. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).

Similar documents
歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe


. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

,......


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * A Study on the

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

歯6권2호.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research


., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

교육치료연구 SNS : SNS SNS SNS SNS, SNS, SNS. SPSS MACRO SNS., SNS SNS. SNS, SNS,. SNS SNS,. (2016) (Corresponding Author) : / / 608 / Tel:

(5차 편집).hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

歯이희경13-1.PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **



Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp DOI: * (,, )..,., ( ),.

. (, 2013).. (2010) % (, 2011). 37% 27% (, 2011) % 42.8% 13.5% (,,, 2013).. (, 2010). 5~ % 41%(2009 ) (, 2013)

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Research Article Korean J Child Stud 2018;39(6): pissn: eissn: X Effect of the Develo


:..,,. (KCYPS)., 2. 5 ( 5) 2 1., 1.,. :,, ( )


상담학연구 : *. 375, -,,. AMOS..,.,.,.,.,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1095 Tel: /

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<C0DBBEF7C1DF202D20C7D1B1B9BFA9BCBAC0CEB1C7C1F8C8EFBFF85FBFA9BCBAB0FA20C0CEB1C728C5EBB1C736C8A3292DB3BBC1F62E687770>

상담학연구 : *.,,,,, (N=495)..,.,.. * (2013). (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j

,......

,......

,126,865 43% (, 2015).,.....,..,.,,,,,, (AMA) Lazer(1963)..,. 1977, (1992)

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

차 례... 박영목 **.,... * **.,., ,,,.,,


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

A study on the sports educational zeal through the qualitative network analysis: Focusing on mothers of student athletes Byung-Goo Lee & Han-Joo Lee*

다문화 가정의 부모

<3132C8ABBCF8C7FD2E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * Relationships a


<31372DB9CCB7A1C1F6C7E22E687770>

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

歯1.PDF


Park, Kim, Yu, and Han 166.,,, (Ministry of Gender Equality and Family [MOGEF], 2016).,,.,..,., 36 (Jin & Bae, 2012) (3.7%).,,.,. (selection)

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의

<C1A4C0C75FC3CAB5EE5FB1B3BBE7BFEBC1F6B5B5BCAD28C3D6C1BE295B315D2E687770>

232 도시행정학보 제25집 제4호 I. 서 론 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 사회가 다원화될수록 다양성과 복합성의 요소는 증가하게 된다. 도시의 발달은 사회의 다원 화와 밀접하게 관련되어 있기 때문에 현대화된 도시는 경제, 사회, 정치 등이 복합적으로 연 계되어 있어 특

<30315FC0CCB5BFC1D65FC7D1B1B9BCBAB8C5B8C52E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

석사학위 논문

상담학연구 * Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1370 Tel: /

Theoretical foundation for the ethics of coaching sport Sungjoo Park* Kookmin University [Purpose] [Methods] [Results] [Conclusions] Key words:

Political Science& International Relations EWHA WOMANS UNIVERSITY

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud


- * (32 ), ,,,, * 2013 ( ) (KRF-2013S1A3A ). :,, 3 53 Tel : ,

大学4年生の正社員内定要因に関する実証分析

* 6 12 (agent),. 12 ( 1), 6 ( 2) ( ).,,,. ( ) ( ).,, , 1. * 2012 ( ) (NRF-2012-S1A3-A ) 2011 :,, ( ) 50 : Tel: ,

,....

