Verification of a causal model among the process of self-regulation motivation and sports performance under the coach's behavior Sun-Yong Kim 1 & Sang-Hyuk Park 2 * 1 Gachon University & 2 Korea Institute of Sport Science

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of subjects Gender Affiliation Total Male Female Middle school 39 38 77 High school 47 38 85 University 84 51 135 Work and professional team 34 25 59 Total 204 152 356 ɑ ɑ ɑ ɑ

ɑ ɑ ɑ ɑ ɑ : ɑ ɑ ɑ ɑ ɑ

Table 2. calculation method of sport performance score calculation of competition goal attainment 1 grade 1 grade 3 point fail or achievement Individual 2 grade 2 grade 2 point fail or achievement 3 grade 3 grand 1 point fail or achievement 1 grade 1 grade 3 point fail or achievement Team 2 grade 2 grade 2 point fail or achievement 3 grade 3 grand 1 point fail or achievement 5 point I obtain very good results in this game 4 point I obtain generally good results in this game 3 point I obtain moderately good results in this game 2 point I obtain generally poor results in this game 1 point I obtain very poor results in this game Table 3. Corelation analysis of the variables Var. a b c d e f g h i j k a 1 -.065.144** -.008.074.160** -.282**.067.173**.210**.081 b -.065 1 -.043.031.002 -.147**.110*.043 -.141** -.157**.007 c.144** -.043 1 -.257**.536**.219** -.330**.020.320**.226**.363** d -.008.031 -.257** 1 -.131*.020 -.161** -.235** -.026 -.188** -.106* e.074.002.536** -.131* 1.359** -.312**.101.395**.308**.267** f.160** -.147**.219**.020.359** 1 -.303**.162**.637**.489**.120* g -.282**.110* -.330** -.161** -.312** -.303** 1.044 -.334** -.265** -.221** h.067.043.020 -.235**.101.162**.044 1.224**.394**.070 i.173** -.141**.320** -.026.395**.637** -.334**.224** 1.649**.151** j.210** -.157**.226** -.188**.308**.489** -.265**.394**.649** 1.120* k.081.007.363** -.106*.267**.120* -.221**.070.151**.120* 1

Table 4. Multiple regression analysis of study variables affecting the performance result Study variables coaching behavior psychologic al needs regulation motivation Predictor variables autonomy training atmosphere competence amotivation Criterion Variable performance result performance result performance result R2 F sig.053 12.902.000.123 53.759.000 -.049 18.093.000 Fig. 1. Structural equation modeling of study (Q:1.650, CFI:.959, GFI:.950, RMR:.042, NFI:.903)

Table 5. Path coefficient analysis of the variables Criteria Prediction Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label competence <--- autonomy training atmosphere.011.057.189.850 rejected autonomy <--- autonomy training atmosphere -.191.059-3.249.001 adoption relatedness <--- autonomy training atmosphere -.013.047 -.285.776 rejected competence <--- no guarantee of privacy -.023.043 -.532.594 rejected autonomy <--- no guarantee of privacy -.080.045-1.779.075 rejected relatedness <--- no guarantee of privacy -.053.036-1.475.140 rejected competence <--- autonomy competition strategy -.014.037 -.383.701 rejected autonomy <--- autonomy competition strategy -.054.038-1.441.149 rejected relatedness <--- autonomy competition strategy -.060.030-1.965.049 adoption competence <--- academic consideration -.105.053-1.969.049 adoption autonomy <--- academic consideration.204.055 3.709 *** adoption relatedness <--- academic consideration -.086.044-1.940.052 rejected competence <--- guarantee of privacy.040.058.685.493 rejected autonomy <--- guarantee of privacy.099.060 1.662.097 rejected relatedness <--- guarantee of privacy.034.048.699.485 rejected competence <--- compulsory training atmosphere -.021.036 -.571.568 rejected autonomy <--- compulsory training atmosphere.039.038 1.040.298 rejected relatedness <--- compulsory training atmosphere.015.030.490.624 rejected IMto experience stimulation <--- competence.063.053 1.178.239 rejected amotivation <--- competence -.358.057-6.266 *** adoption extra regulation <--- competence -.136.061-2.208.027 adoption indentified regulation <--- competence.175.050 3.462 *** adoption tnetergrated regulation <--- competence.048.050.960.337 rejected IMto experience stimulation <--- autonomy.082.050 1.641.101 rejected amotivation <--- autonomy -.299.053-5.617 *** adoption extra regulation <--- autonomy -.282.057-4.928 *** adoption indentified regulation <--- autonomy.057.047 1.218.223 rejected tnetergrated regulation <--- autonomy -.135.047-2.899.004 adoption IMto experience stimulation <--- relatedness.439.064 6.879 *** adoption amotivation <--- relatedness -.270.068-3.952 *** adoption extra regulation <--- relatedness.186.073 2.529.011 adoption indentified regulation <--- relatedness.394.060 6.534 *** adoption tnetergrated regulation <--- relatedness.319.060 5.322 *** adoption performance result <--- IMto experience stimulation.011.072.155.877 rejected performance result <--- amotivation -.248.065-3.814 *** adoption performance result <--- extra regulation.081.064 1.274.203 rejected performance result <--- indentified regulation.099.076 1.303.192 rejected performance result <--- tnetergrated regulation -.012.078 -.157.875 rejected

