B3B2BFEE2E687770>


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * A Study on the


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

,....

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j

Research Article Korean J Child Stud 2018;39(6): pissn: eissn: X Effect of the Develo


<BFCFBCBA30362DC0B1BFECC3B62E687770>

歯6권2호.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * Relationship among

歯이희경13-1.PDF

<353420B1C7B9CCB6F52DC1F5B0ADC7F6BDC7C0BB20C0CCBFEBC7D120BEC6B5BFB1B3C0B0C7C1B7CEB1D7B7A52E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

교육치료연구 SNS : SNS SNS SNS SNS, SNS, SNS. SPSS MACRO SNS., SNS SNS. SNS, SNS,. SNS SNS,. (2016) (Corresponding Author) : / / 608 / Tel:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Effects of a Classwi

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3


<C0DBBEF7C1DF202D20C7D1B1B9BFA9BCBAC0CEB1C7C1F8C8EFBFF85FBFA9BCBAB0FA20C0CEB1C728C5EBB1C736C8A3292DB3BBC1F62E687770>

석사학위 논문

歯유성경97.PDF

,......


jung, pack, song, kim, and Yi , , , OECD 1.30 (Statistics Korea, 2015a).,,., , 2006 (Ministry of Health

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw

서론

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Qualitative Case

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA


118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

2 大 韓 政 治 學 會 報 ( 第 18 輯 1 號 ) 과의 소통부재 속에 여당과 국회도 무시한 일방적인 밀어붙이기식 국정운영을 보여주고 있다. 민주주의가 무엇인지 다양하게 논의될 수 있지만, 민주주의 운영에 필요한 최소한의 제도적 조건은 권력 행사에서 국가기관 사이의


상담학연구. 9., , 21..,,,,,,... (Corresponding Author): / / 154 Tel: /

<BAB8B0C7B1B3C0B0B0C7B0ADC1F5C1F8C7D0C8B8C1F632392D312E687770>

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타

Transcription:

Research Article Korean J Child Stud 2016;37(6):169-184 https://doi.org/10.5723/kjcs.2016.37.6.169 pissn: 1226-1688 eissn: 2234-408X The Effects of Parental Forgiveness and Parent-Child Communication on School-Age Boys and Girls Forgiveness Eun Hye Kim 1, Hyun-Sim Doh 1, Min-Jung Kim 2, Sun Hee Rhee 3 Department of Child Development, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea 1 Department of Child Welfare, Namseoul University, Cheonan, Korea 2 Department of Childhood Education, Soongsil Cyber University, Seoul, Korea 3-1, 1, 2, 3 1, 2, 3 Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of parental forgiveness and parent child communication on school-age children s forgiveness in late childhood. Methods: A total of 231 fifth and sixth graders (122 boys and 109 girls) living in Daegu participated in the study. They responded to questionnaires regarding parental forgiveness, parent child communication and children s forgiveness. The data were analyzed by t-tests, Pearson s correlations, and SEM using SPSS 18.0 and LISREL 9.1. Results: First, paternal forgiveness had a direct effect on children s forgiveness. Second, parental forgiveness had an indirect effect on children s forgiveness through parent child communication. Finally, multigroup analyses revealed that paternal forgiveness had a direct effect and an indirect effect through father child communication on boys forgiveness, whereas maternal forgiveness had an indirect effect on girls forgiveness through mother child communication. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the gender of parents and children needs to be considered to explain school-age children s forgiveness. In addition, these findings have implications for future research and practice by highlighting the importance of parental forgiveness and parent child communication in forgiveness education programs for children and parent education programs. Keywords: parental forgiveness, parent-child communication, children's forgiveness, middle childhood development,.,., Corresponding Author: Hyun-Sim Doh, Department of Child Development, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Korea E-mail: simdoh@ewha.ac.kr The Korean Association of Child Studies This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Kim, Doh, Kim, and Rhee 170 (K. Kim & Im, 2006; K. S. Kim, 2004; Watanabe, 2011)., (Enright, 2001; McCullough, Pargament, & Thoresen, 2000; Y. Oh, 1990; Worthington, 2005), (S.-H. Kim, 2011),., (Enright, 2001; K.-S. Kim, 2002; Y.-H. Oh, 2006; Park, 2003; Worthington & Wade, 1999).,.. (Enright, Gassin, & Wu, 1992), (K. Kim & Im, 2006; A.-R. Lee & Koo, 2009; J. Y. Lee, 2008; Y.-H. Oh, 2006; Park, 2012)..,,., (Doh et al., 2011).,., (Sin, 2008), (Jang, Kim, & Hong, 2005), (K.-S. Kim & K.-J. Kim, 2007).,.,,,,,,,., (J. A. Kim, 2009).,,,.., (Jeong, 2005; E. M. Kang, 2007; K.-S. Kim & Ha, 2006; K.-S. Kim & Kim, 2009; H. H. Lee, 2005; Staub, Pearlman, Gubin, & Hagengimana, 2005),.,. (Basset, 2007; A.-R. Lee & Koo, 2009; Park, 2012) (Basset, 2007; J.-R. Kang, 2010; Neal, 2005). - (Neal, 2005).,, (Bassett, 2007; Neal, 2005). (Neal, 2005), - (Putallaz & Heflin, 1990)., - (Mullet, Girard, & Bakhshi, 2004).

