Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

歯14.양돈규.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A study on Characte

인문사회과학기술융합학회

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp.1-19 DOI: *,..,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp DOI: * (,, )..,., ( ),.

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to


상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j


. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

상담학연구 : *.,,,,, (N=495)..,.,.. * (2013). (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

(5차 편집).hwp

노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp

,, (, 2010). (, 2007).,,, DMB, ,, (, 2010)., LG., (, 2010) (, ,, ) 3, 10, (, 2009).,,. (, 2010)., (, 2010). 11

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * Relationship among

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

상담학연구 * Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1370 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Qualitative Case

< FC3BBBCD2B3E2C1A4C3A5C0C720C8AEC0E5B0FA20B9DFC0FC28C3D6C1BE31292E687770>

서론 34 2

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Basic Study on t

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

.. IMF.. IMF % (79,895 ). IMF , , % (, 2012;, 2013) %, %, %

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

상담학연구. 10,,., (CQR).,,,,,,.,,.,,,,. (Corresponding Author): / / 567 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * A Study on the

Kor. J. Aesthet. Cosmetol., 라이프스타일은 개인 생활에 있어 심리적 문화적 사회적 모든 측면의 생활방식과 차이 전체를 말한다. 이러한 라이프스 타일은 사람의 내재된 가치관이나 욕구, 행동 변화를 파악하여 소비행동과 심리를 추측할 수 있고, 개인의


Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con


- * (32 ), ,,,, * 2013 ( ) (KRF-2013S1A3A ). :,, 3 53 Tel : ,

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Educational Design


가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과

상담학연구 : *. 375, -,,. AMOS..,.,.,.,.,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1095 Tel: /

교육치료연구 SNS : SNS SNS SNS SNS, SNS, SNS. SPSS MACRO SNS., SNS SNS. SNS, SNS,. SNS SNS,. (2016) (Corresponding Author) : / / 608 / Tel:

歯제7권1호(최종편집).PDF

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,, (, 2011)..,,, (, 2009)., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994;, 1995), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, (, 201

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

석사학위 논문


상담학연구 *,. 41 -, ,,, 82,,, Likert..96,.94,.88,.89, ,. (CCR: Conflict Over Child Rearing) (DSC: Dissatisfaction With Childre

<C1A63238B1C731C8A328C6EDC1FDC1DF292E687770>


DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * Difference in Paren

118 김정민 송신철 심규철 을 미치기 때문이다(강석진 등, 2000; 심규철 등, 2001; 윤치원 등, 2005; 하태경 등, 2004; Schibeci, 1983). 모둠 내에서 구성원들이 공동으 로 추구하는 학습 목표의 달성을 위하여 각자 맡은 역할에 따라 함께

27 2, 1-16, * **,,,,. KS,,,., PC,.,,.,,. :,,, : 2009/08/12 : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/30 * ** ( :

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: ICT * Exploring the Re

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

歯유성경97.PDF

한국성인에서초기황반변성질환과 연관된위험요인연구

,......

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp.159-180 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.27.1.201703.159 The Effects of Parenting Attitude on Aggression and Sense of School Community perceived by Elementary School Students Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of parenting attitude on aggression and school violence allowance perceived by elementary school students. Method: We distributed questionnaires to 540 students at 12 elementary schools in Ulsan, t-test, one way ANOVA, correlation analysis, regression analysis and structural equation modeling were performed. Results: A statistical differences in physical aggression, allowing school violence, animosity were identified by the genders of the participants. Male students were highly aware of physical aggression, allowing school violence than female students, and female students were highly aware of the animosity than male students. The data showed that the levels of allowing school violence increased as student s grades change from the 4 th to 6 th grades. In addition, we also analyzed the potential structual relation between Parenting Attitude and Aggression and School Violence Allowance, The results showed that parenting attitude would have an direct effects on aggression and aggresssion would have a direct effect on school violence allowance. Conclusion: The current findings would be meaningful to develop parents education of school violence prevention. Key words : Parenting Attitude, Aggression, School Violence Allowance Corresponding Author: Hahn, Dae-Dong, Pusan National University, Dept. of Education, Busandaehakro, Jangjeondong, Busan, Korea, e-mail: ddhahn@pusan.ac.kr

.., 5,.,,,,, (, 2012).,..,.,,,,.,.., (, 2001), (, 2003), (, 2009).. (Baumrind, 1971). (,, 2012).,, (,, 2006). (, 2011)., (, 2012)., (,, 2001)..

