Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * Relationships a

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * A Study on the

상담학연구 : * ,,,.,,,..,.,.,,,,.. *. (Corresponding Author): / / 815 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Rheu-suppl hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * Relationship among


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

(5차 편집).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

27 2, 1-16, * **,,,,. KS,,,., PC,.,,.,,. :,,, : 2009/08/12 : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/30 * ** ( :

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

도비라

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>


,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: ICT * Exploring the Re


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

Àå¾Ö¿Í°í¿ë ³»Áö

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

서론 34 2


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

, :. CQS,. 143 CQS, CQS. CQS, CQS.. :,, 366 Tel : ,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

<5BC0AFBEC6B1E2C7E0BAB9B0A85D20C0CEBCE2BFEB20C3D6C1BEBABB5F F312E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Study on the Resea

가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

:,,,. (,, ), (,,,, ),,. 559 ( 205, 203, 151; 132, 427).,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,..,. :,, ( )


232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 및 자아존중감과 스트레스와도 밀접한 관계가 있고, 만족 정도 에 따라 전반적인 생활에도 영향을 미치므로 신체는 갈수록 개 인적, 사회적 차원에서 중요해지고 있다(안희진, 2010). 따라서 외모만족도는 개인의 신체는 타

- 최원희ㆍ 김명희: 중년후기 여성의 집단회상 경험과 효과에 대한 연구 - 에 직면하며 심리 사회적인 역할갈등, 고립, 위축, 상실 감 등을 경험하게 된다. 이 시기동안 위기에 잘 대처하 지 못하면 자신에 대하여 실망하며 두려움과 슬픔 등 을 겪으면서 자아존중감이 낮아

교육치료연구 SNS : SNS SNS SNS SNS, SNS, SNS. SPSS MACRO SNS., SNS SNS. SNS, SNS,. SNS SNS,. (2016) (Corresponding Author) : / / 608 / Tel:

.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

歯유성경97.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T


한국 출산력의 저하 요인에 관한 연구


.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.173-188 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.4.201812.173,, * Relationships among Test Anxiety, Academic Burnout, Resilience, and Academic Achievement of Medical School Students Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the difference of test anxiety, academic exhaustion, and resilience by the grade and the effects of test anxiety, academic exhaustion, and resilience on academic achievement of medical students. Method: The subjects of the study were 415 medical students. In the first and second years of medical school students were divided into lower grade group, and the 3rd and 4th grade were divided into higher grade group, and then test anxiety, academic burnout, and resilience test were conducted. The academic achievement was converted into the standard score Z score. Results were analyzed by independent sample t-test, correlation analysis, and hierarchical multiple regression analysis. Results: Test anxiety and academic burnout showed no difference between grade levels, and resilience was found to be higher in the lower grade than in the upper grade. In the case of lower grades, resilience has a statistically significant effect on academic achievement, while academic burnout and test anxiety have negative effects. In the case of the older students, inactivity, which is a subfactor of academic burnout, has a negative effect on academic achievement. Conclusion: Test anxiety and academic burnout have a negative impact on academic achievement, and resilience is a factor that has a positive effect on academic achievement. In order to improve the resilience of medical students, educational intervention should be prepared. Key words : Medical students, test anxiety, academic burnout, resilience * 2017 (2017-2). Corresponding Author: Im, Sun-Ju Pusan National University School of Medicine, Dept. of Medical Education, Busandaehakro 49, Yangsan, Korea, e-mail: sunjuim11@hanmail.net

.,.,, (academic burnout).. (exhaustion), (cynicism), (inefficacy) (Schaufeli, Martinez, Pinto, Salanova, & Bakker, 2002). (,,,, 2010),,, (Kiuru, Aunola, Nurmi, Leskinen, & Salmela-Aro, 2008; Toutkoushian & Curtis, 2005).,,, (, 2012; Lee & Larson, 2000; Salmela-Aro, Kiuru, Leskinen, & Nurmi, 2009)., (Kim, Lee, Kim, Choi, & Lee, 2015; Maslach & Leiter, 2008). (, 2012),.. 382 (2013),. 2 (, 2014),, (,,,, 2014). (test anxiety) (, 2008).,,. Deffenbacher,

