(K-CERQ) * Garnefski, Kraaija Spinhovena(2001) (2004) (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire; CERQ).. 18 513 (CERQ), (PDS), (BDI) (DERS). 263 36 35 CERQ, 7. 250 9, 9.,, -,., CERQ. * 2011 (No. NRF-2011-32A-B00307). (Corresponding Author): / / 11-1 Tel: 02-3277-2643 / E-mail: ahn12@ewha.ac.kr
.,,. (Gross, 2002;,,, 2011). Joormann Siemer(2011),,. - (Lazarus, 1993; Gross, 2002).,.. (Carver, Scheier & Weintraub, 1989; Lazarus, 1993; Compas, Orosan, & Grant 1993).,,,,. (Compas et al,, 2001)., (Parker & Endler, 1992).,,,,,,, (,, 1999; Ryan, Martin, & Dahlen, 2005,,, 2008),, (Fabes et al., 1994;,, 1998; Garnefski et al., 2001).
, (Endler & Parker, 1990, 1994; Parker & Endler, 1992; Garnefski, et al., 2001)., (Gross & John, 2003;, 2005), (, 1998). - (Garnefski et al., 2001). 2001 Garnefski (2001) (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire; CERQ), 9 1. CERQ, (acceptance) (refocus on planning) (putting into perspective) (positive refocusing) (positive reappraisal) (self-blame) (other-blame) (rumination) (catastrophizing),,
(Jermann et al., 2006; Garnefski & Kraaij, 2007;,, 2008,, Loch, Hiller, Witthoft, 2011; Perte, Miclea, 2011;,, 2012).,,. CERQ,,,, (Jermann et al., 2006)., CERQ (Garnefski, Legerstee, Kraaij, Kommer, & Teerds, 2002; Garnefski & Kraaij, 2007).,,.,., 36 9 4,,, (Jermann, et al., 2006; Loch, Hiller, Witthoft, 2011; Perte, Miclea, 2011)., 9. / (Garnefski et al, 2001) (Jermann et al., 2006; d'acremont & Van der Linden, 2007). 9 /.,.., 13 (Wei, 2008; Hussain & Bhushan, 2011),, CERQ. (DERS) CERQ,, (PDS), (BDI) CERQ,
Garnefski, Kraaij, & Spinhoven(2001) Jermann, et al.(2006) Perte & Miclea(2011) Loch, Hiller & Witthoft(2011) Netherland N=547, 12-16. French N=224, 18-37. Romanian N=1807, (13-18 ) (18-65 ) Duesch N=414, 18-76., 28.30 36 9, 8,19,20 0.3 36 9, 20, 21, 30, 5, 32, 24, 33, 7, 8 19, 30, 31 / 36 9, 19, 12, 21, 7, 25, 34 36 9,, (Garnefski, Kraaija, & Spinhoven, 2001). CERQ, K-CERQ. K-CERQ., 513. 263,, 250. 263 23 (SD=3.52) 120 143, 250 22 (SD=4.34) 113, 137. (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire; CERQ) Garnefski (2001) CERQ
(2004). CERQ. (, ), (, ) (, ), (, ), (, ), (, ), (, ), (, ), (, ) 9 4 36. 5 ( : 1 =, 5 = ),. CERQ Cronbach s.80, Cronbach s (Cronbach s =.40).60-.91. (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; DERS) Gratz Roemer (2004) (2007) (K-DERS). DERS,,,,, 6. K-DERS 35, 6. 5 (1 =, 5 = ),. DERS Cronbach s.93,.92. (Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale: PDS) (Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale: PDS) Foa, Cashman, Jaycox Perry(1997) PTSD (2005). PDS 49 DSM-IV PTSD B, C, D 17, 4 (0 =, 1 = 1, 2 = 1 2-4 3 = 1 5 ). Cronbach s.92. Beck (Beck Depression Inventory-II; BDI-II) Beck (1961) DSM-IV BDI- II(Beck et al, 1996) (2008). BDI-II 2
, 1 21. 4,, 16, 18 7. BDI-II (0-13 ), (14-19), (20-28), (29-63). BDI-II Cronbach s.91. CERQ,. CERQ DERS, PDS, BDI-II. SPSS 18.0 AMOS 20.0, SAS. CERQ CERQ CERQ,. 2.19 3.83 0.98 1.39..00.65, 14.40..84, (Cronbach s =.68), (Cronbach s =.77). 13,.15.23 (Smith, McCarthy, & Anderson, 2000). K-CERQ 35. (, 1995)., 1 8,. 7 9, 8, 9 scree plot,,, 7