Freud,. (, 2004).,.,.. (,, 2015)., (Berstein & Watson, 1997).,,..,.,.,,,.,.,,?,,?

. 1) 부모양육태도의개념 (Schaefer, 1959)., (Fishbein, 1975).. (Cummings, 2003).., (Hammer & Turner, 2001)., (, 2000).., (Combs & Snygg, 1995). Medinnus(1965)., (, 2004)., (, 2005).,. 2) 부모양육태도의유형 Symonds(1949).,,

,,,.,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,,,,,,, (, 2009; 1997;, 2003). Symonds,. Schaefer(1959) Symonds PARI(Parental Attitude Research Instrument).. -, -, -, -.. (1965) (, ), (, ), (, ), (, ), (, ),, (1974),,,, (1979) (, ), (, ), (, ), (, ), (, ), (,,, ). Schaefer, (1982)., (1982),,,, -, -, -, -.. -,.,. -,.,

,. -,.,. -.,,. (aggression), (, 1998).,,,,,, (, 2007).,.,, (, 2012).. Buss Durkee(1957),,,,,, (, 2013).,,,,,.,,,,. Feshbach(1970), Thome(1977),,,, Kauffman(1981),,. (, 1997),,, (, 2006).

(, 2013).,,.. Buss Durkee(1957) 4 (2015).,,, 4..,,,,,,,,,,,, (, 2007). (, 2002)., (,, 2005; Heather & Vangie, 1997). (Farrell & Sullivan, 2004). (Berstein & Watson, 1997).,,, (, 1974).,.., (, 2011).,.

,.. (2012),. (2013),. (2013),. (2007),,., (2014),,.,..,,.,..

[ -1].,,... 2 117, 65,592 1). (, ) 12 4, 5, 6 1 15 540. 523 95.6%, 23 500 < -1>. ( ) (%) 246 49.2 254 50.8 4 161 32.2 5 160 32.0 6 179 35.8 1) (2017.01.01. )

,., (1982) (1987). Buss Durkee(1957) (2007). Rigby Slee(1993) (2000). Likert 5, < -2>. Cronbach s ɑ - 10.654-10.830-10.730.788-10.673 6.793 5.808 6.762.830 4.779 9.741 5.720.729., (cronbach's ɑ).,, t-test, one way ANOVA.,,, Pearson, (structural equation modeling). SPSS Win 18.0 Amos 18.0, p<.05, p<.01, p<.001.

. 1) 배경변인에따른학생의공격성차이 < -1>. (N=500) M SD t / F Scheffé 2.59.778 2.33.776 3.703 *** 4(a) 2.33.816 5(b) 2.50.781 6(c) 2.53.755 3.103 * 2.44.856 2.65.894-2.703 ** 4(a) 2.43.921 5(b) 2.57.892 6(c) 2.64.824 2.635 2.36.742 2.32.755.620 4(a) 2.21.829 5(b) 2.36.779 6(c) 2.45.633 4.527 ** c>a 2.07.849 1.97.833 1.367 4(a) 2.00.890 5(b) 2.02.798 6(c) 2.09.835.830 * 2.37.676 2.32.654.803 4(a) 2.24.735 5(b) 2.35.661 6(c) 2.43.588 3.385 * c>a * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 (M=2.59) (M=2.32),., (M=2.59) (M=2.33) (t=3.703, p<.001),

