Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp.207-227 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.29.1.201903.207 : * A Study on the Relationship between Parental Overprotection and College Student Burnout: the Moderated Mediating Effect of Ego-resiliency and Friendship Quality Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between parental overprotection and college student burnout, focusing on the moderated mediating effect of ego-resiliency and friendship quality. Method: An online survey was conducted on 278 college students. A total of 276 data were analyzed by the 3-step moderated mediation analysis proposed by Preacher, Rucker, and Hayes(2007). Results: The results of this study were as follows: First, parental overprotection had a significant direct effect on college student burnout. Second, ego-resiliency partially mediated the relationship between parental overprotection and college student burnout. Third, friendship quality moderated the mediating effect of ego-resiliency in the relationship between parental overprotection and college student burnout. Conclusion: This study showed that parental overprotection, ego-resiliency and friendship quality have influences on college student burnout. Based on the results, educational counseling and related suggestions were proposed to reduce college student burnout. Key words : Parental overprotection, Student burnout, Ego-resiliency, Friendship quality * 1 (2019). Corresponding Author: Oh, In-soo. Ewha Womans University, Dept. of Education, Ewhayeodaegil 25, Daehyeondong, Seoul, Korea, e-mail: insoo@ewha.ac.kr
. (, 2015;, 2016).,.,.,,,., (, 2012;,,, 2009)., (, 1997).,,, (, 2011;, 2016). (, 2016).,...,,,,,.., (,, 2014)... Shin, Lee, Kim Lee(2012), (2014),,..
.. (, 2015;,, 2015).. (,, 2012;,, 2011), (,, 2014).. (,, 2014;,, 2011;,, 2015)..,.. (2015), (2013)..,,.... (,, 2006), (,,, 2018, Zaleski, Levey-Thors, & Schiaffino, 1998).,, (Jacobs & Dodd, 2003). (Bukowski, Newcomb, & Hartup, 1996). (Berndt & Perry, 1986), (Parker & Asher, 1993). (,,, 2018;
Boudreau, Santen, Hemphill, & Dobson, 2004; Zaleski, Levey-Thors, & Schiaffino, 1998)...,.. (,, 2014).. (,, 2014;,, 2011).., (,, 2013) (,, 2013;, 2005). < I-1>.,..
.,?,?,?.,,,,, 4 278. 2018 9 2. 278 2 276. 44.6%(123 ), 55.4%(153 ). 1 15.9%(44 ), 2 16.3%(45 ), 3 29%(80 ), 4 (7 ) 38.8%(107 ). 27.9%(77 ), 21.4%(59 ), 17.4%(48 ), 9.8%(27 ), 8%(22 ), 5.8%(16 ). 1) 한국과보호양육척도 (K-POS) (2014) (K-POS)., 3 ( : ), 4 ( : ), 4 ( : ), 4 ( : ) 15. (1 ) (5 ) 5 Likert. Cronbach s α.692.
2) 대학생학업소진척도 Schaufeli, Martinez, Pinto, Salanova Bakker(2002) (Maslach Burnout Inventory-Study Survey Scale, MBI-SS), (2013). 5 ( : ), 4 ( : ), 5 ( : ) 14. (1 ) (5 ) 5 Likert,. Cronbach s α.855. 3) 대학생자아탄력성척도 (2012). 6 ( : ), 6 ( : ), 6 ( : ), 6 ( : ) 24. (1 ) (5 ) 5 Likert,. Cronbach s α.817. 4) 한국판친구관계질척도 (2010) Parker Asher(1993) (Friendship Quality Questionnaire, FQQ). 3 ( : ), 5 ( : ), 3 ( : ), 5 ( : ), 5 ( : ) 21. (1 ) (5 ) 5 Likert. Cronbach s α.914. SPSS 25.0 SPSS Process macro 3.1
.,.,,., Pearson., Hayes(2018) SPSS macro Process. (bootstrapping) (Preacher & Hayes, 2008).,,, (Preacher & Hayes, 2008).. 1) 기술통계,,,. < -1>. 3, 10 (Kline, 2011), 3 10. 15-75 19-71 43.928 9.74 -.022 -.120 14-70 14-65 38.236 9.228.071 -.158 24-120 57-117 87.547 10.401.038.255 21-105 42-105 80.652 11.828 -.164.067 2) 상관분석, < -2>.