171 From Parental Forgiveness to Children's Forgiveness,,, (Cohen, 1992; Janssens & Deković, 1997). (Bandura, 1977),.,.. - (Barnes & Olson, 1982; Seon, 2011). -,,,,, (Roh & Jun, 2005)., -. - (J.-S. Lee, 2009; Ra, Hyun, Cha, & Yun, 2010; Sin, 2008; Steinberg, 2001),., - (H. S. Kim, 2003), - (Basset, 2007; J.-S. Lee, 2009; Roby, 1997). (Ra et al., 2010)., -, (Sin, 2008), (J.-R. Kang, 2010)., (Enright, 2001).,, -.,, (J. R. Oh & Kim, 1999), -., -, -., -,, (Neal, 2005). -, -. -, -,. (Feshbach, 1997), (Neal, 2005). - -. -,.,,. (Neal, 2005; Watanabe, 2011),.,, (Neal, 2005). -

Kim, Doh, Kim, and Rhee 172 (Jaffee & Hyde, 2000; Neal, 2005), (Jaffee & Hyde, 2000; Wark & Krebs, 1996),, (Russell & Russell, 1987).., (Watanabe, 2011)., - (J.-S. Lee, 2009).,.,,, (J.-R. Kang, 2010)., (Seo & Lee, 2006), (Shin, 2009),., (Do, 2008), (Steinberg, 2001). - Figure 1. Linking paternal and maternal forgiveness to school age children s forgiveness through parent child communication.., -. (Figure 1). 1 -? 1-1.? 1-2. - -? 2 - -? 연구참가자 231 5, 6. (Moon, 2001), -,.,,., 122 (528%), 109 (47.2%), 5 103 (44.6%), 6 128 (55.4%), 32 (13.9%), 72 (31.2%), 107 (46.3%), 20 (8.6%). 44.5 (SD = 3.41), 42.0 (SD = 3.48).

173 From Parental Forgiveness to Children's Forgiveness 69 (29.9%) 66 (28.6%). 82 (35.5%),,,, 59 (25.5%), 108 (46.8%), 35 (15.2%). 조사도구, -,., -. (1 ), (2 ), (3 ), (4 ) 4 Likert,. 부모의용서 Enright (1991) J.-H. Park (2006). (10 ), (10 ), (10 ) 3 ( 30 ).,..,..,..,....,.. (Cronbach s α).87,.90,.87,.89,.90,.86. 부모-자녀의사소통 - Barnes Olson (1982) - (Parent-Adolescent Communication Inventory) Min (1991) - -. (10 ) (10 ) 20. -,, -., ( )., ( ).. (Cronbach s α), -.91.93, -.80.85. 아동의용서 Enright (1991) J.-H. Park (2007).,, 3, 10 30. ( ), ( ), ( ).,.,.,.,.,.,.. (Cronbach s α).81..80,.84.

