Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: A Longitudinal St

Similar documents
Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Mediating Eff

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: : A Study on the Ac

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: 3 * Effects of 9th

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: : Researc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * Strenghening the Cap

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: : A basic research

,,,.,,,, (, 2013).,.,, (,, 2011). (, 2007;, 2008), (, 2005;,, 2007).,, (,, 2010;, 2010), (2012),,,.. (, 2011:,, 2012). (2007) 26%., (,,, 2011;, 2006;

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Study on Teache

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Analysis of

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: * The

가족스트레스와 가정생활만족도 간의 관계에서 자아분화의 매개효과

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Structural Rel

:,,.,. 456, 253 ( 89, 164 ), 203 ( 44, 159 ). Cronbach α= ,.,,..,,,.,. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp DOI: The Effect of Caree

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effect of Paren

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: * Review of Research

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * Suggestions of Ways

. (2013) % % 2. 1% (,, 2014).. (,,, 2007). 41.3% (, 2013). (,,,,,, 2010)... (2010),,, 4.,.. (2012), (2010),., (,, 2009).... (, 2012).


27 2, 17-31, , * ** ***,. K 1 2 2,.,,,.,.,.,,.,. :,,, : 2009/08/19 : 2009/09/09 : 2009/09/30 * 2007 ** *** ( :

. 45 1,258 ( 601, 657; 1,111, 147). Cronbach α=.67.95, 95.1%, Kappa.95.,,,,,,.,...,.,,,,.,,,,,.. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: Awareness, Supports

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: An Exploratory Stud

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Grounds and Cons

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: 3 * The Effect of H

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: * A Study on the Pe

지난 2009년 11월 애플의 아이폰 출시로 대중화에 접어든 국내 스마트폰의 역사는 4년 만에 ‘1인 1스마트폰 시대’를 눈앞에 두면서 모바일 최강국의 꿈을 실현해 가고 있다


,......

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: IPA * Analysis of Perc

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: The Effects of Pare

歯5-2-13(전미희외).PDF

230 한국교육학연구 제20권 제3호 I. 서 론 청소년의 언어가 거칠어지고 있다. 개ㅅㄲ, ㅆㅂ놈(년), 미친ㅆㄲ, 닥쳐, 엠창, 뒤져 등과 같은 말은 주위에서 쉽게 들을 수 있다. 말과 글이 점차 된소리나 거센소리로 바뀌고, 외 국어 남용과 사이버 문화의 익명성 등

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp DOI: NCS : G * The Analy

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: - K * The Analysis

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * Experiences of Af


상담학연구 * Shelton(1990) Eden(2001).. D 480,, 425..,... * (Corresponding Author): / / ( ) 1370 Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Research Subject

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * The Effect of Boa

<5BC0AFBEC6B1E2C7E0BAB9B0A85D20C0CEBCE2BFEB20C3D6C1BEBABB5F F312E687770>

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Relationship Betw

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * Early Childhood T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A S

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp DOI: (NCS) Method of Con

- * (32 ), ,,,, * 2013 ( ) (KRF-2013S1A3A ). :,, 3 53 Tel : ,

., (, 2000;, 1993;,,, 1994), () 65, 4 51, (,, ). 33, 4 30, 23 3 (, ) () () 25, (),,,, (,,, 2015b). 1 5,

상담학연구 * ,. SAS,,, Sobel test., (,, ), (, ), (, ) (,, ).,,,.,.. * (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: / j

54 한국교육문제연구제 27 권 2 호, I. 1.,,,,,,, (, 1998). 14.2% 16.2% (, ), OECD (, ) % (, )., 2, 3. 3

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Analysis on the E

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.1-16 DOI: * A Study on Good School

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: : - Qualitative Met

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp DOI: ICT * Exploring the Re

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * Discussions on

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: * Relationship among

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2017, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on the Opti

歯14.양돈규.hwp

상담학연구 : *.,,,,, (N=495)..,.,.. * (2013). (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

특수교육논총 * ,,,,..,..,, 76.7%.,,,.,,.. * 1. **

歯유성경97.PDF

(5차 편집).hwp

상담학연구,, SPSS 21.0., t,.,,,..,.,.. (Corresponding Author): / / / Tel: /

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: * A Research Trend

27 2, * ** 3, 3,. B ,.,,,. 3,.,,,,..,. :,, : 2009/09/03 : 2009/09/21 : 2009/09/30 * ICAD (Institute for Children Ability

인문사회과학기술융합학회

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: * The Participant Expe

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Study on the Resea

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: A Critical Reflecti

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

,......