.. 3. 61.92%, 25.4% 8. 14.8%, 4 9.6% 4. 4.9% 4 3. 2.9% 4, 2.3% 4 7 2.0% 3., 9 7., 9 9 CERQ (Garnefski, Kraaij, & Spinhoven, 2001; Jermann et al., 2006; Perte & Miclea, 2011)., 2.13 3.64 1.09 1.36. 35.922,.83,.79,.87,.76,.69,.63,.89,.84,.89,. 13..29.68, 5.40..52.89.40. K-CERQ 13 35 CERQ (K-CERQ),, -,., 7 (, 2000),
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 19 0.82 0.06 0.09-0.06-0.16 0.03 0.00.75 8 0.78 0.01 0.01-0.08-0.03 0.08-0.07.70 21 0.70-0.19-0.03 0.08 0.01 0.10 0.04.64 7 0.69-0.11 0.04 0.05 0.31 0.02 0.06.62 11 0.47 0.19-0.02-0.13-0.11 0.08-0.04.28 24 0.42 0.11 0.03-0.25-0.16-0.01 0.05.29 5 0.41-0.06-0.03 0.08 0.24 0.14 0.13.38 35 0.40-0.04 0.04 0.12 0.18 0.16-0.06.29 22-0.01 0.82 0.07-0.12 0.07 0.02 0.06.70 36-0.04 0.80 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.07.77 14 0.04 0.74-0.10 0.17 0.01-0.10 0.02.67 3-0.08 0.73-0.02 0.03 0.14-0.06-0.10.64 31 0.03 0.03 0.89 0.02-0.07 0.02-0.02.80 9 0.07-0.00 0.74-0.04 0.02-0.19-0.02.69 29-0.03-0.03 0.73-0.02 0.19 0.10 0.02.51 18 0.04 0.04 0.71-0.00-0.05-0.19-0.08.67 16 0.01 0.03-0.02 0.91 0.03 0.06-0.03.87 23 0.01-0.08-0.01 0.56 0.23 0.04 0.23.71 17-0.17 0.06 0.03 0.56-0.02-0.10 0.22.56 10-0.07 0.15-0.03 0.47 0.33 0.01 0.04.66 1-0.11 0.17 0.02 0.44-0.01-0.04 0.08.34 28-0.10 0.05 0.06 0.38 0.26-0.01 0.30.63 25-0.14 0.16 0.03 0.23-0.09 0.11 0.13.17 2-0.02 0.08-0.03 0.03 0.70 0.05-0.10.51 27-0.02 0.10 0.01 0.06 0.66 0.00 0.15.66 32-0.07 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.63 0.09 0.18.56 15 0.06 0.24-0.04 0.15 0.56-0.07 0.01.60 12 0.01-0.06-0.06-0.03 0.07 0.84-0.02.76 20 0.14 0.08-0.08 0.07-0.07 0.75 0.01.69 4 0.07-0.05-0.01 0.01 0.01 0.69 0.01.54 34 0.10-0.16 0.06 0.08 0.22 0.45 0.14.42 33 0.00-0.01-0.01-0.09 0.12-0.01 0.80.65 26 0.02 0.01-0.12 0.23-0.06 0.01 0.67.67 30-0.04 0.28 0.09 0.06-0.02 0.08 0.48.42 6 0.17-0.06-0.06 0.18 0.30-0.03 0.33.43 25.42 14.81 9.60 4.94 2.85 2.28 2.02
- 4 2.13 1.22.41.83.84 12 2.29 1.20.47.81.87 =.83 20 2.35 1.26.47.83.80 34 2.88 1.36.51.88.69 8 2.38 1.25.52.73.89 11 2.45 1.32.48.79.70 =.79 19 2.22 1.24.53.74.80 24 2.18 1.19.33.82.52 9 2.62 1.30.33.83.89 18 2.70 1.33.29.84.85 =.87 29 2.58 1.21.48.90.64 31 2.67 1.30.32.83.86 5 2.83 1.19.61.78.74 7 2.77 1.25.65.75.75 =.76 21 2.55 1.25.59.77.78 35 2.82 1.28.63.80.63 6 3.26 1.25.55.80.74 26 3.37 1.11.53.72 =.68.75 33 3.64 1.09.60.68.80 1 2.96 1.29.35.72.53 17 3.49 1.28.53.59.73 =.63 25 2.70 1.19.44.64.60 30 3.26 1.19.57.57.65 3 2.91 1.18.47.88.73 14 2.97 1.16.48.85.83 =.89 22 2.81 1.24.50.84.86 36 2.88 1.20.57.85.85 2 3.21 1.20.62.82.64 15 3.28 1.23.68.77.80 =.84 27 3.36 1.13.65.77.81 32 3.00 1.18.67.79.72 10 2.73 1.32.63.79.83 16 2.76 1.32.55.79 =.89.82 23 3.08 1.34.62.77.83 28 3.49 1.25.60.87.61
9 7 9 CERQ (Garnefski, Kraaij, & Spinhoven, 2001; Jermann et al., 2006; Perte & Miclea, 2011). 9 df p RMSEA TLI CFI 7-1 1400.18 539.00.080.818.835 7-2 1470.70 552.00.082.810.824 9-1 1153.04 532.00.068.867.881 9-2 1272.60 559.00.072.854.863. RMSEA = Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation; TLI = Comparative Fit Index; CFI = Comparative Fit Index.
