초기부모애착척도

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

상담학연구 : *.,,,,, (N=495)..,.,.. * (2013). (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

歯14.양돈규.hwp


상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

歯유성경97.PDF

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

상담학연구,. H ,,.,,.,,.,. (Corresponding Author): / / 220 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

<30392EB9DAB0A1B6F72CC1A4B3B2BFEE2E687770>

상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j

- * (32 ), ,,,, * 2013 ( ) (KRF-2013S1A3A ). :,, 3 53 Tel : ,

<30382E20B1C7BCF8C0E720C6EDC1FD5FC3D6C1BEBABB2E687770>

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과

歯정남운(최종).PDF

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

상담학연구 * Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1370 Tel: /

,......

상담학연구 *,. 41 -, ,,, 82,,, Likert..96,.94,.88,.89, ,. (CCR: Conflict Over Child Rearing) (DSC: Dissatisfaction With Childre

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

44-6대지.08김정희-5

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Rheu-suppl hwp

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **


歯5-4-26(황혜리,김미경).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

상담학연구. 9., , 21..,,,,,,... (Corresponding Author): / / 154 Tel: /

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

(5차 편집).hwp

* (Continuing Bonds Scale: CBS) ( K-CBS),. 1 (293 ), 10, 52.59%. K-CBS (200 ), , K-CBS,, K-CBS.. K-CBS. K-CBS.,. * 2014 ( ) (NRF-2014S1A


歯6권2호.PDF


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

- - - Table 1. SSP 절차와내용 1, 30. 2, 3,, 2. 3, , 3. 5, , ,

<C7D1B1B9B1B3C0B0B0B3B9DFBFF85FC7D1B1B9B1B3C0B05F3430B1C733C8A35FC5EBC7D5BABB28C3D6C1BE292DC7A5C1F6C6F7C7D42E687770>

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

교육치료연구 SNS : SNS SNS SNS SNS, SNS, SNS. SPSS MACRO SNS., SNS SNS. SNS, SNS,. SNS SNS,. (2016) (Corresponding Author) : / / 608 / Tel:

상담학연구 : *. 375, -,,. AMOS..,.,.,.,.,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1095 Tel: /

정보화정책 제14권 제2호 Ⅰ. 서론 급변하는 정보기술 환경 속에서 공공기관과 기업 들은 경쟁력을 확보하기 위해 정보시스템 구축사업 을 활발히 전개하고 있다. 정보시스템 구축사업의 성 패는 기관과 기업, 나아가 고객에게 중대한 영향을 미칠 수 있으므로, 이에 대한 통제

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

상담학연구 , , ,, ( ),.,., 15 19,, 30, (Corresponding Author): / Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

歯5-4-04(윤치연외).PDF


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

278 경찰학연구제 12 권제 3 호 ( 통권제 31 호 )

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

Original Article Korean J Child Stud 2016;37(5): pissn: eissn: X The Pathways From


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * A Study on the

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

04_이근원_21~27.hwp

(Ausubel, 1955:, 2008 ) (Tangney, Niedenthal, Covert, & Hill-Barlow, 1998).,,.,,., (Goss, Gilbert, & Allan, 1994),.,,. (Claesson, 2002),, (Kaufman, 19

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

歯김길문.PDF

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3


27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

상담학연구 : Vocational Identity Status Assessment(VISA-K) 412 Porfeli et al., (2011) (Vocational Identity Status Assesment: VISA),, (2014) VISA-K,,,,, 6.

Vol.259 C O N T E N T S M O N T H L Y P U B L I C F I N A N C E F O R U M

Transcription:

담학연구 (Early Parental Attachment Scale: EPAS). 50.,, 20 241-9, 9 18. -,. 302 2,., - -,,. - -.. -. 7 Likert -.91,.93, -.89,.90.. (Corresponding Author): / / 31 70 Tel: 02-570-7115 / E-mail: zeebee33@naver.com

, (Erickson, 1968)...,.., (Rizzuto, 2000).. (destructive entitlement).... Bowlby(1973) -. (availability) (responsiveness).,, (Main, Kaplan, & Cassidy, 1985) (Bowlby, 1973). Bowlby Ainsworth et al., (1978) (the strange situation). (Bowlby, 1973) (Brumariu & Kerns, 2010), (Armsden & Greenberg, 1987; Wilkinson, 2008), (Brennan, Clark, & Shaver, 1998; Collins & Read, 1990; Fraley,