Alvarez, M. S., Balaguer, I., Castillo, I., & Duda, J. L. (2009). Coach autonomy support and quality of sport engagement in young soccer players. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 138 148. Amorose, A. J., Anderson-Butcher, D. (2007). Autonomyupportive coaching and self-determined motivation in high school and college athletes: A test of self-determination theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 654-670. Amorose, A. J., Anderson-Butcher, D. (2015). Exploring the independent and interactive effects of autonomy- upportive and controlling coaching behaviors on adolescent athletes motivation for sport. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 4, 206-218. Bae, B. R. (2009). AMOS. 17.0 structural equation modeling. Chunlam Books. Bartholomew, K., Ntoumanis, N., Thogersen-Ntoumani, C. (2010). The controlling interpersonal style in a coaching context: Development and initial validation of a psychometric scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32, 193-216. Cheon, S. H. (2010). The effects of providing rationales in autonomy-supportive ways upon the identified regulation and intention of amotivated students toward physical activity. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology. 21(3), 309-326. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). The paradox of achievement: The harder you push, the worse it gets in J. Aronson (ed.). Improving Academic Achievement: Contributions of Social Psychology, 59 85. New York: Academic Press. Gagneʼ, M., Ryan, R. M., & Bargmann, K. (2003). Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and wellbeing of gymnastics. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15, 372-389. Hodge, K., Lonsdale, C., & Jackson, S. (2009). Athlete