Kim, Doh, Kim, and Rhee 174 조사절차 3 2013 3 3., 500., 1. 483, (83 ) (106 ), (52 ), (11 ) 231,. 자료분석 PASW (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) LISREL 9.1 (Jöreskog & Sörbom).,, Cronbach s α, Pearson.,, - (Structural Equation Modeling [SEM]),. 예비분석,, -, t.,, -., (t = -2.11, p <.05), (M = 25.96, SD = 5.39) (M = 24.43, SD = 5.66). - - (t = -2.08, p <.05) (M = 21.91, SD = 5.57) (M = 20.35, SD = 5.81). (t = -2.15, p <.05), (M = 26.61, SD = 4.46) (M = 24.25, SD = 5.55). 부모의용서, 부모 - 자녀의사소통및아동의용서간의상관관계, - Pearson (Table 1).,, (,, ) (,, ) ( : rs =.25.35, p <.001; : rs =.26.34, p <.001 ).,,., -, - ( : rs =.31.35, p <.001; : rs =.36.42, p <.001), - ( : rs = -.24.28, p <.001; : rs = -.33.38, p <.001).,., -, - ( : rs =.31.34, p <.001; : rs =.43.52, p <.001), - ( : rs = -.28 -.32, p <.001; : rs = -.26 -.31, p <.001).,,. 측정모형분석, -

175 From Parental Forgiveness to Children's Forgiveness., χ² = 113.98(df = 55, p <.001), NFI =.92, CFI =.94, GFI =.89, RMSEA =.10, 90% CI = [.08.11]. χ², χ² = 113.98(df = 55, p <.001), χ² (G. S. Kim, 2009). NFI, CFI, GFI.90, RMSEA.05,.08 (Hong, 2000)., RMSEA.10, -.40. (β).40 (Song, 2009) - ( : β =.07; : β =.17). χ 2 = 79.97(df = 34, p <.001), NFI =.96, CFI =.99, GFI =.95, RMSEA =.04, 90% CI [.02.06]., (β).78 1.02. C.R. (Critical Ratio).001 (Table 2). Table 1 Correlations Among Parental Forgiveness, Parent-Child Communication and Children s Forgiveness Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Paternal forgiveness 1. Emotion 2. Behavior.68*** 3. Cognition.69***.72*** Maternal forgiveness 4. Emotion.30***.24***.26*** 5. Behavior.20**.26***.24***.66*** 6. Cognition.20**.20**.26***.68***.65*** Father-child communication 7. Father-child open communication 8. Father-child dysfunctional communication Mother-child communication 9. Mother-child open communication 10. Mother-child dysfunctional communication Children s forgiveness.31***.34***.33***.23***.30***.16* -.28*** -.32*** -.30*** -.23*** -.18** -.09 -.55***.15*.27***.19**.43***.52***.52***.31*** -.16* -.16* -.22** -.19** -.31** -.26*** -.26*** -.32***.43*** -.53*** 1. Emotion.32***.32***.30***.26***.27***.30***.31*** -.29***.38*** -.35*** 2. Behavior.28***.35***.28***.29***.32***.29***.33*** -.24***.42*** -.38***.71*** 3. Cognition.27***.27***.25***.29***.34***.29***.35*** -.27***.36*** -.34***.66***.78** M 2.42 2.47 2.56 2.52 2.48 2.62 2.82 2.02 2.96 2.11 2.48 2.58 2.73 SD 0.51 0.51 0.48 0.56 0.53 0.48 0.66 0.53 0.71 0.57 0.48 0.52 0.52 Note. N = 231. *p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.