CR 33 1.00 0.80 6 1.06 0.74 0.09 11.50 26 0.96 0.75 0.08 11.69 1 1.00 0.53 30 1.00 0.65 17 1.27 0.73 0.13 9.93 25 0.97 0.60 0.12 8.30 14 1.00 0.83 36 1.00 0.85 22 1.07 0.86 0.06 18.70 3 0.87 0.73 0.06 14.09 15 1.00 0.80 27 1.00 0.81 32 0.89 0.72 0.07 13.47 2 0.81 0.64 0.07 11.30 16 1.00 0.82 23 1.00 0.83 10 1.01 0.83 0.06 17.36 28 0.70 0.61 0.07 10.75 4 1.00 0.84 12 1.00 0.87 20 0.97 0.80 0.06 16.76 34 0.91 0.69 0.07 12.99 11 1.00 0.70 19 1.00 0.80 8 1.16 0.89 0.06 18.03 24 0.65 0.52 0.08 8.57 18 1.00 0.85 31 1.00 0.86 9 1.02 0.89 0.05 20.65 29 0.69 0.64 0.06 11.77 5 1.00 0.74 7 1.00 0.75 21 1.07 0.78 0.07 14.75 35 0.92 0.65 0.08 11.48. ***p<.001, **p<.01.
4. K-CERQ 35, TLI, RMSEA CFI, GFI. TLI, CFI, GFI.90 RMSEA.05,.08,.10.10. 35 7 (7-1 ) RMSEA.08 TLI, CFI, GFI ( (539, N= 263)=1400.18, p<.001; TLI=.818; CFI=.835). 35 7 (7-2) ( (552, N= 263)=1470.7, p<.001; TLI=.810; CFI=.824, RMSEA=.082). 35 9 (9-1) ( (532, N= 263)=1153.04, p<.001; TLI=.867; CFI=.881; RMSEA=.068), 35 9 (9-2) ( (559, N= 263) =1272.6, p<.001; TLI=.854; CFI=.863; RMSEA=.072)., 35 9. 9.74-.80,.53-.73,.73-.86,..64-.81,.61-.83,.69-.87,.52-.89,.64-.89,.65-.78. K-CERQ K-CERQ DERS., K-CERQ,.04.72.,.28., -.14-.14,.30-.57. K-CERQ K-CERQ (PDS), (BDI).,,. PDS PDS.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2.46** 3.32**.48** 4.59**.60**.60** 5.58**.55**.53**.70** 6.30**.18**.12.30**.31** 7.28**.09.04.23**.11.41** 8.14**.12.10.20**.05 -.05.37** 9.50**.30**.19**.47**.36**.58**.72**.29** DERS.14**.07 -.14* -.01 -.10.34**.57**.30**.47** PDS.19**.03.03.10 -.05.33**.67**.25**.57** BDI.06 -.09 -.11 -.06 -.12.34**.54**.21**.47** Mean 3.42 3.10 2.89 3.21 3.01 2.41 2.31 2.64 2.74 SD 0.98 0.90 1.03 0.97 1.09 1.08 1.01 1.11 1.00. **p<.01, *p<.05 Garnefski (2001) (CERQ).,,, - 13, 35, 7., 9,,. CERQ 9 9, 7 35 9 (Garnefski, Kraaij, & Spinhoven, 2001; Jermann et al.,
2006; Perte & Miclea, 2011).,,, (DERS). K-CERQ (Garnefski & Kraaij, 2006;, 2007;,,, 2011).., CERQ,,,,,... CERQ, (Wei, 2008; Perte & Miclea, 2011).,.,,.,.,.., (Garnefski, Kraaija, & Spinhovena, 2001; Garnefski et al., 2002; Garnefski & Kraaij, 2006;, 2004;, 2007;,,, 2011),., K-CEQR 9, /.,
,. (Garnefski, Kraaija, & Spinhoven, 2001, Garnefski & Kraaij, 2007).,,,,,,.,,.,, (Cann, et al., 2011). CERQ CERQ,. (Wei, 2008; Hussain & Bhushan, 2011), K-CERQ. K-CERQ., CERQ, CERQ., K-CERQ.,,,, K-CERQ (Garnefski & Kraaij, 2007;,, 2008;, 2011;,,, 2011).,, (Garnefski, Kraaija, & Spinhoven, 2001;,, 2008;,,, 2012a), K-CERQ.
, K-CERQ (Gross, 2002)..,,.,., 35 9..,.,,. (,,, 2012b),,,, (Nolen- Hoesksema, 1991; Ryan, 2005;, 2007). (, 2007)..,. K-CERQ., (1999).. (1), 5-168. (1998).,. (2004).,., (1998).. (7), 83-96. (1995).. :. (2005).,. (2007). (complex trauma). (1), 1-
21.,, (2012a). :,,. (2). 839-854.,, (2012b). PTSD :. (5). 2363-2378. (2011).,.,, (2011). :., 1-9., (2008).. (4), 887-905. (2000). :. (2007). :. (4), 1015-1038.,,,,,, (2007).,,. (3), 663-679., (2012). :. (1), 255-272. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283. Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., Triplett, K. N., Vishnevsky, T., & Lindstrom, C. M. (2011). Assessing posttraumatic cognitive process: The Event Related Rumination Inventory. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 24(2), 137-156. Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Saltzman, H., Harding Thomsen, A., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 87-127. d'acremont, M., & Van der Linden, M. (2007). How is impulsivity related to depression in adolescence? Evidence from a French validation of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 271-282. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evalution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844-854. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1994). Assessment of multidimensional coping: task, emotion and avoidance strategies. Psychological Assessment, 6, 50-60. Fabes, R. A., Eisenberg, N., Karbon, M., Troyer, D., & Switzer, G. (1994). The relations of children's emotion regulation to their vicarious emotional responses and comforting behaviors. Child Development, 65(6), 1678-1693. Floyd, R. J., & Widamann, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological assessment Special Issue: Methodological Issues in Psychological assessment Research, 7, 286-299. Foa, E. B., Cashman, L., Jaycox, L., & Perry, K. (1997). The validation of a self-report measure of
posttraumatic stress disorder: The Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale. Psycholigical Assessment, 9, 445-451. Garnefski, N., Kraaija, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(8), 1311-1327. Garnefski, N., Legerstee, J., Kraaij, V., Kommer, T. V. D., & Teerds, J. (2002). Cognitive coping strategies and symptoms of depression and anxiety: A comparison between adolescents and adults. Journal of Adolescence, 25(6), 603-611. Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2006). Relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies of and depressive symptoms: A comparative study of five specific sample. Personality and Individual Difference, 39, 1-11. Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2007). The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Psychometric features and prospective relationships with depression and anxiety in adults. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 141-149. Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281-291. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362. Gross, J. J. (2007). Handbook of emotion regulation (Ed). New York: Guilford Press. Jermann, F., Van der Linden, M., d'acremont, M., & Zermatten, A. (2006). Cognitive Emotion regulation questionnaire: Confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric properties of the French translation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 126-131. Joormann. J., & Siemer, M. (2011). Affective processing and emotion regulation in dysphoria and depression: Cognitive biases and deficits in cognitive control. Social and Personality Compass, 5(1), 13-28. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review Psychology, 44, 1-21. Loch, N., Hiller, W., Witthoft, M. (2011). The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). Psychometric evaluation of a German adaptation. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 40 (2), 94-106. Marsh, H. W., Artin, A. J., & Jackson, S. (2010). Introducing a short version of the physical self-description questionnaire: New strategies, shot-form evalative criteria, and applications of factor analysis. Journal of Sport & Exerise Psychology, 32, 438-482. Nolen-Hoesksema, S. (1991). Response to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 569-511. Parker, J. D. A., & Endler, N. S. (1992). Coping with coping assessment: A critical review. European Journal of Personality, 6, 321-344. Perte, A., & Miclea, M. (2011). The standardization of the cognitive emotional regulation questionaire (CERQ) on Romanian population. Romanian Assiciation for Cognitive Science, 15(1), 111-130. Ryan, C., Martin, E. R., & Dahlen. (2005). Cognitive emotion regulation in the prediction of depression,