1 2 3 4 1. 1 2..211 ** 1 3. -.176 ** -.561 ** 1 4. -.049 -.297 **.436 ** 1 ** p<.01,. (r=.211, p<.01), (r=-.176 p<.01),. (r=-.561, p<.01), (r=-.297, p<.01). (r=.436, p<.01). (moderated mediation) (Hayes, 2018).. < -3> (β=.048, p>.05). Preacher, Rucker Hayes(2007) 3,,. 1. 2. 3.
1 = B SE β t.200.056.211 3.574 *** =.045, F =12.773 *** 2.187.054.197 3.481 ** -.224.044 -.288-5.082 *** =.127, =.083, F =19.876 ***.191.054.201 3.539 *** 3 -.223.044 -.285-5.035 *** 1.147 1.358.048.845 =.129, =.002, F =13.475 *** ** p<.01, *** p<.001 1 Process macro Model 4 (Hayes, 2018).,.,... 1) 과보호적양육태도의학업소진에대한직접효과 < -4>., (β=.116, p<.05).,,.
: 95% B SE β t -.188.064 -.176-2.956 ** -.313 -.063 =.031, F =8.739 ** : 95% B SE β t.110.048.116 2.301 *.016.204 -.048.045 -.541-10.733 *** -.568 -.392 =.328, F =66.652 *** * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 2) 과보호적양육태도와학업소진의관계에서자아탄력성의매개효과 < -4>., (β=-.176, p<.01), (β=-.541, p<.001).,. (bootstrapping) (Preacher & Hayes, 2008), 5,000. (LLCI) (ULCI) 0 (Shrout & Bolger, 2002). 0. 0.
Boot SE 95%.090.033.027.155 Boot SE 95%.200.056.090.310. 5,000 3) 자아탄력성, 학업소진의관계에서친구관계질의조절효과, 3 1. 2,,. Aiken West(1991). 1, 2. 3. (Variance Inflation Factor; VIF) 10 (multicollinearity) (Aiken & West, 1991). (VIF) 1. < -6>. 1, (β=-.561, p<.001). 2, (β=-.533, p<.001) (β=-.065, p>.05). 3 (β=.109, p<.05).,., < -7>. 1SD,, +1SD 0.
1 = B SE β t VIF -.498.044 -.561-11.227 *** 1.000 =.315, F =126.034 *** 2 -.473.049 -.533-9.600 *** 1.235 -.051.043 -.065-1.167 1.235 =.318, =.003, F =63.781 *** -.477.049 -.537-9.738 *** 1.236 3 -.051.043 -.065-1.185 * 1.235 3.665 1.674.109 2.190 * 1.002 =.330, =.012, F =44.710 *** * p<.05, *** p<.001 Boot SE 95% -1SD -.563.064 -.688 -.437 M -.477.049 -.573 -.380. 5,000 +1SD -.391.062 -.512 -.269, ± (simple slope test) (Aiken & West, 1991)., < -1>.,.
,.,., 3 1 2. 3 SPSS Process macro 3.12 Model 14, < -8>., (t=-2.956, p<.01), (t=-3.884, p<.001)., (t=2.254, p<.05).,. < -9>. 1SD,, +1SD 0.
= B SE t 95% -.188.064-2.956 ** -.313 -.063 =.031, F =8.739 ** = B SE t 95%.114.047 2.401 *.021.207-1.055.272-3.884 *** -1.590 -.520 -.704.292-2.414 * -1.278 -.130 * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001.007.003 2.254 *.001.014 =.344, F =35.561 *** Boot SE 95% -1SD.102.038.031.181 M.086.032.025.152 +1SD.069.028.019.130. 5,000..