(M=2.65) (M=2.44) (t=-2.703, p<.01). 4(M=2.24), 5(M=2.35), 6(M=2.43) (F=3.385, p<.05)., 4(M=2.33), 5(M=2.50), 6(M=2.53)(F=3.103, p<.05), 4(M=2.21), 5(M=2.36), 6(M=2.45) (F=4.527, p<.01). 2) 배경변인에따른학생의학교폭력허용도차이 < -2>. (N=500) M SD t / F Scheffé 2.62.561 2.55.512 4(a) 2.51.612 5(b) 2.62.535 6(c) 2.62.458 1.530 2.155 * 2.00.773 1.77.686 4(a) 1.88.753 5(b) 1.89.680 6(c) 1.90.776 3.459 ***.117 * 2.31.603 2.16.500 4(a) 2.20.602 5(b) 2.24.534 6(c) 2.26.538 3.024 **.547 * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 (M=2.31) (M=2.16) (t=3.024, p<.01)., (M=2.00) (M=1.77) (t=3.459, p<.001). 4(M=2.20), 5(M=2.24), 6(M=2.26)

,., 4(M=2.51), 5(M=2.62), 6(M=2.62) (F=2.155, p<.05), 4(M=1.88), 5(M=1.89), 6(M=1.90) (F=.117, p<.05). 1) 부모의양육태도, 공격성, 학교폭력허용도의상관관계,, < -3>. -, -, -, - 4.,,, 4., 2.. a1(-), a2(-), a3(- ), a4(- ) b1( ), b2( ), b3( ), b4( ) c1( ), c2( ),, Pearson < -4>. (a1, a2, a3, a4) (b1, b2, b3, b4) (c1, c2) (-). (b1, b2, b3, b4) (c1, c2) (+).,,.,.

a1 a2 a3 a4 b1 b2 b3 b4 c1 c2 a1 1.00.32 ***.64 ***.68 *** -.10 * -.19 *** -.16 *** -.33 *** -.14 *** -.25 *** a2 1.00.21 ***.40 *** -.09 * -.15 *** -.16 *** -.21 *** -.12 ** -.15 *** a3 1.00.53 *** -.05 -.14 *** -.10 * -.18 *** -.07 -.14 *** a4 1.00 -.21 *** -.31 *** -.26 *** -.36 *** -.21 *** -.30 *** b1 1.00.49 ***.58 ***.54 ***.43 ***.37 *** b2 1.00.55 ***.51 ***.37 ***.31 *** b3 1.00.62 ***.45 ***.41 *** b4 1.00.40 ***.48 *** c1 1.00.51 *** c2 1.00 M 3.70 3.17 3.42 3.50 2.46 2.55 2.34 2.02 2.58 1.88 SD.691.417.604.623.787.881.753.842.537.738 * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 2) 부모의양육태도, 공격성, 학교폭력허용도의구조관계모형 < -5>. (Repression Weights) (Squared Multiple Correlation), 0 C.R. 2. S.M.C..40. R.W. S.R.W. S.E. C.R. p V S.M.C. a1 1.194.865.067 17.810 0.000.120.748 a2.339.407.039 8.635 0.000.145.466 a3.839.696.054 15.437 0.000.188.484 a4 1.000.803 - - -.138.645 b1.852.713.055 15.578 0.000.304.509 b2.904.676.061 14.711 0.000.421.457 b3.922.807.052 17.584 0.000.197.652 b4 1.000.783 - - -.274.613 c1 1.000.716 - - -.141.513 c2 1.387.723.120 11.547 0.000.259.523,,

[ -1]. CMIN=114.307, df=32, p=.000, CMIN/df=1.572, RMR=.025, GFI=.953, AGFI=.920, CFI=.956, RMSEA=.072, NFI=.941, IFI=.956,. CMIN p<.000,. CMIN/df 1.572 2, RMR.05, GFI, AGFI, CFI, NFI, IFI.90, RMSEA 2).05.10. < -6>. 2) Brown & Cudeck(1993) RMSEA RMSEA<.05, RMSEA<.08, RMSEA<.10, RMSEA>.10.