engagement in elite sport: An exploratory investigation of antecedents and consequences. The Sport Psychologist, 23, 186 202. Kernis, M. H., Paradise, A. W., Whitaker, D. J., Wheatman, S. R., & Goldman, B. N. (2000). master of one; A psychological domain Not likely if one's self esteem is unstable. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin. 26, 1297-1305. Kim, G. S. (2009). Latent growth modeling and structural equation analysis-amos LISEL. Hanarae Academy. Kim, Y. S. (2004). The relationship between autonomy, competence, sport motivation level, and effort in high school football players. Master Dissertation. Seoul National University. Kimberley J Bartholomew, Nikos Ntoumanis, Cecilie Thogersen toumani, (2010). The Controlling Interpersonal Style in a Coaching Context: Development and Initial Validation of a Psychometric Scale. Journal of sport exercise psychology, 32, 193 216. KoKa, A. Hein, V. (2005). The effect of Perceived teacher feedback on intrinsic motivation in physical education. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36, 91-106. Lee, C., & Song, Y. G. (2011). The relationship between achievement goal orientation and basic psychological needs on autonomy-supportive coaching for Taekwondo participants. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 50(3), 275-286. Lee, M. H. & Kim, A. Y. (2008). Development and construct validation of the basic psychological needs scale for korean adolescents: based on the self-determination theory. Korean journal of social and personality psychology, 22(4), 157 174. Lee, Y. S., Park, J. H., Song, Y. G., & Lee, C. (2014). The effects of coach s autonomy-support and peer motivational climate on athletes psychological need satisfaction in youth sport. Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies, 56(1), 237-248. Lee. Y. J. (2002). Understanding of canonical correlation analysis. Sukjung Books. Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Rose, E. A. (2008). The development of the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ): Instrument development and initial validity evidence. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 323-355. Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Rose, E. A. (2009). Athlete burnout in elite sport: A self determination perspective. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 785 795. Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 881 954. Matosic, D. & Cox, Anne E. (2014). Athletes Motivation Regulations and Need Satisfaction Across Combinations of Perceived Coaching Behaviors. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 26, 302-317 Noh, H. J. (2005). The analysis of social survey through SPSS AMOS. Hyungseul Publishg Network. Oh, Y. T., & Yang, M. H. (2013). The mediating effect of self-regulated motivation in the relationship between perfectionism and athlete burnout. Journal of Coaching Development. 15(4). 55-63. Park, B. H. (2011). A study on coach-athlete relationship perceived by athletes and structural relations between self-regulation motivation and athletic satisfaction. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 50(6). 197-210. Park, J. G., & Kim, G. H. (2013). A casusal Structure between Perceived Coaching Behaviors, Autonomous vs Controlled Regulation of Behaviors, and Emotions: A self-determination theory perspective. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 52(5). 263-277 Park, S. H. (2012). The examination of time-series stability on self-determination motivation theory for sport performance anticipation: latent growth modeling application. Ph.D. Dissertation. Korea University. Ryan, R. M., Frederick, C. M., Lepes, D., Rubio, N., & Sheldon, K. M. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 28, 335 354. Silva, M. N., Markland, D. A., Carraca, E. V., Vieira, P. N., Coutinho, S. R., Minderico, C. S., Matos, M. G., Sardinha, L. B., & Teixeira, P. J. (2011). Exercise stimulation motivation predicts 3 yr weight loss in women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 43, 728 737. Smith, A., Ntoumanis, N., & Duda, J. L. (2010). An investigation of coach behaviors, goal motives, and implementation intentions as predictors of well being in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22, 17 33. Song, Y. G. & Cheon, S. H. (2012). Development and

validation of controlling coach behaviors scale. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology, 23(1), 111-123. Spray, C. M., Wang, C. K. J., Biddle, S. J. H. and Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2006). Understanding motivation in sport: An experimental test of achievement goal and self-determination theories. European Journal of Sport Science, 6, 43-51. Tessier, D., Sarrazin, P., & Ntoumanis, N. (2010). The effect of an intervention to improve newly qualified teachers interpersonal style, students motivation and psychological need satisfaction in sport based physical education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 242 253. Vallerand, R. J., & Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 142 69. Vansteenkiste, M. Mouratidis, A. & Lens, W. (2010). Detaching reasons from aims. Fair play and well being in soccer as a function of pursuing performance approach goals for stimulation or controlling reasons, Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32, 217-242. Vazou, S. & Ntoumanis, N. & Duda, J. L. (2006). Predicting young athletes' motivational indices as a function of their perceptions of the coach-and peer-created climate. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 215-233. Wang, C. K., Koh, K. T., Chatzisarantis, N. (2009). An Intra-Individual Analysis of Players' Perceived Coaching Behaviours, Psychological Needs, and Achievement Goals. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 4, 177-191. Yang, M. H. (2011). Testing self-regulation motivation as a mediator of the relationship between autonomy support and self management among Taekwondo athletes. Journal of marin sport studies, 1(1), 59-72. Yang, M. H. (2015). The relationship between autonomous coaching behavior and deliberate practice and athlete satisfaction: The mediating role of self-determined motivation. Journal of Coaching Development. 17(3). 77-91. Yang, M. H., & Kim, D. J. (2010). Development of basic psychological needs satisfaction scale in sport and model verification within self-determination theory. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology, 21(3), 217-231. Yang, B. H. (2006). Understanding of multivariate data analysis method for marketing, social, and behavior science. Communication Books.