Zwemer, Whisman, Hill, Sloan(1986),,,. (, 2005;, 2009; Cassady & Johnson, 2002) (Klassen, Krawchuk, & Rajani, 2008)..,., (, 2014). 1,. 2., (, 2000). 3 4.., (Spiegel, Smolen, & Jonas, 1985).. 1 2, 3 4.,.., (resilience). (Masten, 2001).., Luthar(1991),. (Rutter, 1985), (Polk, 1997), (Garmezy, 1993).

(Masten, Powell, & Luthar, 2003; Reivich & Shatté, 2002),,, (,, 2013).,,... (, 2008;, 2003), (, 2012). Lam, Wong, Mary, Lam, Pang(2010),. Gardner Parkinson(2011)., (,,,,, 2011; Garmezy, 1993)....,,,,... 1.,,? 2.,,,? 3.,,?

. 2017 8 500,,. 415. 1 2, 3 4. 1) 시험불안 Benson El Zahhar(1994), (2011) (The Revised Test Anxiety Scale: RTA). 5 6 5 4 4 20,..83.84,.94. 2) 학업소진 Schaufeli, Martinez, Pinto, Salanova, Bakker(2002) MBI-SS(Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey) Shin, Puig, Lee, Lee Lee (2011).,, 3.,,. 15,. Shin, Puig, Lee, Lee Lee(2011) (Cronbach s α).82~86,.83,.81.90. 3) 회복탄력성 Reivich Shatté(2003),, (2009) (KRO). (18) (18), (17) 53

, (Cronbach s α).87. (Cronbach s α).92,.79.87. 4) 학업성취도 2017 1 4.5, Z.,, t-.,,. VIF, Durbin-Watson..,, t- < -1>. n M(SD) t p 222 23.26(6.73) 193 23.58(7.51) -.46.646 222 39.25(7.77) 193 37.94(7.22) 1.78.076 222 187.54(18.38) 193 179.57(21.19) 4.06.000 (p>.05). (t=4.06, p<.001). (M=187.54, SD=18.38) (M=179.57, SD=21.19).

, < -2> (t=3.53, p<.001), (t=3.40, p<.01), (t=3.49, p<.01). n M(SD) t p 222 59.42(6.88) 3.53.000 193 56.97(7.27) 222 65.22(7.66) 3.40.001 193 62.46(8.69) 222 62.90(8.05) 3.49.001 193 60.14(8.01),, < -3>. (r=-.21, p<.01), (r=-.16, p<.01). (r=-.29, p<.001), (r=-.19, p<.01). (r=.06, p>.05), (r=.15, p<.05). (r=.44, p<.001), (r=-.31, p<.001). (r=-.47, p<.001). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1. - 2. -.17 * - 3. -.29 ***.69 *** - 4. -.21 **.87 ***.88 *** - 5. -.06.43 ***.44 ***.46 *** - 6. -.19 **.24 ***.32 ***.34 ***.43 *** - 7. -.16 *.11.17 *.15 *.24 ***.31 *** - 8. -.16 *.37 ***.43 ***.44 ***.82 ***.69 ***.69 *** - 9..00 -.19 ** -.22 ** -.29 *** -.29 *** -.29 *** -.33 *** -.41 *** - 10..15 * -.15 * -.11 -.22 ** -.19 ** -.30 *** -.29 *** -.34 ***.47 *** - 11..00 -.14 * -.18 ** -.25 *** -.22 ** -.40 *** -.32 *** -.40 ***.43 ***.56 *** - 12..06 -.20 ** -.21 ** -.31 *** -.29 *** -.41 *** -.39 *** -.47 ***.76 ***.84 ***.83 *** - * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001