anxiety, stress, and anger. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1-12. Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M.., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102-111. Ware, J. E., & Gandek, B. (1998). Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reality: The IQOLA project approach, international uality of life assessment. Journal of Cliical Epidemiology, 51, 945-952. Wei, Y. M. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in chinese college students. Chinese Association for Mental Health, 22(4), 281-283. : 2013. 04. 15. : 2013. 06. 14. : 2013. 06. 16.
Validation of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in a Korean population Ewha Womans University The present study examined the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Cognitive Emotional regulation Questtionnaire(K-CERQ) that is developed by Garnefski, Kraaija and Spinhoven(2001) and translated by Kim(2004). We conducted preliminary study for analyzing the items and conducting exploratory factor analysis in 263 undergraduate student. The results of item analysis and exploratory factor analysis suggested 35 items under seven factors. Then we conducted the confirmatory factor analysis and calculated reliability of the K-CERQ in 250 undergraduate student. They completed with K-CERQ, Post-traumatic Diagnostic Scale(PDS), Beck Depression Inventory-II(BDI-II) and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale(DERS). Confirmatory factor analysis result supported the nine factor cross correlation structure of the K-CERQ. In results of item analysis and reliability analysis of final structure, the sub-scales of the K-CERQ showed high internal consistency and good for criterion-related and convergent validity. Results are discussed in suggestion for using the K-CERQ and restriction of this study. According to these findings, we confirmed that K-CERQ is relatively reliable and valid scale and expect that K-CERQ is helpful to promote domestic cognitive emotional regulation research and understand findings in manner appropriate to the culture of Korea. Key words : Cognitive emotional regulation strategy, CERQ
1. (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire; CERQ) 1.. 1 2 3 4 5 2.. 1 2 3 4 5 3.. 1 2 3 4 5 4.. 1 2 3 4 5 5.. 1 2 3 4 5 6.. 1 2 3 4 5 7.. 1 2 3 4 5 8.. 1 2 3 4 5 9.. 1 2 3 4 5 10.. 1 2 3 4 5 11.. 1 2 3 4 5 12.. 1 2 3 4 5 13.. 1 2 3 4 5 14.. 1 2 3 4 5 15.. 1 2 3 4 5 16.. 1 2 3 4 5 17.. 1 2 3 4 5 18.. 1 2 3 4 5 19.. 1 2 3 4 5 20.. 1 2 3 4 5 21.. 1 2 3 4 5 22.. 1 2 3 4 5 23.. 1 2 3 4 5 24.. 1 2 3 4 5 25.. 1 2 3 4 5 26.. 1 2 3 4 5 27.. 1 2 3 4 5 28.. 1 2 3 4 5 29.. 1 2 3 4 5 30.. 1 2 3 4 5 31.. 1 2 3 4 5 32.. 1 2 3 4 5 33.. 1 2 3 4 5 34.. 1 2 3 4 5 35.. 1 2 3 4 5 36.. 1 2 3 4 5