Rheu-suppl hwp

,......


교육치료연구 SNS : SNS SNS SNS SNS, SNS, SNS. SPSS MACRO SNS., SNS SNS. SNS, SNS,. SNS SNS,. (2016) (Corresponding Author) : / / 608 / Tel:


,, (, 2003;, 2004).,, (, 2008;, 2010;, 2003;, 2012).,, (, 2007; Hahn et al., 2011). (, 2010;, 2012; Lam et al., 2010), (, 2008;, 2006).,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


노동경제논집 38권 3호 (전체).hwp



2014 자격연수 제1기_수정.hwp

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2016, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp DOI: * Meta Analysis : T

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp DOI: Parents Perception

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Study on Organizi

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: : * A Study on the

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

ePapyrus PDF Document

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: The Exploratory Stu

,, (, 2010). (, 2007).,,, DMB, ,, (, 2010)., LG., (, 2010) (, ,, ) 3, 10, (, 2009).,,. (, 2010)., (, 2010). 11

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp DOI: (LiD) - - * Way to

Abstract Background : Most hospitalized children will experience physical pain as well as psychological distress. Painful procedure can increase anxie

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp DOI: A Qualitative Case

DBPIA-NURIMEDIA

Theoretical foundation for the ethics of coaching sport Sungjoo Park* Kookmin University [Purpose] [Methods] [Results] [Conclusions] Key words:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2019, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp DOI: * The Effects of Sp

:,,,. (,, ), (,,,, ),,. 559 ( 205, 203, 151; 132, 427).,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,..,. :,, ( )

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp DOI: * A Critical Review

380 Hyun Seok Choi Yunji Kwon Jeongcheol Ha 기존 선행연구에서는 이론연구 (Ki, 2010; Lee, 2012), 단순통계분석 (Lee, 2008), 회귀분석 (Kim, 2012)과 요인분석 (Chung, 2012), 경로분석 (Ku,

Transcription:

Journal of Educational Innovation Research 2018, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp.147-173 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.1.201803.147,, A Longitudinal Study between Directors Leadership Perceived by Teachers, Teachers Efficacy and Young Children Happiness Purpose: The purpose of this study was to verify change profile between directors` leadership, teachers` efficacy, young children` happiness, and to provide basic data for promoting young children` happiness by analyzing longitudinal change profile. Method: 2013-2015 longitudinal data of PSKC provided by KICCE. The research objects were 688 young children from 6 regional area in korea. Results: First, teachers` efficacy and young children` happiness showed significant change. Those variables selected a linear change model as it has increased from time passes. Second, the initial status of directors` leadership, the initial status and the rate of change of teachers` efficacy showed significant direct influence to the initial status and the rates of change of young children` happiness. The initial status and the rates of change of teachers` efficacy were found partial mediating effects between the initial status of directors` leadership and the initial status and the rates of change of young children` happiness. Conclusion: The results indicate that effort to promote director s leadership and teachers` efficacy is needed to promote young children` happiness. Key words : directors` leadership, teachers` efficacy, young children` happiness, multivariate latent growth model Corresponding Author: Suh, Won-Suk. Pusan National University, Dept. of Early childhood Education, 2, Busandaehak-ro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan, Korea, e-mail: stevekorea86@gmail.com

. (, 2011;, 2014;, 2016). (,, 2017). (,, 2017), (, 2015). (2013). (, 2011;, 2013;, 2015), (,, 2017a). ( 4-5 ),, Adler(2011, 2014). (,, 2017b). (, 2011;, 2015). (,, 2011;,, 2013) (,, 2017;,, 2017;, 2013;,, 2017c) (,, 2016;, 2008;, 2017;, 2016).., (,, 2017).