Kim, Doh, Kim, and Rhee 176 Table 2 Fit Indices of the Measurement Model χ² df NFI CFI GFI RMSEA (90% CI) Measurement model 79.97 34.96.99.95.04 [.02.06] Note. N = 231. 구조모형분석 -, NFI =.97, CFI =.98, GFI =.95, RMSEA =.06, 90% CI [.03.08]. - (Table 3, Figure 2).,, (β =.23, p <.01),,,,., - Table 3 Path Estimates of Latent Variables B β SE C.R. p Paternal forgiveness Children s forgiveness.20.23.06 3.11 ** Maternal forgiveness Children s forgiveness.12.15.06 1.74 0.08 Father-child communication Children s forgiveness.10.18.04 2.61 ** Mother-child communication Children s forgiveness.13.25.04 3.39 ** Paternal forgiveness Father-child open communication.63.40.10 6.14 *** Maternal forgiveness Mother-child open communication.95.60.09 10.21 *** Note. N = 231. **p <.01. ***p <.001. Figure 2. Direct and indirect paths from paternal and maternal forgiveness to children s forgiveness. Standardized coefficients are given. *p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.

177 From Parental Forgiveness to Children's Forgiveness,, - (β =.40, p <.001), - (β =.18, p <.01)., -, -., - (β =.60, p <.001), - (β =.25, p <.01)., -,. - Table 4., (β =.29, p <.001) (β =.28, p <.001). - (β =.25, p <.01), - (β =.18, p <.01).,, (β =.06, p <.05) (β =.13, p <.05) -., (Squared Multiple Correlation [SMC]), - 31%.,, - (multiple group analysis)., Table 4 Direct, Indirect, and Total Effects in the Structural Equation Model Path from latent to latent variables Direct effect Indirect effect Total effect SMC Paternal forgiveness Children s forgiveness.23*.06*.29***.31 Maternal forgiveness Children s forgiveness.15.13* 28*** Father-child communication Children s forgiveness.18** Mother-child communication Children s forgiveness.25** Paternal forgiveness Father-child communication.40***.16 Maternal forgiveness Mother-child communication.60***.36 Note. N = 231. *p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001. Figure 3. Direct and indirect paths from paternal and maternal forgiveness to boys forgiveness. Standardized coefficients are given. **p <.01. ***p <.001.

Kim, Doh, Kim, and Rhee 178 Figure 4. Direct and indirect paths from paternal and maternal forgiveness to girls forgiveness. Standardized coefficients are given. **p <.01. ***p <.001. (invariant path coefficient), χ² = 211.48(df = 99, p <.001), NFI = 0.83, CFI = 0.88, RMSEA = 0.147,.,, 6 χ². χ²,.,, -., (Figure 3, Figure 4). 5, 6, -...,,. (Neal, 2005), (Basset, 2007; Neal, 2005)..,,,,, (Parke & Buriel, 1998).,,,,,.,,.,,,.

179 From Parental Forgiveness to Children's Forgiveness, -, -.,,. -, (Neal, 2005)., - -. -., -, -, -., (Neal, 2005), (Jaffee & Hyde, 2000).,,,,,, (H. Kim, 2003; H. J. Lee & Kim, 2000; Seon, 2011)., (Enright, 2001; J. Y. Lee, 2008; J.-H. Park, 2003; Ra et al., 2010), (Y.-H. Oh, 1995), (K.-S. Kim & Kim, 2007),., -,. (Neal, 2005), (H. Kim, 2003), (J.-R. Kang, 2010). (Ryu, 2010),, (Denham, Zoller, & Couchoud, 1994; Mun, 2004). (Wade & Worthington, 2003) - (Denham et al., 1994; M. S. Lee, 2013; Ryu, 2010), (K. Kim & Im, 2006; McCullough, Worthington, & Rachal, 1997).,. - -., -.,, -.,, -,,.,,.,, -,,.,,,., -,,

Kim, Doh, Kim, and Rhee 180, (Bandura, 1986)., (Han & Hur, 2003), - (Halberstadt & Eaton, 2002; H. R. Lee & Choi, 2002; Yoo & Lim, 2006).,., (Biller, 1981; J.-R. Kang, 2010; Steinberg, 2001) (Watanabe, 2011).,,.,, -.,,., - -......,,..,, (Baumeister, Exline, & Sommer, 1998; Emmons, 2000),.., -, -.,,,.,,,,.. Acknowledgements This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF- 2013S1A3A2055259). Notes This article is a part of the first author s master s thesis submitted in 2014. Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