(r=-.18, p<.05) (r=-.16, p<.05), (r=.17, p<.05)..46(p<.001), -.52(p<.001). -.59(p<.001).,, < -4>. 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2. -.07 3. -.12.87 *** 4. -.07.94 ***.93 *** 5. -.05.53 ***.53 ***.51 *** 6. -.11.40 ***.44 ***.51 ***.48 *** 7. -.18 * -.04 -.01 -.05.02.09 8. -.16 *.43 ***.46 ***.46 ***.76 ***.70 ***.57 *** 9..17 * -.46 *** -.51 *** -.52 *** -.40 *** -.53 *** -.32 *** -.60 *** 10..01 -.38*** -.39 *** -.46 *** -.25 *** -.56 *** -.23 ** -.47 ***.66 *** 11..10 -.34 *** -.33 *** -.41 *** -.29 *** -.57 *** -.23 *** -.50 ***.58 ***.76 *** 12..10 -.45 *** -.46 *** -.52 *** -.35 *** -.62 *** -.29 *** -.59 ***.83 ***.92 ***.89 *** - * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001,,, < -5>. VIF 1.26-1.45 10,.59-.79.1. Durbin-Watson 1.99. (t=2.77, p=.006), (t=-2.77, p=.006), (t=-2.19, p=.029), 7% (F=6.61, p=.000).

B β t F R AdjR 2 -.01 -.20-2.77 ** -.01 -.17-2.19 * 6.61 ***.29.07.01.21 2.77 ** * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001,,,,,,,, < -6>. VIF 1.23-2.09 10,.49-.81.1. Durbin-Watson 2.05. (t=-4.42, p=.000), 7% (F=19.51, p=.000). 14%.,. B β t F R AdjR 2 1 -.04 -.29-4.42 *** 19.51 ***.29.07 2 3 3 -.04 -.30-4.76 ***.01.18 2.79 ** 13.94 ***.37.11.02.23 3.45 ** 11.87 ***.38.13 -.04 -.28-4.40 *** -.03 -.18-2.64 ** -.03 -.24-3.64 ***.02.26 3.87 *** -.02 -.15-2.16 * -.03 -.15-2.13 * 10.18 ***.40.14 * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001,,

, < -7> (t=-2.27, p=.024). 3% (F=5.16, p=.024). B β t F R AdjR 2 -.00 -.12-1.34 -.01 -.16-2.27 * 5.16 *.16.03.00.01.15 * p<.05,,,,,,,, < -8> (t=-2.47, p=.014). 4% (F=6.09, p=.014). B β t F R AdjR 2 1 -.02 -.18-2.47 * 6.09 *.18.03 * p<.05.,,,.,.,., (, 2011). (2015).

(2015),,,,,.. (2014), 2.,,, (2014) 2, 1, 3, 2. (2016)., (Michielsen, De Vries, & Van Heck, 2003; Niemi & Vainiomäki, 2006).,.,.,,. (,, 2013).,, (2017),, -,,. 4,,,,,. 4...,,.,.,. (2016).,. 1, 2

, 3, 4. (, 2016).,. (, 2005;, 2009; Cassady & Johnson, 2002; Klassen, Krawchuk, & Rajani, 2008). (2008) (2003). Lam (2010),.. (Kim, Lee, Kim, Choi, & Lee, 2015), (Schaufeli, Martinez, Pinto, Salanova, & Bakker, 2002).,...,,.,,..,,.,...

,,,,, (2000). -. (12), 227-239.,,,, (2011). :. (4), 1371-1390. (2005). 5.. (2008).,.. (2009)... (2014)...,,, (2010). 5. (1), 81-93.,, (2009).. (4), 105-131.,,,,, (2012).. (1), 55-63. (2012). :, (2013). (MBI-SS). (2), 165-187. (2003)..,, (2017)., -,. (1), 425-437. (2011). :. (1), 99-109. (2014).. (2), 77-87.,,, (2014). - -. (4), 299-308.,,,,, (2015).