Waller, & Brennan, 2000; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985; Hazan & Shaver, 1987). (, 2013; Flores, 2004), (,,, 2010), (,, 2007), (, 2006) (Limke & Mayfield, 2011; Miner, 2009).., - (the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment-Revised: IPPA-R; Armsden & Greenberg, 1987) - (Parental Bonding Instrument: PBI; Parker, Tupling, & Brown, 1979), (Adult attachment interview: AAI; George, Kaplan, & Main, 1985) (Fouladi, Moller, & McCarthy, 2006). IPPA-R (1998). (1992) PBI, AAI., Bowlby(1973, 1988) IPPA-R,, -,. 15 19. PBI. AAI IPPA-R PBI,, (Brennan, Clark, & Shaver, 1998). Ainsworth et al.,(1978) 3 (, -, ) Hazan Shaver(1987) 3 (Adult Attachment Questionnaire: AAQ) (,, 2015). (AAQ) (Crowell, Fraley, & Shaver, 1999). ( ),.

,., - (EPAS). - (IPPA-R), (PAM), (AAI), (PAS). IPPA-R Greenberg, Siegel Leitch(1983) Armsden Greenberg(1987) 25 75 5 Likert. IPPA-R,,. (Brennan, Clark, & Shaver, 1998). (Parental Attachment Measure: PAM) Hazan Shaver(1987) 3 (AAQ) Collins Read(1990) (Adult Attachment Scale: AAS) Proctor(1998) (others) (parents).,, 6 18 5 Likert. AAS (Fraley, Waller, & Brennan, 2000),. AAS 17., PAM 17. George, Kaplan, Main(1985) (AAI) 20. 5.,,,, (role-reversing) 5 12. AAI -,,, -.. (Parental Attachment Scale: PAS) (AAI) Fouladi, Moller McCarthy (2006) 23 6 Likert.

, AAI -, (Crowell, Treboux, & Waters, 1999). AAI (quality), (PAS)., (Fouladi, Moller, & McCarthy, 2006),. (EPAS).,,., 20. 50-18.,., (ECR-R), (STAI), (SWBS) (EPAS).,,,, 20 260. 118 (45.3%), 142 (54.7%) 35 (SD = 10.85) 106 (40.8%) 154 (59.2%).,, 318. 136 (42.7%), 182 (57.3%), 33 (SD = 11.71) 164 (51.6%), 114 (35.8%), 40 (12.6%).. AAI George, Kaplan, Main(1985) ( 5-12 ) /. 2016 3 4

. (EPAS) Bowlby(1980) Ainsworth et al., (1978) - (insecure-anxious/ambivalent attachment) (insecure-avoidant attachment). -,. AAI, PAS ( ) -. IPPA-R ( ), PAM. - ( : ( ) ) 50 50 100.. 1 7 7 Likert (Summed rating method)., 2 3. ( ). ( )..,.,, 260, 19 241. (,,, ), - -, (, 2000). (SPSS 20.0), 2-9, 9 18. (Cronbach s α).

,, 312. 18. 302 (AMOS 20.0). EPAS.,. (ECR-R) (SPSS 20.0). - (Experience in Close Relationships Scale-R: ECR-R) ECR-R Brennan, Clark Shaver(1998) Fraley, Waller Brennan(2000). (2004). ECR-R 7 Likert 18 36.,. (2004).89,.85..92.89. (Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI-T) -(State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI) Spielberg, Gorsuch, Lushene(1970) (1978). STAI 20(FormX-I) 20(FormX-II) 40.. 4 Likert 7 Likert. (1978).86..90. (Existential well-being: EWB) Paloutzion Ellison(1982) 10,, 10 20 6. (Limke & Mayfield, 2011; Miner, 2009) (Korean-Version).,

..78 (Paloutzion & Ellison, 1982).85. 18, -, Cronbach s α 1 * - - 3 2 4.14 1.51.671 **.912 3.04 1.33.666 **.905 11 4 4.05 1.64.740 **.907 2.93 1.62.762 **.899 13 6 3.48 1.57.743 **.907 2.93 1.42.725 **.901 29 8 5.02 1.41.759 **.905 3.98 1.56.786 **.896 35 10 3.44 1.54.787 **.903 2.93 1.38.795 **.895 38 14 4.35 1.61.828 **.900 3.47 1.50.796 **.895 41 16 4.07 1.57.833 **.899 3.46 1.53.836 **.891 45 18 3.58 1.62.766 **.905 3.05 1.49.743 **.900 50 12 3.70 1.68.804 **.902 3.26 1.49.725 **.901 2 1 2.29 1.35.721 **.855 2.71 1.70.645 **.835 10 3 2.49 1.64.573 **.877 2.37 1.64.517 **.851 14 7 2.49 1.49.795 **.846 2.76 1.44.697 **.823 22 5 2.11 1.23.709 **.856 2.07 1.18.678 **.825 28 9 2.52 1.39.793 **.846 2.67 1.35.769 **.813 34 11 2.03 1.28.710 **.856 1.97 1.31.747 **.816 40 15 2.14 1.21.755 **.851 2.09 1.21.736 **.818 44 17 2.20 1.35.740 **.852 2.19 1.40.768 **.813 49 13 3.14 1.50.581 **.872 3.35 1.51.539 **.845 3.18 1.47 2.84 1.44. **p <.01, * p. 11 2