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.1-22 DOI: * An Analysis of the Ext

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

<5BC0AFBEC6B1E2C7E0BAB9B0A85D20C0CEBCE2BFEB20C3D6C1BEBABB5F F312E687770>

,, (, 2003;, 2004).,, (, 2008;, 2010;, 2003;, 2012).,, (, 2007; Hahn et al., 2011). (, 2010;, 2012; Lam et al., 2010), (, 2008;, 2006).,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Transcription:

:,. (NYPI) (KCYPS) 2011~2013 1 2 ( 2 ), 1 3 ( 3 ), 1 4 ( 1 ) (N=2,178).,.,,,.,..,..,. :,, (110-745) 25-2 E-mail : yoonsunhan@skku.edu

. (2013) 2011 9.0% 2000 3.5% 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012). (2012)

2009 (International Civic and Citizenship Education Study) 38, 38 21. (2010). (,, 2011).. (, 2013;,,,,, 2014;, 2013) (,, 2015;,, 2014). (, 2012),.. (Crosnoe & Johnson, 2011)..,. Sharabany, Gershoni Hofman(1981).. Hartup(1983).,, (, 2012). (Hartup, 1993)., (Berndt, 2002)., (Youniss, 1982). (Hymel, Rubin, Rowden, & LeMare, 1990).

,, (,,, 2007)., (Fordham & Stevenson-Hinde, 1999; Parker & Asher, 1993).,. -,., (,, 2014). (, 2015)., Davis(2003),,., (scaffolding). -,.,,, (, 2010). Birch Ladd(1997) Pianta Steinberg(1992) (Closeness), (Dependency), (Conflict).,, (2003),,,,. (2009),,,. (, 2013).,.. (, 2013). (, 2014).,

(,, 2015). (2012) 2,. (2014)..,, (Erickson & Pianta, 1989). (,, 2012)., (,, 2015). (2013) 1, 2,.., (2013),,.. (,, 2013;, 2013)., (,, 2010;, 2011)., (2012) 1 2. 2 3, 5 (, 2012). (Fabes, Carlo, Kupanoff, Laible, 1999; Gurucharri & Selman, 1982).,. (Wentzel, 1998;,, 2008;,,, 2012).,

, (Aboud, 1988).,, (Hoffman, 2001; Doyle, Beaudet, Aboud, 1988;,, 2008). 5 4 (2010). (2014), Aboud(1988).,.. (, 2015).. (,, 2010;, 2011;, 2012),., (,, 2015;,, 2013)..,,,?,?,? 2010 (NYPI) (KCYPS). 2010 1 4, 1 2016. 2010 1 2,351 2011~2013 1

2 ( 2 ), 1 3 ( 3 ), 1 4 ( 1 ). ( ) ( ) 2,178 ( : 1,110, : 1,068). (1991)..,.,.,.,. 5.. (,,, 2011) 4. (1=, 2=, 3=, 4= ), 4, 1. 2, 3, 4 2 4.69. (1991) 5. (1=, 2=, 3=, 4= ),.,.,.,.,.. 4, 2 5.84. (2008)..,.,.,,.,. 5 4 (1=, 2=, 3=, 4= ). 4, 2

.84.. (1=, 2=, 3=, 4=, 5=),. (,,, 2014;, 2015) (, 2015;, 2014)..,. 4 4 4. =1, =0.,, (latent growth curve modeling: LGCM). LGCM 3.. 1, 0, 1, 2 1, 2, 3. LGCM (2000) χ², TLI, CFI, RMSEA. CFI TLI.90, RMSEA.80 (, 2000). (Full- Information Maximum Likelihood: FIML) (Enders & Bandalos, 2001). SPSS 22.0, LGCM AMOS 22.0.,, 1. 2 1 3., 2

2 3 4 3.06.49 3.12.46 3.14.42 2.81.66 2.89.63 2.88.58 2.79.62 2.93.62 3.04.57 3 4 3., 2 1 2.. 1 1 (r =.39, p <.001), 2 2 (r =.40, p <.001), 3 3 (r =.46, p <.001).. 1 ~3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 2.40 *** 1 3.32 ***.36 *** 1 4.39 ***.19 ***.20 *** 1 5.23 ***.40 ***.23 ***.39 *** 1 6.19 ***.16 ***.46 ***.31 ***.31 *** 1 7.25 ***.17 ***.14 ***.27 ***.18 ***.17 *** 1 8.14 ***.24 ***.17 ***.16 ***.22 ***.15 ***.41 *** 1 9.08 ***.12 ***.27 ***.10 ***.13 ***.24 ***.38 ***.42 *** 1 * p <.05. ** p <.01. *** p <.001.. 1. 1( 2) 2. 2( 3) 3. 3( 1) 4. 1( 2) 5. 2( 3) 6. 3( 1) 7. 1( 2) 8. 2( 3) 9. 3( 1)