181 From Parental Forgiveness to Children's Forgiveness In English References Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=o69047585 Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffes, NJ: Prentice Hall. Barnes, H. L., & Olson, D. H. (1982). Parent-adolescent communication scale. In D. H. Olson, H. I. McCubbin, H. L. Barnes, A. Larsen, M. J. Muxen, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Family inventories: Inventories used in a national survey of families across the family life cycle (pp. 33-48). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Bassett, H. H. (2007). Individual differences in children s forgiveness: Intraindividual, parental, and family environmental contributors (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http:// search.proquest.com/docview/304736249 Baumeister, R. F., Exline, J. J., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives (pp. 79-104). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press. Biller, H. B. (1981). The father and sex role development. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 115-159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 Denham, S. A., Zoller, D., & Couchoud, E. A. (1994). Socialization of preschoolers emotion understanding. Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 928-936. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.30.6.928 Emmons, R. A. (2000). Is spirituality an intelligence?: Motivation, cognition, and the psychology of ultimate concern. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10(1), 3-26. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr1001_2 Enright, R. D. (2001). Forgiveness is a choice: A step-by-step process for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington: American Psychological Association. Enright, R. D., Gassin, E. A., & Wu, C. (1992). Forgiveness: A development view. Journal of Moral Education, 21(2), 99-114. doi:10.1080/0305724920210202 Feshbach, N. D. (1997). Empathy, the formative years: Implications for clinical practice. In A. C. Bohart & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (pp. 33-59). Washington: American Psychological Association. Halberstadt, A., & Eaton, K. L. (2002). A meta-analysis of family expressiveness and children s emotion expressiveness and understanding. Marriage & Family Review, 34(1-2), 35-62. doi:10.1300/j002v34n01_03 Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 703-726. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.703 Janssens, M. A., & Deković, M. (1997). Child rearing, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviour. The International Society for the Study of Behavioural Develoment, 20(3), 509-527. doi:10.1080/016502597385252 Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2012). LISREL 9.1 student edition for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International. McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000). The psychology of forgiveness: History, conceptual issues, and overview. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-14). New York: Guilford Press. McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 321-336. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.321 Mullet, E., Girard, M., & Bakhshi, P. (2004). Conceptualizations of forgiveness. European Psychologist, 9(2), 78-86. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.9.2.78 Neal, L. K. (2005). The relationship between children s propensity to forgive, parents propensity to forgive and parenting practices (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www. researchgate.net/publication/35208743 Parke, R. D., & Buriel, R. (1998). Socialization in the family: Ethnic and ecological perspectives. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3. Social, Emotional, and personality development (pp. 463-552). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Putallaz, M., & Heflin, A. (1990). Parent-child interaction. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 189-216). New York: Cambridge University Press. Roby, D. C. (1997). Forgiveness, parental nurturance and self-esteem (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://search. proquest.com/ Russell, G., & Russell, A. (1987). Mother-child and father-child relationships in middle childhood. Child Development, 58(6), 1573-1585. doi:10.2307/1130696 Staub, E., Pearlman, L. A., Gubin, A., & Hagengimana, A. (2005). Healing, forgiveness and reconciliation in Rwanda: Intervention and experimental evaluation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(3), 297-334. doi:10.1521/ jscp.24.3.297.65617 Steinberg, B. S. (2001). The making of female presidents and prime ministers: The impact of birth order, sex of siblings, and father-daughter dynamics. Political Psychology, 22(1),