. -() 2.38(3.98).97(1.21), -() 2.46(3.23).94(1.12). - -.57.80,.67.83, -.52.77,.67.84. -.87.91 -.84.90.. 50 2 -.30 5 45. KMO(Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) Bartlett, KMO =.905, = 2246.245(p<.001), KMO =.899, = 2164.302(p<.001) (, 1998). Direct Oblimin (, 2000). (Eigenvalue) 1 7 (SPSS 20.0),, 2. (Cronbach α) 8 2. 35.10, - 9, 9 18. 241 -.25.78 21.7%.61.84 32.3% 2 54.0%. -.36.78 17.0%.61.86 36.8% 53.8%. 302 ( ) -.46.82 (.42.85) 27.1%(22.6%),.65.86(.47.87) 36.4%(34.8%) 63.5%(57.4%)., 18 2. 2 1-1 1-2. EPAS (ECR-R),,. (SPSS 20.0), - -.. -,. 3 EPAS.

16 ( )..86.04.87.17 4 ( )..83.05.65.09 10 ( )..82.03.76.17 14 ( )..81.14.81.06 8 ( )..78.15.79.18 12 ( )..77.02 74.46 6 ( )..73.10.65.16 18 ( )..69.12.67.16 2 ( )..65.01.47.10 15 ( )..07.82.11.85 9 ( )..14.82.06.72 11 ( ) ()..11.80.15.73 17 ( )..07.79.10.73 7 ( )..01.76.14.72 1 ( )..10.72.19.61 5 ( )..18.71.12.67 13 ( )..28.64.22.65 3 ( )..15.46.19.43 6.55 4.87 6.27 4.06 (%) 36.40 63.47 34.82 57.38. ( ) 302., (134) = 520.06, p<.001, TLI =.88, CFI =.89, RMSEA =.098, (134) = 579.47, p<.001, TLI =.83, CFI =.85, RMSEA =.105..43.86, 48.83. - -

.63.81,.70.86, -.61.80,.59.82. 4-1 4-2.. 2-1 2-2. - - - - -.130 - -.660 **.117 * -.066.424 **.228 ** -.430 **.185 **.484 **.098 -.274 **.149 *.248 **.233 **.322 ** -.182 **.236 **.339 **.269 **.632 **.456 ** - -.182 ** -.225 ** -.326 ** -.346 ** -.521 ** -.475 ** -.780 ** - M 2.57 4.23 2.81 3.33 3.18 3.65 3.46 4.25 SD.1.01 1.18 1.07 1.05.94.76.80.74.91.93.89.90.92.89.90.85. *p <.05, **p <.01 df TLI CFI RMSEA(90% ) 520.066 134.88.89.098(.089.107)

df TLI CFI RMSEA(90% ) 579.476 134.83.85.105(.096.114).

(EPAS). - Ainsworth et al.,(1978) Brennan, Clark, Shaver(1998) EPAS - 2. -,..,,. 2..42.87. 2. 4.0, ( = 63.47, = 57.38) 2..43.86. TLI, CFI.90 RMSEA.10 (, 2000). (item parceling) (Nasser & Takahashi, 2003), - (r=.59.86, p<.01) (.43.86) - 2.., (n=241) -.87.91 -.84.90. (n=302) -.91.93 -.89.90..84.88 EPAS., 3. -, (,, 2012; Collins & Read, 1990; Hazan & Shaver, 1987; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007).,.. - (r=.23, p<.01), - (Limke & Mayfield, 2011) (r=.46, p<.01).

,. -.,.. (,,, 2014;,, 2010;, 2013),.. -. - (Ainsworth et al., 1978), - (,,, 2014; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007).., (,, 2003;, 2013; Limke & Mayfield, 2011; Miner, 2009)..,. - (PBI). PBI..,. (, 2002; Limke & Mayfield, 2011).. (M = 3.33) (M = 4.23).