R.W. S.R.W. S.E. C.R. p -.472 -.479.070-6.732.000 -.069 -.089.041-1.690.041.424.726.039 10.751.000 CMIN=114.307, df=32, p=.000, CMIN/df=1.572 RMR=.025, GFI=.953, AGFI=.920, CFI=.979, RMSEA=.072, NFI=.941, IFI=.956 -.479, p<.001.40..726, p<.001.40. (-). (+). -.089, p<.05.40, -.347 -.436....,.., (M=2.59), (M=2.31), (M=2.00). (M=2.65) (M=2.44).

,,,,.,,,.,,,,,. 4..,.,. -, -, - (-) -,.,,,.,,, (2008),, (2013)..,,,,.,,, (.-479). (.726).,. (2012) (2013) (2016)

.....,.,.,,.,. (1998).. (2), 1-18. (2008).,.. (2009)... (2000)... (2008).. (3), 151-176. (1992).. (2003)... (2009).,.., (2006).,. (4), 897-908., (2015).

. (1), 151-171. (2009)... (2001)... (1997)... (2016). :. (1) 97-106. (2012)..., (2001).,. (1), 79-94. (1997)..., (2005).. (1), 300-324. (2004).. (1), 99-113., (2012).. (1), 15-28, (2014). :. (7), 217-242. (1965).. :., (1982).. (1), 1-15. (2003)... (2015)... (2007).,,. 25-50. (1979).. :. (2000). :.

(2013)... (2011).. (3), 117-136. (2006)... (2012). :. (2011). (NIE).. (2004)... (2007)... (2005)... (2013)... (1974)... (2013)... Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental psychology Monographs, 4(1), 1-103. doi:10.1037/h0030372. Berstein, J. Y., & Watson, M. W. (1997). Children who are targets of bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(4), 483-498. doi:10.1177/088626097012004001. Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). A inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 343-349. doi:10.1037/h0046900. Combs, A. W., & Snygg, D. (1959). Individual behavior: A perceptual Approach to behavior. New York: Harper & Brothers. Cummings, E. M., Braungart-Rieker, J. M., & Rocher-Schudlich, T. D. (2003). Emotion and personality development in childhood. In Handbook of psychology, New York: John Wiley & Sons. Farrell, A. D., & Sullivan, T. N. (2004). Impact of witnessing violence on growth curves for problem behaviors among early adolescents in urban and rural settings. Journal of Community Psychology,

32, 505-525. doi:10.1002/jcop.20016. Fishbein, M. (1975). Attitude intension and behavior: An introduction theory and research reading. Mesachusetts: Addison-Wesley. Frodi, A., Macaulay, J., & Thome, P. R. (1977). Are woman always less aggressive than men: A review of the experimental literature. Psychological Bulletin, 84(4), 634-660. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.4.634. Hamner, T. J., & Turner, P. H. (2001). Parenting in contemporary society. New York: Allyn & Bacon. Heather, M. G., & Vangie F. (1997). Adolescent dating violence: Differences between one-sided and mutually violent profiles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 126-141. doi:10.1177/088626097012001008. Kauffman, J. M. (1981). Characteristics of children s behavior disorders. Columbus A Bell & Howell Company. Medinnus, G. R. (1965). Delinquents perceptions of their parents. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29(6), 582-593. doi:10.1037/h0022776. Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1993). Dimensions of interpersonal relation among Australian school children and their implications for psychological well-being. The journal of Social Psychology, 133(1), 33-42. doi:10.1080/00224545.1993.9712116. Schaefer, E. S. (1959). Development of a maternal behavior research instrument. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 95, 48-56. doi:10.1080/00221325.1959.10534247. Symonds, P. M. (1949). Psychology of parents-child relationship. New York: Appleton-century craft. : 2017.1.27 / : 2017.2.22 / : 2017.3.20

:. : 12 540, t-,,,. :,,. 4 6.,,,. :,.