,. 1 ~3,.,,. 1.. χ², TLI, CFI, RMSEA. 3,,. χ² ( χ²=59.77, df=3, p<.001), TLI, CFI, RMSEA. ( χ²=47.75, df=3, p<.001) ( χ²=296.30, df=3, p<.001).. 4.,,, 0

χ²(df) TLI CFI RMSEA [90% ] 65.105(4).873.916.084[.067.102] 5.331(1).964.994.045[.014.085] 58.707(4).869.913.079[.062.098] 10.957(1).905.984.068[.036.106] 298.434(4).509.672.184[.167.202] 2.137(1).992.999.023[.000.067] (SE) (SE) 3.071(.010) *** 0.111(.009) *** -.022(.005) *** (SE) 0.037(.006) *** 0.013(.004) ** (SE) 2.822(.014) *** 0.201(.018) *** -.042(.010) *** (SE) 0.039(.008) *** 0.018(.008) * (SE) 2.796(.013) *** 0.178(.016) *** -.023(.009) ** (SE) 0.125(.007) *** 0.020(.007) ** * p <.05. ** p <.01. *** p <.001....037,.039,.125.. 2, 5. (χ²(16)=78.69, p<.001, TLI=.933, CFI=.980, RMSEA=.042, 90% =[.033,.052]) (χ²(16)=67.69, p<.001, TLI=.942, CFI=.983, RMSEA=.039, 90% =[.029,.048]).

.. (β = 0.325, p <.001), (β = 1.555, p =.002)., (SE) 0.325(.053) *** 0.250 1.555(.492) ** 1.173 0.157(.072) * 0.334 0.284(.042) *** 0.296 1.292(.557) * 1.186 0.174(.094) 0.492 * p <.05. ** p <.01. *** p <.001...

.. (β = 0.284, p <.001) (β = 1.292, p =.020).,.,.,.,, (, 2013),,,. (LGCM).,..,,,.,. (2012).. (,, 2001). (Wentzel, 1998)., (,, 2008), (Fabes et al., 1999).. 2 1.

. (, 2012;, 2012;, 2012). (2012) 2 3 5,. (2012)..,.., 3 (Hoffman, 2001). (Doyle et al., 1988). (2008) 6 2,..,, (White et al., 2009).,.... (2013) 1 2,. (2012).,. (,, 2013),.

(, 2013)...,.., (,, 2013).,.,. (, 2014),.,.,..,. (, 2015). (, 2012).. (, 2015)., (, 2012).

,, (,, 2012).. 4, (ceiling-effect).,. 2 1., (, 2009).......,.,.. (2012).., (2012).. (1), 87-117.

, (2010).,,. (1), 203-225. (2014). :. (2), 36-64. (2010)..., (2010).. (4), 69-88.,, (2012). -,. (2), 429-459.,, (2007).., 2-225., (2009). - (Stars). (4), 697-714., (2014). -. (3), 245-267. (2012).. (6), 183-208. (2013).. (3), 1717-1737., (2015).. (2), 479-498. (2015)..,,,, (2014). -. (2), 227-255. (2015)...,, (2012).. (2), 1-21.,,,,, (2010)... (1991)...,, (2007). :,,. (1), 1-41., (2013).., 285-310. (2011).. (3), 333-352. (2013).. (2), 219-248.