(,, 2009; Meyer & Allen, 1997), (,, 2016;,, 2017). (, 2015;,,, 2015;,, 2017; Barbuto & Wheeler, 2006), (, 2002;,, 2017a, 2017c) (, 2013)., (2014) ( ) 27.8%, 11.6%., (2016). 5,, - (2016) -. (, 2013),. (,, 2017a; Ashton, 1984; Riggs & Enochs, 1990) (,, 2017c) - (, 2011;, 2015), (,, 2014;, 2016)...,. (2008) (2015)

. (2016).,. (, 2014;,, 2014),.. (,,, 2016;, 2016),. Bronfenbrenner(1979),,,. (, 2011;, 2015;,, 2017a). (,, 2014;, 2016). (2015) Bronfenbrenner(1992),,,.,..

,?,?. (KICCE) 2008 2017(PSKC) 2013 (6 )-2015 (8 ). 2150 ( ) 1462 688, 4 (6 ) 6(8 ).., < -1>. n % n % 357 51.9 331 48.1 67 9.7 96 14.0 189 27.5 98 14.2 121 17.6 117 17.0 1) 기관장의리더십 (DLS-T: Director Leadership Scale for Teacher) (2004) DLS(Director Leadership Scale).,,, 10,,, 10, 20

, 5 Likert.,.949,.885,.947. 2) 교사효능감 (TES-T: Teacher Efficacy Scale for Teacher) 2013 (6 )-2014 (7 ) Bandura(2006) TSES(Teacher Self-efficacy Scale) (2008) - Bredekamp(1985) Holloway Reichhart-Erickson(1988) ECOI(Early Childhood Observation Instrument) (1991). (6-7 ) 13, 7, 4, 5, 29, 7-10 17, 5 Likert. 2015(8 ) (2010),,, (2012). (8 ) 9, 5 Likert.,. 6.833, 7.850, - 6.889, 7.917, 6.837, 7.870, 8.899. 3) 아동행복감 (HS-YC: Happiness Scale for Young Children) Lyubomirsky Lepper(1999) SHS (Subjective Happiness Scale) (2014) MCS(2008) OHS(Overall Happiness Scale). 4, 6, 10, Level 4 Likert. 7 Likert,. 5 Likert,. 7.579, 8.668,

8.669,.748 (, 2017). Cronbach s α 2013(6 ) 2014(7 ) 2015(8 ) 10 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 - -.949 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 - -.885 20 - - -.947 7 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.833.850 - - 10 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17.889.917-17 -.837.870-9 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 - -.899 4 1, 2, 3, 4 -.579.668 6 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 - -.669 10 - - -.748 2008 2017 (KICCE) 2008 (PSKC) (data mining), Excel 2016, SPSS AMOS 24.0 program., (6-8 ),. (M) (SD), ( SKEW 2) ( KURT 4). pearson s (r),., x 2 (p>.05), CMIN/df(4.0 ), IFI(0.9 ), TLI(0.9 ), CFI(0.9 ), RMSEA(0.08 ) (, 2017). 2016 (9 ) (least square method)

., (full information maximum likelihood method) (MLGM). Holmbeck(1997) Δx 2,,, Sobel-test(Sobel, 1982).. 1) 연구변인의기술통계,, < -1>. M SD SKEW KURT M SD SKEW KURT (8 ) 3.93.65 -.50.32 (6 ) 4.04.33.07.47 (7 ) 4.02.26 -.00 3.19 (7 ) 4.07.38 -.04 -.07 (8 ) 4.34.29 -.28.22 (8 ) 4.34.47 -.31 -.36, 8 M=3.93(SD=.65). 6 M=4.04(SD=.33), 7 M=4.07(SD=.38), 8 M=4.34(SD=.47) 6 8. 7 M=4.02(SD=.26), 8 M=4.34(SD=.29). (FIMLM) (MLGM). SKEW 2, KURT 4..