. (4), 301-308. (2011).,,. (12), 5797-5804.,,,,,, (2016),,. (4), 231-240. Benson, J., & El Zahhar, N. (1994). Further refinement and validation of the Revised Test Anxiety Scale. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(3), 203-221. Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 270-295. Deffenbacher, J. L., Zwemer, W. A., Whisman, M. A., Hill, R. A., & Sloan, R. D. (1986). Irrational beliefs and anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10(3), 281-291. Gardner, D. H., & Parkinson, T. J. (2011). Optimism, self-resilience, and social, or is it support as mediators of the relationships among workload, stress and wellbeing in Veterinary students. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 38(1), 60-66. Garmezy, N. (1993). Children at poverty: Resilience despite risk. Psychiatry, 56, 127-136. Kim, B., Lee, M., Kim, K., Choi, H., & Lee, S. M. (2015). Longitudinal analysis of academic burnout in Korean middle school students. Stress and Health, 31(4), 281-289. Kiuru, N., Aunola, K., Nurmi, J. E., Leskinen, E., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2008). Peer group influence and selection in adolescents' school burnout: A longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54(1), 23-55. Klassen, R. M., Krawchuk, L. L., & Rajani, S. (2008). Academic procrastination of undergraduates: Low self-efficacy to self-regulate predicts higher levels of procrastination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 915-931. Lam, J. G., Wong, W. S., Mary, S. M., Lam, K. F., & Pang, S. L. (2010). Psychological well-being of interns in Hong Kong; What causes them stress and what helps them. Medical Teacher, 32(3), 120-126. Lee, M., & Larson, R. (2000). The Korean examination hell : Long hours of studying, distress, and depression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(2), 249-272. Luthar, S. S. (1991). Vulnerability and resilience: A study of high-risk adolescents. Child Development, 62(3), 600-616. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of applied psychology, 93(3), 498-512. Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American psychologist, 56(3), 227-238.

Masten, A. S., Powell, J. L., & Luthar, S. S. (2003). A resilience framework for research, policy, and practice. in Luthar, S. S. (Ed.). (2003). Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 1-25). London: Cambridge University Press. Michielsen, H. J., De Vries, J., & Van Heck, G. L. (2003). In search of personality and temperament predictors of chronic fatigue: a prospective study. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(5), 1073-1087. Niemi, P. M., & Vainiomäki, P. T. (2006). Medical students distress quality, continuity and gender differences during a six-year medical programme. Medical teacher, 28(2), 136-141. Polk, L. V. (1997). Toward a middle-range theory of resilience. Advance in Nursing Science, 19, 1-13. Reivich, K., & Shatté, A. (2002). The resilience factor: 7 keys to finding your inner strength and overcoming life s hurdles. NY: Broadway Books. Reivich, K., & Shatté, A. (2003). The resilience factor. New York: Broadway Books. Rutter, M. (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity: Protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 598-611 Salmela-Aro, K., Kiuru, N., Leskinen, E., & Nurmi, J. E. (2009). School Burnout Inventory (SBI): Reliability and validity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 48-57. Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 33(5), 464-481. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M. I., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of Engagement and burnout: A Confirmative Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92. Shin, H., Puig, A., Lee, J., Lee, J. H., & Lee, S. M. (2011). Cultural validation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Korean students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 633-639. Spiegel, D. A., Smolen, R. C., & Jonas, C. K. (1985). Interpersonal conflicts involving students in clinical medical education. Journal of Medical Education, 60(11), 819-829. Toutkoushian, R. K., & Curtis, T. (2005). Effects of socioeconomic factors on public high school outcomes and rankings. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(5), 259-271. : 2018.11.06. / : 2018.11.12. / : 2018.12.20.

,, :,,,. : 415, 1 2, 3 4,,. 4.5 Z. t-. :,.,.. :,,.