Kim, Doh, Kim, and Rhee 182 89-110. doi:10.1111/0162-895x.00227 Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E. L. (2003). Overcoming interpersonal offense: Is forgiveness the only way to deal with unforgiveness? Journal of Counseling and Development, 81(3), 343-353. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00261.x Wark, G. R., & Krebs, D. L. (1996). Gender and dilemma differences in real-life moral judgement. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 220-230. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.220 Watanabe, N. (2011). Forgiveness in Japanese children and adolescents: Dispositional, emotional, and parental influence (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://digilib.gmu.edu/ Worthington, E. L. (2005). Initial questions about the art and science of forgiving. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 1-14). New York: Brunner-Routledge. Worthington, E. L., & Wade, N. G. (1999). The psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(4), 385-418. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/ In Korean Do, K.-H. (2008). Relation among father s child-rearing involvement, father-child communication style, children s achievement motivation and school adjustment. Journal of The Korean Association of Practical Arts Education, 20(4), 139-155. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=a77045497 Doh, H.-S., Lee, H.-S., Kim, S.-H., Choi, M.-K., Lee, S., & Kim, S. (2011). Human development and the family. Seoul: Kyomunsa. Han, J.-L., & Hur, G.-H. (2003). Relationships between argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness of parents and their offsprings. Speech & Communication, 2, 41-71. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a99873027 Hong, S. (2000). The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structural equation modeling and their rationales. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 161-177. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a100628132 Jang, S.-S., Kim, H.-S., & Hong, S.-H. (2005). Effect verification of forgiveness program focused on peer relation for elementary school children. The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 2(2), 199-220. Retrieved from http://www.riss. kr/link?id=a100633142 Jeong, J. Y. (2005). The effect of a forgiveness training program on the forgiveness and personal relationship of elementary school children (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss. kr/link?id=t10057485 Kang, E. M. (2007). The effects of forgiveness group counselling program on the interpersonal stress and stress coping of elementary school children (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=t11219577 Kang, J.-R. (2010). Parent s child-rearing behaviors perceived by adolescents and adolescents emotional intelligence as related to adolescents forgiveness (Mater s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=t12115189 Kim, G. S. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Seoul: Hannarae. Kim, H. (2003). The influence of religion, parenting behavior and self-esteem on forgiveness in Ewha womans university students (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=t8928892 Kim, H. S. (2003). Educational psychology. Seoul: Hanol. Kim, J. A. (2009). A study on the practical research to overcome anger of children (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss. kr/link?id=t11770837 Kim, K., & Im, H. (2006). An exploration of psychological process of interpersonal forgiveness: Focused on effects of empathy and apology on forgiving behavior. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 20(2), 19-33. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a100629615 Kim, K.-S. (2002). The development and the effects of program for forgiveness. The Korea Journal of Youth Counseling, 10(1), 165-191. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=a76449038 Kim, K. S. (2004). Reflective inquiry on empirical-scientific studies of forgiveness and suggestions for following forgiveness studies. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 18(4), 33-49. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a75412531 Kim, K.-S., & Ha, Y.-S. (2006). The effects of a forgiveness counseling-education program on the degree of forgiveness and emotional intelligence of elementary school students. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 20(4), 909-930. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a75418847 Kim, K.-S., & Kim, H.-Y. (2009). The effects of empathy education program on children s empathy ability and emotional intelligence. The Journal of Elementary Education, 22(4), 275-300. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=a76591400 Kim, K.-S., & Kim, K.-J. (2007). The effects of a forgiveness counseling education program on the degree of forgiveness and empathy ability of elementary school students. Asian Journal of Education, 8(4), 87-109. Retrieved from http:// www.riss.kr/link?id=a100422933 Kim, S.-H. (2011). Development of youth tolerance scale. Journal of Evaluation on Counseling, 4(1), 63-81. Lee, A.-R., & Koo, J. (2009). Relationship between forgiveness and personality. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 23(3), 89-105. Retrieved from http://www.riss. kr/link?id=a100629643 Lee, H. H. (2005). The effects of a forgiveness education group