2) 연구변인들간상관관계,, < -2>, < -3>. (8 ) (8 ) (8 ) (8 ) (8 ) (8 ) (8 ) (8 ) 1 (8 ).69 ** 1 (8 ).94 **.90 ** 1 (8 ).42 **.51 **.50 ** 1 (8 ) -.04 -.03 -.04.00 1 (8 ).05.04.05.09 *.28 ** 1 (8 ) -.00.00.00.05.84 **.76 ** 1 * p<.05, ** p<.01 (8 ) (8 ) (7 ) (8 ) (8 ) (8 ) (8 ) (7 ) (8 ) (8 ) (8 ) 1 (8 ).69 ** 1 (8 ).94 **.90 ** 1 (6 ).01.01.01 1 (7 ).01 -.03 -.01.09 * 1 (8 ).42 **.51 **.50 ** -.03 -.04 1 (7 ) -.01.02.01 -.04.02.02 1 (8 ) -.04 -.03 -.04.00 -.03.00.15 ** 1 (8 ).05.04.05 -.05 -.01.09 *.07.28 ** 1 (8 ) -.00.00.00 -.02 -.03.05.14 **.84 **.76 ** 1 * p<.05, ** p<.01, (8 ) (8 ) (r=.09, p<.05), (8 ) (8 ) (r=.50, p<.01).

,.,.,, (, 2015)..,.09~.50.80, p<.05. 3) 연구변인의측정시기별변화함수추정 < -1>, < -2>., (Duncan & Duncan, 2004). 3. (LGM) (intercept) (node) (parameter) 1, 1 (Slope) 3 3 6-8 0, 1, 2 (, 2017).

< -1>, < -2> < -4>. x 2 df CMIN/df IFI TLI CFI RMSEA 311.031 6 51.838-245 -35.0.000.272 7.236 3 2.412.999.999.999.045 7694.101 6 1282.350 -.209.396.000 1.366 7.502 3 2.501.999.999.999.047 p>.05-4.0.90.90.90.08, CMIN/df=311.031, IFI=-245, TLI=-35.0, CFI=.000, RMSEA=.272, CMIN/df=7.236, IFI=.999, TLI=.999, CFI=.999, RMSEA=.045. CMIN/df=1282.350, IFI=-.209, TLI=.396, CFI=.000, RMSEA=1.366, CMIN/df=2.501, IFI=.999, TLI=.999, CFI=.999, RMSEA=.035.,., < -5>. (Means) (Variances) (Intercept), (Slope) (Intercept) (Slope) (Intercept) (Slope) 3.999 ***.152 *** -.022 *.007.008(S.E.=.006) 4.017 ***.323 ***.066 ***.129 *** -.056(S.E.=.004) *** * p<.05, *** p<.001 : y :, : I, :, : error, 3.999(p<.001)

,.152(p<.001),.152. -.002(p<.05).007(p>.05),. 4.017(p<.001),.323(p<.001),.323..066(p<.001),.129(p<.001),...008(p>.05), -.056(p<.001),. p<.001. < -3>., Holmbeck(1997) (full model) (partial model) Δx 2, Δx 2 =264.854( ) - 20.365( )=244.489, 2 Δx 2.050 5.991. x 2 df CMIN/df IFI TLI CFI RMSEA (full model) 2913.390 11 264.854.588 -.052.587.620 (partial model) 183.285 9 20.365.975.923.975.168 p>.05-4.0.90.90.90.08

(partial model) CMIN/df= 20.365, x 2 (golden standard), (Goodwin & Goodwin, 1999; Schmidt & Hunter, 1996), IFI=.975, TLI=.923, CFI=.975. < -7>. B β S.E. t(p).048.879.007 7.103 *** -.381 -.982.012-32.393 *** 1.885 5.422.524 3.596 *** -2.913-5.960.787-3.703 ***.548.085.234 2.338 * -.917 -.101.350-2.623 ** 5.045 5.636 1.386 3.641 *** -7.789-6.188 2.078-3.748 *** * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001