(2010).. (1), 93-116. (2009).. (2), 59-79., (2008).. :. (2013). 2012. (2013)..., (2009).. (1), 579-591. (2010)...,, (2013).. (3), 1-14. (2015).. (10), 27-48., (2013).. (3), 53-77., (2014).. (4), 55-81. (2012).,,. (2), 51-73. (2015)... (2014)... (2012)..., (2001).. (-), 117-162., (2012). :,, (Resilience). (8), 103-142.,,, (2003). -. (2), 25-42., (2008).,,. (4), 27-47. (2012).. (3), 145-169. (2014)... (2015)..., (2015). :,

. (2), 389-411., (2008).. (1), 1-18., (2014). 2014.,, (2014).. (12), 97-125., (2011).. (3), 165-187. (2000). :. (1), 161-177.,, (2011).. (3), 713-732. (2010).. (4), 152-184. Aboud, F. E. (1988). Children and prejudice New York: B. Blackwell. Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children's early school adjustment. Journal of school psychology, 35(1), 61-79. Berndt, T. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 7-10. Crosnoe, R., & Johnson, M. K. (2011). Research on adolescence in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 439-460. Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children's social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 207-234. Doyle, A., Beaudet, J., & Aboud, F. (1988). Developmental patterns in the flexibility of children's ethnic attitudes. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 19(1), 3-18. Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430-457. Erickson, M. F., & Pianta, R. C. (1989). New lunchbox, old feelings: What kids bring to school. Early Education and Development, 1(1), 35-49. Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., Kupanoff, K., & Laible, D. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/ moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19(1), 5-16. Fordham, K., & Stevenson Hinde, J. (1999). Shyness, friendship quality, and adjustment during middle childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(5), 757-768. Gurucharri, C., & Selman, R. L. (1982). The development of interpersonal understanding during childhood, preadolescence, and adolescence: A longitudinal follow-up study. Child Development, 53(4), 924-927. Hartup, W. W. (1983). Peer relations. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 103-196). New York: John Wiley. Hartup, W. W. (1993). Adolescents and their friends. New Directions for Child and Adolescent

Development, 1993(60), 3-22. Hoffman, M. L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press. Hymel, S., Rubin, K. H., Rowden, L., & LeMare, L. (1990). Children's peer relationships: Longitudinal prediction of internalizing and externaliziing problems from middle to late childhood. Child Development, 61(6), 2004-2021. Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 611-621. Pianta, R. C., & Steinberg, M. (1992). Teacherchild relationships and the process of adjusting to school. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1992(57), 61-80. Sharabany, R., Gershoni, R., & Hofman, J. E. (1981). Girlfriend, boyfriend: Age and sex differences in intimate friendship. Developmental Psychology, 17(6), 800-808. Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202-209. White, F. A., Wootton, B., Man, J., Diaz, H., Rasiah, J., Swift, E., et al. (2009). Adolescent racial prejudice development: The role of friendship quality and interracial contact. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(6), 524-534. Youniss, J. (1982). Parents and peers in social development: A sullivan-piaget perspective. University of Chicago Press. : 2015. 10. 09 1 : 2015. 10. 15 : 2016. 02. 05

Analysis of the Association between Teacher Relationship, Peer Relationship, and Multicultural Acceptability among Adolescents in Korea: Using Latent Growth Modeling Taekho Lee Seokyoung Lee Yoonsun Han Department of Child Psychology & Education, Sungkyunkwan University In this study, we examined the longitudinal change of multicultural acceptability, peer relationship, and teacher relationship using latent growth curve modeling. This study used data from the second, third, and fourth waves of the middle school student cohort (N=2,178) of the Korean Children-Youth Panel Survey (KCYPS). The dependent variable was multicultural acceptability. The independent variables were peer relationship and teacher relationship. The major longitudinal findings of this study are as follows: First, peer relationships, teacher relationships and multicultural acceptability increased with time. Second, peer relationship showed a significant effect on the multicultural acceptability over time. Finally, the teacher relationship showed a significant effect on the multicultural acceptability over time. These results show differentiation with previous cross-sectional studies of multicultural acceptability. Furthermore, it is expected that this study will provide educational implications for the cultivation of multicultural acceptability. Key words : physical education, gender, aggression, depression, social withdrawal