183 From Parental Forgiveness to Children's Forgiveness counseling program on the aggression and interpersonal stress of elementary school children (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=t10057415 Lee, H. J., & Kim, K. W. (2000). The relationship among the parent-adolescent communication, adolescents self-esteem, and social development. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 9(3), 283-295. Retrieved from http://www.dbpia.co.kr/ Article/NODE02363753 Lee, H. R., & Choi, B. G. (2002). The relation between preschoolers emotion understanding and parents emotion expressiveness and attitude toward children s emotion expressiveness. Family and Environment Research, 40(10), 103-112. Retrieved from http://www.ndsl.kr Lee, J.-S. (2009). The effects of parent-child conflicts and empathy on forgiveness and psychological maladjustment (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=t11549359 Lee, J. Y. (2008). The effect of receiving forgiveness and forgiving others on psychological well-being and interpersonal trust: Moderated by perfectionism and cultural dispositions (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://dlps.nanet.go.kr/ Lee, M. S. (2013). The mediating effects of children s empathy ability and self-resilience between parent-child communication and school adjustment of children (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=t13122003 Min, H. Y. (1991). The relationship between juvenile delinquency and parent-adolescent communication, family cohesion and adaptability (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www. riss.kr/link?id=a3034431 Moon, M. Y. (2001). The effects of children s perception of parental rising attitude on children s behavior of maladjustment (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=t7912738 Mun, Y.-S. (2004). The effects of parent-child interaction by type on children s empathy, perspective-taking & prosocial behavior. The Korean Society for Early Childhood Education, 24(1), 115-143. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=a99534648 Oh, J. R., & Kim, S. H. (1999). The facilitation training program of mother-child relationship. The Studies of Student Guidance, 32(1), 31-107. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=a19499586 Oh, Y. (1990). The development of forgiveness in the context of friendship conflict. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 4(2), 247-273. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=a19659349 Oh, Y.-H. (1995). The use of forgiveness in the treatment of Hahn : A psychological approach. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 7(1), 70-94. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a100630887 Oh, Y.-H. (2006). A survey of hurt and forgiveness of Korean people. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 20(2), 467-486. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a75417226 Park, J.-H. (2003). Exploration of the relation between forgiveness and health. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 8(2), 301-321. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=a100631833 Park, J.-H. (2006). A review of forgiveness psychological theory and education program. The Korean Journal of the Human Development, 13(1), 117-134. Retrieved from http://www. riss.kr/link?id=a77013570 Park, J.-H. (2007). A validation study of the enright forgiveness inventory for children (EFI-C): Mediation effect of forgiveness. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(1), 265-281. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a75416964 Park, J.-H. (2012). A study to explore the relationship between forgiveness, personality and subjective well-being. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 26(4), 927-949. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com Ra, Y.-S., Hyun, M.-H., Cha, S.-Y., & Yun. S.-Y. (2010). Relationship between a childhood emotional abuse, symptom of complex posttraumatic stress, and forgiveness. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(1), 21-34. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a100627474 Roh, Y.-O., & Jun, M.-K. (2005). A study on the adolescent s perception of marital conflict and the parents-children communication. Journal of the Korean Association of Practical Arts Education, 18(1), 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.ndsl. kr/ Ryu, S.-M. (2010). The effects of children perceived parent-child communication styles on children s empathic ability and conflict-resolution strategies to friends (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=t12114218 Seo, C. R., & Lee, H. S. (2006). The effects of family environment and individual psychological variables on adolescents problem behaviors. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 18(2), 151-162. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a77045375 Seon, M. S. (2011). The relations among perceived parent-adolescent communication, sense of well-being, self-efficacy, and egoresilience of high school students (Master s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=t12275555 Shin, H.-K. (2009). Relationships among parenting styles and children s life stress and negative automatic thoughts: The moderating effect of parenting styles according to age and gender. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(4), 1083-1105. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a100627465 Sin, M.-S. (2008). Relations among forgiveness, parents child-rearing attitudes and school adjustment of elementary school students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/ link?id=t11478114

Kim, Doh, Kim, and Rhee 184 Song, J. J. (2009). SPSS/AMOS statistics analysis method when writing thesis. Paju: 21 century. Yoo, E. H., & Lim, M. O. (2006). The relationship between parents emotional expressiveness and children s selfregulation. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 27(6), 97-106. Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=a5007213 Eun Hye Kim Hyun-Sim Doh Min-Jung Kim Sun Hee Rhee ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-6830 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7393-4520 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6591-9419 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8036-2340 Received October 31, 2016 Revision received December 18, 2016 Accepted December 19, 2016