,., (β=.897, p<.001), (β=-.982, p<.001), (β=5.422, p<.001), (β =-5.960, p<.001).,. (β=.085, p<.05), (β=-.101, p<.01).,. (β=5.636, p<.001), (β=-6.188, p<.001)..,, < -8>. * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001.879 *** -.879 *** -.982 *** - -.982 *** 5.422 *** -5.457 *** -.035-5.960 *** 5.984 ***.024.085 * -.085 * -.101 ** - -.101 ** 5.636 *** - 5.636 *** -6.188 *** - -6.188 *** 5.422(p<.001),.879.085+(-.982) 5.636=-5.457(p<.001), -.035(p>.05). 5.960(p<.001),.879 (-.101)+(-.982) (-6.188)=5.984(p<.001),.024(p>.05).

. Sobel-test, < -9>. A B Z-value P-value B S.E. B S.E..048.007.548.234 2.216 *.026.048.007 -.917.350-2.447 **.014 -.381.012 5.045 1.386-3.616 ***.000 -.381.012-7.789 2.078 3.722 ***.000 * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 Sobel-test, Z=2.216(p<.05), Z=-3.616(p<.001), Z=-2.447(p<.01), Z=3.722(p<.001).,,., (β=5.636, p<.001)....,,

,.,. (, 2014), (Peterson, Park, & Seligman, 2005; Scheier & Carver, 1992; Schwartz et al., 2002). (,, 2009), (,, 2012). (, 2017),., (,, 2017;,, 2017,,, 2017b, 2017c) (2011). (, 2015;,, 2017),. (,, 2017;,, 2017b, 2017c). (2017),.,,

.,. (,, 2017a), (,,, 2016;, 2015).,, (,, 2017;,, 2017c).,,,.,., (2015), (2016) (, 2008).,. (, 2015;,, 2017;,, 2017;, 2013;,, 2017b, 2017c),. (MLGM)

(, 2015).. (,, 2017;,, 2016).. (, 2010;, 2015). (,,, 2002;,,,,, 2002) 4..,.,,,,, (, 2017;,,,, 2015). 3-5 (,, 2010;,, 2008), (, 2009). (,, 2010;,, 2013), (, 2009;,, 2011). (Ward, Vaughn, & Robb, 1988) (Adler, 2011, 2014), (,, 2016), (,, 2014), (, 2017).,.

. (+),.,. (, 2015) (, 2015).. - (, 2011) (,, 2016),. (Bronfenbrenner, 1979),,,... (, 2011;, 2015;, 2015). (2015). (, 2015),.

.,. -,.,,,, (Bronfenbrenner, 1992).. (,, 2012;, 2015)..,. (,, 2017)...., 8 1..,. ().,

Bronfenbrenner(1979).,..,.., 9.,.,. (IRT)., (2011).. (3), 1-23. (2009).. 451-477. (2014).. 1-28. (2015).. (1), 5-28. doi:10.18023/kjece.2015.35.1.001. (2011)., -.. (2002)..., (2009).,. (4), 857-567., (2010).. (2), 257-270.,, (2016).,,. (3), 294-313. doi:10.18023/kjece.2016.36.3.013.

(2017). :., (2008).. (6), 311-333. (1991)... (2013).. (3), 377-400. doi:10.18023/ kjece.2013.33.3.016.,,,,,, (2004). :., (2008). Bandura (Teacher Self-efficacy Scale). (2), 169-191. doi:10.18023/kjece.2008.28.2.008.,,,,, (2015).. (2), 153-182., (2016).. (2), 413-439. doi:10.18023/kjece.2016.36.2.018., (2016).. (2), 111-128. doi: 10.14396/jhrmr.2016.23.2.111. (2011).. (10), 23-42., (2016).,, -. (1), 217-240. (2015).. (2), 211-242.,, (2002)., :. (2), 63-92.,,,, (2002).. (1), 95-118., (2017).. (4), 1-19. doi:10.20437/koaece22-4-01.,,, (2012). :. (2008).,,. (1), 137-158. doi:10.24211/