..,.,. (2014) Shin, Lee, Kim Lee(2012)... (, 2014).,.....,.,. (2014). (,, 2014;,, 2015), (Ungar, 2009)......,
.,.,.,,.. Wilks(2008), Jacob Dodd(2003)..., (, 1992).. (,, 2013;, 2005). (Perry & Bussey, 1984), (,, 2013).........,. (2014),
.,.,, (2018) 2 2,..,.,,.., (2012).. (4), 281-302., (2006). :,. (2), 209-230., (2014). : 4, 5, 6. 585-612. (2016). :,.. (2015). :.., (2015). -. (2), 73-89. (1997).. (2), 1-19. (2010).. (6), 197-213., (2011).. (3), 647-661., (2013). :. (6), 3323-3339.,, (2018).
. (9), 684-695. doi:10.5392/ JKCA.2018.18.09.684.,,,,, (2011).. (2), 133-152.,, (2018). 2. (2), 27-58. doi:10.15854/jes.2018.6.49.2.27., (2014).,. (3), 275-282. doi:10.7739/jkafn.2014.21.3.275. (2012). :., (2011).. 85-113., (2013). (MBI-SS) :. (2), 165-187.,, (2009).. (3) 59-78. (2015)... (1992).. 52-66., (2012).. (6), 3077-3094. (2014)..., (2014).. (4), 307-328., (2015).. (6), 644-655. doi:10.7475/ kjan.2015.27.6.644., (2013).,. (2), 169-185. doi:10.7856/kjcls.2013.24.2.169., (2013).. (4), 477-497. (2005).,. 57-81. (2016).. (2), 124-131. doi:10.12799/jkachn.2016.27.2.124.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. CA: Sage Publications. Berndt, T. J., & Perry, T. B. (1986). Children s perceptions of friendships as supportive relationships. Development Psychology, 22, 640 648. doi:10.1037//0012-1649.22.5.640 Boudreau, D., Santen, S. A., Hemphill, R. R., & Dobson, J. (2004). Burnout in medical students: Examining the prevalence and predisposing factors during the four years of medical school. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 44(4), S75-S76. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.07.248 Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F., & Hartup, W. W. (1998). Cambridge studies in social and emotional development. The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence. NY: Cambridge University Press. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach(2rd ED.). NY: Guilford Press. Jacobs, S. R., & Dodd, D. (2003). Student burnout as a function of personality, social support, and workload. Journal of college student development, 44(3), 291-303. doi:10.1353/csd.2003.0028. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(3rd ED.). NY: Guilford Press. Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental psychology, 29(4), 611-621. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.611. Perry, D, G., & Bussey, K. (1984). Social development. NJ: Prentice-Hall. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891. doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316. Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 33(5), 464-481. doi:10.1177/0022022102033005003. Shin, H., Lee, J., Kim, B., & Lee, S. M. (2012). Students perceptions of parental bonding styles and their academic burnout. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(3), 509-517. doi:10.1007/s12564-012-9218-9. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological methods, 7(4), 422. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422. Ungar, M. (2009). Overprotective Parenting: Helping Parents Provide the Right Amount of Risk and
Responsibility. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 37(3), 258-271. doi: 10.1080/ 01926180802534247. Wilks, S. E. (2008). Resilience amid academic stress: The moderating impact of social support among social work students. Advances in social work, 9(2), 106-125. Zaleski, E. H., Levey-Thors, C., & Schiaffino, K. M. (1998). Coping mechanisms, stress, social support, and health problems in college students. Applied Developmental Science, 2(3), 127-137. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0203_2 : 2019.01.28. / : 2019.02.07. / : 2019.03.20.
: :. : 278. 276 SPSS Process macro. :,.,.,. :,,..