.,. (Wallin, 2010). Bowlby(1980) 2. (AIA) 40 70% (Phelps, Belsky, & Crnic, 1998).,, 2,..,.,,,.,,.,.,... (2004).,.,, (2014).. (3), 1277-1297., (1978). STAI. (10), 1223-1229.,, (2014)., -. (4), 339-359., (2015).. (1), 131-149. (2006). :,

. (1), 33-60., (2003).. (4), 765-778. (1992). - (Parental Bonding Instrument):., 979-989., (2012). :. (4), 1921-1935. (1998).. :. (1998)..,. (2000).. :. (2013)..,., (2007).. (4), 17-32., (2010)., -,,, -. (2), 385-411. (2013)., :. (5), 3065-3087.,,, (2002).. (1), 93-124. (2000).. (1), 161-177.,, (2009). :. (1), 67-86. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(5), 427-454. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss. New York: Basic Books. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books. Brennan. K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measures of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York: Guilford Press. Brumariu, L. E., & Kerns, K. A. (2010). Parent child attachment and internalizing symptoms in childhood and adolescence: A review of empirical findings and future directions. Development and psychopathology, 22(01), 177-203. Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship

quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663. Crowell, J. A., Treboux, D., & Waters, E. (1999). The adult attachment Interview and the relationship questionnaire: Relations to reports of mothers and partners. Personal Relationships, 6, 1-18. Erickson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton. Flores, P. (2004). Addiction as an attachment disorder. Lanham: Jason Aronson Inc. Fouladi, R. T., Moller, N. P., & McCarthy, C. J. (2006). Examination of internal consistency and construct validity of scores on the parental attachment scale: Preliminary psychometric result. American Counseling Association, 39(1), 2-30. Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350-365. George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1985). Adult Attachment Interview Protocol. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley. Greenberg, M. T., Seigel, J. M., & Leitch, C. J. (1983). The nature and importance of attachment relationships to parents and peers during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, 373-386. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524. Limke, A., & Mayfield, P. B. (2011). Attachment to God: Differentiating the contributions of fathers and mothers using the experiences in parental relationships scale. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 39(2), 122. Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. C. (1985). Security in infancy, preschool and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing Points of Attachment Theory and Research: Monographs of the society for research in child development, 50, 60-104. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press. Miner, M. H. (2009). The impact of child-parent attachment, attachment to God and religious orientation on psychological adjustment. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 37(2), 114-124. Nasser, F., & Takahashi, T. (2003). The effect of using item parcels on ad hoc goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: An example using Sarason's Reactions to Tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(1), 75-97. Paloutzion, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being and the quality of life. In L. A. Peplau, D. Permon (Ed). Loneliness: a sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 224-236). New York: John Wiley & Sones. Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L, B, (1979). A parental bonding instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 1-10. Phelps, J. L., Belsky, J., & Crnic, K. (1998). Earned security, daily stress and parenting: A comparison of five alternative models. Developmental psychopathology, 10, 21-38. Proctor, M. T. (1998). Attachment to God: Is it a viable concept? The relationship between attachment to God, child and adult attachment experiences, God concept and the quality and nature of attachment to God.

Unpublished thesis, UWS, Australia. Rizzuto, A. M. (2000). The Birth of the Living God: A Psychoanalytic Study ( ). : ( 1979 ). Spielberg, C. D., Corsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. California: Consulting Psycology Press. Wallin, D. J. (2010). [Attachment in Psychotherapy]. (,, ). : ( 2007 ). Wilkinson, R. B. (2008). Development and properties of the adolescent friendship attachment scale. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(10), 1270-1279. : 2016. 06. 15. : 2016. 08. 16. : 2016. 08. 23.

담학연구 Development and Validation of Early Parental Attachment Scale(EPAS) Torch Trinity Graduate University This study aims to develop and validate Early Parental Attachment Scale(EPAS) that measures early parental attachment of Korean adults. For this purpose, a preliminary scale consisting of 50 questions was developed based on the literature and foreign scales on early parental attachment. After it was approved by professional counselors and Korean language teacher, the scale was used to measure early parental attachment of 241 adults over age of 20 in Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Incheon. As a result of exploratory factor analysis, 18 questions - 9 questions on anxiety-ambivalence, and 9 questions on avoidance- were selected. Out of 2 sub-factors, anxietyambivalence measures instability in parental relationships, while avoidance measures distance in parental relationships. Two-factor model was validated after conducting confirmatory factor analysis on 302 adults in Seoul, Gyeonggi, and Incheon. Result of correlation between EPAS and related variables, EPAS was positively related to Adult Attachment(ECR-R) and Trait Anxiety(STAI-T), but negatively related to Existential well-being Scale(EWBS), demonstrating convergent and incremental validity. EPAS's internal reliability was paternal attachment anxious-ambivalent.91, avoidant.93. maternal attachment anxious.89, avoidant.90. Finally, implications and limitations of the study were discussed. Key words : early parental attachment, scale development, validation, adult