tjkte.2008.25.1.137. (2014).. (3), 149-169., (2014).. (1), 5-28. doi:10.18023/kjece.2014.34.1.001. (2015). :,,. (4), 303-327.,, (2015). :. (2), 112-125. doi:10.15284/kjhd.2015.22.2.113., (2017).,. (1), 1-17. doi:10.14698/jkcce.2017.13.01.001., (2013).,,. Andragogy Today-International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 16(2), 147-173., (2017).,. (1), 65-83. doi:10.14698/jkcce.2017.13.01.065., (2017). (HLM). (2), 247-270. doi:10.17643/kjce.2017.26.2.13.,, (2016). :. (2), 497-514. doi:10.18023/kjece.2016.36.2.021. (2017).. (1), 305-324. doi:10.22155/jfece.24.1.305.324. (2014).,. (4), 151-167. (2010). :.., (2012).. 41-71. (2013)... (2015).,,. (2), 27-56. doi:10.24159/joec.2015.21.2.27.,,,,, (2010).

. (2015)..., (2009).. Family and Environment Research, 47(3), 103-118. (2011).. (2), 267-288., (2013)... 103-126.,,, (2015).,,. (4), 181-202. (2015). :., (2014). :,,. (7), 89-118., (2011).. (4), 161-178. (2015).. (2), 24-44. (2016).. (4), 369-378, doi:10.17643/kjce. 2016.25.4.19., (2016). -. (2), 53-70. doi:10.18023/kjece.2016.36.2.003. (2015). :., (2014).,,. (1), 45-68. (2015). -. (3), 591-607. (2013).. (2), 157-180. (2017). :., (2017a).,,,. (1), 325-352. doi:10.20437/koaece22-1-13., (2017b).. (5), 79-103. doi:10.18023/kjece.

2017.37.5.004., (2017c)... 639-664. Adler, A. (2014). ( ). :. ( 2011 ) Ashton, P. L. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 29-35. doi:10.1177/002248718403500507. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Ed.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Barbuto, J. E., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group & Organization Management, 31(3), 300-325. doi:10.1177/1059601106287091. Bredekamp, V. S. (1985). The reliability of the instruments and procedures of a national accreditation system for early childhood programs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, Md. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge. MS: Harvard University Press. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised for mutations and current issues. London: Jessica Kingsley. Duncan, T. E., & Duncan, S. C. (2004). An introduction to latent growth curve modeling. Behavior Therapy, 35(2), 333-363. doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80042-x. Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an efficacy belief instrument for elementary teachers. Science Education, 74(6), 625-637. doi:10.1002/sce.3730740605. Goodwin, L. D., & Goodwin, W. L. (1999). Measurement myths and misconceptions. School Psychology Quarterly, 14(4), 408-427. doi:10.1037/h0089017. Holloway, S. D., & Reichhart-Erickson, M. (1988). The relationship of day care quality to children's free-play behavior and social problem-solving skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 3(1), 39-53. doi:10.1016/0885-2006(88)90028-2. Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(4), 599-610. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.65.4.599. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness; Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social indicators research, 46(2), 137-155. doi:10.1023/a:1006824100041. MCS (2008). MCS Child Paper Self Completion Questionnaire. http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/page.aspx?

&sitesectionid=866&sitesectiontitle=the+age+7+survey+of+the+mcs+(2008) 2015.01.21.. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 25-41. doi:10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z. Scheier, M., & Carver, C. (1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16(2), 201-228. doi:10.1007/bf01173489. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenario. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 199-223. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.199. Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. (2002). Maximizing versus satisfying: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 1178-1197. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirected effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). SanFrancisco: Jessey-Bass. Ward, M. J., Vaughn, B. E., & Robb, M. D. (1988). Social-emotional adaptation and infant-mother attachment in siblings: Role of the mother in cross-sibling consistency. Child Development, 59(3), 643-651. doi:10.2307/1130564. : 2018.01.23. / : 2018.02.12. / : 2018.03.20.

,, :. : (KICCE) (PSKC) 2013 (6 )-2015 (8 ), 6 688. :,.,,. :.